Secondary Logo

Journal Logo


Safety, immunogenicity, efficacy, and acceptability of COVID-19 vaccination in people with multiple sclerosis: a narrative review

Capone, Fioravante,*; Rossi, Mariagrazia; Cruciani, Alessandro; Motolese, Francesco; Pilato, Fabio; Di Lazzaro, Vincenzo

Author Information
doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.346539
  • Open



In 2019, the pandemic caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection started to spread around the world, affecting millions of people. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes a complex set of symptoms, primarily involving the respiratory tract, but in many cases affecting also multiple organs and leading to life-threatening conditions or even death. To date, 347 million people have been infected, and 5.57 million deaths have been reported all around the world (No author listed, 2022a). Like many other viruses, SARS-CoV-2 tends to mutate over time. The currently used nomenclature divided variants into four classes: Variant Being Monitored (VBM), Variant of Interest (VOI), Variant of Concern (VOC), and Variant of High Consequence (VOHC) (Arora et al., 2022). The currently circulating VOCs are the delta and omicron, while previously circulating VOCs include alpha, beta, and gamma variants (No author listed, 2022b).

Over the past two years, new therapeutic strategies (i.e., antiviral drugs, humanized and recombinant monoclonal antibodies) have been developed, leading to a significant reduction in death and severe complications. However, only a global vaccination campaign can bring things to normal, since a large amount of data (Lopez Bernal et al., 2021; Tenforde et al., 2021) has shown the reduction of hospitalization and complication rates following the extensive vaccination of the population. Vaccination is especially recommended for vulnerable people such as the elderly and patients with chronic diseases and/or those who are receiving pharmacological treatments with effects on the immune system.

People with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) are considered at a high risk for COVID-19-related complications for several reasons (Brownlee et al., 2020) Moreover, it has been shown that infections are associated with an increased risk of relapses or pseudo-relapses in PwMS, and infection-associated relapses are more likely to induce sustained disability (Buljevac et al, 2002). Finally, some subgroups of MS patients, as those taking anti-CD20 drugs, may be at higher risk both for SARS-CoV-2 infection and for COVID-19-related complications (Reder et al., 2021). A recent study reported a higher incidence of COVID-19 in an MS cohort compared to the general population, despite most patients did not require hospitalization and had a positive outcome (Sepúlveda et al., 2021). On the other hand, PwMS who died of COVID-19 were at a high risk for developing severe COVID-19 complications because of individual factors such as age, comorbidity, or severe disability (Barzegar et al., 2021). The evidence has confirmed that there is no difference in the infection rate among drug-naïve PwMS and those receiving IFN-β, glatiramer acetate, and fingolimod. Whereas second-line treatment options, such as cladribine, alemtuzumab, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, have been related to the highest risk of infection (Rostami and Ghasemi-Kasman, 2021). For all these reasons, PwMS are considered a vulnerable group in many countries and have been given priority in the administration of the vaccine. As of January 2022, more than 20 vaccines with different mechanisms of action (mRNA, viral vector, and recombinant protein subunit vaccine) have been approved worldwide (No author listed, 2022c). In many countries, policymakers decided to make mRNA vaccines the first choice for vulnerable people, including PwMS, because of their safety profile, the low production cost, the ready availability, and their higher efficacy (Polack et al., 2020). For this reason, most of the data presented in this review refers to mRNA vaccines (Moderna mRNA-1273 and Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2). In December 2021, a new vaccine was approved in Europe, developed by Novavax (NVX-CoV2373) and described as both a protein subunit vaccine and a virus-like particle vaccine (Woopen et al., 2021). At present, there are no reports of serious immune-mediated or neurological events with NVX-CoV2373 (Keech et al., 2020). This is in line with the well-known evidence on the efficacy and safety of subunit vaccines for other conditions (i.e., Hemophilus influenzae B Hib, hepatitis B, human papillomavirus, whooping cough, pneumococcal disease, meningococcal disease, and shingles) in MS patients (Mailand and Frederiksen, 2017). In the next few months, MS international societies may now consider NVX-CoV2373 a preferable vaccine for MS patients over those mRNA-based (Heath et al., 2021). Aim of this review is to summarize the main findings of the safety, efficacy, and acceptability of COVID-19 vaccination for MS patients.

Search Strategy and Selection Criteria

The current review considers articles published from 2020 to 2022. The manuscripts were searched electronically using PubMed and Google Scholar databases. We used a combination of the following keywords/terms: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, multiple sclerosis, vaccine, safety, efficacy, acceptability, willingness, immunogenicity, side effects, disease-modifying therapies, humoral response, and cellular response.

COVID-19 Vaccine and Multiple Sclerosis

Safety and side effects

Reported side effects of mRNA vaccines in the general population were mild-to-moderate, and included injection-site pain, short-lived febrile symptoms, fatigue, and headache (Polak et al., 2020; Baden et al., 2021). Overall, literature data showed roughly the same short-term side effects in the MS population. Achiron et al. (2021) first described the safety profile of Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine in a group of 555 PwMS. All the adverse events reported were mild-to-moderate, more evident in younger patients, and more frequent in patients with lower disability (expanded disability status scale ≤ 3) and after the second dose (Achiron et al., 2021). An Italian study on 140 PwMS who received both types of mRNA-based vaccines reported similar data. In particular, patients experienced pain at the injection site, fatigue, myalgia, and fever as short-term side effects, especially after the second dose. In this study, no severe side effects requiring hospitalization or unusual adverse events were reported (Capone et al., 2021).

