Rugby league is a contact team sport that is intermittent in nature, with periods of high-intensity activity (e.g., high-speed running, sprinting, and physical collisions) and low-intensity recovery (e.g., standing, walking, and jogging) performed over two 40-minute halves. Depending on playing position, players cover distances in the range of 3,000–8,000 m during a match (27,33,43). Over the course of a rugby league season, players are required to compete on a weekly basis over a 7- to 8-month period, with generally 5–10 days between matches. After games, players need to recover quickly to recommence training and prepare for the next scheduled game. For this reason, monitoring fatigue and subsequent recovery from competition is thought to be important so that appropriate training activities and recovery strategies can be implemented.
Given the demands imposed during matches, players typically experience immediate and prolonged symptoms of fatigue, defined as sensations of tiredness and associated decrements in muscular performance and function (1). Recent studies have investigated the fatigue induced by a single rugby league match and the time course of subsequent recovery (29–32). These studies have reported increases in neuromuscular fatigue (assessed via countermovement jumps [CMJ]) for up to 48 hours (29,32), perceptual fatigue (assessed by a questionnaire) for up to 4 days (29) and elevated plasma creatine kinase (CK) for up to 5 days (30,31) after a match. Although the existing literature suggests there is significant fatigue induced by a game of rugby league, there is currently no evidence examining fatigue over a series of rugby league matches. During the competitive season there are intensified periods of competition where players are required to compete in multiple matches within a week, accentuating the need for recovery. During these periods of intensified competition when players are not afforded the 5 days required to fully recover from a game, fatigue is likely to accumulate. Despite this, there is currently no research pertaining to the demands imposed on rugby league players during intensified periods of competition and the effect on fatigue, recovery, and match performance. Such information is vital to gain an understanding into the nature and time course of cumulative fatigue during a period of intensified rugby league competition. This will allow coaching staff to manage player fatigue more effectively.
Several studies have shown that assessing lower body neuromuscular performance (11,29,32,42) may be a useful measure for monitoring recovery and fatigue in rugby league players. Despite this, these markers give no indication of fatigue in the upper body. This paucity of information appears surprising given the large involvement of the upper body musculature in the frequent collisions that occur during competition (2,42). As such, it would appear important to assess upper body neuromuscular function when monitoring fatigue and recovery from competition.
Although studies from other team sports have found residual fatigue to compromise performance (10,36), the occurrence of cumulative fatigue during a period of intensified competition and its effects on subsequent match performance in rugby league are yet to be elucidated. With this in mind, the aim of this study was to (a) determine the physiological and perceptual responses to an intensified period of rugby league competition and (b) determine whether match performance in rugby league players is compromised in the presence of cumulative fatigue. We hypothesized that fatigue and muscle damage would accumulate over the competition period and match performance would deteriorate as the competition progressed.
Experimental Approach to the Problem
To test our hypotheses, rugby league players were monitored over an intensified 3-game competition spanning 5 days. The dependent variables assessed were neuromuscular fatigue, blood CK response, perceptual well-being, and match performance. To determine the neuromuscular responses to competition, peak force and peak power from the upper body and lower body neuromuscular fatigue were assessed by players performing plyometric press-ups (PPs) and CMJs on a force platform. These 2 tests are simple to administer and are similar to movements experienced during competition. Moreover, these movements are unlikely to compromise recovery from competition. The whole-blood CK response was examined to indirectly assess the skeletal muscle damage induced by competition. Creatine kinase is widely used as an indirect marker of skeletal muscle damage; assessing the CK response allows comparisons to be made with the existing literature. Perceptual fatigue was quantified by means of questionnaires to determine player well-being. Previous research (29) has shown this measure to be useful in measuring subjective feelings of fatigue after competitive rugby league matches. Match performance was measured during each game via video analysis and global positioning system (GPS) monitoring. The GPS analysis allowed player movements to be objectively and reliably tracked over the course of the competition. Video analysis allowed vital game statistics to be assessed over the course of the competition. Physical performance measures derived from the GPS units included distance covered, distance covered at high and low intensities, and accelerations (both absolute and relative). Offensive and defensive statistics were coded from the videos of each game. Offensive statistics included the number of carries, decoy and support runs, and meters per carry. Defensive statistics included completed, missed, ineffective, and successful tackles and tackles per minute of match play. These measures from both video analysis and GPS allowed match performance to be assessed over the 3 games and therefore determine whether performance changed over the course of the competition.
