Journal Logo

Research Article: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The effect of vitamin D3 on blood pressure in people with vitamin D deficiency

A system review and meta-analysis

He, Silu BS; Hao, Xiyuan MS

Editor(s): Yang., He

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015284
  • Open

Abstract

1 Introduction

Vitamin D is 1 kind of steroid hormone. It can promote the absorption of calcium, phosphorus and other elements in the gastrointestinal tract. Vitamin D plays a key role in the skeleton and mineral metabolism which is an importance of human health.[1] The Institution of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines[2] pointed out that vitamin D deficiency was defined as a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) content less than 20ng/mL (or 50 nmol/L). Vitamin D deficiency is prevalent in Chinese population with.[3] There is a large volume of published studies describing that vitamin D deficiency can not only cause osteoporosis or other common diseases, but also lead to cardiovascular diseases, metabolic diseases, and tumors. Hypertension is an important factor that causes cardiovascular disease. Recent evidence indicated that serum 25-OHD levels were negatively correlated with the risk of hypertension.[4] It is considered that blood pressure changes in people with vitamin D deficiency would be related to vitamin D supplementation. This study aims to compare the changes in blood pressure in people with vitamin D deficiency after administration of vitamin D3 by meta-analysis.

2 Methods

2.1 Search strategy

CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase were searched by tow reviewers independently by computer from the database to December 2017. The search terms included vitamin D3, cholecalciferol, and 25-OHD. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English language which were reported the effects of vitamin D3 supplementation in people with vitamin D deficiency on blood pressure would be included.

2.2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The subjects were people with vitamin D deficiency. The baseline serum 25-OHD of them should be lower than 20ng/mL (or 50nmol/L). The RCTs mentioned that the observation group was administered a dose of vitamin D3 and the control group was the placebo. The subjects were with no vitamin D deficiency and the form of vitamin D was not mentioned in the articles as vitamin D3 was not included. Articles that data cannot be extracted from were not included. Studies that were published repeatedly were included only once. No ethical review is needed in this study.

2.3 Data extraction

The 2 reviewers extracted the data according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, then used self-made Excel forms and hand-drawn forms to record data. Mean age, male ratio, body mass index (BMI), mean serum 25-OHD baseline, sample size, subjects, nationality (or ethnicity), intervention measures, and course of treatment from the studies were extracted.

2.4 Quality assessment

The quality of studies was assessed via using the Cochrane Handbook: random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other bias. Publication bias was generated by using a funnel plot to examine whether there was a bias towards studies.

2.5 Data synthesis and analysis

Data synthesis and analysis were carried out by RevMan 5.3 software and Stata 14.0 software. Relative risk (RR) was used as the statistic of curative effect analysis, and weighted mean difference (WMD) was used as the statistic of continuous variables. 95% confidence interval (CI) was given as the statistic of curative effect analysis. Heterogeneity analysis was performed by χ2 statistics. Fixed effect model was used when P >.1 and I2 <50% and random effect model was used when P <.1 or I2 ≥50%. The mean changes of systolic pressure (ΔSBP) and the mean changes of DBP (ΔDBP) were performed to evaluate the effects of vitamin D3 of intervention groups and placebo of control groups. If the ΔSBP or ΔDBP are not mentioned in the articles, the mean and SD of ΔSBP and ΔDBP should be calculated by formulas. Mean (change) = Mean (Final)−Mean (baseline), . Subgroup analysis was used to compare ΔSBP and ΔDBP according to age, course of treatment, treatment regimen, average daily dose, hypertension, and BMI index. We assessed publication bias by using Egger test.

3 Results

3.1 Study selection

The screening process is detailed in Figure 1. A total of 861 published articles were screened. Of those articles, 174 were first excluded due to duplicate publications. 575 were excluded after reading the titles and abstracts and then 112 articles were further screened. 62 of these did not fit the specific inclusion criteria and data from 33 articles cannot be extracted. Finally, a total of 17 RCTs[5–21] were included, including 22 arms and 1687 participants.

Figure 1
Figure 1:
Flow chart of study selection.

3.2 Study characteristics

The characteristics of the studies are shown in Table 1. The mean serum 25-OHD of the participants from all articles are lower than 20ng/mL (or 50 nmol/L). The mean age of the participants is between 18 and 74 years old. The duration of intervention is 6 weeks to 12 months. Participants of 5 articles were hypertension. 5 arms of 3 articles were diabetic participants. The BMI is between 23.9 and 36.1.

