Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Improving health literacy in patients with diabetes

Watts, Sharon A. DNP, FNP-BC, CDE; Stevenson, Carl BSN, RN; Adams, Margaret MA, ARNP, CCNS/BC-ADM, CDE

doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000510739.60928.a9
Feature: CE Connection
Free
CE

Health literacy means how well someone can obtain, communicate, process, and understand basic health information to make appropriate health decisions. It's a stronger predictor of health status than income or education level. Brush up on how to assess and improve health literacy to help patients with diabetes stay healthy.

Sharon A. Watts is an NP in endocrinology at the Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center in Cleveland, Ohio, and is the Metabolic Syndrome and Diabetes Advisor for the Office of Nursing Services Veteran Affairs in Washington, D.C. Carl Stevenson is a staff RN at the Boise VA Medical Center in Boise, Idaho. Margaret Adams is a diabetes CNS at the Iowa City VA Health Care System in Iowa City, Iowa.

The authors and planners have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.

Figure

Figure

LIMITED HEALTH LITERACY and lack of basic math skills (numeracy) are more pervasive problems than many nurses suspect. Combine these limitations with a largely self-managed chronic disease such as diabetes and the possible complications—such as severe hypoglycemia—can be catastrophic. In diabetes, use of high-risk drugs such as sulfonylureas and insulin require additional patient understanding to prevent admissions for hypoglycemia and overuse of hospital resources.1

Patients with a limited ability to read and write shouldn't be considered unintelligent. Many patients with low literacy skills can learn complex self-management protocols, provided they receive clear instructions. This article provides a literature review about health literacy related to diabetes self-management and gives nurses evidence-based tools they can use to help patients overcome health literacy or numeracy issues.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Understanding health literacy and numeracy

The CDC defines health literacy as the degree to which someone has the capacity to obtain, communicate, process, and understand basic health information and services to make appropriate health decisions.2 These skills are a prerequisite to make sense of health information and services or to provide health information and services to others.

Health numeracy describes the skills and ability to understand and use numbers required to successfully execute many health-related tasks, including:

  • calculating medication dosing intervals and correction scales for insulin.
  • interpreting medication instructions and food labels.
  • determining insulin-to-carbohydrate ratios.3
  • deciphering charts (such as for growth and body mass index).
  • weighing the risks and benefits needed to make informed decisions related to healthcare, such as appropriate A1C target ranges based on comorbidities and age.
Back to Top | Article Outline

Understanding the impact

Health literacy is one of the strongest predictors of health status—stronger than income, employment status, education level, and racial or ethnic group.4 Assessing and managing low health literacy is important for nurses who hope to help patients with diabetes stay safe, informed, and well controlled.

The scope of the problem is described by the National Center for Education Statistics.5 Overall, it estimates that only 12% of adults have proficient levels of health literacy, defined as the skills needed to perform more complex and challenging literacy activities. The CDC identifies 18.8 million people in the United States as having diabetes. If 88% of them have health literacy deficiencies, then 16 million Americans will have problems managing their diabetes, especially if they take insulin.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Looking at the literature

Al Sayah et al. conducted a systematic review of 24 studies about the relationship of health literacy or numeracy and at least one health outcome in people with diabetes.6 The results indicate that low health literacy is consistently associated with poorer diabetes knowledge.

Other retrospective or smaller studies have shown some concerning trends, however. Kaiser Permanente's Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE) examined the impact of health literacy on a cross section of patients with diabetes (N = 14,357).7 They asked patients to self-report their level of health literacy and any significant episodes of severe hypoglycemia, such as losing consciousness or needing assistance to manage the reaction. Overall, they noted that problems learning, needing help reading, and lack of confidence with forms were independently associated with significant hypoglycemia. Of the 14,357 patients, 11% or 1,579 individuals had experienced signs and symptoms of severe hypoglycemia. Within this group experiencing severe hypoglycemia, 59% were taking insulin, 23% were taking mixed oral medications, 13% were taking secretagogues, and 5% were taking metformin alone. They also reported that 8% or 129 of 1,579 had to go to the ED or were admitted to the hospital because of their signs and symptoms. For these reasons, hypoglycemia seems to be implicated as a potentially serious and costly consequence of limited health literacy in this population.

The impact of health literacy on our nation's veterans is also substantial. A study of 502 veterans in Miami, Fla., evaluated the impact of inadequate health literacy.8 They found that 29% of their population had low health literacy, 26% had marginal literacy, and 45% had adequate literacy. For those veterans with inadequate health literacy, they perceived their health as poor or fair (63%) compared with those with adequate health literacy (37%). This perceived lack of health and limited health literacy poses barriers to clinical outcomes that nurses need to understand when interacting with veterans, especially those with a complicated, largely self-managed chronic disease such as diabetes.

Problems with health numeracy can have a large impact on diet management and nutrition as well as on A1C control. A study by Bowen et al. found that patients with diabetes (N = 150) with numeracy problems consumed more calories from carbohydrates than from protein or fats.9 They also noted that those with low numeracy skills were more likely to estimate portion size incorrectly, misinterpret food labels, and receive worse diabetes self-care.

The Bournemouth Diabetes and Endocrine Centre in the United Kingdom found that people (N = 112) with higher health numeracy skills (53%) achieved lower A1C levels than their counterparts.10

Table Addi

Table Addi

Osborn and colleagues examined the relationship of self-efficacy to health literacy and numeracy and diabetes control.11 Their cross-sectional primary care study of 383 participants found that health literacy and numeracy are each associated with greater diabetes self-efficacy, and greater diabetes self-efficacy is associated with lower A1C levels.

Some studies found that patients with low health literacy have more hospital readmissions and use the ED more often. Rubin et al. noted poor health literacy (lack of knowledge about diabetes and discharge instructions) was one of five major reasons for early readmission of patients with diabetes in their qualitative study.12 They indicated that most patients lacked awareness that the A1C reflects the average range of blood sugar over 3 months, and most didn't know their most recent A1C value.

Berkman and colleagues reviewed six studies and found that all but one study showed a statistically significant association of increased hospitalization and use of inpatient services with lower health literacy levels.13 Moreover, their review of studies showed an association of greater ED use with low health literacy.

Health literacy also impacts appointment no-show rates. Holtzman and colleagues conducted a study at a university dental clinic in Los Angeles (N = 200) and found that the strongest predictor for failing to show for appointments was seeking health information through fewer rather than more sources.14 The second most common reason, however, was lack of health literacy.

Patients with lower health literacy are more likely to make errors when taking their medications. Mixon et al. reported that among patients taking cardiac medications, female participants with higher health literacy and higher subjective numeracy had lower odds of misunderstanding their medications' indications, doses, or frequency.15 Furthermore, Berkman et al. examined participants' ability to interpret prescription medication and nutrition labels and found a positive correlation with health literacy level.13

Health literacy assessments can also impact patient satisfaction. Komenaka et al. conducted a study (N = 2,026) that found routine health literacy assessment is feasible in a surgical practice and doesn't cause any perceived decrease in patient satisfaction.16 In fact, satisfaction was greater during the years when health literacy assessments were performed.

In summary, lack of health literacy may lead to multiple strains on the healthcare system as well as for patients, including medication errors, missed appointments, adverse medical outcomes, and lower patient satisfaction. For patients with diabetes, a chronic disease requiring daily self-management, it's imperative to assess for limited literacy and numeracy skills and adjust interventions appropriately.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Performing an assessment

Understandably, many patients aren't willing to admit they have literacy problems. Assessing this clinical barrier can be complex. First and foremost, remember that years in school or education level may not accurately reflect literacy skills. Wallace notes that while “variables such as years of education are associated with health literacy, they are not perfectly correlated and do not provide enough information to guide care.”17 Some patients with limited health literacy have completed high school or college, are well spoken, may look over written materials and say they understand, hold white collar or even healthcare jobs, and function well when not under stress.

The National Assessment of Adult Literacy discussed additional reasons for limited literacy skills.5 These can include learning disabilities, cognitive decline in older adults, and the “use it or lose it” theory of neuroplasticity that suggests that reading abilities are typically three to five reading levels below the last year of school completed.

