Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

The Convergent Validity between Two Objective Methods for Quantifying Training Load in Young Taekwondo Athletes

Haddad, Monoem; Chaouachi, Anis; Castagna, Carlo; Wong, Del P; Chamari, Karim

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research: January 2012 - Volume 26 - Issue 1 - p 206-209
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31821ef7e8
Original Research

Haddad, M, Chaouachi, A, Castagna, C, Wong, DP, and Chamari, K. The convergent validity between two objective methods for quantifying training load in young taekwondo athletes. J Strength Cond Res 26(1): 206–209, 2012—Various studies used objective heart rate (HR)-based methods to assess training load (TL). The common methods were Banister's Training Impulse (TRIMP; weights the duration using a weighting factor) and Edwards' TL (a summated HR zone score). Both the methods use the direct physiological measure of HR as a fundamental part of the calculation. To eliminate the redundancy of using various methods to quantify the same construct (i.e., TL), we have to verify if these methods are strongly convergent and are interchangeable. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the convergent validity between Banister's TRIMP and Edwards' TL used for the assessment of internal TL. The HRs were recorded and analyzed during 10 training weeks of the preseason period in 10 male Taekwondo (TKD) athletes. The TL was calculated using Banister's TRIMP and Edwards' TL. Pearson product moment correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the convergent validity between the 2 methods for assessing TL. Very large to nearly perfect relationships were found between individual Banister's TRIMP and Edwards' TL (r values from 0.80 to 0.99; p < 0.001). Pooled Banister's TRIMP and pooled Edwards' TL (pooled data n = 284) were nearly largely correlated (r = 0.89; p < 0.05; 95% confidence interval: 0.86–0.91). In conclusion, these findings suggest that these 2 objective methods, measuring a similar construct, are interchangeable.

1Tunisian Research Laboratory “Sports Performance Optimization”, National Center of Medicine and Science in Sports (CNMSS), Tunis, Tunisia; 2School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Team-Sports Research Area, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 3Department of Health and Physical Education, The Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong; and 4High Institute of Sports and Physical Education Ksar Said, Manouba University, Tunisia

Address correspondence to Monoem Haddad,

Back to Top | Article Outline


Heart rate (HR) monitoring has become a popular method for measuring exercise intensity (1). Various studies have used the HR to evaluate the cardiovascular responses of Taekwondo (TKD) training. These studies have demonstrated that TKD is an energy demanding intermittent high-intensity sport. The HR is a noninvasive measure that has frequently been used as a reliable index of relative exercise intensity during a variety of intermittent training and competition environments (8,12). This method is based on the principle that there is a linear relationship between HR and steady-state work rate (2,13). Although absolute measures of external load such as the speed and distance coverage are commonly used, the internal load such as the response to the training may be more informative because it provides the interindividual and intraindividual differences that may exist in the way people respond to various modes of exercise.

Two methods based on the HR for quantifying internal training load (TL) are commonly used: Banister's TRIMP and Edwards' TL. Banister et al. (3) proposed a method of quantifying the TL of a training session into an unit ‘dose’ of physical effort. They suggested that a person's HR response to exercise, along with the exercise duration, collectively called a training impulse (TRIMP), may be a plausible measure of effort, because it is based on the extent to which exercise raises the HR between resting and maximal levels (3,11). Edwards' TL is a theoretical modification to the calculation of TRIMP that facilitates the quantification of interval training (7). Although the Edwards' TL method was used in various studies for monitoring TL, there appears to be no evidence that this method of quantification has been validated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the convergent validity between these 2 objective methods. Because the 2 objective HR-based methods calculate the same construct (i.e., TL) using the direct physiological measure of HR, it is hypothesized that these 2 objective methods are interchangeable.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Experimental Approach to the Problem

This study investigated the construct validity of the Edwards' TL method for quantifying internal TL in young TKD athletes. To achieve this, the TL calculated by Edwards' method was compared with that calculated by Banister's TRIMP method for quantifying internal TL. Then, the convergent validity between these 2 commonly used HR to quantify TL was tested.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Ten young elite-level Taekwondo male athletes (mean ± SD, HRmax 198.0 ± 7.1 b·min−1, HRrest 54.2 ± 8.8 b·min−1, and HRreserve 147.9 ± 6.5 b·min−1) took part in the study. These young TKD athletes were members of a regional under-14 representative team competing at the highest level for their age category in Tunisia. All the subjects were in the black belt rank of the Word Taekwondo Federation style and have been competing regularly in national and international competitions for at least 2 years. Each athlete belonged to a body-mass category as classified by the Tunisian Taekwondo Federation (i.e., −34, −38, −42, −45, −48, −51, −55, −59 −63, and +63 kg). Before the study, all the subjects and the parents were informed about the potential risks and benefits associated with participation, and both signed a written informed consent form, agreeing with the protocol procedures and publication of the data. The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was fully approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the National Centre of Medicine and Science in Sports of Tunis, Tunisia before the commencement of the assessments. All the athletes were fully accustomed to the procedures used in this research and were informed that they could withdraw from the study at any time without penalty.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Experimental Protocol