A specific cause for concern in PwMS is the risk of reactivation of disease induced by COVID-19 vaccines. Indeed, anecdotal reports suggest that such vaccines might be associated with central and peripheral nervous system inflammation. A first case series reported the clinical and MRI features of seven individuals who received SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines who developed neurologic symptoms and MRI findings consistent with active central nervous system (CNS) demyelination (3 new-onset demyelinating diseases and 4 exacerbations of MS) (Khayat-Khoei et al., 2022). A recent systematic review has identified 32 cases of CNS demyelination following the administration of different types of COVID-19 vaccine. Demyelinating syndromes were more frequent after administration of mRNA-based vaccines, especially following the first dose. The clinical presentation was heterogeneous, including transverse myelitis, MS onset, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. More than half of the cases had a history of immune-mediated diseases, with favorable outcomes in most cases (Ismail and Salama, 2022a).

On the other side, studies specifically designed to evaluate the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in people with a previous diagnosis of demyelinating disease, including MS, demonstrated that the incidence of new symptoms or the worsening of symptoms was relatively low and the relapse rate was comparable to that reported in non-vaccinated people (Lotan et al., 2021). A more detailed study conducted in a larger cohort of MS patients (324 PwMS) who received the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine showed that the incidence of relapses in the 2 months before and after vaccination was not statistically different (Di Filippo et al., 2021). Epstein et al. (2022) have collected data from 1164 patients with neuroinflammatory diseases including MS, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, neurosarcoidosis, and myelin oligodendrocyte antibody-mediated disease. Their results suggested that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in these patients are safe, and it seems unlikely they could worsen the underlying disease activity, both from the clinical and radiological viewpoint (Epstein et al., 2022). No data are available regarding the booster jabs. Thus, in absence of definite guidelines, the management of vaccination schedules in high-risk MS patients should be decided on a case-by-case basis. Finally, the risk of neuroinflammation induced by COVID-19 itself should be considered. A recent review has described 102 cases of CNS demyelination putatively associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection from January 2020 until June 2021 (Ismail and Salama, 2022b). This is in line with the robust evidence in the literature reporting a higher risk of inflammatory neurologic complications after COVID-19 than neurologic adverse events following immunization (Garcia-Grimshaw et al., 2021). To maintain the protection against SARS-Cov-2, a third and a fourth dose of vaccine are currently being administered worldwide. To date, few studies have investigated the safety of booster jabs in PwMS.

Available data (Achtnichts et al., 2021; Dreyer-Alster et al., 2022; König et al., 2022) suggest that the safety profile is similar to that reported following the first and second doses. Moreover, the frequency of MS symptoms worsening and acute relapses within the first 30 days after the third dose is similar to that reported after the second dose (Achtnichts et al., 2021).

In conclusion, based on available data, COVID-19 vaccination should be recommended in all PwMS, because the risk of morbidity, mortality, and neuroinflammation associated with COVID-19 largely outweighs the low percentage of serious neurologic and non-neurologic adverse events associated with vaccines. Surely, long-term post-marketing surveillance is necessary to confirm the safety of COVID-19 vaccines also in real-life scenarios.

Immunogenicity and efficacy

The immunogenicity of a vaccine (i.e., inducing the immune response) is a key factor in determining its efficacy. In PwMS, several factors could influence the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines and should be considered. First of all, MS is an autoimmune disease, thus the alteration of immune system functioning could impair vaccine immunogenicity. To test this hypothesis, several studies have investigated the humoral response following SARS-Cov-2 vaccination in MS patients naïve to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) (Achiron et al., 2021; Capone et al., 2021; Pitzalis et al., 2021; Sormani et al., 2021a; Tallantyre et al., 2022). All of them found anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels comparable to those observed in healthy people, thus confirming that MS is not associated per se with an increased risk of developing an attenuated response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

The DMTs act on the immune system and could influence the response to vaccinations. Therefore, several studies have investigated how the use of different DMTs could influence the development of post-vaccination immunity against SARS-Cov-2 (Table 1). Most of them have measured the humoral response to vaccination while the cellular response is still little investigated.

Table 1:
Studies on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in MS patients treated with different

To date, all studies on the immunogenicity of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients treated with interferon, dimethyl fumarate, glatiramer acetate, and teriflunomide have demonstrated an adequate antibody response (Achiron et al., 2021; Capone et al., 2021; Georgieva et al., 2021; Pitzalis et al., 2021; Sormani et al., 2021b; Tallantyre et al., 2022).

Interestingly, one study shows that patients treated with interferon have a higher IgG titer compared to healthy subjects (Maniscalco et al., 2021). The authors suggested that this finding could be linked to the interferon mechanism of action that does not involve peripheral lymphocytes.

Besides, even patients treated with cladribine (Achiron et al., 2021; Capone et al., 2021; Georgieva et al., 2021; Grothe et al., 2021; Pitzalis et al., 2021; Sormani et al., 2021b; Tallantyre et al., 2022), alemtuzumab (Drulovic et al, 2020; Achiron et al., 2021; Capone et al., 2021; Georgieva et al., 2021; Pitzalis et al., 2021; Sormani et al., 2021b; Tallantyre et al., 2022), and natalizumab (Achiron et al., 2021; Capone et al., 2021; Ciotti et al., 2020; Georgieva et al., 2021; Pitzalis et al., 2021; Sormani et al., 2021b; Tallantyre et al., 2022) have an adequate humoral response. Only one study involving 10 patients treated with cladribine found a lower level of serum antibodies compared with healthy subjects or MS patients treated with other DMTs (Maniscalco et al., 2021).

