Journal Logo

Research Article: Clinical Trial/Experimental Study

Traditional Chinese medicine as an adjunctive therapy to oral montelukast for treating patients with chronic asthma

Wang, Xuehui MD, PhDa,*; Tian, Ziting BMb; Gao, Fengli MD, PhDa; Zhang, Xia BMb; Liu, Jianqiu MMa,*; Li, Zhuying MD, PhDa,*

Editor(s): Yang., Chengwu

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009291
  • Open


1 Introduction

Asthma is a very common chronic condition among the respiratory diseases. It involves airways narrowing, swelling, and production of extra mucus in patients. It manifests with difficulties in breathing, and triggers coughing, wheezing, and shortness of breath. Its prevalence rate is reportedly 4.3% worldwide,[1] ranging from 0.7% to 21.0%.[1–2] It has been estimated that around 300 million people worldwide have asthma, and this number will increase to 400 million by 2025.[3] Thus, it accounts for significant healthcare costs and also loss in work productivity.[3]

Its treatment focuses on maintaining near-normal lung function in patients, as well as minimizing activity limitations, and episodes of asthma worsening. Unfortunately, in many patients, chronic asthma (CAS) cannot be controlled with a single type of medicine, and most of them still present with poorly controlled asthma and poor quality of life.[4–5] It has been reported that montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA), can effectively control such condition. However, it still has limited efficacy.[6]

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), especially traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), including acupuncture[7] and Chinese herbal medicine,[8] is an effective alternative therapy for patients with asthma and its usage for asthma control from 14% to 60%.[9–11] Despite its common use worldwide, the evidence for its efficacy is still limited. Therefore, the lack of evidence for CAM in treating CAS in adults warrants strictly designed randomized clinical trials.

Ping Chuan Ke Li (PCKL) has been used to treat patients with asthma in China with no significant adverse events.[12–16] It has been reported that PCKL can effectively inhibit airway inflammation and remodeling in experimental asthma animals.[17–20] It can not only reduce inflammatory cell infiltration in the lung tissue of asthmatic rats, but can also decrease bronchial mucosa and airway wall thickening, blood vessel wall thickening, and vascular proliferation.[17–20] A previous pilot clinical trial also explored the effect of PCKL in patients with CAS.[14] However, there is no scientific evidence to evaluate its efficacy in patients with CAS from a more convincingly designed randomized controlled trial. In the present study, we conducted the first randomized controlled trial to explore the efficacy of PCKL as an adjunctive therapy to oral montelukast compared with placebo combined with montelukast in patients with CAS. The dose of PCKL administered in this study is consistent with that in the previous pilot study.[14] We hypothesized that for treatment of CAS, the efficacy of PCKL as an adjunctive therapy to oral montelukast would be superior to the efficacy of placebo combined with montelukast.

2 Methods and materials

2.1 Study design

The present study was approved by the ethics committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine and was conducted at the same hospital from January 2013 to December 2016. Seventy-two eligible patients with CAS were randomly allocated to an intervention group or a control group at a ratio of 1:1. Patients in the intervention group received PCKL as an adjunctive therapy to oral montelukast, while those in the control group were given placebo with oral montelukast.

2.2 Patients

All patients in this study were diagnosed with mild to moderate CAS and aged between 18 and 60 years. In addition, all patients manifested >12% enhancement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) after bronchodilator inhalation. Furthermore, all included patients provided written informed consent before enrollment in the present study. Patients were excluded if they had severe organ diseases, such as respiratory, cardiac, or hepatic diseases; cancer; were pregnant or breastfeeding; underwent surgery; were allergic to the study medications; or received steroid medicine within 1 month before the study.

2.3 Randomization and blinding

Stratified randomization was done by a computerized generation random number list generated using Statistics Analysis System (SAS) package (Version 8.1; SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) after the run-in period. All patients were randomly allocated to the intervention group or control group at a 1:1 ratio. The randomization assignments were concealed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. PCKL and placebo were distributed by a dispenser, who did not involve the process of treatment and efficacy evaluation or data analysis. Attending doctors and practitioner, patients, the outcome assessors, and data analysts were blinded to the treatment allocation information.

2.4 Intervention

All patients in both groups were administrated montelukast orally every night, 10 mg/day for 3 months. In addition, patients in the intervention group received PCKL (10 g/sachet, 2 sachets 3 times daily).[14] Patients in the control group were given a placebo (the same dose as the PCKL in the intervention group). Patients in both groups were treated at 3 months. To ensure the safety and availability of the medication, the herbal medicine was administered in a condensed granular form, and was packed in sachets. Each sachet contained 10 g of medicine, and was provided by a licensed manufacturer of TCM. The placebo was also provided by the same manufacturer, with a similar appearance, packaging, and similar bitter taste as the PCKL.

