Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is advanced as the most minimally invasive and least traumatic corneal procedure for correcting refractive errors using a single laser. Although SMILE obtains similar results to femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with spherical myopia, it has deficiencies in astigmatism correction.
The purpose of this study was to compare refractive outcomes and high-order aberrations (HOAs) between SMILE and femtosecond LASIK corneal procedures at 1 year post-operative.
Ninety-two patients (181 eyes) with myopia/myopic astigmatism underwent either SMILE (group 1) or femtosecond LASIK (group 2). The refractive target was to achieve emmetropia in all cases. Data were analyzed to determine significance of change in refraction and HOAs. Furthermore, astigmatism was subjected to vector analysis using the Thibos (calculation of change, Δ, in J 0 and J 45 values) and Alpins (calculation of difference, ΔC, between target-induced astigmatism [TIA] and surgically induced astigmatism) methods.
Forty-five patients (89 eyes) from group 1 and 47 patients (92 eyes) from group 2 completed the study. The main significant (P ≤ .001) findings were as follows: (a) residual astigmatism was greater in group 1; (b) group 1, ΔJ 0 = 1.015J 0 + 0.040 (R = 0.861), ΔJ 45 = 1.082J 45 + 0.019 (R = 0.792), ΔC = 0.401TIA + 0.323 (R = 0.489), and mean spherical aberration increased from −0.003 (SD, ±0.059; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.015 to 0.009) to 0.028 μm (SD, ±0.041; 95% CI, −0.037 to −0.020); and (c) group 2, ΔJ 0 = 0.952J 0 − 0.005 (R = 0.921), ΔJ 45 = 0.962J 45 − 0.002 (R = 0.923), ΔC = 0.187TIA + 0.101 (R = 0.272), mean coma reduced from 0.114 (SD, ±0.087; 95% CI, 0.096 to 0.132) to 0.077 μm (SD, ±0.059; 95% CI, 0.065 to 0.089), and trefoil from 0.089 (SD, ±0.049; 95% CI, 0.079 to 0.0990) to 0.056 μm (SD, ±0.047; 95% CI, 0.046 to 0.066).
In comparison with SMILE, femtosecond LASIK offered better precision in the overall control of astigmatism and HOAs.
1Specialty Eye Hospital Svjetlost, Zagreb, Croatia
2School of Medicine University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
3Ophthalmology Department, School of Medicine University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
4NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, United Kingdom *email@example.com
Submitted: October 3, 2017
Accepted: June 20, 2018
Funding/Support: None of the authors have reported funding/support.
Conflict of Interest Disclosure: None of the authors have reported a financial conflict of interest.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization: MB, AB, VC, NG, SP; Data Curation: MB, MK, AD, AB; Formal Analysis: MB, MK, AD, VC, SP; Investigation: MB, MK, AD, AB; Methodology: MB, MK, AB, VC, NG, SP; Project Administration: MB, MK, AD; Supervision: AB, VC, MM, NG, SP; Validation: MB, MK, AD, AB, VC, MM, NG, SP; Visualization: MB, AD, AB, VC, NG, SP; Writing – Original Draft: MB, SP; Writing – Review & Editing: MB, MK, MM, NG, SP.