Journal Logo


Practical Guidelines and Considerations for the Use of Elastic Bands in Strength and Conditioning

Wilson, John MSc1; Kritz, Matthew PhD, RSCS*D2

Author Information
Strength and Conditioning Journal: October 2014 - Volume 36 - Issue 5 - p 1-9
doi: 10.1519/SSC.0000000000000087



The power-producing capability of an athlete is often considered the key performance indicator for successful sports performance. Strength and conditioning specialists use a variety of methods to enhance the production of human power (13). Resistance training is commonly used to develop and enhance athletes' ability to produce force, a major contributor to athletes' ability to produce power. In brief, there are 3 modes of resistance training: constant external resistance, accommodating resistance, and variable resistance (VR). Constant resistance is where the external load is unchanged throughout the full range of motion and is the most popular form of resistance training (28).

Accommodating resistance (also termed isokinetic resistance) allows the muscle to contract maximally while the velocity is controlled (28). VR aligns with the force capabilities of the muscle throughout a given range of motion (22). According to Zander, VR training has been around for over a century, dating back to 1870s when Nautilus weight machines were designed to accommodate the human strength curve (34), which relates to the scientific model of varying force capabilities at different joint angles (22). More recently, VR elastic bands have been used within the sport and health professions to enhance proprioceptive motor control (1,2,6,24,29). In addition, elastic bands have become increasingly more popular as a performance enhancement tool and subsequently have been investigated systematically to better understand the mechanisms responsible for the performance adaptations that have been observed (1–3,6,7,16–19). However, despite the empirical attention elastic bands have received, surprisingly, little information is available detailing the various ways elastic bands may be used within a strength and conditioning environment. Therefore, the objective of this article is to provide the reader with some practical methods for using elastic bands (Figure 1) to challenge or assist a movement's range of motion for the purpose of enhancing muscular power as well as provide examples of how elastic bands may be used to enhance an individual's kinesthetic awareness.

Figure 1:
Sample of elastic bands commonly used by strength and conditioning coaches (supplied by Iron Woody strength band, Inc.).



Elastic bands can challenge or assist the human strength curve by providing variation in how a muscle complex is challenged over a range of motion (7,18,33). There are several concepts that have been reported in the literature for why elastics bands may be a benefit for enhancing the power capability of an athlete. Advocates of using elastics bands purport that they can assist with enhancing the force and/or acceleration capability of muscle to a greater degree than free weights alone.

To understand why proponents of elastic bands favor this training modality, it is important to consider that the human strength curve is influenced by the torque (relationship between force and joint angle) about single joints using 2- or 3-dimensional coordinate systems (12). The human strength curve, as described above, can be classified into 3 categories: ascending, descending, and bell shaped (Figure 2) (20,22). The shape of the curve is determined by the neuromuscular force angle relationship (22). An example of exercises influenced by a descending curve where maximum strength is required at the end of the concentric phase are upper-body pulling movement tasks such as the bent over row, chin-ups, and bench row (11).

Figure 2:
An illustration of the 3 classified human strength curves (adapted with permission from McMaster DT, Cronin J, and Mcguigan MR, Forms of variable resistance training. Strength Cond J 31: 50–64, 2009. Adapted by permission of Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins.

Single-joint movements such as bicep curls or leg extensions are examples of bell-shaped strength curve exercises where maximum strength occurs around the middle of the movement's range of motion (11). Finally, movement tasks such as a squatting, deadlifting, and/or weightlifting movement tasks are examples of an ascending strength curve (11). Human movement is empowered by the summation of the multijoint torques allowing humans to lift heavier loads at or near full limb extension (4).

The fact that training with elastic bands aims to challenge the ascending strength curve by providing a variable load throughout a range of motion with the most resistance experienced at or near full muscular extension where humans typically exhibit the highest force production capability is a primary reason why elastic bands in combination with constant resistance may be superior over constant resistance alone (2,7,18). The limitations of using constant resistance or free weight all the time in training is the fact that the load is unchanged throughout the movement's range of motion. This is important to understand when you consider the mechanical properties of muscle, specifically how muscles are mechanically disadvantaged at certain positions within a movement task due to the length tension principle. Constant resistance may not adequately challenge the musculature at the point in a range where the greatest loads can be lifted (10). Rather the musculature is limited at the point in a range where it is weakest (i.e., the sticking point).