Table 1
Table 1:
Trial characteristics.

3.3 Quality assessment

The quality evaluation of the study is shown in Figure 2. 17 RCTs were all double-blind and reported dropouts. There were no selective reports or other sources of bias that were mentioned in the articles. Only 3 articles[5,8,14] were not explained the randomization methods. Only 5 references[11,16–19] were used the correct allocation concealment. All of the 17 articles included are of high quality.

Figure 2
Figure 2:
Risk of bias in the included studies.

3.4 Outcome results

3.4.1 Primary outcome

The forest plots of ΔSBP and ΔDBP are shown in Figure 3. A total of 17 RCTs and 22 arms were included.

Figure 3
Figure 3:
Forest plot of comparison for ΔSBP and ΔDBP. DBP = diastolic pressure, SBP = systolic pressure.

Compared with the control group, there was no significant difference between ΔSBP in vitamin D deficiency participants by oral administration of vitamin D3 [WMD = −1.94, 95% CI (−3.93, 0.04) P = .06]. There was an indication of heterogeneity (P <.00001, I2 = 68% >50%, random effect model).

Compared with the control group, there was no significant difference between ΔDBP in vitamin D deficiency participants by oral administration of vitamin D3 [WMD = −0.50, 95% CI (−1.17, 0.17) P = .14]. There was no indication of heterogeneity (P = .03 >.01, I2 = 39% <50%, fixed effect model).

3.4.2 Subgroup outcome

3.4.2.1 ΔSBP Subgroup

Compared with the control group, there was a significant difference in the age >50 years subgroup of ΔSBP [WMD = −2.32, 95% CI (−4.39, −0.25) P = .03]. There was a significant difference in the hypertension subgroup [WMD = −6.58, 95% CI (−8.72, −4.44) P <.00001]. There was a significant difference in the BMI >30 subgroup [WMD = −3.51, 95% CI (−5.96, −1.07) P = .005]. The outcomes of ΔSBP subgroup are listed in Table 2.

Table 2
Table 2:
Outcomes of ΔSBP subgroup.
3.4.2.2 ΔDBP Subgroup

Compared with the control group, there was a significant difference only in the hypertension subgroup [WMD = −3.07, 95% CI (−4.66, −1.48) P = .0002]. The outcomes of ΔDBP subgroup are listed in Table 2.

3.5 Publication bias

There was no publication bias based on Egger test (t = −0.95, P = .355 for ΔSBP, t = −0.48, P = .634 for ΔDBP, Fig. 4).

Figure 4
Figure 4:
Egger test for ΔSBP. SBP = systolic pressure.

4 Discussion and conclusion

Vitamin D3 is one of the most active forms of vitamin D with the highest biometabolic rate. It is synthesized in skin by ultraviolet radiation and is less obtained from usual diet. A meta-analysis[22] of 7 RCTs indicated that vitamin D3 is more efficacious at increasing serum 25-OHD than is vitamin D2, and vitamin D3 supplementation intake was the preferred treatment for vitamin D deficiency.[23] Numerous studies have attempted to explain the possible mechanisms of vitamin D deficiency that induced hypertension. Presently, there are 3 mainstream theories: First, it is that the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is activated. An animal experiment has shown that mice lacking the vitamin D receptor has had elevated production of renin and angiotensin II.[24] The second is vitamin D deficiency leads to hyperparathyroidism. Serum 25-OHD levels and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels are negatively correlated and high PTH level causes hypertension. The last is that vitamin D deficiency causes endothelial dysfunction. The reducing of NO in the blood vessels caused by endothelial dysfunction affects the vasodilation and then raised blood pressure. It suggests that vitamin D deficiency might be a risk factor of hypertension.

All the studies reviewed so far, however, the RCTs included from each study had larger individual differences and the conclusions of them are not the same. The relationship between vitamin D3 and blood pressure has been widely investigated in several previous meta-analysis. For the purpose of exploring the relationship between vitamin D deficiency and blood pressure, a total of 17 articles including 22 arms involving 1687 participants were included in this study. The results showed that vitamin D3 made no effect on ΔSBP or ΔDBP in people with vitamin D deficiency. A meta-analysis of Beveridge[26] shown no effect of vitamin D supplementation was seen on SBP or DBP in the subgroup of mean baseline 25OHD level ≤20 ng/mL. In this study, another 3 RCTs were included which were published after Beveridge's study. Furthermore, the participants of Beveridge's study were administered vitamin D2 , vitamin D3 or 1-α-Hydroxylated vitamin D and participants of this study were only administered vitamin D3. These reasons may lead to different conclusions of the 2 studies. Another meta-analysis in 2016 including 30 RCTs by Golzarand[25] reported that there was no significant difference in the effects of vitamin D3 supplementation on systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The conclusion was similar to this study but the participants in that study were not limited to vitamin D deficiency. This is the first meta-analysis of blood pressure after vitamin D3 supplementation for people with vitamin D deficiency.

