Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Research

Effects of a Six-Month Local Vibration Training on Bone Density, Muscle Strength, Muscle Mass, and Physical Performance in Postmenopausal Women

Tankisheva, Ekaterina1; Bogaerts, An2; Boonen, Steven3; Delecluse, Christophe2; Jansen, Paul4; Verschueren, Sabine M.P.1

Author Information
The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research: September 2015 - Volume 29 - Issue 9 - p 2613-2622
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000895
  • Free



Aging is associated with a decrease in bone mineral density (BMD), known as osteoporosis, and a decline of lean muscle mass and muscle strength known as sarcopenia (21,36). Both osteoporosis and sarcopenia are important socio-economic and personal problems because they contribute to an increased fall risk, an increased number of hip and vertebral fractures, and physical weakness (7,29,32). Hip fractures are associated with high mortality and morbidity rate among postmenopausal women (6). Therefore, the prevention of bone loss and muscle weakness remains an important question.

Mechanical loading by means of physical exercise has been shown to have an osteogenic effect, to increase muscle strength, and to improve body balance (15,18,19). High-impact exercises such as running and jumping may enhance bone acquisition in young age (1,14,25), as well as maintain BMD and reduce the risk of falls and osteoporotic fractures at older ages (5,10,16,20,23,39). However, high-impact training is not practical and even unsafe in a significant proportion of older individuals, potentially leading to injuries and even fractures (9).

An alternative training method might be vibration training, which combines factors of both impact exercise and conventional resistance training. The effects of long-term whole-body vibration (WBV) training on BMD and muscle power have previously been reported among the elderly (2,27,30,38). However, WBV may not be an adequate training method for a large segment of the adult populations, including the frail elderly, adults who are in a wheelchair or bedridden individuals, and patients with knee osteoarthritis who are unable to stand on a WBV platform. These older adults have a high risk for osteoporosis and sarcopenia, thus are at high risk for falls and fractures.

Therefore, a different form of vibration training—local vibration training—was applied in an attempt to broaden the impact of vibration intervention to the frail elderly. First, custom-made vibration devices were specially designed for this study to broaden the effect of vibration training to specific target body zones. Applying the vibration training locally may avoid the significant decrease of vibration signal up to the thigh and the hip (35), for example, patients with knee prostheses. Second, we conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial for postmenopausal women who underwent 6 months of locally applied vibrations at the midthigh and around the hip. Effects of this locally applied vibration on static and dynamic knee muscle strength, muscle mass, and BMD were assessed. Delivering the vibration locally at the regions that are most at risk for fractures (hip) or most in need of muscle strengthening (m. quadriceps) might be a more suitable approach than WBV training.


Experimental Approach to the Problem

The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial for postmenopausal women who were randomly assigned to a vibration group (n = 17) or a control group (n = 18). The participants in the vibration group applied vibration locally with frequencies between 25 and 45 Hz, and accelerations between 1.71 and 3.58g. Muscle strength and muscle mass, bone density, and physical performance were assessed at baseline and after 6-month vibration intervention.


Fifty postmenopausal women between 66 and 88 years volunteered to participate in the study. The inclusion criteria were (a) age above 65 years, (b) free from medications known to affect bone metabolism or muscle strength, (c) obtained approval after an extensive medical examination by a general practitioner, and (d) free from hip prosthesis. Participants were excluded if they met any of the following criteria: severe heart and vascular diseases or neurological disorders, such as Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, and peripheral neuropathy. After an extensive medical screening, 35 postmenopausal women met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the study. The participants were randomly assigned to a vibration group (n = 17) or a control group (n = 18) using computer-generated random numbers (Figure 1). None of the participants were engaged in another training program, or in regular organized sports or other physical activities. All participants gave written informed consent after receiving both verbal and written information about the study and its possible risks. The study was approved by the Leuven University Human Ethics Committee according to the declaration of Helsinki.

Figure 1
Figure 1:
Flow chart of the participants.