Seven (backs, n = 3; forwards, n = 4) amateur male rugby league players (mean ± SE, age 21.7 ± 0.35 years; body mass 87.5 ± 3.47 kg; and height 180.5 ± 1.51 cm) competing in an international student rugby league competition over a 5-day period volunteered to take part in the study. The competition took place in April; all the players had been training and competing in weekly fixtures with their respective teams for 7 months preceding the tournament. All the players were free from injury at the time of testing, and only the players who competed in each game of the competition were included in the study. Before the study, the players attended a presentation and received an information sheet outlining the experimental procedures, and the associated risks and benefits of participation. Written informed consent was obtained from each player, and all the players were free to withdraw from the study at any time without penalty. The University of Chester's ethical review board and Scotland Rugby League approved all experimental procedures.
Each player competed in 3 games over a 5-day period; there was exactly 48 hours between each game. Over the 3 games, the team won 1 and lost 2 fixtures, scoring 80 points and conceding 104. The games were played at the same time of day (19:00 hours) on the same outdoor floodlit pitch (temperature: 10.3 ± 1.5° C; humidity: 80.3 ± 7.6%). Baseline measures for neuromuscular fatigue, muscle damage, and perceptual fatigue were taken 36 hours before game 1 between 08:00and 10:00 hours after each player getting 8–10 hours of sleep. Subsequent measures were obtained every morning at the same time under the same conditions for the next 6 days. In addition, neuromuscular fatigue and CK were assessed within 2 hours after each of the 3 games (22:00–23:00 hours). Match performance was assessed via video and GPS analysis of each game. The players were asked to maintain their normal diet in the lead-up to the competition and throughout the competition. A schematic representation of the experimental protocol and competition schedule are shown in Table 1.
Upper and Lower Body Neuromuscular Fatigue
A PP and CMJ were used to detect upper and lower body neuromuscular fatigue, respectively. Both exercises were performed on a force platform (Force Platform, Ergotest Innovation, Porsgrunn, Norway) sampling at 100 Hz connected to a laptop (Dell Inspiron 9100, Dell, United Kingdom); data were analyzed using software provided by the manufacturer (MuscleLab 4020e, Ergotest Innovation) for peak power and peak force. Before assessment, the players were habituated with procedures, and they performed a standardized warm-up consisting of dynamic stretches and plyometrics for both the upper and lower body lasting approximately 2 minutes. The players were randomly divided into 2 groups; half of the players performed the PP followed by the CMJ, and the other half of the players performed the exercises in reverse order; this order was maintained for all testing sessions. For the PP, the players were asked to start in a press-up position with their hands on the force platform in a self-selected position and arms extended. On the experimenter's signal, the players were required to lower their body by flexing their elbows to a self-selected depth before extending the elbows as fast as possible so that their hands left the platform. For the CMJ, the players were instructed to keep their hands on their hips for the entire jump and to jump as high as possible. As reported previously (10,29), the players received no instruction as to the depth of the countermovement performed before the concentric phase of the jump. The players performed 2 practice attempts of both PP and CMJ before performing a single effort of each that was recorded. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the PP was 0.86 and 0.86 for peak power and peak force, respectively, and for the CMJ, it was 0.98 and 0.97 for peak power and peak force, respectively.
Whole-blood CK activity was assessed from a fingertip capillary sample with the player in a seated position. After prewarming of the hand to approximately 42° C, a 30-μl sample of blood was taken and subsequently analyzed using a colorimetric assay procedure (Reflotron, Boehringer Mannheim, Germany). Before each testing session, quality control (calibration) measurements were undertaken, according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The “normal” reference range for CK activity, as provided by the manufacturer using this method, is 24–195 IU·L−1.
During competition, player movements were monitored via GPS units sampling at 10 Hz (Team 6.5, Catapult Sports, Victoria, Australia) fitted within a custom-made vest. The units also included triaxial accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers sampling at 100 Hz to provide information on collisions. Each player was fitted with the GPS vest before the pregame warm-up. After the warm-up, and approximately 15 minutes before kick-off, the GPS unit was switched on and inserted into a padded compartment at the rear of the vest so that it sat between the shoulder blades in the upper thoracic-spine region. The GPS unit was switched off immediately after each game. Data were subsequently downloaded to a laptop (Dell Inspiron 1545) and analyzed using software provided by the manufacturer (Logan Plus, Version 4.7, Catapult Sports). Nonplaying minutes were omitted from the analysis. Data were categorized into movement speed bands representing low- (0–17 km·h−1) and high-speeds (>17.1 km·h−1), and collision intensity bands corresponding to mild, moderate, and heavy (17). Maximal accelerations were defined as changes in velocity >2.78 m·s−2. Previous research studies have found these units to be reliable when quantifying movements that are commonplace during rugby league competition (5,8,20).
