Secondary Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Shod vs. Barefoot Effects on Force and Power Development During a Conventional Deadlift

Hammer, Mark, E.; Meir, Rudi, A.; Whitting, John, W.; Crowley-McHattan, Zachary, J.

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research: June 2018 - Volume 32 - Issue 6 - p 1525–1530
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002246
Original Research

Hammer, ME, Meir, RA, Whitting, JW, and Crowley-McHattan, ZJ. Shod vs. barefoot effects on force and power development during a conventional deadlift. J Strength Cond Res 32(6): 1525–1530, 2018—The kinetics of a conventional deadlift in shod (S) vs. unshod (US) footwear conditions in 10 male participants (mean ± SD, age = 27.0 ± 5.8 years; body mass = 78.7 ± 11.5 kg; height = 175.8 ± 8.2 cm; 1 repetition maximum [1RM] deadlift = 155.8 ± 25.8 kg) was assessed in 2 testing sessions. A counterbalanced, cross-over experimental design was used with different loads (60 and 80% 1RM). Four sets of 4 repetitions were prescribed per session with 2 sets per shoe and with each shoe condition involving 1 set per load. Peak vertical force (PF), rate of force development (RFD), time to peak force (TPF), anterior-posterior (COP-AP) and mediolateral (COP-ML) center of pressure excursion, and barbell peak power data were recorded during all repetitions. Except for RFD (F = 6.389; p = 0.045; ηp2 = 0.516) and ML-COP (F = 6.696; p = 0.041; ηp2 = 0.527), there were no other significant main effects of shoe. There were significant main effects of load for PF (p ≤ 0.05), COP-AP (p = 0.011), TPF (p = 0.018), and COP-AP (p = 0.011). There were no significant interactions found between session, shoe, and load (p range from 0.944 to 0.086). Although the US condition may have produced changes in RFD and ML-COP compared with the shod condition, there is only limited evidence in the current study to support this lifting technique for the conventional deadlift. Further investigation is required to clarify any possible implications of this result and its benefit to lifters.

School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia

Address correspondence to Rudi A. Meir, rudi.meir@scu.edu.au.

Copyright © 2018 by the National Strength & Conditioning Association.