Vibration Equipment

Custom-made vibration devices were specially designed for this study (Figure 2). Each device consisted of 1 control unit, 4 vibrators connected to the control unit, and a medical approved power supplier (24V–2.9A; Powerbox, Gnesta, Sweden). Each vibrator had an encoder. The rotating element inside the vibrators was a cylindrical brass part with a diameter of 20 mm and a thickness of 8 mm (weight: 0.022 g). The frequency of the rotating element was continuously adjustable between 25 and 45 Hz, which resulted in peak acceleration between 1.71 and 3.58g as measured by accelerometer MEMS, SMB380 (Microelectromechanical system; Bosch Sensortec GmbH, Reutlingen, Germany) in a separate measurement in 5 young adults lying supine and with the vibration devices on the body in the same way as during training. The accelerations in different combinations of vibration parameters were recorded for a period of 60 seconds each. The frequency, the duration, and the number of bouts, as well as the duration of the rest periods, were adjustable and displayed on the control unit. The vibrators were attached to the body by a strap. The motor control of the vibrators ensured that the set vibration parameters remained constant independently of the applied strap pressure. Because of the structure of the underlying limb, the centrifugal forces on the body were buffed (mass-spring system). The motor control of the vibrators ensured that the set vibration parameters remained constant independently of the applied buffing by the body.

Figure 2
Figure 2:
Control unit and vibrators.


The participants were instructed how to apply the vibrators in a supine-lying position once per day, 5 d·wk−1 for a period of 6 months, at home. All participants applied the vibrators on the midthigh (m. quadriceps) and around the hip (m. gluteus maximus and m. gluteus medius) using bandages. The required vibration program was set up before each training period. After the end of the daily setup training period, the vibration device stopped automatically. Every week, 1 training session was supervised by a researcher to ensure that the training protocol was followed correctly. The compliance rate was recorded by the participant using a calendar book.

During the 6-month vibration intervention period, training loading increased progressively according to the overload principle by increasing the duration and numbers of bouts and shortening the rest periods, as well as increasing the acceleration and the frequency of the training (Table 1).

Table 1
Table 1:
Characteristics of the vibration training program.

The first 11 weeks, vibrators were applied on each side—1 on the hip and 1 on the midthigh, respectively. From 12th week till the end of the 6-month period, 3 vibrators were applied on each side—1 on the hip and 2 on the thigh, respectively, to allow further increase of the training stimulus for the muscle. The vibrators were applied first on the right or left side and then on the other one. The duration of 1 session lasted for a maximum of 30 minutes.

The participants of the control group were not involved in any additional training program and were asked not to change their lifestyle.


To evaluate safety, compliance, and feasibility, all subjects were encouraged to report possible (side) effects or occurrence of falls during each training session. At the end of the study, each participant filled in a questionnaire about the training protocol and the usage of the vibration device.

Bone mineral density, muscular strength, and muscle mass, as well physical performance, were assessed at baseline and at 6 months in both groups. The assessors for BMD and muscle mass were blind to the patients' allocation to both the experimental and the control groups. For practical reasons, it was not possible to have an assessor for muscular strength, shuttle walk test (SWT), and modified physical performance test (mPPT) blinded for group allocation because there was no extra senior evaluator available who was not involved in the training program.

Muscle Strength

Muscle strength was recorded unilaterally on the right side on a motor-driven isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex Medical Systems Inc., New York, NY, USA) by means of a standard protocol of dynamic and isometric tests (38). The reliability of isokinetic dynamometry was assessed in our laboratory in older people aged 65–79 years. High intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) are achieved for the isometric tests (ICC = 0.89–0.99) and isokinetic tests (ICC = 0.95–0.97). For the isotonic tests, ICCs gradually decreased as the external resistance increased (ICCs from 0.89 to 0.83 with external resistance from 0 to 40% respectively).

Isometric Strength

The participants performed a maximal voluntary muscle contraction of the knee extensors, and peak torque (N·m) was recorded. The knee joint angle was set at 30, 60 and 90°.

Isokinetic Strength

The participants performed a series of isokinetic flexion-extension movements against the lever arm of the dynamometer. The velocity was set at 60, 180, and 240°·s−1. The knee extension was initiated at a joint angle of 90° and ended at 160°, and the peak torque was assessed (N·m).

Isotonic Strength

The participants performed several ballistic tests with a resistance of 0, 20, and 40%. The degree of resistance was individually determined as a percentage of the isometric maximum in the knee angle of 90°. The maximal velocity of the lever arm was recorded to determine the ballistic strength. The knee extension was initiated at a joint angle of 90° and ended at 160°. After each extension, the leg was passively returned to the starting position.

