Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Erratum

Harmonization of standardized uptake values between two scanners, considering repeatability and magnitude of the values in clinical fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET settings

a phantom study

Erratum

Nuclear Medicine Communications: March 2020 - Volume 41 - Issue 3 - p 296
doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001166
  • Free

In the article that appeared on pages 857 to 864 in the August 2019 issue of Nuclear Medicine Communications [1], figures 3 and 4 were published incorrectly. The figures should have been published as follows.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3:
Relationships between SUVs measured by Celesteion and Aquiduo are plotted for each sphere diameter. The measured SUVs consist of SUVmax and SUVpeak measured by Aquiduo and Celesteion. Each line consists of four plots from the phantoms of actual SUV 2, 4, 8, and 16. SUV, standardized uptake value.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4:
Relationships between the ratio of the product of multiplication (SUVmax and SUVpeak multiplied by the estimated multiplication factor) to the actually measured SUVmax and SUVpeak and the actual SUVs. SUV, standardized uptake value.

References

1. Iizuka H, Daisaki H, Ogawa M, et al. Harmonization of standardized uptake values between two scanners, considering repeatability and magnitude of the values in clinical fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET settings: a phantom study. Nuc Med Comms. 2019; 408857–864
    Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.