Cornett provides some of these red flags to keep in mind when meeting a patient for the first time. These warning signs could indicate problems with health literacy or numeracy.18

  • Patients often make excuses when asked to read or fill out forms; for example, “I don't have my glasses,” “I'm too tired to read,” or “I'll read this when I get home.”
  • Poor readers often lift text closer to their eyes or point to the text with a finger while reading. Their eyes may wander over the page without finding a central focus.
  • Patients may provide an incomplete medical history or check all items as “no” to avoid follow-up questions. Poor readers often miss appointments and make medication errors.
  • Patients with low health literacy become skilled at listening, and they often take instructions literally to avoid making mistakes. For example, they may be instructed in clinic to take nutritional insulin three times a day, but then they skip a meal and still take the insulin. In this case, they may not be able to read the prescription label that says to take this insulin with meals. To identify their medications, they look at the pills for color, size, and shape because they can't read the labels. Patients may appear nervous, confused, frustrated, or even indifferent. They may withdraw or avoid situations where complex learning is required. Patients often give incorrect answers when questioned about what they've read.

Powers et al. provide a review of the 10 most common health literacy assessment tools.19 They identify the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (3 minutes), the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (7 to 12 minutes), and possibly the Medical Term Recognition Test (2 minutes) as the most accurate tools for identifying patients with limited health literacy. Cooper-Bailey et al. also provide reviews for several diabetes-specific assessment tools such as the Diabetes Numeracy Test-15, DNT-Adolescent and DNT-14 Adolescent, Diabetes-specific Health Literacy Index, Literacy Assessment for Diabetes, and Spoken Knowledge in Low Literacy in Diabetes scale.3

One succinct method proposed to determine health literacy is asking the following three simple questions:

  • How confident are you when filling out medical forms by yourself?
  • How often do you have someone help you read hospital materials?
  • How often do you have problems learning about your medical condition because of difficulty understanding written information?20

However, Johnson et al. didn't find single-item questions (as above) used to screen for written health literacy to be effective screening tools for health numeracy.21 They did find that a low education level is a specific predictor of low health numeracy. Therefore, despite the available literacy tools, it's probably best for the busy clinician to use a Health Literacy Universal Precautions approach when dealing with all patients and their families. (See Additional health literacy resources.)

This means clinicians should assume all patients have some measure of limited health literacy and numeracy.22 Using this approach will ensure that clinicians will be communicating information in a way that can be understood by the half or more of the population with low literacy skills.

Various communication methods to overcome low literacy and numeracy barriers are presented here to help optimize diabetes education and the nurse's impact on care.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Nursing interventions

When communicating with any patients and families, and especially those suspected of limited health literacy and numeracy, an important first rule is to limit or “chunk” needed information into small pieces. This way, teaching can be done slowly and the patient can be evaluated for understanding. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) suggests breaking healthcare information into three main parts, from the patient's perspective:

  • Explain what's wrong (briefly).
  • Why is it important to me?
  • What do I need to do and why?22

Keep patient communication simple and focus on action steps rather than on complicated explanations and pathophysiology. Make sure information is culturally sensitive by asking if there's anything you should know about their culture, beliefs, or religious practices that would help you take better care of them. Then make a note of it. Use active voice; for example:

  • Take this insulin daily.
  • Carry glucose tablets for low blood sugar.

Simple communication strategies, which are also important, should focus on the “need to do” rather than on “nice to know.” Always begin by asking patients at each visit what's important to them or what brings them in for a visit. Explore what they want to know to make informed decisions and to execute day-to-day management of their disease. When focusing on specific “need to do” activities, a return demonstration is a must to ensure comprehension and accuracy. Some additional strategies include the following.

