Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

A Decision Tree for the Use of Estrogen Replacement Therapy or Hormone Replacement Therapy in Postmenopausal Women: Consensus Opinion of The North American Menopause Society

Menopause: 2000
Consensus Opinion: PDF Only

Objective

Menopause is associated with physiologic changes that may have negative effects on quality of life in some women and/or that may increase morbidity and mortality secondary to osteoporosis and/or coronary heart disease. Estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) and combined estrogen/progestogen therapy (hormone replacement therapy [HRT]) play an important role in reducing these negative effects. The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) sought to develop treatment algorithms that could assist the clinician in deciding whether to recommend ERT/HRT to postmenopausal women.

Design

NAMS held a closed conference of experts to develop a decision tree that outlined the rational use of ERT/HRT in postmenopausal women on the basis of risks versus benefits. The proceedings of the conference were used to assist the NAMS Board of Trustees in developing this consensus opinion of the Society.

Results

On the basis of the conference proceedings, NAMS developed three algorithms for the clinician to use as a tool in deciding whether to recommend ERT/HRT to a woman who is postmenopausal: (1) menopause-related symptoms, (2) cardiovascular risk, and (3) osteoporosis risk.

Conclusions

The goal of ERT/HRT is to enhance women's quality of life as well as to reduce the risks of death and disability associated with osteoporosis and coronary heart disease. The decision to initiate ERT/HRT must be individualized according to each woman's needs. This decision tree for ERT/HRT presents a rational approach to decision making on the basis of the principles of care; details of specific therapeutic interventions will change as data from clinical trials are presented. (Menopause 2000;7:76-86. © 2000, The North American Menopause Society.)

Received October 29, 1999; accepted November 1, 1999.

The Board of Trustees of The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) developed this consensus opinion with assistance from the following participants in a closed conference held in Cleveland, Ohio, on July 10, 1998: Wulf H. Utian, MD, PhD; Margery L. S. Gass, MD; Jay M. Sullivan, MD; Glen D. Stettin, MD; and J. Christopher Gallagher, MD. Additional review was provided by Bruce Ettinger, MD, FACP, and Sandra Lewis, MD, FACC. Edited, modified, and subsequently approved by the NAMS Board of Trustees on October 11, 1999.

Address reprint requests to NAMS, P.O. Box 94527, Cleveland, OH 44101, USA.

©2000The North American Menopause Society