In addition to the GPS analysis, each game was filmed using a Sony DCR-HC51 video camera (Sony, London, United Kingdom). The camera was positioned on a tripod at the top of the main stand of the stadium on the halfway line so that the entire playing field could be filmed. The zoom function was set so that there was a field of view of approximately 10 m around the ball at all times. The games were analyzed using a simple hand notation analysis procedure. The performance variables analyzed are described in Table 2 and procedures outlined previously (21,37). The test-retest reliability of the analysis was assessed by reanalyzing the first game 4 weeks apart. The average ICC for the variables assessed was 0.92, ranging from 0.79 to 0.99.
Subjective perceptions of well-being were measured using a previously used psychological questionnaire (29). The questionnaire rated feelings of fatigue, sleep quality, general muscle soreness, stress levels, and mood, on a 1–5 Likert scale with 0.5-point increments. Each score was summated to provide an overall well-being score with a higher score suggesting greater well-being. The questionnaire was completed each morning upon waking between 08.00 and 10.00 AM (Table 1). Similar scales have been shown to have good reliability and validity (14).
Session Rating of Perceived Exertion
Session rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was obtained within 30 minutes after each game using a modified RPE scale (15). Match load was calculated by multiplying the RPE score with the playing minutes. This method for quantifying load has been previously shown to have high test-retest reliability in rugby league players (17,26).
Differences in muscle damage, neuromuscular fatigue, match performance, and perceived wellness were compared using traditional significance testing and using more practical statistical tests based on the real-world relevance of the findings (4,9,24). Analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Changes in CK, neuromuscular fatigue, perceived wellness, and match performance were assessed using repeated measures analysis of variance. If significant main effects were found, Bonferroni post hoc analyses were performed to locate the differences. Cohen's effect size (ES) statistic with 95% confidence intervals was used to determine the practical significance of observations (9). Effect sizes of <0.09, 0.10–0.49, 0.50–0.79, and >0.80 were considered trivial, small, moderate, and large, respectively (9). The ICCs were used to determine the test-retest reliability of the dependent variables. All data are reported as mean ± SE; the significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05.
Lower Body Neuromuscular Fatigue
Moderate reductions in peak power during the CMJ were observed at 12 (p > 0.05; ES = −0.70 [−1.25 to −0.20]) and 36 hours after game 1 (i.e., 12 hours before game 2; p < 0.001; ES = −0.73 [−1.28 to −0.20]). No reductions in peak force during the CMJ were observed at any time point after game 1 (p > 0.05). Neuromuscular fatigue during the CMJ had not recovered by game 2 as peak power remained lower than baseline at 2 hours (p < 0.01; ES = −0.6 [−1.16 to −0.10]), 12 hours (p < 0.05; ES = −1.07 [−1.64 to −0.50]), and 36 hours (p < 0.05; ES = −1.09 [−1.67 to −0.50]) after game 2. Once again, there were only trivial and small reductions in peak force at 2 hours (p > 0.05; ES = −0.01 [−0.54–0.50]), 12 hours (p > 0.05; ES = −0.20 [−0.74–0.30]), and 36 hours (p > 0.05; ES = −0.18 [−0.71–0.40]) after game 2 (Figures 1 and 2).
Upper Body Neuromuscular Fatigue
There were small to moderate reductions in upper body peak power at 2 (p > 0.05; ES = −0.017 [−0.70–0.40]), 12 (p > 0.05; ES = −0.54 [−1.09–0.00]) and 36 hours (p > 0.05; ES = −0.55 [−1.09–0.00]) after game 1. There were no changes in peak force at 2 (p > 0.05; ES = 0.66 [0.11–1.20]), 12 (p > 0.05; ES = 0.02 [−0.51–0.60]), and 36 hours (p > 0.05; ES = −0.06 [−0.61–0.50]) after game 1 (Figures 3 and 4). After game 2, peak power was significantly lower than baseline 12 hours (p < 0.05, ES = −1.11 [−1.69 to −0.50]) after the match. There were nonsignificant, but moderate to large reductions in peak power 2 hours (p > 0.05, ES = −0.74 [−1.29 to −0.20]), and 36 hours (p > 0.05; ES = −0.95 [−1.51 to −0.40]) after game 2. Peak force for the PP was lower than baseline at 2 (p < 0.01; ES = −0.89 [−1.49 to −0.30]), 12 (p < 0.05; ES = −0.63 [−1.18 to −0.10]), and 36 hours (p < 0.05; ES = −0.72 [−1.28 to −0.20]) after game 2. Furthermore, peak force at 36 hours after game 2 was significantly lower than peak force 12 hours after game 1 (p < 0.05; ES = −0.78 [−1.39 to −0.40]).
