Stock car racing is one of the largest spectator sports in the United States (14). Articles on driver fitness have appeared in popular consumer publications (22) and the racing literature (20). Recently, strength and conditioning practices have been recommended for stock car drivers (10). Although stock car drivers require athletic abilities and experience injuries, the physical demands, injuries, and training practices have not been researched with this population of athletes (10).
Research has yet to examine the physical demands and physiology of stock car racing (6). Nonetheless, a number of studies have evaluated some of these issues with open wheel formula car racing (1,15,16,19,26) and other types of racing such as “national class” (27) and sports cars (3). These studies show that some race car drivers demonstrate heart rates, V[Combining Dot Above]O2, ventilatory volumes, and metabolic response that are similar to those of athletes participating in basketball, boxing, soccer, running, bicycling, and handball (15,16). Heart rates responses range from 142 to 180 b·min−1 (16,19) with energy expenditures that are 8–10 times greater than resting levels while driving in nonracing high-speed conditions in open wheel cars (15).
Driving a race car also appears to require substantial strength. Race car drivers demonstrate trunk flexion and extension force production, leg extension strength, and neck extension strength that is similar to a variety of other athletes (1). Racing also requires the ability to control multiplaner acceleration of the torso, neck, and head and react to acute visual stimuli such as another driver and accidents on the track (1,3,13,19,27). Race car drivers demonstrate better reaction time than controls (3) and superior hand, ankle, trunk, neck, grip, and leg extensor strength compared with controls (1). Thus, these physical attributes seem necessary for success when driving some types of race cars.
Research identifying stock car racing injuries is limited and dated with one study examining the hospitalization of drivers as a result of racing injuries. This study identified 31 extremity injuries, 22 contusions, 12 strains, 12 knee injuries, and 11 fractures (5). Other published reports identify a variety of concerns such as head acceleration during crashes and the associated head and neck injuries (11,23), heat stroke (19), and back and cervical spine pain because of stiff race car suspensions, down force characteristic of race cars, and seats with limited padding (4).
Physical fitness is believed to be important for race car driving performance (18,26) and may affect racing safety and competitive pace (15,16). The development of sound strength and conditioning programs requires a comprehensive needs analysis (2). This analysis includes consideration of the demands of the sport, the injuries that occur, and the training practices and training status of its participants (2). Most of the limited published racing research is dated and focuses on open wheel formula car racing outside the United States. To date, no research has examined these issues with stock car drivers. The purpose of this study was to assess the physical demands, injuries, and training practices of stock car drivers to further understand this sport and its participants and to provide information to guide the strength and conditioning professional who works with this population of athletes.
Experimental Approach to the Problem
This study was designed to test the hypothesis that stock car drivers experience a variety of physical demands similar to those that have been proposed for other forms of automobile racing, that stock car driver experience a variety of injuries, and that the strength and conditioning practices of these subjects are correlated to their racing performance. For the quantitative elements of the study, the independent variables included the quantification of exercise participation. The dependent variables included racing success as measured by track points standings.
Forty stock car drivers (age = 35.91 ± 13.4 years; height 178.51 ± 7.39 cm; weight 86.20 ± 16.67 kg; racing experience = 13.58 ± 11.30 years; age at start of their racing career = 21.39 ± 9.53 years) from 27 states in the United States participated in this study, via telephone or in person interviews. Twenty subjects raced on dirt tracks, and 20 subjects raced on asphalt tracks. Two subjects raced on both dirt and asphalt. Subjects participated in a variety of classes of racing. Eighteen subjects raced late model or super late model stock cars, 8 raced in a modified class, 6 raced sportsmen or super stock, 6 raced street stock, 2 competed in front wheel drive cars, and 1 competed in the Craftsman Truck Series. Collectively, these drivers estimated that the average cost of stock cars in the division that they race was $29,140.65. Ten of these drivers were nationally ranked by various racing governing/sanctioning bodies, with an average ranking in the top 21%. Ten drivers were regionally ranked with their average ranking in the top 11%. Collectively, the drivers ranked in the top 24% at the specific race tracks they raced at. Institutional review board approval was acquired for the project and informed consent were obtained from the subjects.
