Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a primary cause of vision loss in the elderly, negatively impacts quality of life, and raises the risk of clinical depression, falls, hip fractures, and placement in nursing homes.1–3 The prevalence of AMD ranges from 1.5% in people older than 40 years to >15% in women older than 80 years.4,5 The number of AMD diagnoses is expected to almost double by 2020.4 Unfortunately, there is no cure for AMD and current treatment options have limited effectiveness and introduce significant patient risk.6,7 Therefore, AMD prevention strategies should be identified and implemented. A number of AMD risk factors have been determined including older age, AMD family history, cigarette smoking, white race, and low dietary intake of antioxidants in the form of fruits and vegetables.8 Given that cigarette smoking and low antioxidant intake are the only modifiable risk factors, increasing antioxidant intake may arguably be the most easily used AMD prevention strategy.
Goji berry (Lycium barbarum L.), well known as a traditional Chinese medicine, is a small red fruit that is widely consumed in China and by Chinese abroad9 because of its benefits on vision as well as kidney and liver function.10,11 Goji berry is the richest natural source of the antioxidant carotenoid, zeaxanthin, which composes the preretinal pigment. Zeaxanthin intake increases plasma zeaxanthin concentrations, which subsequently increases preretinal pigment concentration, i.e., lutein and zeaxanthin, and ultimately lowers AMD risk.12,13 Therefore, regular consumption of goji berry may play a role in the prevention of AMD and help to maintain preretinal pigment density.14
Although Chinese consumers believe in the benefits of goji berry on eyesight, very few human studies on the effects of goji berry supplementation on visual parameters have been reported. A 15-day regimen of goji berry juice supplementation had no effect on visual acuity in healthy young adults.15 Although general endogenous antioxidant markers increased with 30 days of goji berry juice supplementation,16 no measures of plasma antioxidant activity were performed. A possible confounding factor in these trials is zeaxanthin bioavailability. Several human studies have investigated the bioavailability of zeaxanthin from goji berry fruit,17–19 and the milk-based goji berry formulation tested by Benzie et al.17 had three times better bioavailability than a goji berry preparation made with traditional hot water extraction.
The objective of this prospective, double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the effect of 90-day supplementation with a proprietary milk-based goji berry formulation, Lacto-Wolfberry (LWB), on clinical risk factors for AMD in healthy elderly subjects. We hypothesized that subjects who consumed LWB would show reduced macula hypopigmentation and accumulation of soft drusen as well as significant improvements in plasma zeaxanthin and antioxidant activity levels vs. placebo.
This single-center, double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at XuShe Community Day Care Center for Elderly Persons (Yi Xing, Zhejiang Province, China). All research procedures performed in this trial were in strict accordance with the guidelines outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and in a predefined protocol that was approved by all researchers and the local ethics committee.
Healthy volunteers aged 65 to 70 years were recruited between November and December 2007. Inclusion criteria included ability to understand the study procedures, ability to comply with study requirements including follow-up, and informed consent provided after receiving verbal and written information about the study. Key exclusion criteria included terminal disease, significant chronic disease (e.g., respiratory, cardiovascular, metabolic, organ failure), deteriorating health status at time of enrollment in the study (e.g., unstable blood pressure, uncontrolled diabetes, or major cardiovascular and/or neurological event in the past 6 months), presence of glaucoma or cataract, lactose intolerance, or participation in any clinical trial within the 3 months prestudy or in a trial of L. barbarum supplement at any time in the past.
During the 90-day study period, each subject consumed 13.7 g of study product (LWB or placebo) per day in the form of freeze-dried powder mixed with 200 ml of soup or hot water at lunch under supervision of the research staff. The active product, LWB, was a milk-based goji berry formulation (Nestlé R&D Centre Shanghai, Shanghai, China) produced by a proprietary process using goji berry fruit (530 mg/g), skim milk (290 mg/g), and maltodextrin (180 mg/g). Placebo was produced using skim milk (290 mg/g), maltodextrin (200 mg/g), sucrose (476 mg/g), and colorants (yellow, caramel) (34 mg/g). The LWB product contained 0.73 mg/g (10 mg/d) goji berry-derived zeaxanthin and 5 mg/g (68.5 mg/d) goji berry-derived vitamin C precursor. To obtain a placebo with similar sensory properties as LWB, the ingredients were dry mixed, dissolved in water, and then freeze dried and milled to a fine powder. Masked study products were supplied to the study site by Nestlé and were stored at the study site in a dry environment under controlled temperature. The study products were provided in single-serving sachets labeled with the subject ID number and instructions for product preparation; each product provided 24 kcal per 100 ml when prepared as directed.