The whole-blood CK response to competition is highlighted in Figure 5. There was a significant increase in CK at 12 (p < 0.01; ES = 2.32 [1.63–3.00]) and 36 hours after game 1 (p < 0.05; ES = 2.01 [1.36–2.70]), and 12 (p < 0.05; ES = 2.14 [1.47–2.68]) and 36 hours after game 2 (p < 0.05; ES = 1.36 [0.77–2.00]). In addition, CK activity 12 hours after game 2 was significantly greater than CK 12 hours before game 2 (p < 0.05; ES = 0.64 [0.13–1.20]). Although not significant, there were large differences in CK observed at 2 hours after game 1 (p > 0.05; ES = 1.4) and 2 hours after game 2 (p > 0.05; ES = 1.87 [1.23–2.50]).
Total well-being scores for each day of the competition are shown in Figure 6. After game 1, there was a significant decrease in total well-being (p < 0.05; ES = −1.56 [−2.64 to −0.50]) at 12 hours compared with baseline. Although total well-being was not significantly greater than baseline at 12 hours before game 2, the difference was of large practical significance (p > 0.05; ES = −0.62[−1.64 to –0.40]). After game 2, total well-being was significantly lower than baseline at 12 (p < 0.05; ES = −1.65 [−2.74 to −0.60]) and 36 hours (p < 0.05; ES = −1.14 [−2.19 to −0.10]) postmatch. Perceptions of fatigue were significantly increased after game 1, and this increase persisted for the remainder of the competition period (12 hours after game 1, p < 0.01; ES = −1.71 [−2.34 to −1.10]; 12 hours before game 2, p < 0.05; ES = −0.76 [−1.31 to −0.60]; 12 hours after game 2, p < 0.01; ES = −1.30 [−1.88 to −0.70]; 36 hours after game 2, p < 0.01; ES = −0.91 [−1.47 to −0.40]). There were significant and large increases in general muscle soreness 12 hours after game 1 (p < 0.01; ES = −2.00 [−2.61 to −1.40]), and 12 hours after game 2 (p < 0.01; ES = −1.53 [−2.09 to −1.00]). Nonsignificant but moderate and large increases in general muscle soreness were observed 12 hours before game 2 (p > 0.05; ES = −0.90 [−1.42 to −0.40]), and 36 hours after game 2 (p > 0.05; ES = −0.68 [−1.19 to 0.20]).
The match performance variables for each of the 3 games are summarized in Table 3.
There was a large increase in the percentage of distance covered at low running speeds between games 1 and 3 (p > 0.05; ES = 1.29 [0.70–1.90]), and games 2 and 3 (p < 0.05; ES = 1.82 [1.18–2.50]). Concomitantly, there was a large decrease in the absolute and relative distance covered at high running speeds between games 1 and 3 (absolute: p > 0.05; ES = −1.25 [−1.84 to −0.70]; relative: p > 0.05; ES = −1.29 [−2.45 to −1.20]) and games 2 and 3 (absolute: p < 0.05; ES = −1.25 [−1.84 to −0.70]; relative: p < 0.05; ES = −1.82 [−1.88 to −0.70]). Moreover, there were large reductions (p > 0.05; ES = −0.88 [−1.44 to −0.30]) in the number of maximal accelerations per minute between games 1 and 3. There were no other significant changes in general performance variables over the competition period (Table 3).
The percentage of successful tackles was reduced (p > 0.05; ES = −0.59 [−1.14–0.00]) and ineffective tackles increased (p > 0.05; ES = 0.67 [0.12–1.21]) between games 1 and 3. The difference in tackles per minute between game 1 and 2 (p > 0.05; ES = −0.41 [−0.13–1.00]) and game 1 and 3 (p > 0.05; ES = −0.24 [−0.73–0.30]) was small to moderate in magnitude. No other changes in defensive performances were observed across matches.