  • Use plain language (avoid medical jargon).
  • Prioritize learning goals.
  • Focus on action, not information.
  • Use concrete and specific phrases.
  • Provide multiple communication forms: printed, verbal, and visual, which include hands-on learning with a real syringe and needle or video information.
  • Confirm that the patient understands the teaching.
  • Encourage questions.
Figure. Exa

Figure. Exa

Be sure to use words that patients are familiar with such as “blood sugar” instead of “glucose.” Focus instructions on actions you expect them to do at home related to their blood sugar. Explaining the pathophysiology of diabetes will just confuse a patient with low literacy skills. Concrete instructions are best. For instance, say, “Check your blood sugar three times a day before meals, treat low blood sugar of 70 or lower with 4 glucose tablets, and recheck your blood sugar in 15 minutes.” Always provide directions in large print, preferably using one- or two-syllable words.

After information has been communicated, make sure to confirm patient comprehension. The teach-back method encourages patients to use their own words to describe what they've learned.23 (See Teach-back tips for patients with low literacy.) AHRQ states three benefits to using the teach-back method:

  • It improves patient understanding and adherence.
  • It decreases call backs and cancelled appointments.
  • It improves patient satisfaction and outcomes.

Comprehension of patient teaching needs to be confirmed in patients managing diabetes. Examples include how to appropriately treat hypoglycemia. A good way to enlist patient feedback might be to ask something like this: “To make sure I explained how to treat a low blood sugar the right way, can you tell me in your own words how you'd describe this to a family member?”

Provide clear instructions to notify the healthcare provider in instances of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia and review these guidelines at each visit to ensure patient safety.

Remember that the basic health literacy rules apply to printed instructions as well. Multiple programs are available online to assess the reading grade level of printed materials and determine appropriate formats. A simple practical rule for the busy nurse is to use plain language and keep all words to one or two syllables when speaking or providing printed instructions. Educational material should be clear and uncluttered. Sentences should be short, with headings and subheadings to break up the text.

Figure

Figure

The National Diabetes Education Program reminds clinicians to assess for a sufficient amount of white space; otherwise, an education sheet can look overwhelming to a patient with low literacy.24 Also, including color photos whenever possible always makes the material more appealing.

Some examples of creative solutions and resources for patients with low literacy include using pill cards with pictures, diagrams created for patients, and free online instructional videos, such as those provided by manufacturers of glucometers and insulin pens. (See Example of a simple pill card.) Try to include family members or other community support help and resources. For patients with limited numeracy skills, use a picture showing a plate with a healthy meal instead of teaching carbohydrate counting.25 (See Using Choose My Plate.) Incorporating a teach-back demonstration of correct insulin administration technique is a must.

White, Wolff, Cavanaugh, and Rothman have created an extensive Diabetes Literacy and Numeracy Education Toolkit.26 This toolkit can be requested from its authors. AHRQ also has an extensive online toolkit noted in the resource section of this article. Use this and online literacy and numeracy education toolkits.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Making a point

In summary, nurses need to understand the impact of health literacy and numeracy deficits on the day-to-day self-management of chronic diseases such as diabetes. Using the simple assessment and universal precautions intervention strategies outlined here can improve the quality of life for patients with diabetes who also have health literacy and numeracy barriers. Ultimately, diabetes care can be enhanced with decreased episodes of hypoglycemia and hospital readmissions by helping patients achieve their diabetes self-management goals and health outcomes.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Teach-back tips for patients with low literacy

  • Use a caring tone of voice and attitude.
  • Display comfortable body language and make eye contact.
  • Use plain language.
  • Ask patients to explain back, using their own words.
  • Use nonshaming questions. For instance, instead of asking patients if they can read, ask them if they have any trouble with written directions on their medications.
  • Use open-ended questions. Avoid questions that can be answered with a simple yes or no.
  • Emphasize that the responsibility to explain clearly is on you, the provider.
  • If patients can't teach-back correctly, explain again and reassess.
  • Use reader-friendly print materials to support learning.
  • Document use of, and the patient response to, teach-back.

