Journal Logo

Research Article: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effect of heat-clearing and detoxifying Chinese medicines combined with conventional therapy on mild hand, foot, and mouth disease with fever

An individual patient data meta-analysis

Yan, Shiyan MD, PhDa; Lu, Ying PhDb; Zhang, Guoliang MD, PhDc; Li, Xiuhui MD, PhDd; Wang, Zhong MD, PhDa; Yao, Chen MDe; Wu, Guiyun MDf; Luo, Lin MD, PhDa; Ai, Yanke MD, PhDa; Guo, Zhongning MDg; Li, Hongjiao MD, PhDa; Li, Tao MDh; Jia, Zhenjun MD, PhDi; Wang, Junwen MD, PhDj; He, Liyun MD, PhDa,∗; Liu, Baoyan MDk,∗

Editor(s): Saranathan., Maya

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020473
  • Open

Abstract

1 Introduction

Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD), accompanied with clinical symptoms of prodromal fever and followed by pharyngitis, mouth ulcers, and rashes on hands and feet, is a common infectious disease among infants and young children.[1,2] HFMD has been widespread in Asia-Pacific regions for more than 30 years. Australia, Korea, India, Singapore, Malaysia, and China have reported the epidemic profile of HFMD.[2–6] In China, several large outbreaks of HFMD occurred in recent years, notably the latest in 2008.[7–9] Considering the severity of the outbreak, HFMD was included in the national class C infectious diseases by the Ministry of Health of China, and was monitored through the direct network reporting system. Since 2008, regional outbreaks of HFMD have been reported frequently in China.[10–14] According to the annual incidence reported by the Ministry of Health of China,[8] the incidence of HFMD is increasing in recent years.[15] As a consequence, more and more studies focus on the epidemic profile of HFMD. In 2014, 2 vaccines for HFMD have been approved by the Chinese Food and Drug Administration; however, they are not widely applied in the clinical practice.[16,17] Until now, there is no effective treatments available for HFMD, although symptom-relieving conventional therapies, especially Paracetamol and adequate fluid intake which are recommended by the World Health Organization, are widely adopted in the treatment of mild HFMD.[18]

In China, it is common practice to treat mild HFMD with heat-clearing and detoxifying Chinese medicines combined with conventional therapy. Many studies have shown that the combination therapy is effective against the mild HFMD. It can shorten the course of the disease and alleviate symptoms without obvious adverse effects.[19–22] In 2010, the Ministry of Health of China issued the “Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of HFMD”, and recommended a number of Chinese medicines in the treatment of mild HFMD.[18] In this guideline, the mostly recommended Chinese medicines are those with heat-clearing and detoxifying effects. All these medicines are proprietary drugs which are widely applied in clinical practice. Although most of these medicines were approved by Chinese Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) many years ago, few publications regarding their clinical efficacy on mild HFMD are available. The majority of existing studies on these medicines was observational with limitations including: inappropriate or even no control group, small sample size, lack of appropriate randomization and blinding design, and poor efficacious outcome measurements.[23] Randomized controlled trials (RCT) started to appear recently and this study aims to combine the individual data from 5 RCTs to assess the efficacy and safety on HFMD.

2 Methods

2.1 Data sources

The 5 RCTs included in this study are all sponsored by the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of China Support Project (No. 200907001) under the research program – ”Research on clinical treatment program and diagnosis rule of traditional Chinese medicine against mild HFMD.” This is the first project to conduct a number of RCTs to study the efficacy and safety of Chinese medicines for treating mild HFMD in China. The Chinese medicines used in the 5 RCTs were Kangbingdu oral solution (KOS), Jinzhen oral solution (JOS), Reduning injection (RI), Xiyanping injection (XI), and Jinlianqingre effervescent tablets (JET). The protocols of the 5 RCTs were similar, especially with respect to their inclusion and exclusion criteria of patients, diagnostic criteria of mild HFMD, conventional treatment arrangements, outcomes, follow-up points, and duration of treatment. Strict quality control measures were used in data management and processing. All 5 trials used the central randomization system of the institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences to randomize participants based on block randomization. JOS and JET adopted double blinding (dummy of JOS or JET) and the other trials were open label trials.

This study was an individual data meta-analysis, and it did not provide any intervention to patients or collect any patients’ data. In addition, all 5 the clinical trials had approved by the institutional review board of their investigation hospitals. Therefore, the ethical review was waived.

