Journal Logo

Research Article: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Systemic sclerosis and risk of cardiovascular disease

A PRISMA-compliant systemic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

Cen, Xintao MMa; Feng, Sining MMa; Wei, Shanshan MDa; Yan, Lu MDa; Sun, Ledong MD, PhDa,b,∗

Editor(s): Rigattieri., Stefano

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023009


1 Introduction

Systemic sclerosis (SSc), also termed scleroderma, is a multisystem autoimmune disease affecting approximately 20 per million people.[1] Women are at a much higher risk of developing SSc than men ranging from 3:1 to 14:1 and the average age at diagnosis is in the fifth life decade.[2] The clinical presentation of SSc is characterized by Raynaud's phenomenon, skin thickening, and fibrosis of internal organs. Although the underlying pathology is unknown, autoimmune inflammation, fibrosis, and vasculopathy may be involved in the pathogenesis of SSc.[3,4]

Involvement of the microvasculature is a prominent feature of SSc. Etiological factors include endothelial injuries, immune activation, proliferative obliterative vascular lesions, and progressive loss of capillaries. Increased risk of microvascular diseases in SSc, including Raynaud's phenomenon, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and renal crisis, has been well established.[3,5] Macrovascular impairment was not originally identified as a feature of SSc with manifestations such as myocardial infarction, stroke, and peripheral vascular disease. However, SSc patients have been shown to have decreased peripheral vascular reactivity and endothelial dysfunction compared with healthy controls.[6] Several studies have revealed an increased prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis in SSc via measurements of carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) on Doppler ultrasound, and coronary artery calcification on multidetector CT.[7–9] Previous meta-analysis reported a higher incidence of coronary artery disease among patients with SSc.[10] In addition, other autoimmune rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus have been linked with an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD), predominantly due to accelerated atherosclerosis.[11–14] The association between SSc and CVD, however, remains unclear.

Therefore, in this study, we aimed to quantitatively synthesize current evidence on the association of SSc with CVD using a meta-analysis of cohort studies.

2 Methods

In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA), we performed this meta-analysis of cohort studies on the association between SSc and risk of CVD.[15]

2.1 Search strategy

The Cochrane Library for literature, Embase, Medline, and PubMed were systematically searched from inception to October 14, 2019, without language or geographic restrictions. We used different combinations of terms “systemic sclerosis” OR “systemic scleroderma” and “cardiovascular disease” OR “peripheral vascular disease” OR “myocardial infarction” OR “stroke” and “cohort study.” We also screened the reference lists of all articles identified (see Table 1,, Supplemental Content, which described the detailed search strategies of electronic databases). The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University.

2.2 Study selection

Two independent authors (XC and LY) screened the titles and abstracts of the search results. The remaining full text of articles was assessed for eligibility. Any disagreements were resolved by consensus. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were cohort studies; reported a quantitative association between SSc and risk of CVD versus non-SSc; enrolled participants without a history of CVD; and had at least 1-year follow-up. Studies were excluded if they were case-control studies or cross-sectional studies; were case series, reviews, abstracts or conference articles; did not report on CVD outcomes of interest.

2.2.1 Data extraction and assessment of risk of bias

Data were extracted independently by 2 authors (LY and SW), using a pilot-tested form. For each study, the following information was extracted: first author name, year of publication, country, study design, study period, participant characteristics, outcomes, outcome assessment, number of cardiovascular disease cases, and mean follow-up years. The risk of bias in cohort studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.[16]

2.3 Statistical analyses

We chose to perform a meta-analysis on adjusted results from included studies. We used hazard ratio estimates that were fully adjusted for confounding factors (see Table 2,, Supplemental Content, which lists all the covariates).

This statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager software, version 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration) and Stata software, version 12.1 (StataCorp). We calculated pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of cardiovascular end points in patients with SSc when compared with non-SSc controls. Specifically, these included cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke. A generic inverse-variance (IV) method was used to pool the data with a random-effects meta-analysis model. Statistical heterogeneity was quantified with the I-squared statistics for each end point category. Substantial heterogeneity was defined as an I2 value greater than 50%.[17] Publication bias was evaluated by visual inspection of funnel plots and by identifying asymmetry of funnel plots using the Egger test.

3 Results

The PRISMA study flow diagram is shown in Figure 1. The systematic literature search of articles published before October 14, 2019, identified 2608 articles, of which 2561 were deemed ineligible based on the titles and/or abstracts. After careful examination of the full text, 7 cohort studies that met the inclusion criteria were identified.

Figure 1
Figure 1:
PRISMA study flow diagram.