Because of their mechanism of action, sphingosine l-phosphate receptor modulators and anti-CD20 antibodies can reduce the immunogenicity of vaccinations. Accordingly, these drugs have been the object of specific interest in several recent studies.

The sphingosine l-phosphate receptor modulators (fingolimod, ozanimod, siponimod) act by regulating lymphocyte egress from lymphoid tissues into the circulation. It is well-known that patients treated with fingolimod develop a lower level of antibodies after flu vaccination (Ciotti et al., 2020). This observation has been also confirmed for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (Achiron et al., 2021; Achtnichts et al., 2021; Capone et al., 2021; Pitzalis et al., 2021; Sormani et al., 2021b; Konig et al., 2022; Tallantyre et al., 2022). Only one study (Sormani et al., 2021b) showed an adequate immune response in patients treated with fingolimod. To date, no data are available for ozanimod while only one article has evaluated the humoral response in patients treated with siponimod (Skorić et al., 2022). In this paper, 13 patients with secondary progressive MS treated with siponimod were tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in comparison to 11 healthy subjects. Although the sample size is small, results consistently show that patients treated with siponimod have a blunted humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Ocrelizumab and ofatumumab are anti-CD20 antibodies that deplete circulating immature and mature B cells but spare CD20-negative plasma cells. Most studies have shown that patients treated with ocrelizumab have an insufficient humoral response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (Bar-Or et al., 2020; Ciotti et al., 2020; Achiron et al., 2021; Gallo et al., 2021; Maniscalco et al., 2021; Novak et al., 2021; Pitzalis et al., 2021; Sormani et al., 2021b; Etemadifar et al., 2022). These data could be explained if we consider the strong depletion of CD20 cells induced by the drug. Only one study (Guerrieri et al., 2021) suggests a different outcome in patients treated with ocrelizumab. Up to now, there are no data about the effect of ofatumumab on the immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

Since the protection against coronavirus cannot be explained entirely by humoral immunity, the cellular response has also been investigated in patients treated with anti-CD20 therapies. Apostolidis et al. (2021) found that the mRNA vaccines provide a strong immune cellular response in patients treated with ocrelizumab although most of those do not develop an optimal level of antibodies (Apostolidis et al., 2021). This conclusion is supported by the presence of high levels of functional Th1 and CD8 T-cells in most of the subjects, even in those patients in which the anti-CD20 therapy altered significantly the antigen-specific T follicular helper cells response. Brill et al. (2021) show similar results demonstrating that patients treated with ocrelizumab develop a SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell response comparable with healthy controls despite a lower level of serum antibodies (Brill et al., 2021). Those data suggest that patients treated with ocrelizumab can benefit from the administration of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine as well.

In the last months, some studies have investigated the humoral response to the third dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in PwMS.

Dreyer-Alster et al. (2022) have evaluated, in a cohort of 211 PwMS, the safety of the third dose of Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine. Moreover, in a subgroup of 55 patients treated with different DMTs, they also measured the level of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies before and after the administration of the third dose. They found a 21-fold increase in IgG titers following the booster jab (Dreyer-Alster et al., 2022).

Interestingly, none of the patients included in this sample was in treatment with ocrelizumab or fingolimod, which have been associated, as previously said, with blunted humoral response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

This issue was specifically addressed in two subsequent studies. König et al. (2022) measured the levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titer after the third dose in 130 MS patients with a weak humoral immune response after 2 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Among them, 100 patients were treated with rituximab, 1 patient with ocrelizumab, and 29 patients with fingolimod (König et al., 2022).

They found out that the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titer increased significantly in all patients after the third dose. The proportion of patients that developed protective humoral immunity after the third dose was 24.8% in the group on anti-CD20 treatment and 6.9% in the group on fingolimod.

Similarly, even Achtnichts et al. (2021) investigated the humoral response after the third dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in 16 MS patients on anti-CD20 therapies that previously failed to reach adequate IgG antibodies levels with the second dose (Achtnichts et al., 2021). Differently from König et al. (2022), in this cohort, only one patient developed a protective humoral immune response after the booster jab.

To date, few data on the incidence of breakthrough COVID-19 among vaccinated PwMS are available in the literature (Chilmuri et al., 2021; Januel et al., 2021; Rose et al., 2021). Rose et al. (2021) described the cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection in 669 fully vaccinated patients with Moderna, Pfizer, or Janssen vaccines. Breakthrough COVID-19 was relieved in 13 patients, 10 in treatment with anti-CD20 therapy, and 3 with fingolimod. Only two of them required hospitalization. The interpretation of these results is limited by the absence of available SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers (Rose et al., 2021). A recent case-series report shows 18 cases of mild COVID-19 after two doses of BNT162b2-vaccination, 13 of which were treated with anti-CD20 therapy, 4 with fingolimod, and 1 with interferon beta (Januel et al., 2021). However, it should be noted that in this report, some patients on anti-CD20 treatment received vaccination during the maximum cell-depletion interval after administration and probably did not develop a valid seroconversion (Chilmuri et al., 2021).