In this subgroup analysis, there is a significant difference in the group of age >50. There is an evidence suggests that the prevalence of hypertension increases from age.[27] The ability to absorb and metabolize vitamin D of humans decreases in age growing, resulting in vitamin D deficiency in the elderly. The systolic blood pressure on vitamin D deficient folks whose age over 50 years old will decrease significantly when their vitamin D levels returned to normal after vitamin D3 supplementation. The differences between the observation group and control group of ΔSBP and ΔDBP in the hypertension subgroup are statistically significant. The results of subgroup analysis from Wei Zhen's meta-analysis[28] published in 2017 showed that oral vitamin D3 supplementation could reduce the systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels in patients with essential hypertension, but could not affect the blood pressure level in people without hypertension. It was similar to the subgroup analysis in this study. It is concluded that vitamin D3 has a hypotensive effect on hypertension patients but useless on non-hypertension patients. The difference of ΔSBP is statistically significant in BMI >30 subgroup. BMI index is positively correlated with blood pressure level. The aggregate analysis of the follow-up data of 240,000 Chinese adults shows that the risk of hypertension in people with BMI >24 is over triple higher than that in people with normal weight.[27] Overweight or obese people are prone to vitamin D deficiency because they lack of exercise and rarely stay outside under ultraviolet radiation. Increased activity in these groups not only reduces body weight but also reduces the risk of hypertension by synthesizing vitamin D from skin exposure to ultraviolet light. Intervention duration less than 6 months, average daily dose over 800IU/d and daily doses appeared to be more effective at reducing blood pressure in the meta-analysis of Golzarand.[25] However, the daily dosage of vitamin D3, intervention measures or the course of treatment are not the factors that influenced the outcomes in this study.

Limitations of this study are as follows:

  • (1) This study may have language bias because all the RCTs included are in English.
  • (2) The dosage of vitamin D3 in the 17 RCTs differs individually which may have an impact on the results of meta-analysis.
  • (3) The participants from quite a few RCTs included in this study took other non-experimental drugs at the same time in the observation group and control group that may affect the reliability of the results.
  • (4) Only RCTs were included in these studies. More multi-center, large-sample, well-designed clinical reports and prospective studies are needed to further summarize this study.

In conclusion, vitamin D3 can be taken as a prophylactic drug for hypertension by the elderly and obese folks with vitamin D deficiency who are at high risk of hypertension. Vitamin D3 can be used as an adjuvant drug to control the blood pressure on hypertension patients with vitamin D deficiency.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Silu He, Qingchun Zhao, Xiyuan Hao.

Data curation: Silu He, Xiyuan Hao.

Formal analysis: Silu He, Xiyuan Hao.

Investigation: Qingchun Zhao.

Methodology: Silu He, Xiyuan Hao.

Project administration: Qingchun Zhao.

Software: Silu He.

Supervision: Qingchun Zhao.

Writing – original draft: Silu He, Xiyuan Hao.

Writing – review & editing: Silu He, Qingchun Zhao.

Silu He orcid: 0000-0003-3178-5800.