Source: Always Use Teach-back! 10 elements of competence for using teach-back effectively. 2016. www.teachbacktraining.org. Developed by Health Literacy Iowa.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Budnitz DS, Lovegrove MC, Shehab N, Richards CL. Emergency hospitalizations for adverse drug events in older Americans. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(21):2002–2012.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Learn about health literacy. 2016. http://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/learn/index.html.
3. Bailey SC, Brega AG, Crutchfield TM, et al. Update on health literacy and diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2014;40(5):581–604.
4. Weiss BD. Health Literacy and Patient Safety: Help Patients Understand. Manual for Clinicians. 2nd ed. American Medical Association Foundation and American Medical Association; 2007. http://www.med.fsu.edu/userFiles/file/ahec_health_clinicians_manual.pdf.
5. Kutner M, Greenberg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C, White S. The health literacy of America's adults: results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. 2006. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006483.pdf.
6. Al Sayah F, Majumdar SR, Williams B, Robertson S, Johnson JA. Health literacy and health outcomes in diabetes: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(3):444–452.
7. Sarkar U, Karter AJ, Liu JY, Moffet HH, Adler NE, Schillinger D. Hypoglycemia is more common among type 2 diabetes patients with limited health literacy: the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE). J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(9):962–968.
8. Rodríguez V, Andrade AD, García-Retamero R, et al. Health literacy, numeracy, and graphical literacy among veterans in primary care and their effect on shared decision making and trust in physicians. J Health Commun. 2013;18(suppl 1):273–289.
9. Bowen ME, Cavanaugh KL, Wolff K, Davis D, Gregory B, Rothman RL. Numeracy and dietary intake in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2013;39(2):240–247.
10. Marden S, Thomas PW, Sheppard ZA, Knott J, Lueddeke J, Kerr D. Poor numeracy skills are associated with glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2012;29(5):662–669.
11. Osborn CY, Cavanaugh K, Wallston KA, Rothman RL. Self-efficacy links health literacy and numeracy to glycemic control. J Health Commun. 2010;15(suppl 2):146–158.
12. Rubin DJ, Donnell-Jackson K, Jhingan R, Golden SH, Paranjape A. Early readmission among patients with diabetes: a qualitative assessment of contributing factors. J Diabetes Complications. 2014;28(6):869–873.
13. Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, et al. Health literacy interventions and outcomes: an updated systematic review. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011;(199):1–941.
14. Holtzman JS, Atchison KA, Gironda MW, Radbod R, Gornbein J. The association between oral health literacy and failed appointments in adults attending a university-based general dental clinic. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2014;42(3):263–270.
15. Mixon AS, Myers AP, Leak CL, et al. Characteristics associated with postdischarge medication errors. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89(8):1042–1051.
16. Komenaka IK, Nodora JN, Machado L, et al. Health literacy assessment and patient satisfaction in surgical practice. Surgery. 2014;155(3):374–383.
17. Wallace A. Low health literacy: overview, assessment, and steps toward providing high-quality diabetes care. Diabetes Spectr. 2010;23(4):220–227.
18. Cornett S. Assessing and addressing health literacy. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. 2009;14(3). Manuscript 2. http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Vol142009/No3Sept09/Assessing-Health-Literacy-.html#Kutner.
19. Powers BJ, Trinh JV, Bosworth HB. Can this patient read and understand written health information. JAMA. 2010;304(1):76–84.
20. Chew LD, Bradley KA, Boyko EJ. Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy. Fam Med. 2004;36(8):588–594.
21. Johnson TV, Abbasi A, Kleris RS, et al. Assessment of single-item literacy questions, age, and education level in the prediction of low health numeracy. JAAPA. 2013;26(8):50–54.
22. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit, 2nd ed. Introduction. 2015. http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/quality-resources/tools/literacy-toolkit/healthlittoolkit2-intro.html.
23. Always Use Teach-back! Welcome to the Always Use Teach-back! training toolkit. 2003. http://www.teachbacktraining.org/.
24. NDEP (National Diabetes Education Program) plain language review process. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. 2015. http://ndep.nih.gov/publications/PlainLanguageReview.aspx.
25. U.S. Department of Agriculture. ChooseMyPlate.com. http://www.choosemyplate.gov/.
26. White RO, Wolff K, Cavanaugh KL, Rothman R. Addressing health literacy and numeracy to improve diabetes education and care. Diabetes Spectr. 2010;23(4):238–243.
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.