Visual Performance of Daily-disposable Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses: A Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial : Optometry and Vision Science

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

CLINICAL TRIALS

Visual Performance of Daily-disposable Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses: A Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial

Sha, Jennifer BOptom/BSc; Tilia, Daniel MOptom; Kho, Danny BOptom/BSc; Amrizal, Hamdy BOptom/BS; Diec, Jennie BOptom; Yeotikar, Nisha BOptom, PhD; Jong, Monica BOptom, PhD; Thomas, Varghese MBioStat; Bakaraju, Ravi C. BOptom, PhD, FAAO1,2*

Author Information
Optometry and Vision Science 95(12):p 1096-1104, December 2018. | DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001311

Abstract

SIGNIFICANCE 

The present study highlights the differences between modern daily-disposable multifocal soft contact lenses to assist eye care practitioners in fitting presbyopic contact lens wearers.

PURPOSE 

The purpose of this study was to compare visual performance of three daily-disposable multifocal contact lenses.

METHODS 

Presbyopes (n = 72) wore 1-Day Acuvue Moist Multifocal, BioTrue ONEday for Presbyopia, and Dailies AquaComfort Plus Multifocal for 1 week in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial. After 1 week, high- and low-contrast visual acuities (HCVA, LCVA) were measured between 6 m and 40 cm and stereopsis at 40 cm. Subjective performance was assessed with 1- to 10-point rating scales for clarity, ghosting, driving vision, vision stability, ease of focusing, overall vision satisfaction, and ocular comfort. Willingness to purchase was reported with categorical responses. Linear mixed models and χ2 tests were used for analysis, and level of significance was set at 5%.

RESULTS 

BioTrue provided better HCVA and LCVA at distance than did Acuvue Moist (P ≤ .03). Subjectively, Acuvue Moist was rated lowest for distance clarity, distance ghosting, and driving vision (P ≤ .05). Acuvue Moist provided better HCVA at 70 to 40 cm and LCVA at 1 m to 40 cm than did BioTrue (P ≤ .01) and better LCVA at 1 m to 50 cm than did AquaComfort Plus (P ≤ .02). AquaComfort Plus also provided better HCVA and LCVA at 50 and 40 cm than did BioTrue (P ≤ .03). Acuvue Moist provided better stereopsis than did BioTrue (P = .02). Subjectively, BioTrue was rated lowest for near clarity (P ≤ .007) and lower than Acuvue Moist for intermediate clarity and near ghosting (P ≤ .04). No other differences were found between lenses (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS 

BioTrue had better distance performance compared with near, whereas Acuvue Moist performed conversely. AquaComfort Plus performed reasonably overall.

Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Optometry

Full Text Access for Subscribers:

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid