Share this article on:

Impact of human CA8 on thermal antinociception in relation to morphine equivalence in mice

Fu, Eugene S.a; Erasso, Diana M.a; Zhuang, Gerald Z.a; Upadhyay, Uditaa; Ozdemir, Mehtapa; Wiltshire, Timothyd; Sarantopoulos, Konstantinos D.a; Smith, Shad B.e; Maixner, Williame; Martin, Eden R.b,c; Levitt, Roy C.a,b,c

doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000872
Clinical Neuroscience

Recently, we showed that murine dorsal root ganglion (DRG) Car8 expression is a cis-regulated eQTL that determines analgesic responses. In this report, we show that transduction through sciatic nerve injection of DRG with human wild-type carbonic anhydrase-8 using adeno-associated virus viral particles (AAV8-V5-CA8WT) produces analgesia in naive male C57BL/6J mice and antihyperalgesia after carrageenan treatment. A peak mean increase of about 4 s in thermal hindpaw withdrawal latency equaled increases in thermal withdrawal latency produced by 10 mg/kg intraperitoneal morphine in these mice. Allometric conversion of this intraperitoneal morphine dose in mice equals an oral morphine dose of about 146 mg in a 60-kg adult. Our work quantifies for the first time analgesia and antihyperalgesia in an inflammatory pain model after DRG transduction by CA8 gene therapy.

aDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management

bJohn P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics

cJohn T. Macdonald Foundation, Department of Human Genetics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

dCenter for Pharmacogenetics and Individualized Therapy, University of North Caroline, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill

eDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA

Correspondence to Roy C. Levitt, MD, Room 8052A (R-371), Rosenstiel Medical Sciences Building, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA Tel: +1 305 2431278; fax: +1 305 243 1373; e-mail:

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

Received July 16, 2017

Accepted August 9, 2017

Back to Top | Article Outline


According to the IOM Report (2011) on Chronic Pain in America, chronic pain affects at least 116 million US adults, accounting for over 30% of Americans 1,2. Systemic analgesics, including opioids, can be limited by side effects and are inadequate in relieving chronic pain. Almost 250 million opioid prescriptions are dispensed annually, indicative of the ‘opioid epidemic’, which has led to a major rise in drug overdose deaths 2,3. This has prompted the need to seek alternatives that selectively and safely ‘silence’ pain-transducing nociceptors, with the potential for prolonged effects (e.g. lasting weeks, months, or longer) 4,5.

Previously, we used complementation in homozygous null mutant (MT) mice, lacking Car8 protein because of an exon 8 deletion, to produce prolonged elevations in thermal pain thresholds after AAV8-V5-Car8 intervention 6. This approach demonstrated successful transduction of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) through sciatic nerve (SN) injections of adeno-associated virus (AAV) virus containing the expression vector encoding Car8 wild-type (WT) cDNA to produce antinociception. However, this finding is ‘paradoxical’ with respect to the mechanism of analgesia seen with morphine. The Car8 protein is known to inhibit inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor-1 (ITPR1) to decrease calcium release 6, whereas morphine depends on increased ITPR1-dependent calcium release to produce analgesia 7. In another study, we addressed the morphine ‘paradox’ in which we found that murine DRG Car8 gene expression is highly variable across inbred strains of mice and genetically regulates the analgesic effects of morphine in an antagonistic manner 8. We surmised that the antagonism between Car8 expression and morphine may be related to their opposing effects on ITPR1-mediated calcium release 8.

In this report, we extended our previous findings 6 to evaluate the potential of the human form of carbonic anhydrase-8 (CA8) to produce thermal antinociception in naive C57BL/6J male mice. To quantify any resultant analgesia, we performed SN injections of AAV8 containing a vector encoding V5-CA8WT compared with injections containing vector encoding V5-CA8MT with the S100P null MT 9. We report herein that AAV8-V5-CA8WT significantly increased thermal baseline withdrawal latencies before carrageenan inflammation, indicating analgesia. AAV8-V5-CA8WT also attenuated decreases in withdrawal latencies after carrageenan inflammation, indicating antihyperalgesia. We further showed quantification of these analgesic and antihyperalgesic responses in morphine equivalents.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Materials and methods