The “Stock Car Driver Survey” was created and was pilot tested with an advisory group of strength and conditioning specialists, sport scientists, and stock car drivers. The survey was divided into 6 sections including background information, physical demands, injuries, fitness practices, psychological demand, and miscellaneous. The data presented in this article include the background information, physical demands, injuries, and fitness practices of the subjects.
The subject sample was obtained from a variety of sources via the Internet. From this information, a list of subjects and their contact information were compiled. Subjects were then selected at random, from this list, and sent an introductory e-mail letter describing the project. The purpose of the introductory e-mail was to explain the project, the expected time commitment, and the confidentiality of information. Subjects who were interested in participating were asked to respond by e-mail or telephone. At this point, a telephone interview was scheduled at a time that was convenient for the subject. The mean duration of the interviews was 43.9 ± 13.9 minutes. After the data were collected, a report of survey findings was mailed to all survey participants.
The interview contained open-ended, numerical, and 10-point Likert's scale questions. Data from numerical and Likert's scale questions were analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient to examine potential relationships between a variety of variables assessed in the survey.
Answers to open-ended questions were content analyzed according to the methods described by Patton (24) and previously used in studies assessing strength and conditioning practices of high school (7) and professional sports (8,9). The researchers generated main and secondary concept themes via inductive content analysis of the raw data. At the point of development of main and secondary concept themes, deductive analysis was used to confirm that all raw data themes were represented within these main and secondary concept themes.
Results revealed significant correlation (p ≤ 0.05) between track points standings and the length of the resistance training sessions (R = −0.71, p = 0.002) and subjects' self-assessment of their fitness (R = −0.53, p = 0.045). No significant correlations (p > 0.05) were found between subject track points standing and other measures of fitness, age, or experience. Results of the qualitative analysis of open-ended questions regarding the physical demands of stock car racing are shown in Tables 1–4. Tables 5–9 show the results of survey questions evaluating the injuries associated with stock car racing. Tables 10–13 show the results of survey questions demonstrating the conditioning practices and athletic experience of the subjects. Subjects reported participating in 2.94 ± 0.99 days of resistance training per week with each session having an average duration of 49.78 ± 24.56 minutes. These training sessions included 2.58 ± 0.75 days of upper-body resistance training per week and 2.19 ± 0.77 days of lower-body resistance training per week. Subjects also reported participating in 2.81 ± 1.43 days of cardiovascular training sessions per week for an average duration of 34.96 ± 15.53 minutes.
This is the first comprehensive study of the physical demands, injuries, and conditioning practices of stock car drivers and serves as part of the need analysis for understanding this previously understudied sport. There are approximately 1,500 race tracks in the United States with larger and more populated states having as many as 79 stock car tracks (25). Thus, the number of stock car drivers is likely to be significant. These data can be used to guide the strength and conditioning services offered to this population of athletes.
The most commonly identified physical demand for stock car racing is upper-body strength, which all subjects identified as one of the top 5 physical demands associated with racing. These demands are associated with steering, steering when the power steering system fails, and steering when there is tire to tire contact with other stock cars or when the tires contact the track wall because these events can cause ballistic movement of the steering wheel. Some subjects indicate that dirt track racing, compared with asphalt, may include more steering wheel work. These findings of the need for upper-body strength are somewhat consistent with previous research, demonstrating that drivers of open wheel race cars had greater upper-body strength than controls (1). Additionally, hand and arm strength has previously been recommended in anecdotal reports for Indy Car drivers (13) and as part of the strength and conditioning program for stock car drivers (10).
This study shows that the second most common physical demand associated with stock car racing is cardiovascular endurance. Subjects in this study recognized the importance of endurance and managing heart rate during racing to prevent fatigue and the loss of focus while racing. Previous research with open wheel and formula car racing indicated fairly high V[Combining Dot Above]O2 demands and heart rates as high as 180 b·min−1 in open wheel formula cars (19) and nearly 150 b·min−1 during simulated race in late model asphalt cars (12). These demands were similar to those of more traditional sports such as basketball, boxing, and soccer. High heart rates during racing are likely because of significant levels of acute physical exertion as evidenced by elevated creatine kinase levels and increased liver metabolism (27).