Muscle Mass

Muscle mass of the right upper leg was assessed by multislice computed tomography scan (Siemens Sensation 16, Forchcheim, Germany), and the delivered axial slices of legs were analyzed with the program Volume. The test was previously described by our research group and the reliability was tested, which yielded an ICC of 0.99 (2). The summed muscle volume (in cubic centimeters) was analyzed. Measurements were performed in the university hospital and were executed by an expert radiologist.

Bone Mineral Density

Bone mineral density of the right hip was assessed by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using the QDR-4500A device (Hologic, Waltham, MA, USA). Standard positioning was used with anterior–posterior scanning of the proximal femur. The coefficient of variation for total hip DXA measurement in our laboratory is 0.56% (37).

Physical Performance

To evaluate the functional capacity, an mPPT for the elderly was performed. Modified physical performance test includes different timed or graded functional tests described previously (26). Additionally to mPPT, physical fitness was assessed using the SWT, which is a standardized incremental submaximal field walking (33).

Statistical Analyses

Because of the small sample size, between-group and within-group differences in muscle strength, muscle mass, and BMD were tested with nonparametric tests. Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to compare the baseline characteristics of the vibration and the control groups. A Shapiro–Wilkinson W test was used to assess the distribution for muscle strength, muscle mass, and BMD. Additionally, the Cohen's d effect size was calculated based on mean values and SD. For Cohen's d, an effect size below 0.3 is considered as “small” effect, around 0.5 as “medium” effect, and 0.8 to infinity as “large” effect. The significance levels for all analyses were set to p ≤ 0.05. All analyses were executed using the statistical package STATISTICA (STATISTICA, Version 9, StatSoft, DELL, Round Rock, Tex.).



The baseline characteristics of the 2 groups are presented in Table 2. The intervention group's average weight was 9 kg higher than the control group (p < 0.015), and the body mass index (BMI) of the intervention group was 3 kg·m−2 higher compared with controls (p < 0.045).

Table 2
Table 2:
Subjects characteristics at baseline and differences between groups.*†

Two participants in the intervention group did not complete the full training protocol because of reasons unrelated to the training (a) personal reasons (dropped out after 6 weeks of vibration) and (b) surgical intervention (dropped out after 3 weeks of vibration). Two participants in the control group refused to repeat the tests after the 6-month period because of personal reasons. The average compliance with the vibration intervention was excellent (X: 96.5%). All participants tolerated the vibration protocol well, and they did not consider the training as unpleasant. None of subjects reported any adverse effects due to vibration. However, in the questionnaires after the 6-month period, 80% of participants in the vibration group reported that applying the vibrators 5 d·wk−1 was time-consuming and they did not show the willingness to participate in a vibration training program for a longer period.

Effect of the Intervention

No significant differences were observed at baseline between the experimental and the control groups for BMD, muscle strength, muscle mass, fat mass, or physical performance (Table 2).

Muscle Strength

Significant between-group difference after the 6-month local vibration training was found in favor of the vibration group only in isometric knee extension strength of 60° with a net benefit of 13.84% (p = 0.01). No between-group differences were found in the other isometric, isokinetic, and isotonic muscle strength tests (p > 0.05).

The effect size based on between-group differences is presented in Figure 3. The Cohen's d effect size for isometric knee extension strength of 60° was large, +1.02. The effect size of the intervention for the other isometric, isokinetic, and isotonic tests appeared small to medium (0.1–0.8).

Figure 3
Figure 3:
Effect of the intervention presented as Cohen'sd effect size. The effect size is based on between-group differences of the paretic leg. An effect size below 0.3 is considered as “small” effect, around 0.5 as “medium” effect, and 0.8 to infinity as “large” effect. E = extension; F = flexion.

Concerning the within-group differences, isometric strength of 60 and 90° of the knee extensors significantly increased by 12.88% (95% CI, 0.8–20.4; p ≤ 0.05) and 6.61% (95% CI, −1.16 to 15.7; p ≤ 0.05), respectively, in the vibration group after the 6-month local vibration training (Figure 4).

Figure 4
Figure 4:
Mean andSE before (pre) and after (post) 6 months of local vibration training. VIB = vibration group; CON = control group; ISOM = isometric muscle strength; ISOK = isokinetic muscle strength; ISOT = isotonic muscle strength. *Within-group difference: a significant difference between baseline and post measures (p ≤ 0.05).