2.2 Intervention

In all 5 trials, all participants received an identical conventional therapy and on top of the conventional therapy 1 of the 5 medications (ie, KOS, JOS, RI, XI, or JET) was added in the treated group. The exact herbal components of each 5 medications were showed in Table 1. According to the guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of HFMD,[18] the treatment regimens in conventional therapy included oral care, skin care, reduction of temperature by applying physical cooling paste or warm bathing and vitamin B, vitamin C. Depending on physician's judgment, participants received the Ibuprofen suspension if body temperature was higher than 38.5°C.

T1
Table 1:
The components of 5 analyzed Chinese medicines.

The patients from both control and treated groups received their study therapy for 7 days. Data were recorded every day during the treatment period. All participants’ informed consents were written by their guardians.

2.3 Inclusion criteria and data collection

As the main cooperating institution of the project, the institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences provided the logistic support for the whole project, which included randomization, drug blinding, data entry, data verification and data analysis. So the 5 datasets were checked and verified by the same standard operation procedure of data cleaning and integrity. Patients were diagnosed according to the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of HFMD.[18] The inclusion criteria were:

  • 1) children aged from 1 to 13 years;
  • 2) presentation of fever between 37.4°C and 39.0°C;
  • 3) skin rash;
  • 4) within 48 hours from the beginning of the HFMD syndromes.

The following data were extracted from the individual dataset of 5 trials and pooled together to be analyzed: age, sex, body temperature, skin rash and oral mucosal lesions at baseline and every day's visit; progression of HFMD, treatment group, use of Ibuprofen suspension, and any adverse event recorded. All the 5 trials used the standardized data collection methods and questionnaire.

2.4 Endpoints

The primary outcome was progression rate defined as the proportion of HFMD participants progressed from mild to severe condition during the follow-up. The severity of HFMD was assessed by investigator according to the guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of HFMD in the 5 studies.[18] The assessment was blinding for the investigator in JET and JOS, and it was not blinding in KOS, RI, and XI. The clinical diagnostic of mild HFMD was established, if the patient had at least 1 of the following symptoms accompanied or not accompanied by fever: maculopapular of vesicular rash on the palms and/or soles and vesicles and/or ulcers in the mouth. Severe HFMD was diagnosed if the patient had any of the following additional symptoms involving the nervous system: lethargy, weakness, agitation, irritability, headache, vomiting, limb weakness, acute flaccid paralysis, myoclonic jerks, ataxia, nystagmus, and oculomotor palsies. In this guideline, fever is a typical symptom of mild HFMD. Fever resolution was defined as body temperature below 37°C for 24 hours after the first intake of the treatment. Time to fever resolution was calculated as the time elapsed between the first intake of the treatment and fever resolution. The severity of skin rash (on hands, feet, hip, chest, back, limbs, and Coccyx area) and of oral mucosal lesions was recorded daily by using a symptom score (1 = absent, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe). The healing time of skin rash or oral ulcer was defined as the time elapsed between the first intake of the treatment and skin rash or oral ulcer completely disappearance.

2.5 Statistical analysis

The individual patient data of the 5 trials was pooled together and analyzed. An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed. Baseline characteristics of patients were compared within each trial and in combination. A 2-stage meta-analysis method was adopted to analyze the pooled effect size.[24] The q-test was used to test the heterogeneity among different trials. If the P value was less than .10, a random effects model (DerSimonian–Laird method) was applied. Otherwise, the fixed-effect model (Mantel–Haenszel method) was used.

All tests were performed by using a 2-sided significance level at 0.05. Review Manager (RevMan) version 4.2 for Windows, which is provided by the Nordic Cochrane Centre (Nordic Cochrane Collaboration, 2003) in Copenhagen, was used for testing heterogeneity and pooling the data. For other analyses, Statistical Analysis System (SAS, version 9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used.

3 Results

A total 947 patients were included. Patient demographic and baseline characteristics for the 5 RCTs are shown in Table 2. The characteristics were similar and no significant among 5 trials. The Figure 1 described the different features of 5 Chinese medicines on the 3 outcomes with their odds ratios (OR)/hazard ratios (HR) point estimates based on the individual patient data. Except JET, the effects of the remaining trials were close on the 3 outcomes, so we conducted pooled analyses to explore the overall effects. The estimates of the time of fever resolution and the healing time of the skin rash or oral ulcer almost overlap among the 5 trials.

