Share this article on:

Heart Rate Responses During Small-Sided Games and Short Intermittent Running Training in Elite Soccer Players: A Comparative Study

Dellal, Alexandre1,2,3; Chamari, Karim3; Pintus, Antonio4; Girard, Olivier5; Cotte, Thierry6; Keller, Dominique1,2

The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research: September 2008 - Volume 22 - Issue 5 - p 1449-1457
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31817398c6
Original Research

Dellal, A, Chamari, K, Pintus, A, Girard, O, Cotte, T, and Keller, D. Heart rate responses during small-sided games and short intermittent running training in elite soccer players: a comparative study. J Strength Cond Res 22(5): 1449-1457, 2008-The purpose of this study was to compare heart rate (HR) responses within and between physical controlled (short-duration intermittent running) and physical integrated (sided games) training methods in elite soccer players. Ten adult male elite soccer players (age, 26 ± 2.9 years; body mass, 78.3 ± 4.4 kg; maximum HR [HRmax], 195.4 ± 4.9 b·min−1 and velocity at maximal aerobic speed (MAS), 17.1 ± 0.8 km·h−1) performed different short-duration intermittent runs, e.g., 30-30 (30 seconds of exercise interspersed with 30 seconds of recovery) with active recovery, and 30-30, 15-15, 10-10, and 5-20 seconds with passive recovery, and different sided games (1 versus 1, 2 versus 2, 4 versus 4, 8 versus 8 with and without a goalkeeper, and 10 versus 10). In both training methods, HR was measured and expressed as a mean percentage of HR reserve (%HRres). The %HRres in the 30-30-second intermittent run at 100% MAS with active recovery (at 9 km·h−1 with corresponding distance) was significantly higher than that with passive recovery (85.7% versus 77.2% HRres, respectively, p < 0.001) but also higher than the 1 versus 1 (p < 0.01), 4 versus 4 (p ≤ 0.05), 8 versus 8 (p < 0.001), and 10 versus 10 (p < 0.01) small-sided games. The %HRres was 2-fold less homogeneous during the different small-sided games than during the short-duration intermittent running (intersubjects coefficient of variation [CV] = 11.8% versus 5.9%, respectively). During the 8 versus 8 sided game, the presence of goalkeepers induced an ∼11% increase in %HRres and reduced homogeneity when compared to games without goalkeepers (intersubject CV = 15.6% versus 8.8%). In conclusion, these findings showed that some small-sided games allow the HR to increase to the same level as that in short-duration intermittent running. The sided game method can be used to bring more variety during training, mixing physical, technical, and tactical training approaching the intensity of short-duration intermittent running but with higher intersubject variability.

1Psychophysiology of Motor Behaviour and Sports Laboratory, Science and Exercise University, Strasbourg, France; 2Applied Physiology Center, CNRS (National Scientific Research Organization), Strasbourg, France; 3Research Unit of Evaluation, Sport, and Health, National Centre of Medicine and Science in Sport, El Menzah, Tunisia; 4Facoltà di scienze motorie di Torino, Torino, Italy; 5ASPETAR, Qatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar; 6Physiology Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Etienne, France

Address correspondence to Alexandre Dellal,

© 2008 National Strength and Conditioning Association