Isokinetic knee flexion strength of 60 and 180°·s−1 changed significantly over time in the vibration group by 23.00% (95% CI, 0.00–55.6; p ≤ 0.05) and 24.06% (95% CI, 4.91–45.8; p ≤ 0.05), respectively. No within-group differences were found in the other isometric, isokinetic, and isotonic muscle strength tests in either the vibration or the control group (p > 0.05, Figure 4).

Bone Mineral Density

As shown in Table 3, total hip BMD did not significantly change over time in both vibration and control groups, and, additionally, no between-group difference was observed between the 2 groups (p > 0.05).

Table 3
Table 3:
Mean changes and between-group differences in muscle strength, shuttle walk test, and modified physical performance test.*†

Muscle Mass

Total muscle or fat mass volume did not change significantly over time in either the vibration or the control group and no between-group differences were observed between the 2 groups (p > 0.05, Table 3).

Physical Performance

As shown in Table 3, no within-group difference in physical performance, mPPT, or SWT over time was observed in either the vibration or the control group (p > 0.05). Similarly, no between-group differences were found between the intervention and the control groups after the 6-month training period (p > 0.05).


This was the first study to investigate the feasibility, safety, and compliance of a 6-month local vibration applied 5 times a week (30–45 Hz, 1.71–3.58g) in postmenopausal women. We hypothesized that the specific local vibration program would be a feasible and safe training method to improve musculoskeletal performance in postmenopausal women.

Overall, no adverse effects due to local vibration were reported and the training intensity was well tolerated. Although, the participants reported that 5 d·wk−1 training was time-consuming, the average compliance with the intervention was excellent (X: 96.5%). Moreover, the participants did not consider the training as difficult, suggesting that local vibration training may be a feasible training program for postmenopausal women.

The main outcomes of the study indicated that the specific vibration program has potential beneficial effects on some aspects of knee muscle strength but failed to affect bone formation, muscle mass, or physical performance in postmenopausal women.

In this study, a local vibration training applied on the hip and midthigh resulted in an improvement in some aspects of knee isometric and isokinetic muscle strength. Isometric knee extension strength of 60 and 90° increased significantly by 12.88 and 6.61%, respectively, in the vibration group after the 6-month local vibration training. The standardized Cohen's d effect size reflected a small to large mean effect on muscle strength as a result of the vibration intervention, which supports the likelihood of a clinically meaningful effect only on muscle knee strength in a larger randomized controlled trial.

Only very few studies investigated the effect of locally applied vibrations on muscle strength (17,24). In a study by Pietrangelo et al. (24), local vibration training was applied close to the tendon of the quadriceps 1–3 times a week to a group of male and female elderly (65–85 years of age). Twelve weeks of high-frequency local vibration training (frequency, 300 Hz) resulted in a significant improvement between 41.7 and 81.2% in isometric knee extension strength. Vibration frequency used by Pietrangelo et al. was much higher compared with our study (300 Hz to 30–45 Hz); however, they did not report the applied amplitude and acceleration of the vibration and the sample size was very small, which might have contributed to the different findings. In a study by Lapole and Perot (17), 14 days of locally applied vibration (50 Hz, 0.2 mm) directly to the Achilles tendon resulted in a greater triceps surae force production. The authors concluded that the specific local vibration training may be beneficial to persons who are not suitable for WBV training.

In addition, our findings are in line with previously reported WBV studies of the elderly (3,27,38). In the study by Verschueren et al. (38), 6-month WBV (35–40 Hz, 2.28–5.09g) resulted in a 15 and 16% net benefit of isometric and dynamic knee strength in postmenopausal women, respectively. Likewise, in another study with WBV, 12 months of vibration training improved isometric knee strength by 9.4% among older adults (3). Roelants et al. (27) reported a significant increase in isometric (15%) and dynamic (16.1%) knee extensor strength after 6 months of WBV (35–40 Hz, 2.28–5.09g) in the elderly. It has been suggested that vibration training may increase muscle strength by similar mechanisms as during resistance training (4). The first mechanism of adaptation is neural adaptation including an increase in motor unit synchronization, inhibition of the antagonist muscles, or cocontraction of the synergist muscles (8). Strength gain may also increase the ability of motor units to fire briefly at very high rates (22). After several months of training, the changes in the morphological structure of the muscle become dominant (31). However, this study failed to find any changes in muscle mass after 6 months of local vibration training, and therefore the neural adaptations seem to be a more relevant mechanism of strength gain. The supine-lying static position taken by the participants may contribute to the lack of changes in other aspects of isometric and dynamic muscle strength. In addition, older age is associated with a decline in the number of muscle spindles, which leads to a reduced muscle sensitivity to mechanical loading (34).

