Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Expression Analysis on Archival Material Revisited: Isolation and Quantification of RNA Extracted From FFPE Samples

Deben, Christophe MSc*; Zwaenepoel, Karen PhD; Boeckx, Carolien MSc*; Wouters, An PhD*; Pauwels, Patrick MD, PhD*,†; Peeters, Marc MD, PhD*,‡; Lardon, Filip PhD*; Baay, Marc PhD*; Deschoolmeester, Vanessa PhD*

Diagnostic Molecular Pathology: March 2013 - Volume 22 - Issue 1 - p 59–64
doi: 10.1097/PDM.0b013e318269de3b
Original Articles
Buy

Background: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is the most readily available source of RNA for the gene expression studies. The main disadvantage is the poor quality of isolated RNA. Our group recently compared 5 commercially available RNA isolation kits and concluded that the RNeasy FFPE kit from Qiagen was the most appropriate one. However, this kit has been discontinued and replaced by a new version. In this study both kits were compared, and spectrophotometric and fluorometric analyses for quantification of RNA samples extracted from FFPE tissue.

Methods: Both RNeasy FFPE kits were compared for the total RNA and DNA yields, purity, and raw cycle threshold. Quantity and quality of the isolated RNA was measured using the NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer and Qubit 2.0 fluorometer.

Results: The average concentration of RNA extracted from FFPE tissue measured using the NanoDrop was 32.0%±9.5% higher than the concentration measured using the Qubit. When measuring an RNA sample extracted from a cell line, the concentration measured using both methods was similar. When comparing both RNeasy FFPE kits, marginal differences were observed for total RNA yield, purity, and raw cycle threshold. However, the residual DNA in the samples isolated using the old kit was higher than in the samples isolated using the new kit.

Conclusions: A fluorometric analysis is more suitable for quantification of RNA samples extracted from FFPE tissue compared with spectrophotometric analysis. For RNA isolation from FFPE tissue, both old and new RNeasy FFPE kits were adequate. The new kit resulted in more efficient DNA removal.

*CORE-Antwerp, Laboratory for Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, University of Antwerp

Departments of Pathology

Medical Oncology, University Hospital Antwerp (UA/UZA), Antwerp, Belgium

C.D. was supported by a scholarship from the agency for Innovation by Science and Technology.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Reprints: Christophe Deben, MSc, University of Antwerp, Laboratory for Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, Universiteitsplein 1 (T3.11), B2610 Wilrijk, Belgium (e-mail: christophe.deben@ua.ac.be).

© 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.