Subjects underwent detailed ophthalmic examinations before and after the 90-day supplementation period by a single experienced ophthalmologist (ZG). Direct ophthalmic evaluation was used to rule out presence of glaucoma, cataracts, and eye injury. Soft drusen were identified in the area of the central fovea of the macula. Assessments for macula pigmentation were conducted with the funduscope focused on the central fovea and the posterior pole was visually segmented into quadrants for evaluation. Pharmacological pupil dilation was occasionally performed (LWB, 13.3%; placebo, 16.0%).
After an overnight fast, blood samples (20 ml) were drawn and collected in serum-separating tubes with (antioxidant capacity) or without (zeaxanthin) heparin. The tubes were centrifuged at 1200g for 15 min at 4°C. All samples were stored at −20°C and analyses were performed within 2 days of sampling. Plasma zeaxanthin was assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography (LC-20A, Shimadzu, Duisburg, Germany). Total antioxidant capacity measurements were made to assess the cumulative effect of all antioxidants present in the plasma including enzymes (superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase), macromolecules (albumin, ceruloplasmin, and ferritin), and a number of small molecules (ascorbic acid, α-tocopherol, β-carotene, reduced glutathione, uric acid, and bilirubin). Total plasma antioxidant capacity was measured by estimating the ability of antioxidants to prevent oxidation of 2,2′-Azino-di-[3-ethylbenzthiazoline sulfonate] using an antioxidant assay kit (Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI).
Study endpoints included number of soft macular drusen, macula hypopigmentation, plasma zeaxanthin and antioxidant activity levels, and adverse events.
Eligible subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to LWB or placebo treatment. Randomization was stratified by gender and age (65 to 67.5 years, 67.6 to 70 years). A computer program was used to create four permuted block randomization lists, stratified by age and gender and with a block size of six, which assigned a unique study ID number and a treatment group to each subject. The unique subject ID number was printed on each set of subject-specific study product sachets, with the contents of the sachets as specified on the randomization lists. The study site received the lists of subject ID numbers without the treatment assignments and was instructed to enroll subjects in numerical order from the appropriate list according to the two stratification factors.
This study was double masked. Subjects were masked to the treatment received and the two study products were identical in shape, size, taste, smell, color, and packaging. All investigators, study coordinators, other site personnel, clinical monitors, data managers, and biostatisticians remained masked to treatment allocation throughout the clinical study until all statistical analyses had been completed. This method provides the most effective and stringent means of minimizing study bias.
All data were recorded on case report forms, double-entered, verified, and independently monitored for accuracy by Sprim Advanced Life Sciences (San Francisco, CA). Continuous variables were summarized as means or medians with appropriate measures of dispersion; categorical variables were summarized as frequencies and percentages. Baseline characteristics of the two study groups were compared descriptively and evaluated using independent-sample t-tests or χ2 tests. Study outcomes were evaluated with χ2 and McNemar test for categorical variables. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS (Cary, NC), S-Plus (Palo Alto, CA), GraphPad (La Jolla, CA), and LogXact software (Cambridge, MA).
Subject flow in each treatment group is displayed in Fig. 1. Ten (13.3%) subjects in the LWB group and seven (9.3%) in the placebo group discontinued early for reasons unrelated to the study or the study product.
Baseline Subject Characteristics
Baseline subject characteristics were similar between the two groups (Table 1).
No macula pigmentation changes were observed in the LWB group during the 90-day supplementation period, whereas 13 subjects in the placebo group showed progression of macula hypopigmentation (p < 0.001). At the 90-day follow-up visit, LWB subjects showed significantly less macula hypopigmentation vs. placebo (p < 0.01; Table 2).
Soft Macular Drusen Count
All study subjects had zero or one soft drusen at the baseline examination. At the 90-day follow-up visit, eight subjects in the placebo group and no subject in the LWB group had two to five soft drusen; this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.02). Subjects in the LWB group had no change in soft drusen count during the study period whereas 11 subjects in the placebo group showed a significant increase (p = 0.004). At the 90-day follow-up visit, LWB subjects showed fewer soft drusen vs. placebo (p = 0.02; Table 3).
Plasma Zeaxanthin Levels
Plasma zeaxanthin levels were stable over time for the placebo group but increased 26% (p < 0.01) with LWB. The change in zeaxanthin levels was significantly greater in LWB vs. placebo (p < 0.01; Fig. 2). No significant relationship was observed between change in plasma zeaxanthin and change in macular characteristics during the 90-day supplementation period.
Plasma Antioxidant Capacity
Antioxidant capacity levels were stable over time for the placebo group but increased 57% (p < 0.01) with LWB. Antioxidant capacity levels were significantly greater in LWB vs. placebo on days 30 and 90 (p < 0.01; Fig. 3).