In addition, present findings showed a significant improvement in isokinetic knee flexion strength of 60 and 180°·s−1 in the vibration group by 23.00 and 24.06%, respectively. This improvement in the flexion knee strength is surprising because the vibration was applied directly to the quadriceps while the participants were in a static supine-lying position. We can only speculate at this time that vibration signal was transmitted to the hamstring muscles in a sufficient way to activate the muscles. The intensity of muscle activation due to vibration reached hereby the threshold for adaptation in the knee flexor muscles but was not high enough in this pilot study to result in significant adaptation in the (stronger) extensor muscles.

This study failed to show any effect of local vibration training on knee isotonic muscle strength (resistance of 20 and 40% of the isometric maximum). In contrast, 1 WBV study did report an improvement in knee-extension speed of movement with an external resistance of 1, 20, 40, and 60% of isometric maximum after 6 months of vibration in postmenopausal women (27). It has been suggested that the vibration training results in a more rapid activation and training of high-threshold motor units (28), which contributes to maximal velocity muscle strength. However, the present findings cannot confirm these suggestions. In addition, the isometric maximum of 90° improved significantly in the vibration group after the local vibration training, which resulted in higher tested resistances (20 and 40%) compared with baseline.

The results of this study failed to show an effect on BMD after 6 months of local vibration training. In contrast to our findings on BMD, a few randomized control trials have shown a significant increase in the BMD of the total hip, femoral neck, and/or lumbar spine after WBV training (11,12,30,38). After 6-month WBV training (35–40 Hz, 2.28–5.09g), Verschueren et al. (38) reported a net benefit of 1.5% BMD at the hip in postmenopausal women. Gusi et al. (11) found a net benefit of 4.3% BMD at the femoral neck in postmenopausal women who followed 8 months of vibration intervention (12.6 Hz, 3.3g: lateral, 0.7g: vertical) in comparison with walking group. Whole-body vibration training with vitamin D supplementation (35–40 Hz, 1.6–2.2g) improved BMD of the hip compared with baseline in postmenopausal women (37). However, vibration intervention did not result in an additional increase in BMD of the hip compared with controls independently of the additional vitamin D supplementation.

Up to our knowledge, this study was the first to assess the effects of locally applied vibration training on BMD. In this study, the lack of changes in bone density may be a result of different factors. The vibration loading was considered as reasonable for postmenopausal women and was based on loadings as induced by WBV training shown before to be effective on bone formation (38). However, the applied frequencies between 30 and 45 Hz and accelerations between 1.71 and 3.58g might not have been optimal to induce higher bone responses. Moreover, while standing on a WBV platform and performing dynamic exercises, the subject experiences both ground reaction and muscle forces that contribute to bone formation (13). However, local vibration training was in a supine-lying static position, and therefore the participants were not exposed to weight-bearing loads, which may explain the lack of changes in bone density. Additionally, fat mass around the hip may alter the transmission of the vibration signal from the vibrators to the bone. Moreover, it may be speculated that the induced muscle forces could alter the damping properties of the muscles and thus alter the transmission of the vibration signal through the body (35). Therefore, the positioning of the vibrators on the hip may not have been optimal enough to reach the target zones sufficiently. A more optimal musculoskeletal response might be achieved if the vibration stimulus is applied in other loading directions. Further studies should quantify the effect of different positions of the local vibration device on musculoskeletal performance.

Our study has limitations, and the results should be interpreted in the context of its design. First, our sample size was small, and we acknowledge that this was an exploratory pilot study with no formal sample size calculation. Moreover, because of the intensive vibration training, it was difficult to recruit more participants who could meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria and who showed a willingness to participate in the trial. Second, we tested only 1 training regime—training 5 d·wk−1, frequency between 30 and 45 Hz, and acceleration between 1.71 and 3.58g. The vibrators were positioned only on the midthigh and around the hip that might not have been an optimal training program. Furthermore, the participants took only a supine-lying static position and they did not perform simultaneously any dynamic exercises. Third, when the findings of this study are interpreted, it should be mentioned that significant differences in weight and BMI were found at baseline between the vibration and the control groups. However, all other baseline tests did not differ between the groups, making them comparable by means of physical performance, BMD, and muscle strength. The manner by which the higher weight influenced the transmission of the vibration signal from the vibrators to the hip cannot be further discussed. Finally, our preliminary findings may only be generalized to a select group of older people and not to younger adults or older men.