The third most common physical demand was identified as heat tolerance, confirming that this is an issue for this population of drivers, as has been suggested (10), and previously demonstrated for drivers of formula cars (19). Increased activation of the sympathetic nervous system because of emotional stress and fluid volume shifts occurs because of in-car temperatures that are reported to be as high as 150°, potentially adding to the thermal stress (19).
Neck, core, and leg strength were also identified as common physical demands associated with stock car racing, consistent with previous reports for stock car drivers (10), and demonstrated for open wheel race car drivers (1). Practical recommendations to focus on training hand, ankle, and trunk strength have been made for open wheel and formula car endurance and road course racers because these are variables where the drivers demonstrated greater strength than controls (1). However, the lower-body demand on short track stock car racers is likely to be substantially higher than their road course counterparts because of the frequent need to break and accelerate during corner entry and exit. Additionally, lateral horizontal acceleration forces expressed as a product of gravitational forces (G) have been found to average more than 2 G in late model stock cars at competitive speeds on an asphalt track, based on recent unpublished research from the author's laboratory. These G-forces, and their effect on the core and legs, were found to be a fairly common physical demand as identified by subjects in this study, as previously suggested (10), and identified for open wheel car drivers (19). Other physical demands of stock car racing included hand/eye/foot coordination and reflexes and reaction time as speculated (10) and demonstrated with Indy Car and British sports car drivers (3,13).
In an attempt to obtain additional information about the demands of driving a stock car and to cross-check the subjects' responses to the question asking them to identify the top 5 physical demands associated with racing, drivers were asked to identify how they felt after a race. Responses to this question generally confirmed the physical demands identified by the subjects. Many subjects reported feeling “fatigue” or “extreme fatigue,” consistent with previous research with race car drivers in national class cars in Greece that demonstrated intense physical exertion with heightened oxidative stress and muscle metabolism (27) and energy expenditures that have been reported to be similar to running 5–6 miles per hour (15). However, these values were attained in a nonracing high-speed driving situation (15) and are likely to be higher during competition. Subjects in the present study also reported increased thirst and perspiration, such as “being saturated with sweat,” which is consistent with previous reports of thermal stress during open wheel racing (19) that has risen to the level of heat stroke in some Grand Prix and Formula car drivers (17) and high levels of cardiorespiratory demands as found with other forms of racing (15,16). Subjects in the present study identified a variety of other physical demands that practitioners should consider when working with this population of athletes. In addition to physical demands, these subjects identified a variety of injuries associated with stock car racing.
In the present study, 43% of subjects had upper extremity injuries and 17.5% had lower extremity injuries, compared with 13% and 17.5%, respectively, in previous studies of drivers who required hospitalization for their injuries (5). In the present study, the most commonly reported problems were back injuries, although head and neck injuries were the most likely to require hospitalization. For those injuries requiring care at a hospital, 12.5% were concussions compared with previous reports of concussions ranging from 2 to 5.4% of racing injuries (5,21), potentially reflecting and increased awareness and assessment of concussion in the sports medicine profession. In the present study, 12.5% had neck injuries that required hospital care, whereas previous reports ranged from 16 to 34% of race car drivers having these injuries (5,21). Despite remaining a concern, some sources indicate that head and neck injuries may be decreasing in racing (23). These changes may be because of advances in technology and use of head and neck restraining devices, which appear to have become more popular after the death of a high profile stock car driver in 2001. Five percent of subjects in the present study had back or torso injuries that required hospital care compared with 16.7% in previous research (5). In the present study, 7.5% of the subjects had extremity injuries requiring a hospital visit and 25% had an extremity injury that required some type of medical treatment compared with as many as approximately 55% in a previous report (5,21). Of the subjects in the present study, 37.5% reported no ongoing physical problems, whereas 22.5% reported ongoing back pain and another 15% suffered from neck pain. These types of physical problems ranged from 63 to 88% for Grand Prix race car drivers (4).
Physical strength has been reported to potentially serve a role in injury prevention in automobile racing (13). Based on the results of the present study, it is plausible that some stock car racing injuries such as those associated with the back, neck, shoulder, hand, knee joint, and shoulder joint and some pulled muscles may be reduced with good strength and conditioning programs and practices.