All experiments and procedures were carried out in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the current guidelines for investigation of experimental pain in conscious animals 10,11. This protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Miami. Male adult C57BL/6J mice, 12–14 weeks of age and weighing 30–35 g, were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, Maine, USA). Mice were kept in a home cage environment with access to food and water ad libitum. Animals were allowed to acclimatize for at least 7 days and were housed in a 12–12 h light–dark cycle in a virus/antigen-free facility with controlled humidity and temperature.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Generation and SN injection of AAV8-V5-CA8 viral particles

Generation and SN injection of AAV8 viral particles is described in our previous work 6. These viral constructs express human CA8 WT or MT CA8 vectors with V5 tag. The S100P mutation in the MT vector is associated with proteasome-mediated degradation that represents a null mutation comparable to the causal Car8 deletion mutation of the waddles mouse 6,9. After SN exposure, 1.5 μl of about 2.0E14 genome copies/ml viral particles containing V5-CA8WT and V5-CA8MT were injected into the SN. The negative control group received saline injections through SN under anesthesia.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Mouse model of inflammatory pain in relation to neurobehavioral testing

A volume of 15 μl of 1% λ carrageenan (Sigma; Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, Missouri, USA) in saline was subcutaneously injected into the plantar surface of left hindpaw. Thermal sensitivity was measured using heat according to the Hargreaves’ test, to obtain threshold calculations, respectively. Tests were performed in a quiet room with daylight-like illumination. Animals were habituated to the behavioral room and apparatus for at least 60 min for 1 week before a blinded investigator collected baseline data. The thermal sensitivity test was performed using an IITC Plantar Antinociception Meter apparatus (IITC Life Sciences, Los Angeles, California, USA) with a plastic box placed on a glass plate of constant temperature (30°C). The mouse plantar surface was exposed to a beam of radiant heat to induce paw withdrawal. The intensity of the Hargreaves’ device was adjusted to obtain average values of 5–9 s in control mice, with a maximum of 20 s as cutoff to prevent potential injury. The latency time (in seconds) from the onset of the intense light beam to paw withdrawal was defined as the withdrawal latency of the paw. Two consecutive tests were averaged to establish the paw withdrawal latency.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Morphine dosing regimen in relation to neurobehavioral testing

For the dose–response assessment, we chose to study doses of saline (vehicle), 1, 3, 10, 30, and 60 mg/kg. The thermal responses of male naive C57BL/6J mice were measured at 30–60 min after a single dose of intraperitoneal saline or morphine administration. This time frame was chosen based on the morphine response findings from Dogrul and Seyrak 12. On a further note, the 30–60 min time frame was required to measure thermal responses after saline or morphine administration, and reflects the acclimation time needed in the behavioral device. Moreover, we show that the maximal response to morphine resides within this window. These morphine doses were selected based on the findings by Wilson et al. 13 in which they found that maximal thermal antinociception occurred at doses less than 100 mg/kg in C57BL/6J mice using a tail immersion assay.

Thermal sensitivity was measured in these mice using the Hargreaves’ assay, as previously described. The thermal latency data in the morphine dose–response assessment are presented after normalization to vehicle (saline). Normalization of the data entailed subtraction of the saline response to adjust for environmental effects due to intraperitoneal injections in nonanesthetized mice.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Statistical analysis

The sample size was n=8 per group for all experiments and the total number of mice studied was N=72. For data presented in Fig. 1, a Tukey’s multiple-comparison post-hoc test of a repeated two-way analysis of variance (treatment×time) was used to analyze these data (IBM SPSS Statistics 24, Armonk, New York, USA). Time was used as the repeated measure factor to determine main effects of treatment, time, and the interaction. Tests of between-subject effects were performed to show an observed power of 1.000 (computed using α=0.05), which include assumption of sphericity, Greenhouse–Geisser correction, and Huynh–Feldt correction. IBM SPSS Statistics 24 was modified to directly calculate the significance between groups at each time point incorporating a Bonferroni’s correction.

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Power was estimated using a two-side two-sample t-test using GraphPad StatMate 2.00 software (La Jolla, California, USA) to determine sample size for data presented in Fig. 2. These calculations were in agreement with other studies 14,15. This power analysis estimates that a group sample size of n=8 is expected to achieve 95% power with a significant level (α) of 0.05. The morphine dosing data are expressed as mean±SEM. All data were normalized to saline response. Normalized data were analyzed for statistical significance by one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison post-hoc test for multiple comparisons (three or more groups) with one variance.

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Back to Top | Article Outline


DRG CA8 overexpression alters thermal nociception before and after carrageenan inflammation

We constructed vectors containing the WT CA8 cDNA with a V5 tag (V5-CA8WT) and CA8 MT cDNA sequence (S100P), which served as a negative control (V5-CA8MT) 8,9. We assessed the effects of V5-CA8 overexpression on thermal nociceptive thresholds for 19 days after SN injection and DRG transduction before and after carrageenan injection and inflammation in the hindpaw of naive C57BL/6J mice (Fig. 1).

Before saline or viral SN injections, baseline thermal latency in naive mice was ∼7 s (mean±SD: 7.34±1.09 s). As shown in Fig. 1, thermal withdrawal latencies were measured in saline-treated and vector-treated mice. Differences in thermal withdrawal latencies were found between groups [F(3, 28)=21.48, P<0.001] and across the 13 time points [F(12, 336)=20.04, P<0.001]. There were also significant interactions between time and group [F(36, 336)=4.37, P<0.001]. Bonferroni’s pairwise comparisons of time×group interaction indicated that there were no differences between groups at baseline, day 1, day 3, and day 5. Withdrawal latencies in the AAV8-V5-CA8WT group were greater than the saline group at all time points after day 7 and after carrageenan application. Withdrawal latencies in the AAV8 empty vector and AAV8-V5-CA8MT groups did not differ from saline treatment at all time points before and after carrageenan treatment.

On day 14, AAV8-V5-CA8WT treatment increased Hargreaves’ thermal latency values by about 4 s compared with baseline values in the naive state (about 11 s compared with 7 s). Thermal latencies did not increase in saline, empty vector, or AAV8-V5-CA8MT-treated groups. Following carrageenan inflammation, the transduction of the mouse DRG with V5-CA8WT prevented a decrease in thermal thresholds below baseline values, with restoration of elevated thermal latencies of about 4 s above baseline by day 19. Conversely, SN administration of saline, virus containing empty vector, and AAV8-V5-CA8MT provided no protection from a decrease in thermal thresholds from baseline following carrageenan inflammation.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Effect of morphine on thermal nociception before carrageenan inflammation

The raw baseline thermal latency for naive mice in Fig. 2 was ∼7 s (mean±SD: 6.87±0.65), which were similar to the unadjusted baseline thermal latency for naive mice studied. Figure 2 shows normalized thermal latencies for intraperitoneal vehicle responses (saline) by subtracting the saline component. After normalization, we found significant increases in thermal withdrawal latencies from mice receiving 10, 30, and 60 mg/kg of morphine compared with saline-treated mice. Mice receiving the highest dose of morphine (60 mg/kg) had increases in thermal withdrawal latencies compared with mice receiving 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg of morphine, but not compared with mice receiving 30 mg/kg. On the basis of this analysis, we were able to assess the amount of parenteral morphine required to increase thermal withdrawal latencies in these naive mice and before carrageenan inflammation. In addition to normalizing the data, we also calculated maximal percentage effectiveness (%MPE) using the formula: (measured thermal latency−saline baseline latency)/[cutoff latency (20 s)−baseline latency] 13. We found a progressive increase in %MPE in relation to the dose, in which the %MPE was 7.48% for the 1 mg/kg group, 20.17% for the 3 mg/kg group, 36.28% for the 10 mg/kg group, 78.86% for the 30 mg/kg group, and 86.20% for the 60 mg/kg group.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Scaling of morphine from mice to humans based on the dose response of morphine on thermal nociception

The amount of morphine administered in mice to produce antinociception (increase in thermal response above baseline) is known as the mouse equivalent dose (Table 1). By obtaining mouse morphine equivalents, these data can be translated to a human equivalent dose by allometric conversion that depends on a formula that accounts for body surface area coefficients in humans and mice 16. As shown in Table 1, we can extrapolate the mouse equivalent dose for thermal somatosensory responses to clinical oral morphine dosing in humans. Using this approach, we estimated that increases in thermal withdrawal latencies on the order of 4 s, as seen with AAV8-V5-CA8WT therapy, corresponds to a dose equivalent to about 10 mg/kg of intraperitoneal morphine (Fig. 2). We found that 10 mg/kg of systemic morphine in mice translates to human equivalent dose of 0.81 mg/kg, 48.65 mg of parental morphine, and 145.95 mg of oral morphine in a 60-kg adult (Table 1).