T2
Table 2:
Patient characteristics and baseline information.
F1
Figure 1:
The effects of 5 Chinese medicines on the 3 outcomes.

3.1 The progressive rate of HFMD

JET was not included because there was no patient progressed to the severe HFMD. No heterogeneity was detected (P = .45) among other 4 trials. The progressive rate of HFMD was significantly lower in the combination therapy than conventional therapy alone; the pooled OR was 0.43 (95%CI: 0.22 to 0.83; P = .01) (Fig. 2).

F2
Figure 2:
Forest plot of the progressive rate of hand, foot, and mouth disease.

3.2 Time to fever resolution

Because of heterogeneity (I2 = 97%, P < .001), JET was not included in the pooled analysis. For the remaining 4 trials, the overall time to fever resolution was no significance between combination therapy and conventional therapy; the pooled HR was 1.12 (95%CI: 0.97 to 1.29; P = .14) (Fig. 3). The HR of JET was 3.88 (95%CI: 3.19 to 4.72; P < .0001).

F3
Figure 3:
Forest plot of the time to fever resolution.

3.3 The healing time of the skin rash or oral ulcer

Similar with the outcome above, JET was not included in the pooled analysis because of the heterogeneity (I2 = 97%, P < .001). The pooled analysis showed that the overall HR of healing time of the skin rash or oral ulcer in 4 trials was 1.22 (95%CI: 1.04 to 1.43; P = .02) (Fig. 4). The HR of JET was 3.79 (95%CI: 2.81 to 5.11; P < .0001).

F4
Figure 4:
Forest plot of the healing time of the skin rash or oral ulcer.

3.4 Safety analysis

With respect to safety, 30 adverse events were reported in the 5 RCTs, including 11 (2.26%) in the combination therapy groups and 19 (4.13%) in the conventional therapy group (P = .1365, Table 3). No serious adverse event was reported. One case of right radial fracture was reported in RI trial. Two diarrhea cases were mentioned in the combination group of XI, which is possibly related to XI. Nine and 18 adverse events were reported in combination and conventional therapy group of JOS, respectively; these cases were not related to JOS, following the judgment of the doctor. No adverse event was reported in JET and KOS.

T3
Table 3:
Adverse events of the 5 trials.

4 Discussion

Our study indicated that the heat-clearing and detoxifying therapy can reduce the progressive rate of mild HFMD and healing time of skin rash or oral ulcer, compared with the conventional therapy. The principle of treatment and methods of treatment are the basic principle which are followed in the TCM clinical practice. The methods of treatment in TCM actually represents a kind of drugs with similar pharmacological properties or a kind of prescriptions with similar efficacy. Heat-clearing and detoxifying therapy is a main and common method of treatment and have anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial effects. Heat-clearing and detoxifying therapy usually applied as a complementary treatment against acute infectious diseases, for instance, influenza, mumps, meningitis and HFMD, as well in China and is mostly recommended by the “Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of HFMD,” which was issued by the Ministry of Health of China. However, there is no verified clinical evidence of their efficacy on HFMD. A meta-analysis showed that Chinese medicines may have an effect on reducing the fever clearance time, rash subsidence time, and healing times of oral symptoms.[19] However, the methodological quality of the included clinical studies was generally poor. In addition, the efficacy outcome was subjective and classified into 4 grades (“curative”, “markedly effective”, “effective” or “ineffective”).[20–24] In our study, the individual patient data was pooled and analyzed from 5 strictly high-quality RCTs which were conducted under similar protocols and produced datasets built with the same structure. Compared with the surrogate endpoints classified 4 grades (“curative”, “markedly effective”, “effective” or “ineffective”), the progressive rate of HFMD is more objective and can directly reflect the true effect of the treatment. Our study suggested the progressive rate of HFMD was significantly lower under the combination therapy than the conventional therapy. No previous clinical study reported the progressive rate of HFMD, which was used here for the first time as primary outcome in the trials of Chinese medicines administered to treat HFMD.