References

[1]. Zhou Jianli, Liu Zhonghou. The progress in global clinical guidelines on the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis using calcium and vitamin D supplementation. Chin J Osteoporos 2017;23:371–80.
[2]. Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 2011;96:1911–30.
[3]. Xiangpeng Liao, Li Zhang Chan, Honghong Zhang, Hanmin Zhu, Jianlie Zhou, Qiren Huang, et al. Application Guideline for Vitamin D and Bone Health in Adult Chinese (2014 Standard Edition) Vitamin D Working Group of Osteoporosis Committee of China Gerontological Society. Chin J Osteoporos, 20(09),1011–1030. doi: 10.3969/j.1006-7108.
[4]. Kunutsor SK, Apekey TA, Steur M. Vitamin D and risk of future hypertension: meta-analysis of 283,537 participants. Eur J Epidemiol 2013;28:205–21.
[5]. Bressendorff I, Brandi L, Schou M, et al. The effect of high dose cholecalciferol on arterial stiffness and peripheral and central blood pressure in healthy humans: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2016;11:e0160905.
[6]. Chen WR, Liu ZY, Shi Y, et al. Vitamin D and nifedipine in the treatment of Chinese patients with grades I-II essential hypertension: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Atherosclerosis 2014;235:102–9.
[7]. Dalbeni A, Scaturro G, Degan M, et al. Effects of six months of vitamin D supplementation in patients with heart failure: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2014;24:861–8.
[8]. Forman JP, Scott JB, Ng K, et al. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on blood pressure in blacks. Hypertension 2013;61:779–85.
[9]. Longenecker CT, Hileman CO, Carman TL, et al. Vitamin D supplementation and endothelial function in vitamin D deficient HIV-infected patients: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Antiviral Ther 2011;17:613–21.
[10]. Mozaffari-Khosravi H, Loloei S, Mirjalili M-R, et al. The effect of vitamin D supplementation on blood pressure in patients with elevated blood pressure and vitamin D deficiency. Blood Press Monit 2014;1:83–91.
[11]. Nagpal J, Pande JN, Bhartia A. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the short-term effect of vitamin D3supplementation on insulin sensitivity in apparently healthy, middle-aged, centrally obese men. Diabetic Med 2009;26:19–27.
[12]. Raja-Khan N, Shah J, Stetter CM, et al. High-dose vitamin D supplementation and measures of insulin sensitivity in polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, controlled pilot trial. Fertility Sterility 2014;101:1740–6.
[13]. Sadiya A, Ahmed SM, Carlsson M, et al. Vitamin D supplementation in obese type 2 diabetes subjects in Ajman, UAE: a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial. Eur J Clin Nutr 2014;69:707–11.
[14]. Salehpour A, Shidfar F, Hosseinpanah F, et al. Vitamin D3 and the risk of CVD in overweight and obese women: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Nutr 2012;108:1866–73.
[15]. Schleithoff SS, Zittermann A, Tenderich G, et al. Vitamin D supplementation improves cytokine profiles in patients with congestive heart failure: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;83:754–9.
[16]. Stricker H, Tosi Bianda F, Guidicelli-Nicolosi S, et al. Effect of a single, oral, high-dose vitamin D supplementation on endothelial function in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a randomised controlled pilot study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012;44:307–12.
[17]. Tabesh M, Azadbakht L, Faghihimani E, et al. Effects of calcium plus vitamin D supplementation on anthropometric measurements and blood pressure in vitamin D insufficient people with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Am Coll Nutr 2015;34:281–9.
[18]. Witham MD, Dove FJ, Dryburgh M, et al. The effect of different doses of vitamin D3 on markers of vascular health in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia 2010;53:2112–9.
[19]. Witham MD, Adams F, Kabir G, et al. Effect of short-term vitamin D supplementation on markers of vascular health in South Asian women living in the UK—a randomised controlled trial. Atherosclerosis 2013;230:293–9.
[20]. Wood AD, Secombes KR, Thies F, et al. Vitamin D3 supplementation has no effect on conventional cardiovascular risk factors: a parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 2012;97:3557–68.
[21]. Zittermann A, Frisch S, Berthold HK, et al. Vitamin D supplementation enhances the beneficial effects of weight loss on cardiovascular disease risk markers. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89:1321–7.
[22]. Tripkovic L, Lambert H, Hart K, et al. Comparison of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;95:1357–64.
[23]. Zhou Jianli, Yang Zhonglin. Vitamin D supplementation and its supplements selection. Shanghai Med 2011;32:472–4.
[24]. Li YC, Qiao G, Uskokovic M, et al. Vitamin D: a negative endocrine regulator of the renin-angiotensin system and blood pressure. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2004;89-90:387–92.
[25]. Golzarand M, Shab-Bidar S, Koochakpoor G, et al. Effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on blood pressure in adults: an updated meta-analysis. Nutr Metabol Cardiovasc Dis 2016;26:663–73.
[26]. Beveridge LA, Struthers AD, Khan F, et al. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis incorporating individual patient data. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:745–54.
[27]. Chinese guidelines for the management of hypertension. Chin Acad J Electr Publ House 2010;3:42–93.
[28]. Wei Zhen, Li Nanfang, Zhou Ling, et al. Effect of vitamin D3 supplement on blood pressure: a meta-analysis. Chin J Hypertension 2017;25:636–42.
Keywords:

blood pressure; meta-analysis; vitamin D deficiency; vitamin D3

Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.