Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Age-Related Variation in Male Youth Athletes' Countermovement Jump After Plyometric Training

A Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials

Moran, Jason J.; Sandercock, Gavin R.H.; Ramírez-Campillo, Rodrigo; Meylan, César M.P.; Collison, Jay A.; Parry, Dave A.

The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research: February 2017 - Volume 31 - Issue 2 - p 552–565
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001444
Brief Review
Buy

Moran, J, Sandercock, GRH, Ramírez-Campillo, R, Meylan, CMP, Collison, J, and Parry, DA. Age-related variation in male youth athletes' countermovement jump after plyometric training: A meta-analysis of controlled trials. J Strength Cond Res 31(2): 552–565, 2017—Recent debate on the trainability of youths has focused on the existence of periods of accelerated adaptation to training. Accordingly, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to identify the age- and maturation-related pattern of adaptive responses to plyometric training in youth athletes. Thirty effect sizes were calculated from the data of 21 sources with studies qualifying based on the following criteria: (a) healthy male athletes who were engaged in organized sport; (b) groups of participants with a mean age between 10 and 18 years; and (c) plyometric-training intervention duration between 4 and 16 weeks. Standardized mean differences showed plyometric training to be moderately effective in increasing countermovement jump (CMJ) height (Effect size = 0.73 95% confidence interval: 0.47–0.99) across PRE-, MID-, and POST-peak height velocity groups. Adaptive responses were of greater magnitude between the mean ages of 10 and 12.99 years (PRE) (ES = 0.91 95% confidence interval: 0.47–1.36) and 16 and 18 years (POST) (ES = 1.02 [0.52–1.53]). The magnitude of adaptation to plyometric training between the mean ages of 13 and 15.99 years (MID) was lower (ES = 0.47 [0.16–0.77]), despite greater training exposure. Power performance as measured by CMJ may be mediated by biological maturation. Coaches could manipulate training volume and modality during periods of lowered response to maximize performance.

1Center for Sports and Exercise Science, School of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom;

2Department of Physical Activity Sciences, University of Los Lagos, Osorno, Chile; and

3Canadian Sport Institute Pacific, Victoria, Canada

Address correspondence to Jason Moran, jmorana@essex.ac.uk.

Copyright © 2017 by the National Strength & Conditioning Association.