Several studies have demonstrated that fever is an important endpoint and the total duration of fever ≥ 3 days, peak temperature ≥ 38.5°C, and history of lethargy were identified as risk factors for the neurological involvement in mild HFMD.[22,23,25,26] Our results suggested that the combination therapy in JET can significantly shorten the time to fever resolution; while JOS, KOS, RI, and XI had no effect on the fever resolution. This might be explained with the ingredients in the medicine. Although there is gypsum (SHIGAO) in KOS, JOS, and JET, have antipyretic effect and commonly used to the treatment of febrile diseases in traditional Chinese medicine,[27,28] the remaining components are not completely same in the 3 drugs. For JET, the further study about the antipyretic mechanic is needed.

With regarding to the healing time of skin rash or oral ulcer, our results indicated that the combination therapy can shorten the healing time, compared with the conventional therapy. For JET, although it was not included in the pooled analysis, the separate results showed that it can shorten the time to fever resolution and the healing time of skin rash or oral ulcer and its effects were greater than the overall estimates of the remaining trials.

In general, heat-clearing and detoxifying Chinese medicines combined with conventional therapy can reduce the progression rate of mild HFMD and shorten the healing time of skin rash or oral ulcer. For JET, it also can shorten the time to fever resolution. These findings are consistent with previous observational studies and clinical trials.[22,23,25,26] The safety analysis suggested that the 5 Chinese medicines were safe. The diarrhea cases in XI might be related to the cooling function with its component, andrographis paniculata. Compared with the previous studies, our results were based on individual patient data from 5 strictly randomized controlled trials and adopted more objective outcomes; it could provide strong evidences in favor of the efficacy of heat-clearing and detoxifying Chinese medicines combined with conventional therapy on treating mild HFMD. However, this study also has some limitations. First of all, because all patients were febrile cases, the efficacy of heat-clearing and detoxifying Chinese medicines on the afebrile mild HFMD calls for further researches. Secondly, for the effects on fever, more studies are needed. Thirdly, this study depended on the ‘guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of HFMD’ of China when determining the inclusion criteria, the progression rate of HFMD, and the cure of HFMD. However, the guideline was not the one accepted worldwide. And as the primary outcome, the progression rate of HFMD was not widely used for the severity and improvement degree of HFMD. Its significance need be proved in the future. Finally, the mechanic of heat-clearing and detoxifying Chinese medicines treatment on mild HFMD is unconcern and needed to be explored in the further study.

5 Conclusion

The heat-clearing and detoxifying Chinese medicines combined with conventional therapy can reduce the progressive rate of HFMD from mild to severe and shorten the healing time of skin rash or oral ulcer. For JET, it also can shorten the time of fever resolution. This study provides a good choice for doctors to treat mild HFMD.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Guoliang Zhang, Xiuhui Li, Liyun He, Baoyan Liu.

Data curation: Guoliang Zhang, Xiuhui Li, Zhong Wang, Lin Luo, Hongjiao Li.

Formal analysis: Shiyan Yan, Guiyun Wu.

Investigation: Guoliang Zhang, Xiuhui Li, Zhong Wang.

Methodology: Shiyan Yan, Ying Lu, Liyun He, Baoyan Liu.

Project administration: Lin Luo, Liyun He.

Supervision: Baoyan Liu.

Writing – original draft: Shiyan Yan.

Writing – review & editing: Ying Lu.