Despite the use of vaccines for the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection is universally recognized as one of the key factors in the fight against the pandemic, some people are still in doubt about vaccination. Several studies have assessed the willingness of the general population to receive the vaccine and the related determinants of this choice (Bell et al., 2020; Neumann-Böhme et al., 2020; Reiter et al., 2020). This issue is particularly relevant for vulnerable people that are at risk to develop severe COVID-19 complications. The first study that focused on MS patients was the one by Ehde et al. (2021), a cross-sectional study that assessed the willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccination in an U.S. population of 486 MS patients. The study was based on an online survey with a response on a 5-point scale (1 = not at all willing, 2 = a little willing, 3 = moderately willing, 4 = very willing, and 5 = extremely willing). They also assessed demographic data, MS disease-related features, and disease severity, together with measures of psychological distress. Moreover, they collected data on patients’ perceived risk of being infected, of being hospitalized for or dying from COVID-19 along with information on where they got informed about COVID and the trust in official communication about the pandemic. The results showed that during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic (between 10 April 2020 and 06 May 2020) about 66% of participants wanted to be vaccinated and, among all the factors included in the analysis, those most related to willingness were the school degree and the higher perception of being at risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection. One year later, the same authors conducted a follow-up survey in the period from January to February 2021, following the approval of COVID-19 vaccines (Ehde et al., 2021). They found that about 20% of the participants were vaccine-hesitant and the major concerns referred to the long-term effects of the vaccine, the vaccine approval process, and the potential impact of the vaccine given their own health conditions/history. Compared with the previous survey, the authors found that people who were in the “willing” or “undecided” groups became more willing but people who were “unwilling” in the first survey remained “unwilling” in the second survey. The authors concluded that vaccine hesitancy has decreased in the MS community during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the public effort should be targeted at the undecided population. Serrazina et al. (2021) tried to assess willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine in the European population affected with MS. They performed an observational, cross-sectional, hospital-based, single-center study, on 337 MS patients, using an online survey in the period between 21st December 2020 and 3rd January 2021. They found that the 80.9% of MS participants were either definitely (35.2%) or probably willing (45.7%) to receive a COVID-19 vaccine whilst the 19.1% of patients said they definitely (2.7%) or probably (16.4%) would not get a COVID-19 vaccine (Serrazina et al., 2021). Another interesting piece of information was that a considerable number of patients prefer to postpone vaccination probably because of the concerns about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. A third study was performed by Yap et al. (2021) based on a single-center Irish population of 105 MS patients, trying to assess the pneumococcal, influenza, and SARS-CoV-2 vaccine attitude. They found that 91.5% of the participants were willing to receive the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (Yap et al., 2021). This percentage was higher than that reported in other studies on COVID-19 vaccination (Ehde et al., 2021a; Ehde et al., 2021b; Serrazina et al., 2021), and higher than that obtained in the same study for influenza and pneumococcal vaccines (~80%). In this study, the most common reason for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was the safety concern. The authors concluded that the increased acceptability of COVID-19 vaccines among people with MS reflects the enormous public effort to emphasize the socio-economic benefits linked with the vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.


To date, an estimated 2.8 million people are living with MS worldwide (No author listed, 2022d). COVID-19 pandemic poses an important challenge for all these people and for their caregivers. Surely, vaccination represents the key factor in the global strategy against the COVID-19 pandemic but, at the same time, several considerations should be done for vulnerable people such as PwMS.

In this review, we have briefly summarized the main available findings of COVID-19 vaccination in MS. In particular, we have reviewed data about the safety, efficacy, and acceptability of COVID-19 vaccines, in patients with MS, with a particular focus on the effects of DMTs.

Overall, in PwMS, COVID-19 vaccination is safe, and the profile of short-term side effects (in terms of frequency, symptoms, and severity) is similar to the general population (Achiron et al., 2021). A matter of specific concern for MS is the potential risk of disease reactivation induced by COVID-19 vaccination. Although few cases of CNS inflammation associated with vaccination have been described (Ismail and Salama, 2022a), available data suggest that, PwMS, is unlikely to observe a reactivation of disease, both clinically and radiologically. However, we have to acknowledge that only Class III evidence, coming from case reports, case-series and retrospective observations, is available. Further studies with a prospective design and larger samples are warranted.

Regarding booster jabs, few data are currently available about the administration of the third dose in PwMS. However, at present, no specific safety alerts have emerged.

Measuring the efficacy of vaccination in real-life poses different methodological problems. Indeed, most studies have measured the immunogenicity of the COVID-19 vaccine as a proxy of vaccination efficacy, whilst only a few studies have measured the number of people who got infected by SARS-CoV-2 after vaccination. Overall, the results of both approaches are similar and demonstrate that MS itself does not influence the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination while the use of some DMTs may numb the immune response.

Evidence has clearly shown an adequate immune response for PwMS taking first-line DMTs such as interferon, dimethyl fumarate, glatiramer acetate, and teriflunomide, with a post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infection incidence rate equal to the general population. Treatment with natalizumab, cladribine, and alemtuzumab does not numb seroconversion to vaccines and offers protection against breakthrough COVID-19 as well. Conversely, patients in treatment with anti-CD20 therapies or sphingosine l-phosphate receptor modulators can have a reduced immune humoral response after COVID-19 vaccination.

Since the protection against the virus strongly relies on cellular immunity, some studies have explored whether such patients could have a protection against Sars-Cov-2 despite low levels of specific antibodies. Available data (Apostolidis et al., 2021; Brill et al., 2021) demonstrate that patients in therapy with ocrelizumab develop a SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell response compared with one of healthy controls while, to our knowledge, no studies have investigated this effect in patients treated with sphingosine l-phosphate receptor modulators.