However, elastic bands used in conjunction with free weights may provide the strength and conditioning professional with an opportunity to challenge a range of motion while mitigating the effects of a movement's “sticking point.” Elastic bands used as a resistive modality compliment the length-tension relationship by requiring a progressive recruitment in high-threshold motor units, thus, requiring the highest motor unit recruitment at the most mechanically advantageous position within that movement (12,16,22,23). Figure 3 illustrates that with an increase in deformation of elastic bands, there is a curvilinear increase in the load experienced by the musculature (22).

Figure 3:
An increase in elastic band deformation results in a curvilinear increase in tension.

Furthermore, an increase in motor unit recruitment is generally reflected by enhanced muscle activation during both the eccentric and concentric phases of a movement (7,13,32). The increase in muscle activation levels may attribute to the unique neuromuscular stimulus achieved with elastic bands (1–3). Although some authors have failed to show an increase in muscle activation using elastic bands, this is not consistent with the majority of elastic band research, and it is therefore unclear to the authors if methodological issues confounded the results of the aforementioned study (9).

In addition, training with elastic bands can challenge the athlete's ability to accelerate a load through a given range of motion. This is in contrast to free weight training alone due to the fact that the force required to get a free weight load moving is not the same force that is required to keep it moving due to momentum the system mass incurs. The greater the elastic band to free weight load will influence the amount of momentum the system will incur. When you consider that the contractile element of muscle is enhanced by high contractile speeds and the acceleration of any object is proportional to the force required to move that object and inversely proportional to its mass or inertia, elastic bands could be a more appropriate modality for developing the velocity capability of muscle. A practical example would be that the beginning of the concentric phase of a barbell squat where the load is created using free weight and elastic bands, the total system load experienced by the athlete will be less, thus allowing the athlete to achieve higher accelerations early in the movement. As the elastic bands stretch, the athlete is required to continue recruitment of high threshold motor units resulting in an increase in force production at higher speeds, which will likely translate to greater power production at or near full limb extension (1,13).

A further consideration for the use of elastic bands to enhance an athlete's ability to produce power is the benefit elastic bands have at assisting with the development and enhancement of an athlete's rate of force development (RFD). RFD is often considered the key performance indicator in power-based sports. Yet, there are many athletes that struggle to express their strength in a short period of time. For sports such as sprinting, when contact times are less than 0.3 seconds (29), some authors report contact durations closer to 0.1–0.2 seconds (14,25,27). There is a dearth of research that has investigated the influence of elastic bands on developing or enhancing RFD. However, the research that has specifically investigated the influence of elastic bands used in training on the RFD capability of an individual has shown improvements in RFD after using elastic bands (25,29,33). Several mechanisms have been suggested for why elastic bands may improve RFD, namely, a longer peak velocity phase, an exploitation of the stretch-shortening cycle, and the increase in elastic energy storage within the soft tissue structures that support human movement (15,33).

Finally, improvements in eccentric strength is a feature of any progressive resistance training program and if trained purposefully can result in an increase in maximum strength, as measured by a 1 repetition maximum (1RM) test (8,30). As elastic bands are a product of their own elastic properties, there is the potential for an increased eccentric loading. This potential is 2-fold: (a) the elastic properties increasing the eccentric loading by “pulling” on the load and (b) the necessity to slow and stop the barbell at the end of the eccentric phase (7). Additionally, at the beginning of the movement, the elasticity increases, thus enhancing velocity of the eccentric phase, which can provide a greater eccentric stimulus from the stored elastic energy (5), in turn contributing to increases in the required force production during the subsequent concentric phase (7). Collation of scientific and anecdotal research for resisting protocols indicate that the total unit load may be between 60 and 85% of an athlete's 1RM, of which 20–30% of this total load is mass provided by elastic band tension (22).