References

[1]. Gillard P, de la Brassinne M. Hand, foot and mouth disease, a not so benign affection: clinical reminder and potential complications. Rev Med Liège 2003;58:635–7.
[2]. Sarma N, Sarkar A, Mukherjee A, et al. Epidemic of hand, foot and mouth disease in West Bengal, India in August, 2007: a multicentric study. Indian J Dermatol 2009;54:26–30.
[3]. Ang LW, Koh BK, Chan KP, et al. Epidemiology and control of hand, foot and mouth disease in Singapore, 2001-2007. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2009;38:106–12.
[4]. Chang LJ, Chang LY, Huang LM. Besides increasing surveillance and waiting for an effective vaccine to emerge in the future, what else can be done to save the lives of HFMD victims? J Formos Med Assoc 2008;107:589–90.
[5]. Ooi MH, Wong SC, Mohan A, et al. Identification and validation of clinical predictors for the risk of neurological involvement in children with hand, foot, and mouth disease in Sarawak. BMC Infect Dis 2009;9:3.
[6]. Wu Y, Yeo A, Phoon MC, et al. The largest outbreak of hand, foot and mouth disease in Singapore in 2008: the role of enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A strains. Int J Infect Dis 2010;14:e1076–81.
[7]. Xiao M, Ye Z, Zhang Z, et al. Coxsackie A16 enterovirus isolated from patients with hand-foot-mouth disease in Tianjin. Tianjin Med J 1985;6:355–8.
[8]. Zhang Y, Zhu Z, Yang W. An emerging recombinant human enterovirus 71 responsible for the 2008 outbreak of hand, foot and mouth disease in Fuyang City of China. Virol J 2010;7:94.
[9]. Yu C. The epidemic of hand, foot and mouth disease caused by CoxA16 in Tianjin. Chin J Epidemiol 1985;6:66–9.
[10]. Chen H, Xu H, Chang C. Epidemiological investigation of 5 outbreaks of hand-foot-mouth disease (HFMD) at the nurseries or kindergartens of Jinan. Chin J School Health 2010;31:828–9.
[11]. Wang Q, Wang Z. Epidemiology of hand foot and mouth disease in China, 2008. Dis Surveillance 2010;25:181–4.
[12]. Zhu W, Chu Q, Liu B, et al. Analysis on the hand-foot-mouth disease outbreak in Pudong new area during 2005-2008. Modern Prev Med 2010;37:4001–6.
[13]. He Z, Jia L, Li X, et al. Outbreaks of hand-foot-mouth disease in Beijing, 2010. China Prev Med 2011;12:851–3.
[14]. Ma F, Du J, Ma J. Analysis of the epidemiological characteristics of hand, foot and mouth disease in Ningxia province during 2008-2010. Modern Prev Med 2012;39:533–6.
[15]. Zhan H, Ke C. The epidemic status of global hand-foot-mouth and the study progress of molecular epidemiological. South China J Prev Med 2011;37:34–8.
[16]. Zhu F, Xu W, Xia J, et al. Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of an enterovirus 71 vaccine in China. N Engl J Med 2014;370:818–28.
[17]. Li R, Liu L, Mo Z, et al. An inactivated enterovirus 71 vaccine in healthy children. N Engl J Med 2014;370:829–37.
[18]. Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China. Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease (2010 version). International Journal of Respiration 2010;30:1473–5.
[19]. Cao HJ, Liu ZL, Steinmann P, et al. Chinese herbal medicines for treatment of hand, foot and mouth disease: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Eur J Integr Med 2012;4:e85–111.
[20]. Qin Li, Hong G, Wen Ao, et al. A clinical analysis on symptom, syndrome and efficacy in 210 children with common type of hand-foot-and-mouth disease. J Tradit Chin Med 2013;54: 584-336.
[21]. Zhang Y. Clinical study on Xiyanping combined with interferon in treatment of children hand, foot and mouth disease. J Modern Med Health 2012;28:8–10.
[22]. Wang B. The clinical observation of the clinical curative effect with Acyclovir treating the hand-foot-mouth disease in 200 cases. J Baotou Med 2011;35:4–5.
[23]. Zhang C, Lv J, Zhao Y. Effective observation of acyclovir combined with potassium sodium dehydroandroandrographolide for injection for treatment of hand-foot-mouth disease in 130 cases. J Heze Med Coll 2011. 23.
[24]. Zhang G, Li Z, Shang L, et al. The retrospectively analyzed on the hand-foot-mouth disease prevention and control of traditional Chinese medicine practices. Clin J Tradit Chin Med 2011;23:753–9.
[25]. Han Z. Clinical Study of Jinlian Qingre Effervescent Tablets in Treating Child Patients with Common Type of Hand, Foot, Mouth Disease (HFMD). Chengdu, China: Chengdu University of TCM; 2012.
[26]. Mu Y, Chen X, Zhang A, et al. Effect of reduning injection on HFMD in children: a randomized controlled trial. Chin J Integr Tradit West Med 2011;31:1209–12.
[27]. Chang HM, But PPH, Yao SC. Pharmacology and Applications of Chinese Materia Medica. 1986;New Jersey: World Sciencific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, 301–304.
[28]. Huang KC. The Pharmachology of Chinese Herbs, Second Edition. 1999;Florida: CRC Press LLC, 157.
Keywords:

hand, foot, and mouth disease; individual patient data; pooled analysis; traditional Chinese medicine

Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.