Practical Applications

The results of this randomized controlled pilot study indicate the potential of locally applied vibrations to improve different aspects of muscle strength in postmenopausal women. Coaches and practitioners should know that the present training protocol of 6 months locally applied vibration on the hip and midthigh seems a feasible and safe training method for the elderly to improve muscular performance. Local vibration training might be a more adequate training approach for a large segment of the frail elderly who are unable to stand on a WBV platform. Delivering the vibration locally at the regions that are most in need of muscle strengthening might be a more suitable approach.


Authors state that they have no conflicts of interest. The work was not funded by NIH, Welcome Trust, HHMI, or any other. The present work will not benefit any companies or manufactures. This study was supported by a grant from Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium. Project: FWO-G0488-08 and FWO-KN- Clinical trial registration number: NCT01499186.


1. Bassey EJ, Ramsdale SJ. Increase in femoral bone density in young women following high-impact exercise. Osteoporos Int 4: 72–75, 1994.
2. Bogaerts A, Delecluse C, Claessens AL, Coudyzer W, Boonen S, Verschueren SM. Impact of whole-body vibration training versus fitness training on muscle strength and muscle mass in older men: A 1-year randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 62: 630–635, 2007.
3. Bogaerts AC, Delecluse C, Claessens AL, Troosters T, Boonen S, Verschueren SM. Effects of whole body vibration training on cardiorespiratory fitness and muscle strength in older individuals (a 1-year randomised controlled trial). Age Ageing 38: 448–454, 2009.
4. Bosco C, Cardinale M, Tsarpela O. Influence of vibration on mechanical power and electromyogram activity in human arm flexor muscles. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 79: 306–311, 1999.
5. Campbell AJ, Robertson MC, Gardner MM, Norton RN, Buchner DM. Psychotropic medication withdrawal and a home-based exercise program to prevent falls: A randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 47: 850–853, 1999.
6. Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Ensrud KC, Scott JC, Black D. Risk of mortality following clinical fractures. Osteoporos Int 11: 556–561, 2000.
7. Doherty TJ. Invited review: Aging and sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol 95: 1717–1727, 2003.
8. Enoka RM. Neural adaptations with chronic physical activity. J Biomech 30: 447–455, 1997.
9. Forwood MR, Burr DB. Physical activity and bone mass: Exercises in futility? Bone Miner 21: 89–112, 1993.
10. Grove KA, Londeree BR. Bone density in postmenopausal women: High impact vs low impact exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 24: 1190–1194, 1992.
11. Gusi N, Raimundo A, Leal A. Low-frequency vibratory exercise reduces the risk of bone fracture more than walking: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7: 92–99, 2006.
12. Humphries B, Fenning A, Dugan E, Guinane J, MacRae K. Whole-body vibration effects on bone mineral density in women with or without resistance training. Aviat Space Environ Med 80: 1025–1031, 2009.
13. Judex S, Rubin CT. Is bone formation induced by high-frequency mechanical signals modulated by muscle activity? J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 10: 3–11, 2010.
14. Kannus P, Haapasalo H, Sankelo M, Sievanen H, Pasanen M, Heinonen A, Oja P, Vuori I. Effect of starting age of physical activity on bone mass in the dominant arm of tennis and squash players. Ann Intern Med 123: 27–31, 1995.
15. Korpelainen R, Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi S, Heikkinen J, Vaananen K, Korpelainen J. Effect of impact exercise on bone mineral density in elderly women with low BMD: A population-based randomized controlled 30-month intervention. Osteoporos Int 17: 109–118, 2006.
16. Krolner B, Toft B, Pors NS, Tondevold E. Physical exercise as prophylaxis against involutional vertebral bone loss: A controlled trial. Clin Sci (Lond) 64: 541–546, 1983.
17. Lapole T, Perot C. Effects of repeated Achilles tendon vibration on triceps surae force production. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 20: 648–654, 2010.
