Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

McElveen John T. Jr.; Hulka, Gregory F.
The American Journal of Otology: July 1998
MIDDLE EAR AND MASTOID DISEASE: PDF Only
Buy

Objective: To avoid the limitations of canal wall down surgery yet maintain the exposure provided by canal wall down mastoidectomy, the authors have developed a completely “reversible” canal wall down mastoidectomy technique. The purpose of this case report is to determine the feasibility of the “reversible” canal wall down mastoidectomy technique in the treatment of a patient with an aural cholesteatoma.

Study Design: Having refined the surgical technique using cadaver temporal bones, the “reversible” canal wall down mastoidectomy was performed in a patient with a recurrent aural cholesteatoma.

Setting: The surgical technique was refined in the Carolina Ear Research Institute's temporal bone dissection lab. The patient underwent the surgical procedure by JTM in a standard operating room setting at a private hospital in Raleigh, North Carolina.

Patients: The patient was a private patient, referred to the Carolina Ear & Hearing Clinic for treatment of recurrent cholesteatoma.

Intervention: A “reversible” canal wall down mastoidectomy was performed in this patient.

Main Outcome Measures: The surgeon determined the adequacy of cholesteatoma exposure following temporary removal of the posterior bony canal wall. Intra-operatively, the surgeon assessed the repositioned posterior bony canal segment, looking specifically at its stability and the absence of gaps along the canal cuts.

Results: Temporary removal of the posterior bony canal wall improved exposure of the cholesteatoma and facilitated cholesteatoma removal. The repositioned bony canal segment was well stabilized by the bone cement (Oto-cem) and no gaps were noted along the canal cuts.

Conclusion: Although it is premature to compare the effectiveness of the “reversible” canal wall down technique to other mastoidectomy procedures, this case confirms the feasibility of this approach.

© 1998, The American Journal of Otology, Inc.