The average meters per carry were significantly reduced in games 2 (p < 0.05; ES = −0.62 [−1.17 to −0.10]) and 3 (p < 0.05; ES = −0.67 [−1.22 to −0.10]) when compared with those in game 1. There was a large increase (p > 0.05; ES = 1.60 [0.98–2.20]) in the number of decoy runs from game 1 to game 3. No other changes in offensive performances were observed across matches.
Rating of Perceived Exertion
Table 3 shows the RPE and game load data for each match during the competition. There was no change in RPE between games 1 and 2 (p > 0.05; ES = 0.05 [−0.48–0.06]), but there were small increases in RPE between games 2 and 3 (p > 0.05; ES = 0.36 [−0.18–0.90]) and games 1 and 3 (p > 0.05; ES = 0.46 [−0.08–1.00]). There were similar, nonsignificant increases in game load between games 1 and 2 (p > 0.05; ES = 0.14 [−0.40–0.70]), 2 and 3 (p > 0.05; ES = 0.05 [−0.49–0.60]) and games 1 and 3 (p > 0.05; ES = 0.17 [−0.36–0.70]).
Although previous studies have determined fatigue and recovery after single games of rugby league (29–32,42), this investigation is the first to study fatigue and performance during an intensified period of competition. This study confirmed our hypotheses and found neuromuscular fatigue, perceptual fatigue, and markers of muscle damage to accumulate over a 3-game intensified rugby league competition. Furthermore, the cumulative fatigue appeared to compromise high-intensity running, maximal accelerations, and defensive performance in the final game of the competition. These results suggest that when players do not receive adequate time to recover between matches, then fatigue will accumulate and compromise vital aspects of match performance.
Moderate reductions in CMJ power below baseline values were seen 12 hours after game 1; this reduction became larger in magnitude as the tournament progressed. There were no meaningful reductions in CMJ peak force at any time point throughout the competition period. Such findings are consistent with previous research (32) and the notion of preferential disruption to type 2 muscle fibers during muscle damaging exercise (6,16), resulting in changes in the force-velocity relationship toward slower muscle. Indeed, evidence of tissue disruption is supported by the very large increases in whole-blood CK observed throughout the competition. This finding may also reflect that maximal strength, as opposed to peak power, is affected less by delayed onset muscle soreness and the inflammatory response (7). Alternatively, the maintenance of peak force may be because of a greater involvement of the lower body in high velocity movements as opposed to high force movements during competition (19,22,43). These findings suggest that rugby league competition compromises the velocity of lower body movements rather than the ability to generate force. Consequently, CMJ variables incorporating a velocity component are more sensitive at detecting fatigue in rugby league players and offer greater utility as a monitoring tool.
This is the first study to assess upper body neuromuscular fatigue after rugby league matches. Peak power and peak force were unchanged after game 1, with moderate reductions immediately after game 2 and the magnitude of fatigue increasing as players approached game 3. These results indicate that there is a significant amount of upper body fatigue induced by an intensified period of rugby league competition and that the time course and mechanisms of upper body fatigue during a rugby league tournament differs from that of the lower body. The distinct movements performed during a match by the upper and lower body could contribute to the disparity in fatigue. For example, the lower body typically performs lower force, higher velocity movements during competition (e.g., running and jumping), whereas the upper body is involved in higher force, lower velocity movements (e.g., tackles and wrestles). Moreover, the greater number of physical contacts involving the upper body compared with the lower body (2,42) suggests that upper body fatigue in the days after a match could be influenced by soreness or muscle damage caused by blunt force trauma. Indeed, previous research suggests that the muscle damage response to rugby competition is linked to physical collisions (13,38,39,42). Taken together, these results indicate that monitoring upper body fatigue after and during intensified periods of competition is important in rugby league players.