Moreover, available data (Rose et al., 2021) suggest that patients treated with anti-CD20 therapies and sphingosine l-phosphate receptor modulators could have a higher risk to develop COVID-19 despite vaccination compared to patients treated with other DMTs.

The administration of additional jabs has been proposed as a strategy to boost the immunity against SARS-COV-2 but there are still a few studies on the matter (Achtnichts et al., 2021; Dreyer-Alster et al., 2022; König et al., 2022).

Overall, available data showed that a small but significant part of PwMS has relevant concerns about vaccination that prevent them from receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Such attitude also called vaccine hesitancy, is a well-known public health issue regarding the general population and not only PwMS (Zuzak et al., 2008).

Although the acceptability of COVID-19 vaccines has increased over the last year, vaccine hesitancy remains a significant problem with potentially dramatic consequences in vulnerable people such as PwMS.

Due to the importance of vaccination in the global strategy against COVID-19, further studies are warranted to understand why people refuse vaccination and to design more effective communication strategies aimed at increasing compliance with the vaccination campaign.


COVID-19 vaccination in PwMS is strongly recommended, considering their well-established safety profile, immunogenicity, and efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients treated with anti-CD20 therapies and sphingosine l-phosphate receptor modulators can have a reduced humoral response and potentially a limited efficacy. In these patients, neurologists should evaluate the appropriate timing for vaccine administration and further studies are necessary to understand the role of cellular immunity and the possible usefulness of booster jabs.

In conclusion, based on available data, COVID-19 vaccination should be certainly recommended in PwMS irrespective of DMTs, because the risk of severe COVID-19 complications largely outweighs the low percentage of serious neurologic and non-neurologic adverse events associated with vaccines. Healthcare providers should unanimously promote vaccine uptake and a specific effort by institutions should be made to convince the undecided population. Surely, the careful post-marketing surveillance is also necessary to confirm the long-term safety of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Considering the results of previous studies on protein subunit vaccines, the approval of this kind of vaccine for COVID-19 (such as NVX-CoV2373) could further improve the vaccination coverage among PwMS.

Author contributions:FC: Conceptualization and original draft preparation. MR, AC, and FM: data search and collection. FP and VDL: analysis and reviewing. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest:The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Availability of data and materials:All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Open peer reviewer:Elena Giusto, San Camillo Hospital: Ospedale San Camillo, Italy.

Additional file:Open peer review report 1.