No adverse events were reported in the placebo group. One adverse event, vomiting and fever of 6-day duration, was reported in the LWB group. This adverse event was classified as mild by the principal investigator (LS) and unrelated to the study product.
The results of this clinical study demonstrated that daily dietary LWB supplementation increases plasma zeaxanthin and total antioxidant levels as well as protects against macula hypopigmentation and accumulation of soft drusen in elderly subjects. Strengths of this clinical trial included the double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled design, stringent data management procedures, and a long supplementation duration in comparison with similar trials examining goji berry's effects in humans.
There is a clear relationship of macula hypopigmentation and soft drusen number with AMD risk.20 Oxidative stress may play a role in AMD development by targeting the junctional proteins vital to retinal pigment epithelium integrity.21 A possible mechanism of action of LWB on these parameters is the transfer of zeaxanthin and other antioxidants from the plasma to the retinal pigment epithelium. High macular zeaxanthin levels are suggested to lower AMD risk.17 Interestingly, blood zeaxanthin levels rose 26% in the LWB group, in striking contrast to another human study in which blood zeaxanthin levels showed a three-fold increase after 28 days treatment with 15 g/d of goji berry supplementation19; however, the effective amount of goji berry-derived zeaxanthin in the LWB used in this study was only about 10 mg/d. Another reason for the smaller increase in blood zeaxanthin level could be related to age-related declines in nutrient absorption and bioavailability; the mean age of subjects was 28 years for the study conducted by Cheng et al.22 vs. 67 years in this study. Of note, the effective amount of goji berry in the LWB (about 7 grams per day) is far less than what Chinese doctors prescribe in traditional Chinese medicine-related formulas with goji berry (typically a dose of 9 to 15 g, 2 to 3 times daily).
Interestingly, the mean increase in blood antioxidant capacity levels was much greater than that of blood zeaxanthin levels in the LWB group (57 vs. 26%, respectively) whereas the means of both parameters remained stable in the placebo group. One possible reason is that LWB contains significant amounts of other antioxidants, in particular a heat-stable vitamin C precursor unique only to the goji berry.23 In fact, the daily dose of LWB added the equivalent of about 40 mg of ascorbic acid to the daily diet of the LWB group. Although the stable vitamin C precursor has been shown to be metabolized to ascorbic acid in rats,23 it remains unknown how much of the precursor is converted to ascorbic acid in humans. Nevertheless, LWB has been shown to stimulate antioxidant activity. In vitro studies demonstrated that LWB can directly scavenge hydroxyl and superoxide radicals, two of the most important biological free radicals. Furthermore, the hydroxyl radical-scavenging ability of LWB is similar to that of mannitol and its superoxide radical scavenging ability is of the same order of magnitude as that of superoxide dismutase. LWB also inhibited FeCl2/ascorbic acid-induced dysfunction in brain tissue and mitochondria, indicating that it may be effective in preventing brain oxidative mitochondrial damage and cognitive dysfunction.24 However, no trials have assessed the potential antioxidant ability of LWB in the retina.
A limitation of this study included a subject pool of only healthy Chinese subjects within a narrow age range. Also, we did not directly assess the optical density of the preretinal pigment. Furthermore, no significant relationship was observed between change in plasma zeaxanthin and change in macular characteristics. Therefore, the notion that increases in plasma zeaxanthin directly affected the macula is speculative.
Daily dietary supplementation with LWB, a goji berry formulation, for 90 days increases plasma zeaxanthin and total antioxidant levels as well as protects from hypopigmentation and accumulation of soft drusen in the macula of elderly subjects. However, the mechanism of action is unclear given the lack of relationship between change in plasma zeaxanthin and change in macular characteristics.
We thank Ying Zhang and colleagues at Sprim China Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and Qiaoji Li (Nestlé R&D Centre Beijing Ltd., Beijing, China) for assistance with study management. We also thank Mohamed Mubasher, PhD, for statistical support, Roger Bick, PhD, for writing assistance, and Morgan Stewart, PhD, for writing assistance and statistical support.
Larry E. Miller
Sprim Advanced Life Sciences
235 Pine Street, Suite 1175
San Francisco, California 94104
1. Banerjee A, Kumar S, Kulhara P, Gupta A. Prevalence of depression and its effect on disability in patients with age-related macular degeneration
. Indian J Ophthalmol 2008;56:469–74.
2. Mangione CM, Gutierrez PR, Lowe G, Orav EJ, Seddon JM. Influence of age-related maculopathy on visual functioning and health-related quality of life. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;128:45–53.
3. Wysong A, Lee PP, Sloan FA. Longitudinal incidence of adverse outcomes of age-related macular degeneration
. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:320–7.