Subjects in this study performed resistance training for an average of nearly 3 days a week with an average of approximately 2.6 days of upper-body training and 2.2 days for lower-body training. This frequency and volume seem to be within commonly recommended ranges (2). Results revealed significant correlation between track points standings (rank) and the length of the resistance training sessions and subjects' self-assessment of their fitness. Thus, conditioning for racing is related to racing success to some degree. Nonetheless, only 18 of the 40 subjects participated in resistance training. For those who participated in resistance training, exercise selection included more upper- than lower-body exercises, reflecting the subject's identification that upper-body physical demands are greatest in this sport and upper-body injuries and fatigue and are experienced by approximately 43 and 18% of the drivers, respectively. Seven of the 10 most common exercises identified by the subjects in the present study focused on the upper body. Only 4 of the 16 resistance training exercise identified by these subjects could be defined as lower-body exercises. Two exercises that were identified specifically train the core, although exercises such as the squat and dead lift also likely train the core.
Many of the subjects were athletes when they were in junior high school and high school, and a small number of these subjects were college athletes as well. Although a background in football was most common, these subjects participated in a wide range of sports, suggesting that no particular athletic background may be best suited for racing. Several of the subjects indicated that they needed to suspend their participation in traditional sports to pursue their racing careers. Because racing requires varied physical abilities such as strength, quick reactions, and muscular and cardiovascular endurance, it is likely that the physical development accrued through a variety of sports may be useful for the stock car driver.
Upper-body strength was identified as the most important physical ability for driving stock cars by 100% of the subjects in this study. This finding was confirmed in part by the subjects who also identified upper-body soreness as the most common source of muscle soreness after races. Subjects also reported upper-body fatigue after races. The upper-body demands associated with stock car racing are further illustrated in this study by the number of upper-body injuries, particularly for the hand and wrist. A number of subjects reported that these injuries were because of ballistic movements of the steering wheel when the front wheels of the stock car make contract with other cars or the wall. These subjects appear to recognize the importance of upper-body strength training as 4 of the top 5 exercises they performed were upper-body exercises such as the bench press, biceps curls, and shoulder exercises, with subjects identifying the desire to gain strength for racing as their primary motivation for performing resistance training.
Approximately 62.5% of the subjects in this study reported cardiovascular endurance as one of the top physical demands of driving a stock car. This result is consistent with the reports of many drivers who reported feeling intense or moderate fatigue and cardiorespiratory effects such as elevated heart rate and shortness of breath while racing. Over half of the subjects who perform cardiovascular conditioning sought to improve conditioning for racing and to improve thermoregulation. In fact, heat tolerance was identified as the third most important physical demand of stock car racing. Not surprisingly, the second most common answer to the question asking subjects how they felt after racing was related to thirst and perspiration.
Training the neck and core was the fourth most important physical demand identified by 37.5% of the subjects. Neck and head soreness and head and neck injuries were each identified in the top 3 concerns for each category. However, no drivers reported performing any neck strengthening exercises. Lower-body strength was identified as the fifth most important physical demand for these subjects because of breaking and working the clutch while racing the stock car. One driver stated, “I stand on the breaks as hard as I possibly can going into every turn.” There is likely to be a difference between asphalt and dirt track racing because corner entry in asphalt racing is more controlled and thus more breaking may occur upon corner entry. Other demands on the legs include managing lateral acceleration forces. Thirty percent of drivers indicated that hand eye and foot coordination was an important physical demand associated with stock car racing, whereas 25% of subjects reported that coping with high lateral acceleration forces was an important physical demand associated with racing. Finally, approximately 22% of subjects indicated that reflexes and reaction time were important physical demands, demonstrating that a variety of factors other than strength and endurance are important for racing, as previously reported (10).
This is the first research article to characterize the physical demands, injuries, and fitness practices of stock car racing. Results of this article can serve as part of the needs analysis of this sport and guide strength and conditioning practitioners in their program design and work with this understudied population of athletes.