There are a few studies that have been conducted investigating the effect of using elastic bands to assist a movement through a given range of motion (2,21,31). The results of these studies have reported greater power and velocity outputs, potentially by a mechanism known as “overspeed.” Two reported benefits of using elastic bands to assist a movement are an increased shortening rate and increased neuromuscular system activation (26,31). Practice-based evidence has used elastic bands with high loads to attenuate the force required at mechanically weak parts of a movement; for example, assisting a heavy back squat so that the load at the bottom of the squat is less. This may be desirable during periods of heavy sport competition when athletes may be feeling more fatigued or in an over-speed training phase where speed of movement is the training objective and the strength coach may not want the athlete to be limited by their speed at the bottom of a movement.

Newton et el. (25) concluded that assisting a movement task allowed the athlete to “explode” out of the bottom of a squat, which in turn would increase specificity and translate to sporting movements like jumping or ballistic nature movements. Further practice-based evidence has reported the use of elastic bands as a corrective exercise or rehabilitation modality. Where by the elastic bands may be used to attenuate a bodyweight load to enable athletes with poor movement competency to use traditional movements like push-ups, pull-ups, and/or single leg squats to learn how to use their body in more a functional manner (Figures 8–12), or to attenuate impact forces associated with plyometric training to allow higher training volumes required in a rehabilitation phase.



Figure 5 illustrates the triangular attachment between a barbell and power rack used by the authors for performing elastic-resisted exercises. Other methods such as that seen in McMaster et al. (21) are achievable, yet, the aforementioned triangular attachment will be the focus of this article. It is strongly recommended regardless which method is used to attach the elastic bands, that the load is quantified to accurately prescribed training loads based on an athlete's capabilities. The method of quantifying the elastic force used by the authors is detailed below:

A known mass (including a 20-kg barbell) was placed on top of a plyometrics box, which in turn is on a forceplate (PASCO Pasport 2-Axis Force Platform—Ps-2142) (Figure 4). The force provided by this “stack” was recorded. The height of the stack was then adjusted to correspond to different pin placements on the squat rack. A range of elastic bands (Figure 1) were set up in a triangular fashion as in Figure 4 and attached to the barbell (Figure 5). This “total force” was then recorded for all elastic bands at different heights on the squat rack. The “stack force” was subtracted from the “total force,” giving an elastic force contribution for different stretch deformations. This process was repeated for different selected heights that corresponded to pin placements on the squat rack to create an elastic force profile.

Figure 4:
Illustration of the stack setup for elastic force profile in the resisted modality.
Figure 5:
Illustration of the setup for measuring the actual force applied by the elastic band in the resisted setup.


The elastic band attachment to the barbell and power rack is illustrated in Figure 7. The stack setup is similar to the resisted force profile; however, the bar is loaded with a weight that resists elastic force at any stretch deformation (Figure 6). The stack force was then recorded. Each individual elastic band was then attached to the barbell that corresponded to different pin heights on the squat rack through the attachment as shown in Figure 7. The total force was then recoded and subtracted from the stack force.

Figure 6:
Illustration of the stack setup for elastic force profile in the assisted modality.
Figure 7:
Illustration of the setup for measuring the actual force deducted by the elastic band in the assisted setup.


There are a number of ways elastic bands can be used to provide VR either through resisting and assisting. These elastic bands can be used as an introduction to basic compound exercises to teach proper eccentric to concentric control and stabilization. Illustrated below (Figures 8–12) are some examples for each fundamental movement pattern including their starting and midpoint positions. These examples can be applied to other exercises such as lunges, pull-ups, and bench pressing. In addition, elastic bands may be used to teach an athlete how to use their body to better express power. For example, fixing elastic bands around an athlete's hips as shown in Figure 12 requires them to emphasize hip extension to complete the movement task with good muscular tension. Hip extension has been reported to be an important segmental requirement during ground-based movement tasks involving the kinetic chain-like sprinting and jumping (18).

Figure 8:
Band-assisted bodyweight box squat.
Figure 9:
Band-assisted bodyweight press-up.
Figure 10:
Band-resisted squat.
Figure 11:
Band-assisted loaded squat.
Figure 12:
Band-resisted hip extension.