Table 1

Table 1

Back to Top | Article Outline


In a previous study, we noted that thermal antinociception in the noninflammatory state after Car8 gene therapy persisted for at least 28 days 6. In this report, we show that SN administration in naive inbred mice and DRG transduction by using AAV8-V5-CA8WT gene therapy produces profound analgesia as demonstrated by a maximal increase of thermal latencies about 4 s above baseline (Fig. 1). In addition, we show that CA8 therapy produced antihyperalgesia by preventing a drop in thermal latencies below baseline in response to carrageenan inflammation along with restored thermal baselines to 4 s above baseline by day 19. These findings support the concept that CA8 gene therapy provides prolonged analgesia before or after the onset of inflammatory pain.

As aforementioned, both CA8 and morphine have ‘paradoxical’ effects on intracellular calcium release, even though both can produce antinociception. Morphine antinociception has been attributed to increased calcium release through ITPR1 binding of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) 7. In contrast, we demonstrated that murine AAV8-V5-Car8WT showed inhibition of ITPR1-mediated cytosolic calcium release in conjunction with decreased thermal hypersensitivity 6. We also found that greater DRG Car8 expression antagonizes morphine analgesia concomitant with regulation of morphine-induced ITPR-mediated calcium release 8. The disadvantage of μ opioids, such as of morphine, is the development of analgesic tolerance seen after morphine administration 14, which may involve pathways that increase intracellular calcium release such as IP3 binding to IP3 receptors 17. Further studies are warranted to determine whether CA8 therapy, which involves inhibition of ITPR1-mediated calcium release, could be advantageous in providing antinociception without the development of analgesic tolerance.

We sought to determine the amount of morphine equivalents needed to produce thermal antinociception and correlate that with thermal antinociception associated with CA8 therapy. The degree of thermal antinociception in mice in response to morphine was assessed by dose–response analysis (Fig. 2). On the basis of allometric modeling by Reagan-Shaw et al. 16 among various species, the proper translation of animal dosing to human dosing entails the use of body surface area in addition to weight. Using the morphine dose–response data collected herein in naive male C57BL/6J mice, we show by allometric conversion that CA8 analgesia from this experiment provided increases in thermal latency on the order of 4 s, which translates to morphine dosing equivalents of about 146 mg of oral morphine in a 60-kg adult human. These adult morphine quantities would exceed the recommended dosing maximum of 50–120 mg of daily oral morphine equivalents based on Centers for Disease Control 18 and Washington State Interagency Guidelines 19 on opioid dosing in chronic noncancer pain patients.

By establishing the relationship between morphine dosing and the degree of analgesia and antihyperalgesia associated with CA8 gene therapy, we extrapolated the potential clinical significance of CA8 gene therapy to morphine equivalents. However, there are several limitations with this strategy. We assessed morphine equivalents in a single inbred strain of male mice before inflammatory challenge. Nonetheless, the increases in thermal latencies observed after AAV8-V5-CA8WT therapy clearly persist after carrageenan inflammation, as compared with saline, empty vector, and MT. Thus, it appears that measuring morphine analgesic equivalents before the onset of carrageenan inflammation should still be relevant. In addition, inbred strains of mice differ in analgesic response by sex and strain, limiting the extrapolation of specific findings 20. For example, C57BL/6 mice only achieve about 75% maximal percentage of thermal antinociception with morphine compared with BALB/cByJ mice, which had the highest degree of maximal percentage antinociception on the order of 90–100% 13. Therefore, this strain appears relevant to test our general hypothesis.

Back to Top | Article Outline


We determined that AAV8-V5-CA8WT SN injection produces profound analgesia in mice before and after severe inflammatory pain, as assessed in morphine equivalents. Further assessment of the safety profile of AAV8-V5-CA8WT therapy in mice will entail various assays to rule out tissue toxicity and neurobehavioral abnormalities. Future research is also needed in understanding the role of known analgesics such as morphine and clonidine in relation to CA8 analgesia, inflammation, and calcium release.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The authors thank Dr D. A. Lubarsky for his generous input and support.

