Secondary Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Efficacy of botulinum toxin type A for treatment of persistent myofascial TMD pain: A randomized, controlled, double-blind multicenter study

Ernberg, Malina,*; Hedenberg-Magnusson, Britta,b; List, Thomasc; Svensson, Peterd,e

Section Editor(s):

doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.03.036

Evidence of an effect by botulinum toxins is still lacking for most pain conditions. In the present randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover multicenter study, the efficacy of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) was investigated in patients with persistent myofascial temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Twenty-one patients with myofascial TMD without adequate pain relief after conventional treatment participated. A total of 50 U of BTX-A or isotonic saline (control) was randomly injected into 3 standardized sites of the painful masseter muscles. Follow-up was performed after 1 and 3 months, followed by a 1-month washout period, after which crossover occurred. Pain intensity at rest was the primary outcome measure, while physical and emotional function, global improvement, side effects, and clinical measures were additional outcome measures. There was no main difference between drugs (ANOVA; P = .163), but there was a significant time effect (P < .001), so BTX-A reduced mean (SD) percent change of pain intensity by 30 (33%) after 1 month and by 23 (30%) after 3 months compared to 11 (40%) and 4 (33%) for saline. The number of patients who received a 30% pain reduction was not significantly larger for BTX-A than after saline at any follow-up visit. The number needed to treat was 11 after 1 month and 7 after 3 months. There were no significant changes after treatment in any other outcome measures, with the exception of pain on palpation, which decreased 3 months after saline injection (P < .05). These results do not indicate a clinical relevant effect of BTX-A in patients with persistent myofascial TMD pain.

Botulinum toxin type A is not an effective adjunct to conventional treatment in persistent myofascial temporomandibular disorders.

Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.

aUnit of Clinical Oral Physiology, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 4064, SE 141 04 Huddinge, Sweden

bDepartment of Stomatognathic Physiology, Eastman Institute, Dalagatan 11, SE 113 24 Stockholm, Sweden

cDepartment of Stomatognathic Physiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Malmö University, SE 212 22 Malmö, Sweden

dDepartment of Clinical Oral Physiology, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, DK 8000 Aarhus, Denmark

eCenter for Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN), MindLab, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +46 8 524 882 36; fax: +46 8 711 83 43.


Article history: Received 12 December 2010; Received in revised form 22 March 2011; Accepted 28 March 2011.

© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article:

Note: If your society membership provides full-access, you may need to login on your society website