Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Letter to the Editor

COVID-19 in the Nuclear Medicine Department, be prepared for ventilation scans as well!

Zuckier, Lionel S.; Gordon, Sharon R.

Author Information
Nuclear Medicine Communications: May 2020 - Volume 41 - Issue 5 - p 494-495
doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001196
  • Free

We read with great interest the recent editorial by Huang et al.[1] regarding the unfortunately timely topic of considerations attendant to running a nuclear medicine department in the context of the COVID-19 epidemic, which complements similar work on diagnostic imaging[2] and hospital-wide preparedness [3]. As the pandemic has unfolded in a somewhat sequential manner [4], lessons learned in one geographic domain are of great value to physicians who practice in locations that are earlier on the learning curve.

One area of concern which we did not see covered in the comprehensive treatment relates to performance of ventilation scans, a standard component of ventilation/perfusion studies performed to exclude pulmonary embolus [5]. The population of patients who are short-of-breath and considered for pulmonary embolus certainly overlap with individuals who may be suffering effects of COVID-19 infection. Beyond standard methods of decontamination, which are relevant to all patients with suspicion of infection [2,6], is there a specific concern that patients performing ventilation studies will expose others to airborne virus by exhalation into the aerosolization system? Do we need to take any additional precautions to minimize airborne distribution of virus, such as requiring technologists to don respiratory mask to protect against airborne virus? Are there any changes in protocol that we can implement to mitigate risk?

Both early and current literature have documented a small degree of contamination produced by leakage of the radioactive aerosol from the closed delivery system into the room [7–9]; this would seem to indicate that there is potential for expired air and aerosolized secretions to contaminate personnel. Optimized techniques may minimize, but not eliminate, a small degree of airborne contamination [10]. In addition, patients frequently cough following inhalation of radiopharmaceutical, which may also expose nuclear medicine workers to aerosolized secretions. It, therefore, seems appropriate to equip technologists in the imaging suite with adequate respiratory equipment such as N-95 masks if ventilation is performed. The United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that when performing aerosol-generating procedures, health care personnel in the room should wear an N95 or higher-level respirator, eye protection, gloves, and a gown [6]. To reduce the necessity of these measures, especially in patients with known infection, it may be preferable to shift to diagnostic algorithms that include perfusion but skip ventilation [11–13], thereby minimizing potential for aerosolization. If ventilation scans are subsequently deemed necessary in a specific patient, a repeat study can be obtained the following day with heightened vigilance and precautions. Where ever possible, a negative pressure room would be preferred. Ultimately, the best solution at every facility will depend on local circumstances, including availability of personal protective equipment.

We wanted to thank Huang et al. for the rapid dissemination of critical information regarding preparations for the nuclear medicine department during the COVID-19 epidemic. We hope that our considerations regarding escape of aerosolized droplets during the performance of ventilation scans will likewise be beneficial and minimize person-to-person transmission within the nuclear medicine suite.


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


1. Huang HL, Allie R, Gnanasegaran G, Bomanji J. COVID19 -nuclear medicine departments, be prepared!. Nucl Med Commun. 2020; 41:297–299
2. Kooraki S, Hosseiny M, Myers L, Gholamrezanezhad A. Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak: what the department of radiology should know. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020. pii: S1546-1440(20)30150-2
3. Chopra V, Toner E, Waldhorn R, Washer L. How should U.S. hospitals prepare for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Ann Intern Med. 2020
4. Johns Hopkins Center for Systems Science and Engineering. Coronavirus COVID-19 Global Cases by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU). 2020. [Accessed 17 March 2020]
5. Parker JA, Coleman RE, Grady E, Royal HD, Siegel BA, Stabin MG, et al; Society of Nuclear Medicine. SNM practice guideline for lung scintigraphy 4.0. J Nucl Med Technol. 2012; 40:57–65
6. National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD), D.o.V.D. Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Healthcare Settings. 2020. March 10, 2020 March 17. 2020; [Accessed March 16 2020]
7. Williams DA, Carlson C, McEnerney K, Hope E, Hoh CK. Technetium-99m DTPA aerosol contamination in lung ventilation studies. J Nucl Med Technol. 1998; 26:43–44
8. Achey B, Miller K, Erdman M, King S. Potential dose to nuclear medicine technologists from 99mtc-DTPA aerosol lung studies. Health Phys. 2004; 86Suppl 2S85–S87
9. Brudecki K, Borkowska E, Gorzkiewicz K, Kostkiewicz M, Mróz T. 99mtc activity concentrations in room air and resulting internal contamination of medical personnel during ventilation-perfusion lung scans. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2019; 58:469–475
10. Avison M, Hart G. The use of a modified technique to reduce radioactive air contamination in aerosol lung ventilation imaging. J Radiol Prot. 2001; 21:155–161
11. Miniati M, Pistolesi M, Marini C, Di Ricco G, Formichi B, Prediletto R, et al. Value of perfusion lung scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: results of the prospective investigative study of acute pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PISA-PED). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996; 154:1387–1393
12. Sostman HD, Miniati M, Gottschalk A, Matta F, Stein PD, Pistolesi M. Sensitivity and specificity of perfusion scintigraphy combined with chest radiography for acute pulmonary embolism in PIOPED II. J Nucl Med. 2008; 49:1741–1748
13. Bajc M, Miniati M, Jögi J, Stein PD. Perfusion SPECT in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013; 40:1432–1437
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.