Secondary Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Relative Intensity Influences the Degree of Correspondence of Jump Squats and Push Jerks to Countermovement Jumps

Cushion, Emily J.; Goodwin, Jon E.; Cleather, Daniel J.

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research: May 2016 - Volume 30 - Issue 5 - p 1255–1264
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001211
Original Research
Buy

Cushion, EJ, Goodwin, JE, and Cleather, DJ. Relative intensity influences the degree of correspondence of jump squats and push jerks to countermovement jumps. J Strength Cond Res 30(5): 1255–1264, 2016—The aim of this study was to determine the mechanical similarity between push jerk (PJ) and jump squat (JS) to countermovement jump (CMJ) and further understand the effect increasing external load may have on this relationship. Eight physically trained men (age 22 ± 3; height 176 ± 7 kg; weight 83 ± 8 kg) performed an unloaded CMJ followed by JS under a range of loads (10, 25, 35, and 50% 1RM back squat) and PJ (30, 50, 65, and 75% 1RM push jerk). A portable force platform and high-speed camera both collecting at 250 Hz were used to establish joint moments and impulse during the propulsive phase of the movements. A standard inverse dynamics model was used to determine joint moment and impulse at the hip, knee, and ankle. Significant correlations (p ≤ 0.05) were shown between CMJ knee joint moment and JS knee joint moment at 25% load and PJ knee joint moment at 30 and 50% load. Significant correlations were also observed between CMJ knee joint impulse and JS knee joint impulse at 10% load and PJ knee joint moment at 30 and 65% load. Significant correlation was also observed between CMJ hip joint impulse and PJ hip joint impulse at 30% load. No significant joint × load interaction was shown as load increased for either PJ or JS. Results from the study suggest partial correspondence between PJ and JS to CMJ, where a greater mechanical similarity was observed between the PJ and CMJ. This interaction is load and joint dependent where lower relative loads showed greatest mechanical similarity. Therefore using lower relative loads when programming may provide a greater transfer of training effect.

School of Sport, Health and Applied Science, St Mary's University, Strawberry Hill, United Kingdom

Address correspondence to Emily J. Cushion, emily.cushion@smuc.ac.uk.

Copyright © 2016 by the National Strength & Conditioning Association.