18. Li WC, Chen YC, Yang RS, Tsauo JY. Effects of exercise programmes on quality of life in osteoporotic and osteopenic postmenopausal women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil 23: 888–896, 2009.
19. Maciaszek J, Osinski W, Szeklicki R, Stemplewski R. Effect of Tai Chi on body balance: Randomized controlled trial in men with osteopenia or osteoporosis. Am J Chin Med 35: 1–9, 2007.
20. McMurdo ME, Mole PA, Paterson CR. Controlled trial of weight bearing exercise in older women in relation to bone density and falls. BMJ 314: 569, 1997.
21. Melton LJ III. How many women have osteoporosis now? J Bone Miner Res 10: 175–177, 1995.
22. Moritani T, deVries HA. Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain. Am J Phys Med 58: 115–130, 1979.
23. Nelson ME, Fiatarone MA, Morganti CM, Trice I, Greenberg RA, Evans WJ. Effects of high-intensity strength training on multiple risk factors for osteoporotic fractures. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 272: 1909–1914, 1994.
24. Pietrangelo T, Mancinelli R, Toniolo L, Cancellara L, Paoli A, Puglielli C, Iodice P, Doria C, Bosco G, D'Amelio L, di Tano G, Fulle S, Saggini R, Fano G, Reggiani C. Effects of local vibrations on skeletal muscle trophism in elderly people: Mechanical, cellular, and molecular events. Int J Mol Med 24: 503–512, 2009.
25. Recker RR, Davies KM, Hinders SM, Heaney RP, Stegman MR, Kimmel DB. Bone gain in young adult women. JAMA 268: 2403–2408, 1992.
26. Reuben DB, Siu AL. An objective measure of physical function of elderly outpatients. The physical performance test. J Am Geriatr Soc 38: 1105–1112, 1990.
27. Roelants M, Delecluse C, Verschueren SM. Whole-body-vibration training increases knee-extension strength and speed of movement in older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 52: 901–908, 2004.
28. Romaiguere P, Vedel JP, Pagni S. Effects of tonic vibration reflex on motor unit recruitment in human wrist extensor muscles. Brain Res 602: 32–40, 1993.
29. Roubenoff R. Sarcopenia and its implications for the elderly. Eur J Clin Nutr 54: 40–47, 2000.
30. Ruan XY, Jin FY, Liu YL, Peng ZL, Sun YG. Effects of vibration therapy on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Chin Med J (Engl) 121: 1155–1158, 2008.
31. Sale DG. Neural adaptation to resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 20: 135–145, 1988.
32. Sinaki M, Brey RH, Hughes CA, Larson DR, Kaufman KR. Balance disorder and increased risk of falls in osteoporosis and kyphosis: Significance of kyphotic posture and muscle strength. Osteoporos Int 16: 1004–1010, 2005.
33. Singh SJ, Morgan MD, Scott S, Walters D, Hardman AE. Development of a shuttle walking test of disability in patients with chronic airways obstruction. Thorax 47: 1019–1024, 1992.
34. Swash M, Fox KP. The effect of age on human skeletal muscle. Studies of the morphology and innervation of muscle spindles. J Neurol Sci 16: 417–432, 1972.
35. Tankisheva E, Jonkers I, Boonen S, Delecluse C, Harry van LG, Druyts H, Spaepen P, Verschueren SM. Transmission of whole body vibration and its effect on muscle activation. J Strength Cond Res 27: 2533–2541, 2013.
36. Tung S, Iqbal J. Evolution, aging, and osteoporosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1116: 499–506, 2007.
37. Verschueren SM, Bogaerts A, Delecluse C, Claessens AL, Haentjens P, Vanderschueren D, Boonen S. The effects of whole-body vibration training and vitamin D supplementation on muscle strength, muscle mass, and bone density in institutionalized elderly women: A 6-month randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res 26: 42–49, 2011.
38. Verschueren SM, Roelants M, Delecluse C, Swinnen S, Vanderschueren D, Boonen S. Effect of 6-month whole body vibration training on hip density, muscle strength, and postural control in postmenopausal women: A randomized controlled pilot study. J Bone Miner Res 19: 352–359, 2004.
39. Wolf SL, Barnhart HX, Kutner NG, McNeely E, Coogler C, Xu T. Reducing frailty and falls in older persons: An investigation of Tai Chi and computerized balance training. Atlanta FICSIT group. Frailty and Injuries: Cooperative studies of intervention Techniques. J Am Geriatr Soc 44: 489–497, 1996.

mechanical loading; tonic vibration reflex; safety

Copyright © 2015 by the National Strength & Conditioning Association.