Training with elastic bands can be used to assist the training of novice to elite level athletes. For novice and/or weaker athletes, elastic bands can be used to attenuate bodyweight or external loads through sticking points, so control and stability can be accomplished throughout a movement task's range of motion. For intermediate- or advanced-level athletes, resistance bands can be used in a resisted or assisted manner to enhance force production, velocity of movement, and subsequent production of mechanical power. The Table highlights a sample program demonstrating how elastic bands may be used as a resistive and assistive modality within the same training phase through the course of a training week and periodized across a training block.

An example of resistance training program for an elite rugby 7s player using both assisted and resisted modalities

In the Table, the authors provide a sample program highlighting the integration of elastic bands for an in-season strength program for an elite rugby 7s. The authors believe that challenging the force production capabilities should be at the beginning of the week when the player is at their freshest and the total accumulated training/game loading is at its lowest, therefore allowing the athlete to express greatest force production. The assisting modality is placed toward the end of the week 2 days before their respective game. This acts as a peaking strategy and a means of aiding recovery by (a) reducing the overall system load (including central nervous system loading) and (b) allowing the player to exert the velocity side of the power equation. The progression across the weeks is to allow for continual development of the mechanisms related to each of the modalities; hence, the increasing percentage of total load as a result of the elastic band, which increases the utilization of the mechanisms gained through elastic bands and not through traditional resistance training.


The use of elastic bands may offer the strength and conditioning coach an opportunity to exploit a range of mechanisms that cannot be provided through traditional resistance training. The practicality of elastic bands allow accommodating resistance to be applied in both a resisting and assisting fashion to accommodate the development of force and velocity characteristics and thus enhance athlete's power production capabilities. The diversity of elastic bands can also be used as a learning tool for novice athletes in enhancing and understanding motor control in numerous traditional resistance exercises.