Training data were collected during the 10 weeks of the precompetitive period in a TKD season from September to November 2009. The training program was planned by the coach of the team, and the researchers did not alter the original training program. During this period, young TKD athletes performed TKD training 3 times per week, in sessions of approximately 2 hours' duration. The training included further sessions of individualized work when necessary (range, 6–10 h·wk−1). During each training session, the first approximately 45 minutes of training (including 15 minutes dedicated for warm-up) was generally designed to focus on fitness development, and the remaining time was devoted to the technical and tactical aspects of TKD with approximately 5 minutes of cooldown at the end. TKD training sessions incorporated a combination of the following conventional activities that are universally practiced (6): basic techniques, technical combinations, predetermined sequence of movements (forms), breaking techniques, self-defense techniques, step sparring, sparring (skill) drills, and free sparring with the inclusion of the use of pads and elastics for additional resistance.

All the training sessions were performed in a TKD gymnasium at the same hour of day (i.e., session starting at 18 hours and 30 minutes) in ambient conditions of 15.75 ± 2.97° C, 1,014 ± 7 mm Hg atmospheric pressure, and 87 ± 3% relative humidity. To avoid dehydration, ad libitum drinking was permitted for athletes during all the training sessions. The following instructions were given to athletes: fast for a period of 3–4 hours before the training session, do not ingest stimulants, and hydrate at will.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Testing Procedures

Training intensity during each TKD training session was recorded using Polar Team HR monitors (Polar Team System, Kempele, Finland), and HR was recorded every 5 seconds. After each training session, HRs were downloaded into a laptop computer using Polar Advantage Software (Polar Electro, Oy, Finland). Resting HR was measured when the athletes were lying on a bed for 10 minutes, after they had woken up (i.e., 5.30 AM). The highest HR value recorded for each athlete at the end of the 20-m shuttle run test (10) was considered to be HRmax.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Edwards' Heart Rate–Based Method

Edwards' TL (7) determines internal load by measuring the product of the accumulated training duration (minutes) in 5 HR zones by a coefficient relative to each zone (50–60% of HRmax = 1, 60–70% of HRmax = 2, 70–80% of HRmax = 3, 80–90% of HRmax = 4, 90–100% of HRmax = 5) and then summing up the results.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Banister's Training Impulse Method

Banister's TRIMP (3) weights the duration using a weighting factor using the following formula:

in which TD is the effective training session duration expressed in minutes and HRR is determined with the following equation: ([HRTS − HRB]/[HRmax − HRB]), where HRTS is the average training session HR, and HRB is the HR measured at rest.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Statistical Analyses

The results are expressed as mean ± SD and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The normality of data was verified using the Shapiro-Wilk W test. Pearson product moment correlation coefficient with the 95% CI was used to determine the convergent validity between Edwards' TL and Banister's TRIMP. The meaningfulness of correlations was evaluated using Hopkins' (9) classification: r < 0.1, trivial; 0.1–0.3, small; 0.3–0.5, moderate; 0.5–0.7, large; 0.7–0.9, very large; > 0.9, nearly perfect; and 1, perfect. Intraclass coefficient correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV) and standard errors of the measurements (SEMs) were calculated to establish the reliabilities of Banister's TRIMP and Edwards' TL. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The TLs were calculated from 284 training sessions. Individual correlations were determined for a minimum of 25 to a maximum of 32 training sessions' data for each athlete. Individual correlations are presented in Table 1. There was a very large to nearly perfect correlations between all individual Edwards' TL and individual Banister's TRIMP. Furthermore, pooled Edwards' TL was very largely correlated with pooled Banister's TRIMP (r = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.86–0.91).

Table 1

Table 1

A test for reliability of Edwards' TL and Banister's TRIMP to predict the same value across 2 different TKD sessions of the same intensity was also performed. The ICC of Banister's TRIMP was 0.92 with the 95% CI of 0.61–0.98. The CV and SEM were of 0.44% and 3.67, respectively. The ICC of Edwards' TL was 0.96 with the 95% CI of 0.80–0.99. The CV and SEM were 0.90% and 3.80, respectively.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The correlations between the 2 objective HR-based methods, namely, Edwards' TL (7) and Banister's TRIMP (3) were established to examine the convergent validity of these indicators for quantifying internal TL in young athletes during TKD training. The results showed very large to nearly perfect correlations between all individual Edwards' TL and individual Banister's TRIMP. Indeed, a nearly perfect correlation was observed between pooled Edwards' TL and pooled Banister's TRIMP. These correlations showed that the 2 methods are strongly convergent and confirmed the hypothesis that they are interchangeable during TKD training sessions performed in this study. This agreed with the findings of a previous study of Borresen and Lambert (4) who found a correlation of r = 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96–0.99) between total TL calculated using Banister's TRIMP and Edwards' TL (pooled data) in recreationally trained adults runners aged 30 ± 5 years.

This study also showed that the 2 HR-based methods commonly used have nearly perfect reliability. Some authors considered Banister's TRIMP as a more pronounced measure of TL than Edwards' TL (for a review, see Borresen and Lambert [5]) Indeed, Banister's TRIMP is considered as a plausible measure of physical effort, because it is based on the extent to which exercise raises the HR between resting and maximal levels. The weighting factor used in the equation of this method emphasizes high-intensity exercise and is also applied to the equation to avoid giving disproportionate importance to long-duration, low-intensity exercise compared with intense, short duration activity (3). This exponential factor is based on the lactate profiles of trained men and women relative to increases in exercise intensity. The ability to quantify TL and reduce training variables to a single figure or factor, as is possible with this equation, is appealing in terms of its practical application (5). To the best of the author's knowledge, there is no evidence that Edwards' TL method has been validated in the literature. Thus, it can be stated that this HR-based method has been derived theoretically and not through experiment. In addition, the linear coefficient relative to each zone (50–60% of HRmax = 1, 60–70% of HRmax = 2, 70–80% of HRmax = 3, 80–90% of HRmax = 4, 90–100% of HRmax = 5) is made theoretically because the individual correlation to the ventilatory and lactic thresholds was not studied. However, this can be accepted because the coefficients used give a proportional weight to the intensity even though these coefficients could have been developed using exponential coefficients (i.e., 1, 2, 4, 7, 9 instead of, e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Despite these criticisms, the results of this study provide evidence concerning the construct application and validity of the Edwards' TL method compared with Banister's TRIMP in young TKD athletes.

The results of this study show that the 2 HR-based methods are interchangeable for the assessment of the same construct (i.e., TL). Therefore, it is not necessary to use the 2 methods for comparing objective and subjective (rating of perceived exertion method) methods in future studies and either 1 of 2 objective methods should be sufficient to investigate the relation between other indicators of TL.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Practical Applications

This study demonstrates the convergent validity between the 2 objective HR methods, described by Banister (3) and Edwards (7), for the assessment of TL in Taekwondo training efforts, and thus, the construct validity of Edwards' TL is warranted. The results suggest that Banister's TRIMP and Edwards' TL methods are interchangeable. Therefore, either Edwards' TL or Banister's TRIMP can be sufficient to quantify the TL of Taekwondo training with young athletes to investigate the relationship between other indicators of TL. Further studies should investigate if these apply to other sports or efforts and for other age categories.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The authors acknowledge the young Taekwondo athletes involved in this investigation. This study was financially supported by the Tunisian Ministry of Scientific Research.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Achten, J and Jeukendrup, AE. Heart rate monitoring: Applications and limitations. Sports Med 33: 517–538, 2003.
2. Arts, FJ and Kuipers, H. The relation between power output, oxygen uptake and heart rate in male athletes. Int J Sports Med 15: 228–231, 1994.
3. Banister, EW. Modeling elite athletic performance. In: Physiological Testing of Elite Athletes. H. Green, J. McDougal, and H. Wenger, eds. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1991. pp. 403–424.
4. Borresen, J and Lambert, MI. Quantifying training load: A comparison of subjective and objective methods. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 3: 16–30, 2008.
5. Borresen, J and Lambert, MI. The quantification of training load, the training response and the effect on performance. Sports Med 39: 779–795, 2009.
6. Bridge, CA, Jones, MA, Hitchen, P, and Sanchez, X. Heart rate responses to Taekwondo training in experienced practitioners. J Strength Cond Res 21: 718–723, 2007.
7. Edwards. High performance training and racing. In: The Heart Rate Monitor Book. Edwards, ed. Sacramento, CA: Feet Fleet Press, 1993. pp. 113–123.
8. Heller, J, Peric, T, Dlouha, R, Kohlikova, E, Melichna, J, and Novakova, H. Physiological profiles of male and female taekwon-do (ITF) black belts. J Sports Sci 16: 243–249, 1998.
9. Hopkins,WG. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med 30: 1–15, 2000.
10. Leger, L and Gadoury, C. Validity of the 20 m shuttle run test with 1 min stages to predict V̇o2max in adults. Can J Sport Sci 14: 21–26, 1989.
11. Morton, RH, Fitz-Clarke, JR, and Banister, EW. Modeling human performance in running. J Appl Physiol 69: 1171–1177, 1990.
12. Pieter, W, Taaffe, D, and Heijmans, J. Heart rate response to taekwondo forms and technique combinations. A pilot study. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 30: 97–102, 1990.
13. Robinson, DM, Robinson, SM, Hume, PA, and Hopkins, WG. Training intensity of elite male distance runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 23: 1078–1082, 1991.

youth; martial arts; training intensity; heart rate methods

Copyright © 2012 by the National Strength & Conditioning Association.