3.1 Study characteristics

The basic characteristics of the included cohort studies are presented in Table 1. Three studies were prospective and 4 were retrospective. Studies originated from Canada,[18] USA,[19,20] the UK,[20] Denmark,[21,22] and Taiwan.[23,24] The 7 studies included a total of 14,813 SSc patients and 5,506,836 controls. The SSc cohorts had mean follow-up period that ranged from 4.3 to 5.2 years. The assessment of outcomes varied among these studies.

Table 1 - Characteristics of cohort studies.
Reference Study setting Study design Study period SSc/Non-SSc Mean age SSc/non-SSc Female (%) SSc/non-SSc Cases SSc/non-SSc Outcomes Outcome assessment Mean follow-up years NOS
Chiang,[23] 2013 NHIRD, Taiwan RC 1997–2006 1238/12,380 49.4/49.4 76/76 86/679 Stroke ICD-9 4.7 8
Man,[20] 2013 THIN, UK RC 1986–2011 MI and stroke: 865/8643 PVD: 858/8580 58.7/58.7 85.8/85.8 MI:20/129 Stroke:22/129 PVD:34/96 MI, Stroke, PVD OXMIS and Read codes 5.2 8
Chu,[24] 2013 NHIRD, Taiwan PC 1997–2006 1344/13,440 50.6/50.6 75.7/75.7 31/203 Acute MI ICD-9 4.3 8
Avina-Zubieta,[18] 2016 Population Data BC, Canada PC 1996–2010 1223/12,433 56.1/56.1 83.2/83.1 MI:59/232 Stroke:37/212 CVD:84/406 MI, Stroke, CVD ICD-9 or ICD-10 5 8
Hesselvig,[21] 2018 Danish population PC 1997–2011 1962/5,428,380 49.2/40.2 80/50.9 310/506,536 CVD ICD-10 NR 7
Ying,[19] 2019 VA Health System, USA RC 1999–2014 4545/9090 60.9/61.0 17/17 353/574 Stroke ICD-9 5.1 7
Butt,[22] 2019 Danish administrative registries RC 1995–2015 2778/13,890 55/55 76/76 MI:100/252 Stroke:112/439 PVD:184/182 MI, Stroke, PVD ICD-8 or ICD-10 NR 8
BC = British Columbia, CVD = cardiovascular disease, ICD = International Classification of Diseases, MI = myocardial infarction, NHIRD = National Health Insurance Research Database, Non-SSc = no diagnostic codes for systemic sclerosis, NOS = Newcastle-Ottawa scale, NR = not reported, OXMIS = Oxford Medical Information System, PC = prospective cohort, PVD = peripheral vascular disease, RC = retrospective cohort, SSc = systemic sclerosis, THIN = The Health Improvement Network database, VA = Veterans Affairs.

3.2 Results of meta-analysis

3.2.1 Association of SSc with cardiovascular disease

Two cohort studies, including 3185 SSc patients, reported the association between SSc and CVD and these originated from Europe and North American. The meta-analysis showed that SSc was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of CVD (pooled HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.97–2.81), and mild heterogeneity was detected (I2 = 44%, P = .18) (see Fig. 2A).

Figure 2
Figure 2:
Forest plots of the association of systemic sclerosis (SSc) with cardiovascular diseases. A, The association between SSc and risk of cardiovascular disease. B, The association between SSc and risk of peripheral vascular disease. C, The association between SSc and risk of myocardial infarction. D, The association between SSc and risk of stroke. A generic inverse-variance (IV) method was used to calculate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) with a random-effects meta-analysis model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistics. SE = standard error, CI = confidence interval.

3.2.2 Association of SSc with peripheral vascular disease

Two cohort studies, including 3636 SSc patients, provided data on the association between SSc and peripheral vascular disease. These 2 studies originated from Europe. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that SSc significantly increased the risk of peripheral vascular disease (pooled HR 5.27, 95% CI 4.27–6.51). No statistically significant heterogeneity was found across these studies (I2 = 0%, P = .36) (see Fig. 2B).

3.2.3 Association of SSc with myocardial infarction

Four cohort studies, including 6210 SSc patients, investigated the association between SSc and myocardial infarction. Two of these studies originated from Europe, 1 from North American, and 1 from Asia. The random-effects model meta-analysis showed that SSc was associated with a significantly increased risk of myocardial infarction (pooled HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.71–3.25). Substantial statistical heterogeneity was observed across these studies (I2 = 67%, P = .03) (see Fig. 2C).

3.2.4 Association of SSc with stroke

Five cohort studies, including 10,649 SSc patients, evaluated the association between SSc and stroke. Two of these studies originated from Europe, 2 from North American, and 1 from Asia. The random-effects model meta-analysis illustrated an increased risk of stroke in patients with SSc (pooled HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.18–1.96). There was substantial statistical heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 78%, P = .001) (see Fig. 2D).

