Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Attentional bias to pain-related information: A meta-analysis

Crombez, Geerta,*,1; Van Ryckeghem, Dimitri M.L.a,1; Eccleston, Christopherb; Van Damme, Stefaana

Section Editor(s):

doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.11.013
Comprehensive review

Summary Individuals who experience chronic pain display an attentional bias towards pain-related words or pictures, but the bias is small and largely variable in effect.

This meta-analysis investigated whether attentional bias, that is, the preferential allocation of attention to information that is related to pain, is a ubiquitous phenomenon. We also investigated whether attentional bias effects are related to the methodological quality of the study, to procedural differences in their measurement, or to individual differences in pain severity, pain-related fear, anxiety, and depression. Results indicated that individuals who experience chronic pain (n = 1023) display an attentional bias towards pain-related words or pictures, but this bias was of a small effect size (d = 0.134), and did not differ from that in control groups (d = 0.082; n = 1398). No evidence was found for an attentional bias towards pain-related words and pictures for acute pain (d = 0.049), procedural pain (d = 0.142), and experimental pain (d = 0.069). However, research in which attentional bias towards signals of impending experimental pain in healthy volunteers was investigated, revealed an attentional bias of medium effect size (d = 0.676). Moderator analyses in the chronic pain group identified important procedural variables that affected the presence and magnitude of an attentional bias towards pain-related words and pictures, that is, type and exposure time of pain-related information. None of the individual difference variables affected the magnitude of the attentional bias. Implications of current findings and future directions are discussed.

Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.

aDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

bCentre for Pain Research, The University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK

*Corresponding author. Address: Ghent University, Belgium, Henri Dunantlaan 2, Ghent 9000, Belgium. Tel.: +32 0 9 2648611; fax: +32 0 9 2646462.


1These authors equally contributed to this work.

Article history: Received 8 June 2012; Received in revised form 15 September 2012; Accepted 21 November 2012.

© 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article:

Note: If your society membership provides full-access, you may need to login on your society website