Additional file

P-Reviewer: Giusto E; C-Editors: Zhao M, Liu WJ, Qiu Y; T-Editor: Jia Y


1. Achiron A, Dolev M, Menascu S, Zohar DN, Dreyer-Alster S, Miron S, Shirbint E, Magalashvili D, Flechter S, Givon U, Guber D, Stern Y, Polliack M, Falb R, Gurevich M 2021 COVID-19 vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis:What we have learnt by February 2021 Mult Scler J 27 864 870
2. Achiron A, Mandel M, Dreyer-Alster S, Harari G, Dolev M, Menascu S, Magalashvili D, Flechter S, Givon U, Guber D, Sonis P, Zilkha-Falb R, Gurevich M 2021 Humoral immune response in multiple sclerosis patients following PfizerBNT162b2 COVID19 vaccination:Up to 6 months cross-sectional study J Neuroimmunol 361 577746 24
3. Achtnichts L, Jakopp B, Oberle M, Nedeltchev K, Fux CA, Sellner J, Findling O 2021 Humoral immune response after the third SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in CD20 depleted people with multiple sclerosis Vaccines 9 1470
4. Apostolidis SA, Kakara M, Painter MM, Goel RR, Mathew D, Lenzi K, Rezk A, Patterson KR, Espinoza DA, Kadri JC, Markowitz DM, Markowitz C, Mexhitaj I, Jacobs D, Babb A, Betts MR, Prak E, Weiskopf D, Grifoni A, Lundgreen KA, et al. 2021 Cellular and humoral immune responses following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis on anti-CD20 therapy Nat Med 27 1990 2001
5. Arora S, Grover V, Saluja P, Algarni YA, Saquib SA, Asif SM, Batra K, Alshahrani MY, Das G, Jain R, Ohri A 2022 Literature review of omicron:a grim reality amidst COVID-19 Microorganisms 10 451
6. Baden LR, El Sahly HM, Essink B, Kotloff K, Frey S, Novak R, Diemert D, Spector SA, Rouphael N, Creech CB, McGettigan J, Khetan S, Segall N, Solis J, Brosz A, Fierro C, Schwartz H, Neuzil K, Corey L, Gilbert P, et al. 2021 Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine N Engl J Med 384 403 416
7. Bar-Or A, Calkwood JC, Chognot C, Evershed J, Fox EJ, Herman A, Manfrini M, McNamara J, Robertson DS, Stokmaier D, Wendt J K, Winthrop KL, Traboulsee A 2020 Effect of ocrelizumab on vaccine responses in patients with multiple sclerosis Neurology 95 e1999 e2008
8. Barzegar M, Mirmosayyeb O, Gajarzadeh M, Afshari-Safavi A, Nehzat N, Vaheb S, Shaygannejad V, Maghzi AH 2021 COVID-19 among patients with multiple sclerosis:a systematic review Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 8 e1001
9. Bell S, Clarke R, Mounier-Jack S, Walker JL, Paterson P 2020 Parents'and guardians'views on the acceptability of a future COVID-19 vaccine:a multi-methods study in England Vaccine 38 7789 7798
10. Brill L, Rechtman A, Zveik O, Haham N, Oiknine-Djian E, Wolf DG, Levin N, Raposo C, Vaknin-Dembinsky A 2021 Humoral and T-cell response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with ocrelizumab JAMA Neurol 78 1510 1514
11. Brownlee W, Bourdette D, Broadley S, Killestein J, Ciccarelli O 2020 Treating multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic Neurology 94 949 952
12. Buljevac D, Flach HZ, Hop WCJ, Hijdra D, Laman JD, Savelkoul HFJ, Van Der Meché FGA, Van Doorn P.A, Hintzen RQ 2002 Prospective study on the relationship between infections and multiple sclerosis exacerbations Brain 125 952 960
13. Buttari F, Bruno A, Dolcetti E, Azzolini F, Bellantonio P, Centonze D, Fantozzi R 2021 COVID-19 vaccines in multiple sclerosis treated with cladribine or ocrelizumab Mult Scler Relat Disord 52 102983
14. Capone F, Lucchini M, Ferraro E, Bianco A, Rossi M, Cicia A, Cortese A, Cruciani A, De Arcangelis V, De Giglio L, Motolese F, Sancetta B, Mirabella M, Di Lazzaro V 2021 Immunogenicity and safety of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in people with multiple sclerosis treated with different disease-modifying therapies Neurotherapeutics 1 9
15. Capuano R, Donnarumma G, Bisecco A, Grimaldi E, Conte M, d'Ambrosio A, Matrone F, Risi M, Borgo RM, Altieri M, Giuliano F, Coppola N, Galdiero M, Tedeschi G, Gallo A 2021 Humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with natalizumab Ther Adv Neurol Disord 14 175628642110381132
16. Chilimuri S, Mantri N, Gongati S, Zahid M, Sun H 2021 COVID-19 vaccine failure in a patient with multiple sclerosis on ocrelizumab Vaccines 9 219
17. Ciotti JR, Valtcheva MV, Cross AH 2020 Effects of MS disease-modifying therapies on responses to vaccinations:a review Mult Scler Relat Disord 45 102439
18. Di Filippo M, Cordioli C, Malucchi S, Annovazzi P, Cavalla P, Clerici VT, Ragonese P, Nociti V, Radaelli M, Laroni A, Buttari F, Lorefice L, Ferraro D, Gajofatto A, Prosperini L, Fantozzi R, Boffa L, Lanzillo R, Moccia M, Clerico M, et al. 2021 mRNA COVID-19 vaccines do not increase the short-term risk of clinical relapses in multiple sclerosis J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 93 448 450
19. Dreyer-Alster S, Menascu S, Mandel M, Shirbint E, Magalashvili D, Dolev M, Flechter S, Givon U, Guber D, Stern Y, Miron S, Polliack M, Falb R, Sonis P, Gurevich M, Achiron A 2022 COVID-19 vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis:Safety and humoral efficacy of the third booster dose J Neurol Sci 434 120155
20. Drulovic J, Ivanovic J, Martinovic V, Tamas O, Veselinovic N, Cujic D, Gnjatovic M, Mesaros S, Pekmezovic T 2020 Humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 vaccines in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with immune reconstitution therapies Mult Scler Relat Disord 54 103150
21. Ehde DM, Roberts MK, Herring TE, Alschuler KN 2021a Willingness to obtain COVID-19 vaccination in adults with multiple sclerosis in the United States Mult Scler Relat Disord 49 102788