3.2.5 Risk of bias and publication of bias assessment

The risk of bias among included cohort studies was summarized in Figure 3. Of the 7 included studies, 5 were at low risk of bias and 2 were at high risk. As to the representativeness of exposed cohort, the study by Ying et al was rated with a high risk because the SSc samples were derived from a group of veterans.[19] As to the comparability of cohorts, the study by Hesselvig et al was rated with a high risk of bias because the age and sex were not matched between SSc patients and control cohorts.[21] All 7 included cohort studies were determined to have a low risk of bias in the domain of adequacy of follow-up of cohorts because the durations of follow-up exceeded 1 year.

Figure 3
Figure 3:
Risk of bias of the cohort studies. Risk of bias of cohort studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Green color represents low risk of bias, red for unclear risk of bias.

The funnel plots evaluated the association of CVD and patients with SSc. In our study, the shape of funnel plots appeared to be symmetrical. The results of Egger test showed no evidence for publication bias (see Figure 1,, Supplemental Content, which detects publication bias).

4 Discussion

In this meta-analysis of 14,813 study participants from 7 cohorts, SSc was significantly associated with higher risks of cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke.

Our study indicated that patients with SSc were prone to have comorbid CVD. A previously published meta-analysis investigated the risk of stroke in patients with SSc.[25] In this work, Ungprasert et al analyzed 4 cohort studies and found a significant association between SSc and increased risk of stroke (RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.26–2.24). However, some limitation to select data in their study should be noted. They included the study by Zoller et al[26] using hospital-based data, which may lead to potential selection bias. Considering several limitations of Ungprasert's study, our meta-analysis provides more precise estimates using nation- or state-wide data.

Most of the included cohort studies were deemed to have a low risk of bias according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We evaluated the two included studies as having a high risk of bias because of study participants from a specific group and no control for confounder factors.[19,21] Consequently, to confirm the association between SSc and CVD more exactly, these points in study design should be taken into account in future prospective cohort studies.

The mechanisms for the increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with SSc are far from being fully elucidated. One possible mechanism is inflammation.[27] SSc has been characterized by T-cell activation and autoantibody formation. Various pro-inflammatory cytokines that have been associated with both atherosclerotic plaques and CIMT, including interleukin (IL)-2, IL-6, and C-reactive protein, have been shown to be increased in patients with SSc.[9,28] Furthermore, emerging studies have found that autoantibodies may have a role in atherogenesis, including those against oxidized low-density lipoproteins (ox-LDL), β2-glycoprotein-I (β2GPI), centromere and cardiolipin.[29,30] Anti-centromere antibody (ACA) is one of the specific hallmark antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) of SSc. Ischemic macrovascular events and plaques are more common in the ACA positive SSc patients when compared with both ACA negative SSc patients and controls.[31]

Another possible mechanism is endothelial dysfunction, which is the key event in the pathophysiology of SSc and atherosclerosis. Although the original stimulus is unknown, endothelial cell injury is regarded as a main driver of vascular alterations, increased matrix deposition and excess fibrous tissues characterizing SSc. Activated endothelial cells express adhesion molecules that promote the recruitment and transmigration of inflammatory cells into vessel walls and infiltration of the extracellular matrix.[32] In addition, several evidences have suggested that high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxidative stress caused by endothelial dysfunction and vascular inflammation, was observed in SSc, leading to oxidation of LDL. Accumulation of oxidized low-density lipoproteins triggers endothelial cell activation and further amplifies inflammatory processes.[8,33,34] The derangement of vasoactive mediators has also been suggested to be an essential component of endothelial dysfunction in SSc, with upregulation of vasoconstrictive endothelin and downregulation of the vasodilator nitric oxide.[5] Inflammatory vascular injury, intimal proliferation and fibrosis may result in the formation and development of atherosclerotic plaques.[35,36] Thus, inflammation and endothelial dysfunction may contribute to the pathogenesis of vascular abnormalities in atherosclerosis and SSc.