There were large increases in CK at 2, 12, and 36 hours after each game, which is similar to findings reported elsewhere in professional rugby league players (30,31,42). The CK response in this study peaked at 12 hours after competition. This is in contrast to the results of previous studies that reported CK activity peaked 24 hours after match play (30,31,42). The reason for this disparity could be because of methodological differences. We only assessed CK 12 and 36 hours after competition and, therefore, may have missed the true peak. Another possible explanation could be because of the lower level of competition in this study, which induced less muscle damage to those reported previously from elite competition (30,31,42). Despite this, the current findings suggest that a subelite game of rugby league induces significant muscle tissue damage and that CK increases cumulatively when there is only 48 hours between 3 competitive matches. Furthermore, the CK response shows a temporal relationship with the reductions in neuromuscular function during the competition period. Therefore, it seems plausible that muscle damage observed in this study contributed to the deterioration in neuromuscular function (3,25,32,34). Despite this, the mechanisms responsible for the increases in CK cannot be ascertained in this investigation. Traditionally, it is believed that eccentric muscle actions (e.g., decelerations) are largely responsible for exercise-induced muscle damage (35). However, recent research also suggests that increases in circulating CK are proportional to the number of physical collisions experienced during rugby matches (13,38,39,42). Finally, the metabolic stress imposed by prolonged, high-intensity exercise periods (40) over several days of competition might have also contributed to the increases in circulating CK. It is likely that a combination of these 3 mechanisms explain the increases in blood CK over the 5-day competition.
Players' perceptions of well-being were progressively reduced during the 3-day competition and are in agreement with the results of studies reporting disturbed psychological states after periods of intensified training (11,23). These data corroborate the neuromuscular and muscle damage responses to an intensified period of competition, suggesting that when players have not fully recovered between matches, fatigue will accumulate. An increase in perceived muscle soreness and fatigue could increase perceived effort and reduce the ability to perform exercise. Indeed, in this study, despite reductions in distances covered and locomotive rates, session RPE for each game showed small increases as the competition progressed. Such findings are consistent with an altered sense of effort and impaired central drive, stimulated by the increases in muscle soreness and perceived fatigue (11,23,28,41). Therefore, reductions in neuromuscular and match performances in the latter stages of the tournament might have been mediated by decreased central drive. Consequently, coaches should acknowledge the increase and time course of muscle soreness and perceptual fatigue after a match, and the potential impact on a player's exercise tolerance. Given the sensitivity and simplicity, these findings support the use of perceptual questionnaires on a daily basis as a monitoring tool to inform coaches and guide training practices, particularly during periods of intensified competition.
The match demands analysis (Table 3) revealed a large increase in the relative distance covered in low speed activity during game 3 and a concomitant decrease in high-speed running. In addition, there were practically meaningful differences in the number of maximal accelerations, number of ineffective tackles, and the percentage of successful tackles in game 3 compared with those of the previous matches. The time course of many of these changes is in line with the neuromuscular, muscle damage and perceptual well-being results exhibited after game 2. The players were able to maintain performance between games 1 and 2, but after game 2, because fatigue accumulated, performance deteriorated. Research in rugby league players has shown that CMJ height and squat jump relative power are correlated with sprint performance over 5, 10, and 30 m (12). As such, it may be that as CMJ peak power deteriorated, so did the ability to perform high-intensity movements during game 3. With this in mind, to maintain peak performance, it appears important for coaches to ensure that lower body power production is not compromised before the competition.
The decrements in defensive performance seen in game 3 may also be linked to the changes in neuromuscular function after game 2. Indeed, research has shown that high-intensity activity, similar to that experienced in competition, compromises tackling performance (18). In addition, lower body power is an important prerequisite for tackling ability (21). As such, it is possible that the decrements in upper and lower body neuromuscular function and overall increases in fatigue contributed to the decrements in defensive performance seen in game 3. A reduction in lower body power could result in players being unable to position themselves quickly enough in defense, or use sufficient leg drive to execute successful tackles. The changes in upper body peak force may also contribute to the attenuation in tackling performance seen in game 3. Previous research has not investigated upper body neuromuscular function and tackling ability; however, given the large involvement of the upper body during tackles (2,42), it is likely to be important. Tackling often involves slower movements where players are required to generate high forces to “win” the tackle contest. As such, a decrease in force-generating abilities of the upper body could be a contributing factor in the attenuation of defensive performance seen in game 3. With this in mind, it appears important that neuromuscular function is not compromised before competition. The findings from this study suggest that neuromuscular fatigue may compromise running performance and tackling ability. Therefore, the assessment of neuromuscular fatigue may be useful in helping to determine readiness to compete in matches.
There are a number of practical applications from this study that are of relevance to coaches and support staff. Over an intensified period of rugby league competition when there is insufficient time to recover between games, fatigue accumulates. High levels of residual fatigue before competition may compromise high-intensity activities during match play such as high-speed running, maximal accelerations, and tackling. As such, careful monitoring strategies should be implemented to determine players' readiness for training and competition.
