de Poli, Rodrigo A.B.1,2; Boullosa, Daniel A.3; Malta, Elvis S.1,2; Behm, David4; Lopes, Vithor H.F.1,2; Barbieri, Fabio A.2; Zagatto, Alessandro M.1,2
1Laboratory of Physiology and Sport Performance (LAFIDE), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Bauru, SP, Brazil;
2Post-Graduate Program in Movement Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Science, Bauru, SP, Brazil;
3College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia; and
4School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland, Canada
Address correspondence to Alessandro M. Zagatto, [email protected].
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003399
Erratum
In the September 2020 issue of the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research in the article by de Poli et al. () , on page 2471, the values of mean ± SD (CI95%) of control condition were published incorrectly. “However, there were no significant differences between conditions for EPCr (1.91 ± 0.44 L [CI 95% 1.65–2.16 L] vs. 6.72 ± 2.42 L [CI 95% 5.32–8.12 L], respectively; p = 0.35) and EOx (7.48 ± 2.26 L [CI 95% 6.18–8.79 L] vs. 7.48 ± 2.26 L [CI 95% 6.18–8.79 L], respectively; p = 0.07)” should have appeared as “However, there were no significant differences between conditions for EPCr (1.91 ± 0.44 L [CI 95% 1.65–2.16 L] vs 1.81 ± 0.51 L [CI95% 1.51–2.10 L], respectively; p = 0.35) and EOx (7.48 ± 2.26 L [CI 95% 6.18–8.79 L] vs. 6.72 ± 2.42 L [CI 95% 5.32–8.12 L], respectively; p = 0.07).”
The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research.
35(5):e289,
May 2021.