2.5 Outcome measurements

The primary outcome of the lung function was measured by FEV1. The secondary outcomes included quality of life, measured by St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ),[21] and any adverse events (AEs) were recorded to evaluate the safety of PCKL.

2.6 Statistical analysis

All data in the present study was analyzed by the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 17.0). Sample size was calculated based on the difference in change of FEV1 of 12% between the intervention group and control group with α = 0.5, β = 0.8, and assuming a 20% drop-out rate.[22] Thus, the required sample size of the present study was estimated to be 72 patients, with 36 assigned to each group. Continuous data was analyzed by the t-test or Mann–Whitney rank sum test. Categorical data was analyzed by the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. All data were analyzed by intention-to-treat. A value of P <.05 was considered as statistically significant.

3 Results

One hundred eight patients were initially assessed by practitioners in the present study (Fig. 1). Of these 108 patients, 36 were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria, met the exclusion criteria, and declined to participate the study. Thus, 72 patients with CAS were randomly divided the intervention group or the placebo group in a ratio of 1:1. Of the 72 included patients, 7 subjects withdrew from the study, because of the consent withdrawal (n = 2), lost to follow-up (n = 3), and adverse events (n = 2) (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1:
Flowchart of patient's selection. PCKL = Ping Chuan Ke Li.

The demographics and baseline characteristics of all included patients are showed in Table 1. No significant differences were found in age, race, duration of asthma, body mass index, smoking status, and lung function between both groups at baseline (Table 1).

Table 1
Table 1:
Demographics and baseline characteristics of patients at trial entry.

The outcome measurements are shown in Table 2. The mean change from baseline (with a 95% confidence interval) was assessed between the intervention and control groups in order to evaluate the efficacy of PCKL as an adjunctive therapy to oral montelukast for the treatment of CAS. When compared to placebo and montelukast, PCKL plus montelukast improved lung function, as measured by FEV1 (P <.05); and enhanced the quality of life, as measured by the SGRQ scale (P <.05).

Table 2
Table 2:
Primary and secondary outcomes at the end of 3 month (change from baseline).

All AEs that occurred in the intervention and control groups are listed in Table 3. There were no significant differences in AEs between the 2 groups. The most frequent AEs were nausea (intervention group, 13.8% vs control group, 8.3%), and upset stomach (intervention group, 8.3% vs intervention group, 11.1%).

Table 3
Table 3:
Adverse events reported in intervention and control groups.

4 Discussion

The results of the present study confirmed our hypothesis that PCKL with montelukast was superior at 3 months compared with placebo with montelukast for treating CAS. Previous studies have evaluated the efficacy of TCM for treating asthma.[22–23] One study investigated the efficacy of augmented Yu Ping Feng San (aYPFS) as an adjunctive therapy to oral montelukast compared with placebo and montelukasta for treating children with mild persistent asthma.[23] This study demonstrated that aYPFS as an add-on to montelukast can alleviate the symptoms of asthma in children. The other study explored the efficacy of modified Mai-Men-Dong-Tang (MMDT).[22] The results indicated that MMDT can significantly improve FEV1 in patients with persistent asthmatic symptoms.[22]

To our best knowledge, this study is the first randomized placebo-controlled double blinded trial with concealed allocation to the practitioners, patients, outcome assessors, and data analyst conducted in China. The results of the present study are consistent with the previous study,[22] which also found that PCKL can improve lung function after 3 months of treatment with PCKL and montelukast. In our study, the difference of mean change of FEV1% predicted between 2 groups was 5.3, which was considered as the minimal clinical important difference in lung function improvement, according to the previous published study.[24]

In this study, the results demonstrated that, compared to placebo and montelukast, PCKL plus montelukast can not only improve lung function, measured by FEV1, but a can also enhance the quality of life, measured by the SGRQ scale. In addition, both groups exhibited similar safety profiles. Thus, PCKL plus montelukast treatment appears to be promising for improving both lung function and quality of life in patients with CAS.

The present study also had several limitations. First, the achieved efficacy was the results of the synergistic efficacy of PCKL with montelukast, and not of montelukast alone, although the baseline medication was similar between both groups. Second, it was difficult to discern whether the AEs were caused by PCKL or montelukast, because all patients in the intervention group received both medications. Third, the present study did not include a follow-up assessment owing to its short duration. Fourth, this study did not include results of asthma control test and major biochemical assays for safety and toxicity parameters as our outcome measurements. Future studies should avoid this limitation. Finally, the sample size in the present study was small. Thus, the issue of larger sample sizes to study the effect of PCKL on persistent asthma still needs to be addressed in the future.