1. Backman J, Häkkinen K, Ylinen J, Häkkinen A, Kyrolainen H. Neuromuscular performance characteristics of open-wheel and rally drivers. J Strength
Cond Res 19: 777–784, 2005.
2. Baechle TR, Earle RW, Wathen D. Resistance training. In: Essentials of Strength
Training and Conditioning (3rd ed.). T.R. Baechle, R.W. Earle, eds. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2008.
3. Baur H, Muller S, Hirschmuller A, Huber G, Mayer F. Reactivity, stability, and strength
performance capacity in motor sports. Br J Sports Med 40: 906–911, 2006.
4. Burton AK. Back pain in Grand Prix drivers. Br J Sports Med 17: 150–151, 1983.
5. Busby JD. Injuries in short track asphalt racing
. Am Fam Physician 18: 137–140, 1978.
6. Dawson GA. A fitness profile of grand national stock car drivers. Phys Sportsmed 7: 60–67, 1979.
7. Duehring M, Feldmann C, Ebben WP. Strength
and conditioning practices of high school strength
and conditioning coaches. J Strength
Cond Res 23: 2188–2203, 2009.
8. Ebben WP, Carroll R, Simenz C. Strength
and conditioning practices of National Hockey League strength
and conditioning coaches. J Strength
Cond Res 18: 889–897, 2004.
9. Ebben WP, Hintz MJ, Simenz C. Strength
and conditioning practices of Major League Baseball strength
and conditioning coaches. J Strength
Cond Res 19: 538–546, 2005.
10. Ebben W. Strength
and conditioning for stock car racing
Cond J 32: 16–27, 2010.
11. Fisher R. How safe are you? 5 safety tips you should never forget. Circle Track 29: 20–24, 2010.
12. Garceau LR, Petushek EJ, Ebben WP. Metabolic demands of a late model stock car driver (abstract). Med Sci Sports Exerc 43: 481, 2011.
13. Hanna TA. Automobile racing
. Physical requirements and safety factors. Arch Environ Health 7: 286–288, 1963.
14. Hugenberg L, Hugenberg B. If It Ain't Rubbin', It Ain't Racin': NASCAR, American Values, and Fandom. J Pop Cult 41: 635–657, 2008.
15. Jacobs PL, Olvey SE. Metabolic and heart rate responses to open-wheel automobile road racing
: A single-subject study. J Strength
Cond Res 14: 157–161, 2000.
16. Jacobs PL, Olvey SE, Johnson BR, Cohn KA. Physiological responses to high-speed, open-wheel racecar driving. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34: 2085–2090, 2002.
17. Jareno A, de la Serna JL, Cercas A, Lobato A, Uya A. Heat stroke in motor car racing
drivers. Br J Sports Med 21: 48, 1987.
18. Klarica AJ. Performance in motor sports. Br J Sports Med 35: 290–291, 2001.
19. Mallows RJ, Newman DG. Cardiovascular data acquisition in a dynamic motion environment. Aviat Space Environ Med 79: 416–419, 2008.
20. Miller B. Physical and mental preparation for racing
. In: Short Track Driving Techniques. Santa Ana, CA: Steve Smith Autosports Publications, 1989. pp. 11–21.
21. Minoyama O, Tsuchida H. Injuries in professional motor car racing
drivers at a racing
circuit between 1996 and 2000. Br J Sports Med 38: 613–616. 2003.
22. O'Conner B. Why Carl Edwards is the fittest man in NASCAR. Men's Fitness 23: 92–98, 2007.
23. Olvey SE, Knox T, Cohn KA. The development of a method to measure head acceleration and motion in high-impact crashes. Neurosurgery 54: 672–677, 2004.
24. Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990.
25. Race Track Locater. May 17, 2007. Available at: www.racingin.com
. Accessed November10, 2009.
26. Schwaberger G. Heart rate, metabolic and hormonal responses to maximal psycho-emotional and physical stress in motor car racing
drivers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 59: 579–604, 1987.
27. Tsopanakis C, Tsopanakis A. Stress hormonal factors, fatigue, and antioxidant responses to prolonged speed driving. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 60: 747–751, 1998.
Keywords:© 2012 National Strength and Conditioning Association
needs analysis; program design; strength; endurance; racing