Variables obtained from a CMJ that include a velocity component appear more sensitive in detecting fatigue during a rugby league competition and, therefore, offer great utility as a monitoring tool. There is a significant involvement of the upper body during rugby league competition. The PP appears to be a suitable measure for determining upper body neuromuscular fatigue after competition. The force component of this movement appears to be compromised by rugby league competition to a greater extent than velocity. As such, assessing upper body force from a PP may prove to be a sensitive measure for assessing upper body neuromuscular fatigue.
Questionnaires that assess perceptions of fatigue and well-being are useful measures for monitoring fatigue and recovery during competition. These questionnaires are noninvasive, simple, and cost-effective measures that can be used at all levels of competition and can provide useful information on individual player's exercise tolerance.
The authors would like to thank the Scotland Rugby League and the coaching staff of the team for allowing them to collect the data. Special thanks go to the players who gave their time to participate in the study. None of the authors have any conflicts of interest with regards to the content of this study. The results of the present study do not constitute endorsement of any product by the authors or the National Strength and Conditioning Association .
1. Abiss CR, Laursen PB. Models to explain fatigue during prolonged endurance cycling. Sports Med 35: 865–898, 2005.
2. Austin D, Gabbett TJ, Jenkins D. Tackling a professional rugby league. J Strength Cond Res 25: 1659–1663, 2011.
3. Avela J, Kyrola inen H, Komi PV, Rama D. Reduced reflex sensitivity persists several days after long-lasting stretch-shortening cycle exercise. J Appl Physiol 86: 1292–1300, 1999.
4. Batterham AM, Hopkins WG. Making meaningful inferences about magnitudes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 1: 50–57, 2006.
5. Boyd LJ, Ball K, Aughey RJ. The reliability of MinimaxX accelerometers for measuring physical activity in Australian football. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 6: 311–321, 2011.
6. Brockett CL, Morgan DL, Gregory JE, Proske U. Damage in different types of motor units following repeated active lengthening of the medial gastrocnemius muscle of the cat. J Appl Physiol 92: 1104–1110, 2002.
7. Byrne C, Twist C, Eston RG. Neuromuscular function following exercise-induced muscle damage
: Theoretical and applied implications. Sports Med 34: 49–69, 2004.
8. Castellano J, Casamichana D, Calleja-Gonzalez J, San Roman J, Ostojic SM. Reliability and accuracy of 10 Hz GPS devices for short-distance exercise. J Sports Sci Med 10: 233–234, 2011.
9. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1998.
10. Cormack SJ, Newton RU, McGuigan R, Cormie P. Neuromuscular and endocrine responses of elite players during an Australian rules football season. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 3: 439–445, 2008.
11. Coutts AJ, Reaburn P, Piva TJ, Rowsell GJ. Monitoring for overreaching in rugby league players. Eur J Appl Physiol 99: 313–324, 2007.
12. Cronin JB, Hansen KT. Strength and power predictors of sports speed. J Strength Cond Res 19: 349–357, 2005.
13. Cunniffe B, Hore AJ, Whitcome DM, Jones KP, Baker JS, Davies B. Time course of changes in immuneoendocrine markers following an international rugby game. Eur J Appl Physiol 108: 113–122, 2010.
14. De Vries J, Michielsen HJ, Van Heck GL. Assessment of fatigue among working people: A comparison of six questionnaires. Occup Environ Med 60: 10–15, 2003.
15. Foster C, Florhaug JA, Franlin J, Gottschall L, Hrovatin LA, Parker S, Doleshal P, Dodge C. A new approach to monitoring exercise training. J Strength Cond Res 15: 109–115, 2001.
16. Fridén J, Lieber RL. Structural and mechanical basis of exercise-induced muscle injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 24: 521–530, 1992.
17. Gabbett TJ. Influence of training and match intensity on injuries in rugby league. J Sports Sci 22: 409–417, 2004.
18. Gabbett TJ. Influence of fatigue on tackling technique in rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res 22: 625–632, 2008.
19. Gabbett TJ. Sprinting patterns of national rugby league competition. J Strength Cond Res 26: 121–130, 2012.
20. Gabbett TJ, Jenkins DG, Abernethy B. Physical collisions and injury during professional rugby league skills training. J Sci Med Sport 13: 578–583, 2010.