4. Friedman DS, O'Colmain BJ, Munoz B, Tomany SC, McCarty C, de Jong PT, Nemesure B, Mitchell P, Kempen J. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration
in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:564–72.
5. Njirić S, Mišljenović T, Mikuličić M, Pavičević L. Incidence of age related macular degeneration in correlation with age, sex and occupation. Coll Antropol 2007;31(suppl 1):107–10.
6. Augustin AJ, Scholl S, Kirchhof J. Treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration
: current therapies. Clin Ophthalmol 2009;3:175–82.
7. Kaufman SR. Developments in age-related macular degeneration
: diagnosis and treatment. Geriatrics 2009;64:16–9.
8. Fine SL, Berger JW, Maguire MG, Ho AC. Age-related macular degeneration
. N Engl J Med 2000;342:483–92.
9. Cheng J, Lee P, Li J, Dennehy CE, Tsourounis C. Use of Chinese herbal products in Oakland and San Francisco Chinatowns. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2004;61:688–94.
10. Chang RC, So KF. Use of anti-aging herbal medicine, Lycium barbarum
, against aging-associated diseases. What do we know so far? Cell Mol Neurobiol 2008;28:643–52.
11. Potterat O. Goji (Lycium barbarum
and L. chinense
): phytochemistry, pharmacology and safety in the perspective of traditional uses and recent popularity. Planta Med 2010;76:7–19.
12. Beatty S, Murray IJ, Henson DB, Carden D, Koh H, Boulton ME. Macular pigment and risk for age-related macular degeneration
in subjects from a Northern European population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:439–46.
13. Carpentier S, Knaus M, Suh M. Associations between lutein, zeaxanthin
, and age-related macular degeneration
: an overview. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2009;49:313–26.
14. Bone RA, Landrum JT, Guerra LH, Ruiz CA. Lutein and zeaxanthin
dietary supplements raise macular pigment density and serum concentrations of these carotenoids in humans. J Nutr 2003;133:992–8.
15. Amagase H, Nance DM. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical study of the general effects of a standardized Lycium barbarum
(Goji) Juice, GoChi. J Altern Complement Med 2008;14:403–12.
16. Amagase H, Sun B, Borek C. Lycium barbarum
(goji) juice improves in vivo antioxidant
biomarkers in serum of healthy adults. Nutr Res 2009;29:19–25.
17. Benzie IF, Chung WY, Wang J, Richelle M, Bucheli P. Enhanced bioavailability of zeaxanthin
in a milk-based formulation of wolfberry (Gou Qi Zi; Fructus barbarum L.). Br J Nutr 2006;96:154–60.
18. Breithaupt DE, Weller P, Wolters M, Hahn A. Comparison of plasma responses in human subjects after the ingestion of 3R,3R'-zeaxanthin
dipalmitate from wolfberry (Lycium barbarum
) and non-esterified 3R,3R'-zeaxanthin
using chiral high-performance liquid chromatography. Br J Nutr 2004;91:707–13.
19. Cheng CY, Chung WY, Szeto YT, Benzie IF. Fasting plasma zeaxanthin
response to Fructus barbarum
L. (wolfberry; Kei Tze) in a food-based human supplementation trial. Br J Nutr 2005;93:123–30.
20. Spraul CW, Grossniklaus HE. Characteristics of Drusen and Bruch's membrane in postmortem eyes with age-related macular degeneration
. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:267–73.
21. Imamura Y, Noda S, Hashizume K, Shinoda K, Yamaguchi M, Uchiyama S, Shimizu T, Mizushima Y, Shirasawa T, Tsubota K. Drusen, choroidal neovascularization, and retinal pigment epithelium dysfunction in SOD1-deficient mice: a model of age-related macular degeneration
. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:11282–7.
22. Cheng CY, Chung WY, Szeto YT, Benzie IF. Fasting plasma zeaxanthin
response to Fructus barbarum
L. (wolfberry; Kei Tze) in a food-based human supplementation trial. Br J Nutr 2005;93:123–30.
23. Toyoda-Ono Y, Maeda M, Nakao M, Yoshimura M, Sugiura-Tomimori N, Fukami H. 2-O-(beta-D-Glucopyranosyl)ascorbic acid, a novel ascorbic acid analogue isolated from Lycium fruit. J Agric Food Chem 2004;52:2092–6.
24. Feng Z, Jia H, Li X, Bai Z, Liu Z, Sun L, Zhu Z, Bucheli P, Ballevre O, Wang J, Liu J. A milk-based wolfberry preparation prevents prenatal stress-induced cognitive impairment of offspring rats, and inhibits oxidative damage and mitochondrial dysfunction in vitro. Neurochem Res 2010;35:702–11.