Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Importance of Age and Postimplantation Experience on Speech Perception Measures in Children With Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implants

Peters, B. Robert*; Litovsky, Ruth; Parkinson, Aaron; Lake, Jennifer*

doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000281807.89938.60
Cochlear Implants

Objectives: Clinical trials in which children received bilateral cochlear implants in sequential operations were conducted to analyze the extent to which bilateral implantation offers benefits on a number of measures. The present investigation was particularly focused on measuring the effects of age at implantation and experience after activation of the second implant on speech perception performance.

Study Design: Thirty children aged 3 to 13 years were recipients of 2 cochlear implants, received in sequential operations, a minimum of 6 months apart. All children received their first implant before 5 years of age and had acquired speech perception capabilities with the first device. They were divided into 3 age groups on the basis of age at time of second ear implantation: Group I, 3 to 5 years; Group II, 5.1 to 8 years; and Group III, 8.1 to 13 years. Speech perception measures in quiet included the Multisyllabic Lexical Neighborhood Test (MLNT) for Group I, the Lexical Neighborhood Test (LNT) for Groups II and III, and the Hearing In Noise Test for Children (HINT-C) sentences in quiet for Group III. Speech perception in noise was assessed using the Children's Realistic Intelligibility and Speech Perception (CRISP) test. Testing was performed preoperatively and again postactivation of the second implant at 3, 6, and 12 months (CRISP at 3 and 9 mo) in both the unilateral and bilateral conditions in a repeated-measures study design. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to analyze statistical significance among device configurations and performance over time.

Setting: US Multicenter.

Results: Results for speech perception in quiet show that children implanted sequentially acquire open-set speech perception in the second ear relatively quickly (within 6 mo). However, children younger than 8 years do so more rapidly and to a higher level of speech perception ability at 12 months than older children (mean second ear MLNT/LNT scores at 12 months: Group I, 83.9%; range, 71-96%; Group II, 59.5%; range, 40-88%; Group III, 32%; range, 12-56%). The second-ear mean HINT-C score for Group III children remained far less than that of the first ear even after 12 months of device use (44 versus 89%; t, 6.48; p < 0.001; critical value, 0.025). Speech intelligibility for spondees in noise was significantly better under bilateral conditions than with either ear alone when all children were analyzed as a single group and for Group III children. At the 9-month test interval, performance in the bilateral configuration was significantly better for all noise conditions (13.2% better for noise at first cochlear implant, 6.8% better for the noise front and noise at second cochlear implant conditions, t = 2.32, p = 0.024, critical level = 0.05 for noise front; t = 3.75, p < 0.0001, critical level = 0.05 for noise at first implant; t = 2.73, p = 0.008, critical level = 0.05 for noise at second implant side). The bilateral benefit in noise increased with time from 3 to 9 months after activation of the second implant. This bilateral advantage is greatest when noise is directed toward the first implanted ear, indicating that the head shadow effect is the most effective binaural mechanism. The bilateral condition produced small improvements in speech perception in quiet and for individual Group I and Group II patient results in noise that, in view of the relatively small number of subjects tested, do not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion: Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children of diverse ages has the potential to improve speech perception abilities in the second implanted ear and to provide access to the use of binaural mechanisms such as the head shadow effect. The improvement unfolds over time and continues to grow during the 6 to 12 months after activation of the second implant. Younger children in this study achieved higher open-set speech perception scores in the second ear, but older children still demonstrate bilateral benefit in noise. Determining the long-term impact and cost-effectiveness that results from such potential capabilities in bilaterally implanted children requires additional study with larger groups of subjects and more prolonged monitoring.

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

*Dallas Otolaryngology Cochlear Implant Program, Dallas, Texas; †University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; and ‡Cochlear Americas, Englewood, Colorado, U.S.A.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to B. Robert Peters, M.D., 7777 Forest Ln., A103, Dallas, TX 75230; E-mail: drpeters@dallasoto.com.

B. Robert Peters has no information to disclose. Ruth Litovsky has received research support from Cochlear Americas and Advanced Bionics Corporation during the time she was involved in the study. Aaron Parkinson is an employee of and owns shares in Cochlear Americas. Jennifer Lake received no support during the time this article was written, but she now works for Cochlear Corporation.

© 2007 Otology & Neurotology, Inc.