This work was funded by grants from the NIDCR R01DE022903; the NIDA R031410; and funding from the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine, and Pain Management, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, Committee on Advancing Pain Research, Care, and Education. Relieving pain in America: a blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2011. .
2. Volkow ND, McLellan T. Opioid abuse in chronic pain – misconceptions and mitigation strategies. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:1253–1263.
3. Rudd RA, Zibbell JE, Gladden RM. Increases in drug and opioid overdose deaths – United States, 2000–2014. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016; 64:1378–1382.
4. Skolnick P, Volkow ND. Re-energizing the development of pain therapeutics in light of the opioid epidemic. Neuron 2016; 92:294–297.
5. Miller G. Is pharma running out of brainy ideas? Science 2010; 329:502–504.
6. Zhuang GZ, Keeler B, Grant J, Bianchi L, Fu ES, Zhang YP, et al. Carbonic anhydrase-8 regulates inflammatory pain by inhibiting the ITPR1-cytosolic free calcium pathway. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0118273.
7. Aoki T, Narita M, Ohnishi O, Mizuo K, Yajima Y, Suzuki T. Disruption of the type 1 insoitol 1,45-triphosphsate receptor gene suppresses the morphine-induce antinociception in the mouse. Neurosci Lett 2003; 350:69–72.
8. Levitt RC, Zhuang GY, Kang Y, Erasso DM, Upadhyay U, Ozdemir M, et al. Car8 dorsal root ganglion expression and genetic regulation of analgesic responses are associated with a cis-eQTL in mice. Mamm Genome 2017; doi: 10.1007/s00335-017-9694-7.
9. Turkmen S, Guo G, Garshasbi M, Hoffmann K, Alshalah AJ, Mischung C, et al. CA8 mutations cause a novel sykndrome characterized by ataxia and mild mental retardation with predisposition to quadrupedal gait. PLoS Genet 2009; 5:e1000487.
10. National Academies Press. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals, 8th ed. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2011.
11. Zimmermann M. Ethical guidelines for investigations of experimental pain in conscious animals. Pain 1983; 16:109–110.
12. Dogrul A, Seyrak M. Systemic morphine produce antinociception mediated by spinal 5-HT7, but not 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 receptors in the spinal cord. Br J Pharmacol 2006; 149:498–505.
13. Wilson SG, Smith SB, Chesler EJ, Melton KA, Haas JJ, Mitton B, et al. The heritability of antinociception: common pharmacogenetic mediation of five neurochemically distinct analgesics. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2003; 304:547–559.
14. Elhabazi K, Ayachi S, Ilien B, Simonin F. Assessment of morphine-induced hyperalgesia and analgesic tolerance in mice using thermal and mechanical nociceptive modalities. J Vis Exp 2014; 89:e51264.
15. Elmer GI, Pieper JO, Negus SS, Woods JH. Genetic variance in nociception and its relationship to the potency of morphine-induced analgesia in thermal and chemical tests. Pain 1998; 75:129–140.
16. Reagan-Shaw S, Nihal M, Ahmad N. Dose translation from animal to human studies revisited. FASEB J 2008; 22:659–661.
17. Smith FL, Lohmann AB, Dewey DL. Involvement of phospholipid signal transduction pathways in morphine tolerance in mice. Br J Pharmacol 1999; 128:220–226.
18. Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain – United States. JAMA 2016; 315:1624–1645.
19. Skaer TL, Nwude AC. Opioid prescribing laws and emergency department guidelines for chronic non-cancer pain in Washington State. Pain Pract 2016; 16:642–647.
20. Lariviere WR, Wilson SG, Laughlin TM, Kokayeff A, West EE, Adhikari SM, et al. Heritability of nociception. III. Genetic relationships among commonly used assays of nociception and hypersensitivity. Pain 2002; 97:75–86.

analgesia; antihyperalgesia; antinociception; CA8 gene therapy; carbonic anhydrase-8; inflammatory pain; morphine

© 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins