Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Relationship Between Velocity Loss and Repetitions in Reserve in the Bench Press and Back Squat Exercises

Rodríguez-Rosell, David1; Yáñez-García, Juan Manuel1; Sánchez-Medina, Luis2; Mora-Custodio, Ricardo1; González-Badillo, Juan José1

The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research: April 25, 2019 - Volume Publish Ahead of Print - Issue - p
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002881
Original Research: PDF Only
Buy
PAP

Rodríguez-Rosell, D, Yáñez-García, JM, Sánchez-Medina, L, Mora-Custodio, R, and González-Badillo, JJ. Relationship between velocity loss and repetitions in reserve in the bench press and back squat exercises. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2019—This study aimed to compare the pattern of repetition velocity decline during a single set to failure performed against 4 relative loads in the bench press (BP) and full back squat (SQ) exercises. After an initial test to determine 1 repetition maximum (1RM) strength and load-velocity relationships, 20 men performed one set of repetitions to failure (MNR test) against loads of 50, 60, 70, and 80% 1RM in BP and SQ, on 8 random order sessions performed every 6–7 days. Velocity against the load that elicited a ∼1.00 m·s−1 (V1 m·s−1 load) was measured before and immediately after each MNR test, and it was considered a measure of acute muscle fatigue. The number of repetitions completed against each relative load showed high interindividual variability in both BP (coefficient of variation [CV]: 15–22%) and SQ (CV: 26–34%). Strong relationships were found between the relative loss of velocity in the set and the percentage of performed repetitions in both exercises (R2 = 0.97 and 0.93 for BP and SQ, respectively). Equations to predict repetitions left in reserve from velocity loss are provided. For a given magnitude of velocity loss within the set (15–65%), the percentages of performed repetitions were lower for the BP compared with the SQ for all loads analyzed. Acute fatigue after each set to failure was found dependent on the magnitude of velocity loss (r = 0.97 and 0.99 for BP and SQ, respectively) but independent of the number of repetitions completed by each participant (p > 0.05) for both exercises. The percentage of velocity loss against the V1 m·s−1 load decreased as relative load increased, being greater for BP than SQ. These findings indicate that monitoring repetition velocity can be used to provide a very good estimate of the number (or percentage) of repetitions actually performed and those left in reserve in each exercise set, and thus to more objectively quantify the level of effort incurred during resistance training.

1Physical Performance and Sports Research Center, Pablo de Olavide University, Seville, Spain; and

2Studies, Research and Sports Medicine Center, Government of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain

Address correspondence to David Rodríguez-Rosell, davidrodriguezrosell@gmail.com.

Copyright © 2019 by the National Strength & Conditioning Association.