This study has several limitations. Firstly, there was substantial statistical heterogeneity with regard to the outcomes of stroke and myocardial infarction, given the differences in baseline characteristics such as gender, age and SSc history. Although we used random-effects models and pooled only studies with similar outcomes, it did not eliminate heterogeneity. Secondly, none of the primary studies provided information on disease severity of SSc. However, because of the evolving classification criteria and the growing use of serum markers and capillaroscopy, patients fulfilling SSc criteria have increased.[37–39] Compared with earlier cohorts, later cohorts were more likely to contain a larger number of patients with early mild SSc, which may tend to bias the results in the assessment of CVD risk.[22] Thirdly, there was some evidence that the rate of cardiac involvement in diffuse cutaneous SSc was higher than that in limited cutaneous SSc.[40] However, we could not evaluate the risks for the two major disease subtypes because no studies examined the association between different subtypes of SSc and CVD. Fourthly, most studies were conducted in Caucasian populations. Several evidences have revealed that SSc in blacks had more severe clinical manifestations and greater mortality than in whites.[41,42] Considering racial differences, more studies in other ethnicities such as Afro-Americans and Asians are needed. Finally, we could not rule out the possibility of residual confounding because no data was available on traditional cardiovascular risk factors, such as body mass index, smoking and family history of CVD.

Despite these limitations, this study has some strengths. First, to our knowledge, this is the largest study of adults with SSc and long-term follow-up of cardiovascular outcomes. Second, only large-scale cohort studies providing more definitive evidence were included. We excluded cross-sectional and case-control studies, which highly reduced the likelihood of recall bias and selection bias. Third, considering the degree of risk, a meta-analysis provides greater statistical power to detect potential associations in comparison with individual studies alone.

In conclusion, this meta-analysis confirms a significant association of SSc with CVD. Future studies should focus on identifying risk factors for CVD in SSc, such as clinical subtypes or disease severity. Furthermore, clinicians who manage patients with SSc should be aware of the increased risk of CVD from the time of SSc diagnosis and undertake preventive measures.

Author contributions

LS conceived and designed the study. XC and LY did the literature review. LY and SW extracted the data and performed the analysis. XC and LY wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript and provided approval of the final version.

Conceptualization: Ledong Sun.

Data curation: Shanshan Wei, Lu Yan.

Formal analysis: Shanshan Wei, Lu Yan.

Investigation: Xintao Cen, Lu Yan.

Software: Shanshan Wei, Lu Yan.

Supervision: Ledong Sun.

Writing – original draft: Xintao Cen, Sining Feng.

Writing – review & editing: Xintao Cen, Sining Feng.