22. Ehde DM, Roberts MK, Humbert AT, Herring TE, Alschuler KN 2021b COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in adults with multiple sclerosis in the United States:A follow up survey during the initial vaccine rollout in 2021 Mult Scler Relat Disord 54 103163
23. Epstein S, Xia Z, Lee AJ, Dahl M, Edwards K, Levit E, Longbrake EE, Perrone C, Kavak K, Weinstock-Guttman B, Diallo F, Ricci A, Riley CS, De Jager PL, Farber R, Wesley SF Multiple Sclerosis Resilience to COVID-19 (MSReCOV) Collaborative (2022) Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in neuroinflammatory disease:early safety/tolerability data Mult Scler Relat Disord 57 103433
24. Etemadifar M, Sedaghat N, Nouri H, Lotfi N, Chitsaz A, Khorvash R, Zolfaghari H, Ghasemi Movaghar A, Pourabbas M, Salari M 2022 SARS-CoV-2 serology among people with multiple sclerosis on disease-modifying therapies after BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) inactivated virus vaccination:same story, different vaccine Mult Scler Relat Disord 57 103417
25. Gallo A, Capuano R, Donnarumma G, Bisecco A, Grimaldi E, Conte M, d'Ambrosio A, Coppola N, Galdiero M, Tedeschi G 2021 Preliminary evidence of blunted humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in multiple sclerosis patients treated with ocrelizumab Neurol Sci 42 3523 3526
26. García-Grimshaw M, Ceballos-Liceaga SE, Hernández-Vanegas LE, Núñez I, Hernández-Valdivia N, Carrillo-García DA, Michel-Chávez A, Galnáres-Olalde JA, Sandoval GC, del Mar Saniger-Alba M, Carrillo-Mezo RA, Fragoso-Saavedra S, Espino-Ojeda A, Blaisdell-Vidal C, Mosqueda-Gómez JL, Sierra-Madero J, Pérez-Padilla R, Alomía-Zegarra JL, López-Gatell H, Díaz-Ortega JL, et al. 2021 Systemic and neurologic adverse events among 704,003 first-dose recipients of the Pfizer-Biontech (BNT162b2) mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in Mexico Clin Immunol 229 108786
27. Georgieva ZG, D?ffinger R, Kumararatne D, Coles AJ, McCarthy C 2021 Diminished seroconversion following a single SARS-COV-2 vaccine in ocrelizumab-treated relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients Mult Scler doi:10.1177/13524585211046786
28. Grothe C, Steffen F, Bittner S 2021 Humoral immune response and lymphocyte levels after complete vaccination against COVID-19 in a cohort of multiple sclerosis patients treated with cladribine tablets J Cent Nerv Syst Dis 13 117957352110601
29. Guerrieri S, Lazzarin, Zanetta C, Nozzolillo A, Filippi, Moiola L 2022 Serological response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in multiple sclerosis patients treated with fingolimod or ocrelizumab:an initial real-life experience J Neurol 269 39 43
30. Heath PT, Galiza EP, Baxter DN, Boffito M, Browne D, Burns F, Chadwick DR, Clark R, Cosgrove C, Galloway J, Goodman AL, Heer A, Higham A, Iyengar S, Jamal A, Jeanes C, Kalra PA, Kyriakidou C, McAuley DF, Meyrick A, et al. 2021 Safety and efficacy of NVX-CoV2373 Covid-19 vaccine N Engl J Med 385 1172 1183
31. Ismail II, Salama S 2022a A systematic review of cases of CNS demyelination following COVID-19 vaccination J Neuroimmunol 362 577765
32. Ismail II, Salama S 2022b Association of CNS demyelination and COVID-19 infection:an updated systematic review J Neurol 269 541 576
33. Januel E, De Seze J, Vermersch P, Maillart E, Bourre B, Pique J, Moisset X, Bensa C, Maarouf A, Pelletier J, Vukusic S, Audoin B, Louapre C COVISEP Investigators (2021) Post-vaccine COVID-19 in patients with multiple sclerosis or neuromyelitis optica Mult Scler doi:10.1177/13524585211049737
34. Keech C, Albert G, Cho I, Robertson A, Reed P, Neal S, Plested JS, Zhu M, Cloney-Clark S, Zhou H, Smith G, Patel N, Frieman MB, Haupt RE, Logue J, McGrath M, Weston S, Piedra PA, Desai C, Callahan K, et al. 2020 Phase 1-2 trial of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein nanoparticle vaccine N Engl J Med 383 2320 2332
35. Khayat-Khoei M, Bhattacharyya S, Katz J, Harrison D, Tauhid S, Bruso P, Houtchens MK, Edwards KR, Bakshi R 2022 COVID-19 mRNA vaccination leading to CNS inflammation:a case series J Neurol 269 1093 1106
36. König M, Torgauten HM, Tran TT, Holmøy T, Vaage JT, Lund-Johansen F, Nygaard GO 2022 Immunogenicity and safety of a third SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose in patients with multiple sclerosis and weak immune response after COVID-19 vaccination JAMA Neurol 79 307 309
37. Lotan I, Wilf-Yarkoni A, Friedman Y, Stiebel-Kalish H, Steiner I, Hellmann MA 2021 Safety of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine in multiple sclerosis (MS):early experience from a tertiary MS center in Israel Eur J Neurol 28 3742 3748
38. Lopez Bernal J, Andrews N, Gower C, Robertson C, Stowe J, Tessier E, Simmons R, Cottrell S, Roberts R, O'Doherty M, Brown K, Cameron C, Stockton D, McMenamin J, Ramsay M 2021 Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on COVID-19 related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England:test negative case-control study BMJ 373 n1088
39. Maniscalco GT, Manzo V, Ferrara AL, Perrella A, Di Battista M, Salvatore S, Graziano D, Viola A, Amato G, Moreggia O, Di Giulio Cesare D, Barbato S, Servillo G, Longo K, Di Giovanni M, Scarpati B, Muggianu SM, Longo G, Russo G, et al. 2021 Interferon beta-1a treatment promotes SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine response in multiple sclerosis subjects Mult Scler Relat Disord 58 103455
40. Neumann-Böhme S, Varghese NE, Sabat I, Barros PP, Brouwer W, van Exel J, Schreyögg J, Stargardt T 2020 Once we have it, will we use it?A European survey on willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-19 Eur J Heal Econ 21 977 982
41. No author listed (2022a) COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic Available at: Accessed January 22, 2022