1. Anderson CE, Sforzo GA, Sigg JA. The effects of combining elastic and free weight resistance on strength and power in athletes. J Strength Cond Res 22: 567–574, 2008.
2. Argus CK, Gill ND, Keogh JW, Blazevich AJ, Hopkins WG. Kinetic and training comparisons between assisted, resisted, and free countermovement jumps. J Strength Cond Res 25: 2219–2227, 2011.
3. Bellar DM, Muller MD, Barkley JE, Kim CH, Ida K, Ryan EJ, Bliss MV, Glickman EL. The effects of combined elastic-and free-weight tension vs. free-weight tension on one-repetition maximum strength in the bench press. J Strength Cond Res 25: 459–463, 2011.
4. Blazevich AJ. Sports Biomechanics: The Basics: Optimising Human Performance: A & C Black, 2010. pp: 184–193.
5. Bobbert MF, Huijing PA, Van Ingen Schenau G. Drop jumping. I. The influence of jumping technique on the biomechanics of jumping. Med Sci Sports Exerc 19: 332–338, 1987.
6. Colado JC, Triplett NT. Effects of a short-term resistance program using elastic bands versus weight machines for sedentary middle-aged women. J Strength Cond Res 22: 1441–1448, 2008.
7. Cronin J, Mcnair P, Marshall R. The effects of bungy weight training on muscle function and functional performance. J Sport Sci 21: 59–71, 2003.
8. Doan BK, Newton RU, Marsit JL, Triplett-Mcbride NT, Koziris LP, Fry AC, Kraemer WJ. Effects of increased eccentric loading on bench press 1RM. J Strength Cond Res 16: 9–13, 2002.
9. Ebben WE, Jensen RL. Electromyographic and kinetic analysis of traditional, chain, and elastic band squats. J Strength Cond Res 16: 547–550, 2002.
10. Elliott BC, Wilson GJ, Kerr GK. A biomechanical analysis of the sticking region in the bench press. Med Sci Sport Exerc 21: 450, 1989.
11. Fleck SJ. Designing Resistance Training Programs. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2004. pp: 31.
12. Frost DM, Cronin J, Newton RU. A biomechanical evaluation of resistance. Sports Med 40: 303–326, 2010.
13. Frost DM, Cronin J, Newton RU. A biomechanical evaluation of resistance: Fundamental concepts for training and sports performance. Sports Med 40: 303–326, 2010.
14. Heinecke M, Jovick B, Cooper Z, Wiechert J. Comparison of strength gains in variable resistance bench press and isotonic bench press. J Strength Cond Res 18: 10, 2004.
15. Hostler D, Schwirian CI, Campos G, Toma K, Crill MT, Hagerman GR, Hagerman FC, Staron RS. Skeletal muscle adaptations in elastic resistance-trained young men and women. Eur J App Physiol 86: 112–118, 2001.
16. Israetel MA, Mcbride JM, Nuzzo JL, Skinner JW, Dayne AM. Kinetic and kinematic differences between squats performed with and without elastic bands. J Strength Cond Res 24: 190–194, 2010.
17. Jakubiak N, Saunders DH. The feasibility and efficacy of elastic resistance training for improving the velocity of the Olympic Taekwondo turning kick. J Strength Cond Res 22: 1194–1197, 2008.
18. Joy JM, Lowery RP, Oliveira De Souza E, Wilson JM. Elastic bands as a component of periodized resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 2013. Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182986bef.
19. Kozub FM, Voorhis T. Using bands to create technique-specific resistance training for developing explosive power in wrestlers. Strength Cond 34: 92–95, 2012.
20. Kulig K, Andrews JG, Hay JG. Human strength curves. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 12: 417–466, 1984.
21. Markovic G, Jaric S. Positive and negative loading and mechanical output in maximum vertical jumping. Med Sci Sport Exerc 39: 1757, 2007.
22. McMaster DT, Cronin J, Mcguigan MR. Forms of variable resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 31: 50–64, 2009.
23. McMaster DT, Cronin J, Mcguigan MR. Quantification of rubber and chain-based resistance modes. J Strength Cond Res 24: 2056–2064, 2010.
24. Murgia CJ, Dover D. Proprioception and resistance band training on injury prevention in gymnasts. Res Q Exercise and Sport 2009.
25. Newton RU, Robertson M, Dugan E, Hanson C, Cecil J, Gerber A, Hill J, Schwier L. Heavy elastic bands alter force, velocity and power output during back squat lift. J Strength Cond Res 16: 1–18, 2002.
26. Newton RU, Kraemer WJ, Hakkinen K, Humphries B, Murphy A. Kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activation during explosive upper body movements. J Appl Biomech 12: 31–43, 1996.
27. Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Alvar BA. Maximizing strength development in athletes: A meta-analysis to determine the dose-response relationship. J Strength Cond Res 18: 377–382, 2004.
28. Pipes TV. Variable resistance versus constant resistance strength training in adult males. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 39: 27–35, 1978.
29. Rhea MR, Kenn JG, Dermody BM. Alterations in speed of squat movement and the use of accommodated resistance among college athletes training for power. J Strength Cond Res 23: 2645–2650, 2009.
30. Sheppard J, Newton RU, Mcguigan MR. The effect of accentuated eccentric load on jump kinetics in high-performance volleyball players. Int J Sports Sci Coach 2: 267–273, 2007.
31. Sheppard JM, Dingley AA, Janssen I, Spratford W, Chapman DW, Newton RU. The effect of assisted jumping on vertical jump height in high-performance volleyball players. J Sci Med Sport 14: 85–89, 2011.
32. Walker S, Taipale RS, Nyman K, Kraemer WJ, Hakkinen K. Neuromuscular and hormonal responses to constant and variable resistance loadings. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43: 26–33, 2011.
33. Wallace BJ, Winchester JB, Mcguigan MR. Effects of elastic bands on force and power characteristics during the back squat exercise. J Strength Cond Res 20: 268–272, 2006.
34. Zatsiorsky V, Kraemer WJ. Science and Practice of Strength Training. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics, 1995. pp: 111.
No Caption Available

variable resistance; elastic bands; accommodating strength curve

© 2014 by the National Strength & Conditioning Association