5 Conclusion

The results of the present study suggest that PCKL as an adjunctive therapy to oral montelukast can improve lung function and quality of life in patients with CAS. Long-term randomized controlled trials with follow-up evaluation are still needed to confirm the present results.


[1]. To T, Stanojevic S, Moores G, et al. Global asthma prevalence in adults: findings from the cross-sectional world health survey. BMC Public Health 2012;12:204.
[2]. Masoli M, Fabian D, Holt S, et al. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Program: the global burden of asthma: executive summary of the GINA Dissemination Committee report. Allergy 2004;59:469–78.
[3]. Braman SS. The global burden of asthma. Chest 2006;130(1 suppl):4S–12S.
[4]. Diette GB, Fuhlbrigge AL, Allen-Ramey F, et al. Asthma severity in patients initiating controller monotherapy versus combination therapy. J Asthma 2011;48:304–10.
[5]. Patel YA, Patel P, Bavadia H, et al. A randomized, open labeled, comparative study to assess the efficacy and safety of controller medications as add on to inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting β2 agonist in the treatment of moderate-to-severe persistent asthma. J Postgrad Med 2010;56:270–4.
[6]. Holgate ST, Bradding P, Sampson AP. Leukotriene antagonists and synthesisinhibitors: new directions in asthma therapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996;98:1–3.
[7]. Li M, Zhang X, Bao H, et al. Acupuncture for asthma: protocol for a systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e7296.
[8]. Zhou F, Wu HJ, Zhai JP, et al. Who are the users of a traditional Chinese sanfu acupoint herbal patching therapy in China?: A cross-sectional survey. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e5414.
[9]. Blanc PD, Kuschner WG, Katz PP, et al. Use of herbal products, coffee or black tea, and over-the-counter medications as self-treatment among adults with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997;100:789–91.
[10]. Blanc PD, Trupin L, Earnest G, et al. Alternative therapies among adults with reported diagnosis of asthma or rhinosinusitis: data from a population-based survey. Chest 2001;120:1461–7.
[11]. Ernest E. Complementary therapies in asthma: what patients use. J Asthma 1998;35:667–71.
[12]. Wang YY. Preparation and manufacture of Ping Chuan Ke Li and its clinical observation on asthma. Chin J Med Res 2011;9:51.
[13]. Mao WL, Liu JQ. Effects of Ping Chuan Ke Li on miR-21 and eosinophils in chronic persistent asthma. World's Latest Med Inform Abstracts 2016;36:237–9.
[14]. Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Fang XY. Clinical Observation of Ping Chuan Ke Li on the Chronic Persistent Asthma (Yang Deficiency) and its Effect on Th17/Treg Balance. 2015;(Master dissertation).
[15]. Heilongjiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wang HX. Clinical Observation of Ping Chuan Ke Li on the Chronic Persistent Asthma (Yang Deficiency) and its Effect on Serum Interleukin 13. 2015;(Master dissertation).
[16]. Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Li WT. Clinical Observation of Ping Chuan Ke Li on the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (Phlegm-Heat Syndrome Type) and its Effect on Inflammatory Mediators. 2010;(Master dissertation).
[17]. Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Gao FL. Effects of Pingchuan Granule on VEGF, NOTCH1 and DLL4 in Chronic Asthmatic Rats According to the Vascular Regeneration/Remodeling. 2015;(Doctorial dissertation).
[18]. Xu J, Han D, Xu HL, et al. Effect of Pingchuan granule on airway inflammation and remodeling in asthmatic guinea pigs. Heilongjiang J Trad Chin Med 2012;41:58–60.
[19]. Heilongjiang Provincial Traditional Chinese Medicine Research Institute, Xu J. Effects of Pingchuan Granule on NF-κB and α-SMA Contents in Asthmatic Guinea Pigs. 2012;(Master dissertation).
[20]. Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Li X. Effect of Pingchuan Granule on Immune Function of Dendritic Cells in Asthmatic Rats by NOTCH Signaling Pathway. 2017;(Doctorial dissertation).
[21]. Jones PW, Quirk FH, Baveystock CM, et al. A self-complete measure of health status for chronic airflow limitation: the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992;145:1321–7.
[22]. Hsu CH, Lu CM, Chang TT. Efficacy and safety of modified Mai-Men-Dong-Tang for treatment of allergic asthma. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2005;16:76–81.
[23]. Chan PH, To CY, Chan EY, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of traditional Chinese medicine as an add-on therapy to oral montelukast in the treatment of mild persistent asthma in children. Complement Ther Med 2016;29:219–28.
[24]. Jones PW, Beeh KM, Chapman KR, et al. Minimal clinically important differences in pharmacological trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014;189:250–5.

asthma; clinical trial; Ping Chuan Ke Li; traditional Chinese medicine

Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.