    42. No author listed (2022b) Tracking SARS-CoV-2 variants Available at: Accessed April 20, 2022
      43. No author listed (2022c) Status of COVID-19 Vaccines within WHO EUL/PQ evaluation process Available at: Accessed May 19, 2022
        44. No author listed (2022d) MS International Federation Atlas of MS Accessed January 23, 2022
          45. Novak F, Nilsson AC, Nielsen C, Holm DK, Østergaard K, Bystrup A, Byg KE, Johansen IS, Mittl K, Rowles W, Mcpolin K, Spencer C, Sagan S, Gerungan C, Wilson MR, Zamvil SS, Bove R, Sabatino JJ, Sejbaek T 2021 Humoral immune response following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination concomitant to anti-CD20 therapy in multiple sclerosis Mult Scler Relat Disord 56 103251
          46. Pitzalis M, Idda M.L, Lodde V, Loizedda A, Lobina M, Zoledziewska M, Virdis F, Delogu G, Pirinu F, Marini MG, Mingoia M, Frau J, Lorefice L, Fronza M, Carmagnini D, Carta E, Orrù V, Uzzau S, Solla P, et al. 2021 Effect of different disease-modifying therapies on humoral response to BNT162b2 vaccine in sardinian multiple sclerosis patients Front Immunol 12 781843
          47. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, Perez JL, Pérez Marc G, Moreira ED, Zerbini C, Bailey R, Swanson KA, Roychoudhury S, Koury K, Li P, Kalina WV, Cooper D, Frenck RW Jr, Hammitt LL, Türeci O, et al. 2020 Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine N Engl J Med 383 2603 2615
          48. Polak SB, Van Gool IC, Cohen D, von der Thüsen JH, van Paassen J 2020 A systematic review of pathological findings in COVID-19:a pathophysiological timeline and possible mechanisms of disease progression Mod Pathol 33 2128 2138
          49. Reder AT, Centonze D, Naylor ML, Nagpal A, Rajbhandari R, Altincatal A, Kim M, Berdofe A, Radhakrishnan M, Jung E, Sandrock AW, Smirnakis K, Popescu C, de Moor C 2021 COVID-19 in patients with multiple sclerosis:associations with disease-modifying therapies CNS Drugs 35 317
          50. Reiter PL, Pennell ML, Katz ML 2020 Acceptability of a COVID-19 vaccine among adults in the United States:How many people would get vaccinated? Vaccine 38 6500 6507
          51. Rose DR, Mahadeen AZ, Carlson AK, Planchon SM, Sedlak J, Husak S, Bermel RA, Cohen JA, Moss BP 2021 Clinical features and outcomes of COVID-19 despite SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in people with multiple sclerosis Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 7 20552173211057110
          52. Rostami Mansoor S, Ghasemi-Kasman M 2021 Impact of disease-modifying drugs on the severity of COVID-19 infection in multiple sclerosis patients J Med Virol 93 1314 1319
          53. Sepúlveda M, Llufriu S, Martínez-Hernández E, Català M, Artola M, Hernando A, Montejo C, Pulido-Valdeolivas I, Martínez-Heras E, Guasp M, Solana E, Llansó L, Escudero D, Aldea M, Prats C, Graus F, Blanco Y, Saiz A 2021 Incidence and impact of COVID-19 in MS:a survey from a barcelona MS unit Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 8 e954
          54. Serrazina F, Sobral Pinho A, Cabral G, Salavisa M, Correia AS 2021 Willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-19:an exploratory online survey in a Portuguese cohort of multiple sclerosis patients Mult Scler Relat Disord 51 102880
          55. Skorić MK, Rogić D, Lapić I, Šegulja D, Habek M 2022 Humoral immune response to COVID-19 vaccines in people with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis treated with siponimod Mult Scler Relat Disord 57 103435
          56. Sormani MP, Inglese M, Schiavetti I, Carmisciano L, Laroni A, Lapucci C, Da Rin G, Serrati C, Gandoglia I, Tassinari T, Perego G, Brichetto G, Gazzola P, Mannironi A, Stromillo ML, Cordioli C, Landi D, Clerico M, Signoriello E, Frau J, et al. 2021a Effect of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in MS patients treated with disease modifying therapies eBioMedicine 72 103581
          57. Sormani MP, Schiavetti I, Landi D, Carmisciano L, De Rossi N, Cordioli C, Moiola L, Radaelli M, Immovilli P, Capobianco M, Brescia Morra V, Trojano M, Tedeschi G, Comi G, Battaglia MA, Patti F, Fragoso YD, Sen S, Siva A, Furlan R, et al. 2021b SARS-CoV-2 serology after COVID-19 in multiple sclerosis:an international cohort study Mult Scler J doi:10.1177/13524585211035318
          58. Tallantyre EC, Vickaryous N, Anderson V, Asardag AN, Baker D, Bestwick J, Bramhall K, Chance R, Evangelou N, George K, Giovannoni G, Godkin A, Grant L, Harding KE, Hibbert A, Ingram G, Jones M, Kang AS, Loveless S, Moat SJ, et al. 2022 COVID-19 vaccine response in people with multiple sclerosis Ann Neurol 91 89 100
          59. Tenforde MW, Self WH, Adams K, Gaglani M, Ginde AA, McNeal T, Ghamande S, Douin DJ, Talbot HK, Casey JD, Mohr NM, Zepeski A, Shapiro NI, Gibbs KW, Files DC, Hager DN, Shehu A, Prekker ME, Erickson HL, Exline MC, et al. 2021 Association between mRNA vaccination and COVID-19 hospitalization and disease severity JAMA 326 2043 2054
          60. Woopen C, Schleußner K, Akgün K, Ziemssen T 2021 Approach to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis Front Immunol 12 2458
          61. Yap SM, Al Hinai M, Gaughan M, Callanan I, Kearney H, Tubridy N, McGuigan C 2021 Vaccine hesitancy among people with multiple sclerosis Mult Scler Relat Disord 56 103236
          62. Zuzak TJ, Zuzak-Siegrist I, Rist L, Staubli G, Simoes-Wüst AP 2008 Attitudes towards vaccination:users of complementary and alternative medicine versus non-users Swiss Med Wkly 138 713 718

          COVID-19; multiple sclerosis; SARS-CoV-2; vaccination; vaccine

          Copyright: © 2023 Neural Regeneration Research