[1]. Nikpour M, Stevens WM, Herrick AL, et al. Epidemiology of systemic sclerosis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010;24:857–69.
[2]. Gabrielli A, Avvedimento EV, Krieg T. Scleroderma. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1989–2003.
[3]. Denton CP, Khanna D. Systemic sclerosis. Lancet 2017;390:1685–99.
[4]. Elhai M, Avouac J, Kahan A, et al. Systemic sclerosis: recent insights. Joint Bone Spine 2015;82:148–53.
[5]. Kavian N, Batteux F. Macro- and microvascular disease in systemic sclerosis. Vasc Pharmacol 2015;71:16–23.
[6]. Frech T, Walker AE, Barrett-O’Keefe Z, et al. Systemic sclerosis induces pronounced peripheral vascular dysfunction characterized by blunted peripheral vasoreactivity and endothelial dysfunction. Clin Rheumatol 2015;34:905–13.
[7]. Mok MY, Lau CS, Chiu SSH, et al. Systemic sclerosis is an independent risk factor for increased coronary artery calcium deposition. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:1387–95.
[8]. Mok MY, Lau CS. The burden and measurement of cardiovascular disease in SSc. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2010;6:430–4.
[9]. Schiopu E, Au KM, McMahon MA, et al. Prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis is increased in systemic sclerosis and is associated with serum proteins: a cross-sectional, controlled study of carotid ultrasound. Rheumatology 2014;53:704–13.
[10]. Ungprasert P, Charoenpong P, Ratanasrimetha P, et al. Risk of coronary artery disease in patients with systemic sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rheumatol 2014;33:1099–104.
[11]. Solomon DH, Karlson EW, Rimm EB, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in women diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis. Circulation 2003;107:1303–7.
[12]. Hesselvig JH, Ahlehoff O, Dreyer L, et al. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus and systemic lupus erythematosus are associated with clinically significant cardiovascular risk: a Danish nationwide cohort study. Lupus 2016;26:48–53.
[13]. Hak AE, Karlson EW, Feskanich D, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus and the risk of cardiovascular disease: results from the nurses’ health study. Arthritis Rheum 2009;61:1396–402.
[14]. Lindhardsen J, Ahlehoff O, Gislason GH, et al. The risk of myocardial infarction in rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes mellitus: a Danish nationwide cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:929–34.
[15]. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009;339:b2535.
[16]. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010;25:603–5.
[17]. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557–60.
[18]. Aviña-Zubieta JA, Man A, Yurkovich M, et al. Early cardiovascular disease after the diagnosis of systemic sclerosis. Am J Med 2016;129:324–31.
[19]. Ying D, Gianfrancesco MA, Trupin L, et al. Increased risk of ischemic stroke in systemic sclerosis: a national cohort study of US veterans. J Rheumatol 2020;47:82–8.
[20]. Man A, Zhu Y, Zhang Y, et al. The risk of cardiovascular disease in systemic sclerosis: a population-based cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:1188–93.
[21]. Hesselvig J, Kofoed K, Wu J, et al. Localized scleroderma, systemic sclerosis and cardiovascular risk: a Danish Nationwide Cohort Study. Acta Derm Venereol 2018;98:361–5.
[22]. Butt SA, Jeppesen JL, Torp Pedersen C, et al. Cardiovascular manifestations of systemic sclerosis: a Danish Nationwide Cohort Study. J Am Heart Assoc 2019;8:e13405.
[23]. Chiang CH, Liu CJ, Huang CC, et al. Systemic sclerosis and risk of ischaemic stroke: a nationwide cohort study. Rheumatology 2012;52:161–5.
[24]. Chu S, Chen Y, Liu C, et al. Increased risk of acute myocardial infarction in systemic sclerosis: a nationwide population-based study. Am J Med 2013;126:982–8.
[25]. Ungprasert P, Sanguankeo A, Upala S. Risk of ischemic stroke in patients with systemic sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mod Rheumatol 2015;26:128–31.
[26]. Zoller B, Li X, Sundquist J, et al. Risk of subsequent ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in patients hospitalized for immune-mediated diseases: a nationwide follow-up study from Sweden. BMC Neurol 2012;12:41.
[27]. Doria A, Sherer Y, Meroni PL, et al. Inflammation and accelerated atherosclerosis: basic mechanisms. Rheum Dis Clin N Am 2005;31:355–62.
[28]. Baraut J, Michel L, Verrecchia F, et al. Relationship between cytokine profiles and clinical outcomes in patients with systemic sclerosis. Autoimmun Rev 2010;10:65–73.
[29]. Boin F, Franchini S, Colantuoni E, et al. Independent association of anti-beta (2)-glycoprotein I antibodies with macrovascular disease and mortality in scleroderma patients. Arthritis Rheum 2009;60:2480–9.
[30]. Sanjadi M, Rezvanie SZ, Totonchi H, et al. Atherosclerosis and autoimmunity: a growing relationship. Int J Rheum Dis 2018;21:908–21.
[31]. Nordin A, Jensen-Urstad K, Bjornadal L, et al. Ischemic arterial events and atherosclerosis in patients with systemic sclerosis: a population-based case-control study. Arthritis Res Ther 2013;15:R87.
[32]. Ngian G, Sahhar J, Wicks IP, et al. Cardiovascular disease in systemic sclerosis—an emerging association? Arthritis Res Ther 2011;13:237.
[33]. Servettaz A, Guilpain P, Goulvestre C, et al. Radical oxygen species production induced by advanced oxidation protein products predicts clinical evolution and response to treatment in systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:1202–9.
[34]. Svegliati S, Spadoni T, Moroncini G, et al. NADPH oxidase, oxidative stress and fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. Free Radic Biol Med 2018;125:90–7.
[35]. Psarras A, Soulaidopoulos S, Garyfallos A, et al. A critical view on cardiovascular risk in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatol Int 2017;37:85–95.
[36]. Abraham DJ, Krieg T, Distler J, et al. Overview of pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009;48: (suppl 3): i3–7.
[37]. Hudson M, Taillefer S, Steele R, et al. Improving the sensitivity of the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic sclerosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2007;25:754–7.
[38]. Jordan S, Maurer B, Toniolo M, et al. Performance of the new ACR/EULAR classification criteria for systemic sclerosis in clinical practice. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2015;54:1454–8.
[39]. LeRoy EC, Medsger TJ. Criteria for the classification of early systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol 2001;28:1573–6.
[40]. Follansbee WP, Curtiss EI, Medsger TJ, et al. Physiologic abnormalities of cardiac function in progressive systemic sclerosis with diffuse scleroderma. N Engl J Med 1984;310:142–8.
[41]. Jaeger VK, Tikly M, Xu D, et al. Racial differences in systemic sclerosis disease presentation: a European Scleroderma Trials and Research group study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019;59:1684–94.
[42]. Silver RM, Bogatkevich G, Tourkina E, et al. Racial differences between blacks and whites with systemic sclerosis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2012;24:642–8.

association; cardiovascular disease; meta-analysis; systemic sclerosis

Supplemental Digital Content

Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.