21. Gabbett TJ, Jenkins DG, Abernethy B. Physical collisions and injury in professional rugby league match-play. J Sci Med Sport 14: 210–215, 2011.
22. Gabbett TJ, Jenkins DG, Abernethy B. Physical demands of professional rugby league training and competition using microtechnology. J Sci Med Sport 15: 80–86, 2012.
23. Halson SL, Bridge MW, Meeusen R, Busschaert B, Gleeson M, Jones DA, Jeukendrup AE. Time course of performance changes and fatigue markers during intensified training in cyclists. J Appl Physiol 93: 947–956, 2002.
24. Hopkins WG. Probabilities of clinical or practical significance. Sport Sci (serial online) 6. Available at: sportsci.org/jour/0201/wghprob.htm
. Accessed August 13, 2011.
25. Horita T, Komi PV, Nicol C, Kyrolainen H. Stretch-shortening cycle fatigue: Interactions among joint stiffness, reflex, and muscle mechanical performance in the drop jump. Eur J Appl Physiol 73: 393–403, 1996.
26. Killen NM, Gabbett TJ, Jenkins DG. Training loads and incidence of injury during the preseason in professional rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res 24: 2079–2084, 2010.
27. King T, Jenkins D, Gabbett TJ. A time-motion analysis of professional rugby league match-play. J Sports Sci 27: 213–219, 2009.
28. Marcora SM, Staiano W, Manning V. Mental fatigue impairs physical performance in humans. J Appl Physiol 106: 857–864, 2009.
29. McLean BD, Coutts AJ, Kelly V, McGuigan MR, Cormack SJ. Neuromuscular, endocrine, and perceptual fatigue responses during different length between-match microcycles in professional rugby league players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 5: 367–383, 2010.
30. McLellan CP, Lovell DI, Gass GC. Creatine kinase and endocrine responses of elite players pre, during, and post rugby league match play. J Strength Cond Res 24: 2908–2919, 2010.
31. McLellan CP, Lovell DI, Gass GC. Biochemical and endocrine responses to impact and collision during elite rugby league match play. J Strength Cond Res 25: 1553–1562, 2011.
32. McLellan CP, Lovell DI, Gass GC. Markers of post-match fatigue in professional rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res 25: 1030–1039, 2011.
33. McLellan CP, Lovell DI, Gass GC. Performance analysis of elite rugby league match play using global positioning systems. J Strength Cond Res 25: 1703–1710, 2011.
34. Nicol C, Komi PV, Horita T, Kyrolainen H, Takala TES. Reduced stretch-reflex sensitivity after exhausting stretch-shortening cycle exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 72: 401–409, 1996.
35. Proske U, Morgan DL. Muscle damage
from eccentric exercise: mechanism, mechanical signs, adaptation and clinical applications. J Physiol 537: 333–345, 2001.
36. Singh TKR, Guelfi KJ, Landers G, Dawson B, Bishop D. A comparison of muscle damage
, soreness and performance following a contact and non-contact team sport activity circuit. J Sci Med Sport 14: 441–446, 2011.
37. Sirotic AC, Knowles H, Catterick C, Coutts AJ. Positional match demands of professional rugby league competition. J Strength Cond Res 25: 3076–3087, 2011.
38. Smart DJ, Gill ND, Beaven CM, Cook CJ, Blazevich AJ. The relationship between changes in interstitial creatine kinase and game-related impacts in rugby union. Br J Sports Med 42:198–201, 2008.
39. Takarada Y. Evaluation of muscle damage
after a rugby match with special reference to tackle plays. Br J Sports Med 37: 416–419, 2003.
40. Tee JC, Bosch AN, Lambert MI. Metabolic consequences of exercise-induced muscle damage
. Sports Med 37: 827–836, 2007.
41. Twist C, Eston RG. The effect of exercise-induced muscle damage
on perceived exertion and cycling endurance performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 105: 559–567, 2009.
42. Twist C, Waldron M, Highton J, Burt D, Daniels M. Neuromuscular, biochemical and perceptual post-match fatigue in professional rugby league forwards and backs. J Sports Sci 30: 359–367, 2012.
43. Waldron M, Twist C, Highton J, Daniels M, Worsfold P. Movement and physiological match demands of elite rugby league using portable global positioning systems. J Sports Sci 29: 1223–1230, 2011.
Keywords:© 2013 National Strength and Conditioning Association
neuromuscular fatigue; muscle damage; recovery; contact sport; match performance