Journal Logo

Research Article: Clinical Case Report

Hepatitis B virus reactivation after successful treatment of hepatitis C virus with sofosbuvir and ribavirin

A case report and literature review

Miyasaka, Akio MDa,∗; Yoshida, Yuichi MDa; Suzuki, Akiko MDa; Masuda, Tomoyuki MDb; Okamoto, Hiroaki MDc; Takikawa, Yasuhiro MDa

Editor(s): Saranathan., Maya

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022650
  • Open

Abstract

1 Introduction

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection shows a variety of clinical courses, including reactivation of previously resolved infection. Such HBV reactivation caused by immunosuppressive therapy or chemotherapy is well known. Risk of reactivation depends on the HBV infection status (chronic, inactive, and resolved hepatitis) and the immunosuppression status of the patient. Furthermore, reactivation may develop not only during immunosuppressive therapy or chemotherapy but also after its interruption or cessation. Moreover, HBV reactivation in chronic hepatitis C patients who have received direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has been known.[1,2]

We herein describe a case of HBV DNA reappearance in a patient with resolved HBV infection-that is, in a patient with negative results for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and the corresponding antibody (anti-HBs) and positive results for antibody against HBV core (anti-HBc)-who received anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment with sofosbuvir (SOF) and ribavirin (RBV).

2 Case report

A Japanese woman with a history of gastroduodenal ulcer was identified as infected with HCV at a medical check-up in 1996, when she was 53 years of age. She then visited our hospital. At this time, aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels were 36 U/L, and 40 U/L, respectively. She has been followed up since then. As of 1997, HBsAg and anti-HBs were negative, but anti-HBc was positive, and she had no obvious family history of HBV. In 2001, she experienced malignant lymphoma (B-cell lymphoma) at 58 years of age. She received chemotherapy (Pirarubicin hydrochloride, Cyclosporine, Oncovin, Prednisolone), and then autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation was performed the next year, thereby, she achieved complete remission. In 2014, HBsAg and anti-HBs were negative, while anti-HBc remained to be positive. The patient then decided to seek treatment for her HCV infection. Genotyping revealed HCV genotype 2b and HCV RNA level was 6.4 LogIU/mL. Combination DAA treatment with SOF at 400 mg/d and RBV at 600 mg/d commenced in October 2015. HCV RNA was negative at 4 weeks post-initiation of SOF/RBV, and HCV RNA levels remained undetectable thereafter. This treatment continued for 12 weeks without severe adverse events. Sustained virological response was achieved at 24 weeks after cessation of this treatment. Moreover, at this time, aminotransferase levels were within the normal range, and serum HBV DNA level was negative. Thirty-nine weeks post DAA cessation, liver enzymes were quite suddenly elevated (aspartate aminotransferase 183 U/L, alanine transaminase 161 U/L) (Table 1) without any symptoms and physical examination findings. However, international normalized ratio of prothrombin time was not prolonged. HBsAg became positive and serum HBV-DNA level increased to more than 9.1 LogIU/mL. The entire genomic sequence of the HBV strain (HB16-1360) obtained from this patient was determined according to the previously described method[3] deposited in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank databases (LC517161). The HBV strain was typed as genotype A (subgenotype A2) and harbored no mutations leading to HBeAg-negative phenotype such as G1896A and A1762T/G1764A. A phylogenetic tree based on the full-length genomic sequence revealed that the HB16-360 strain obtained from the present case shared the highest similarity (99.7%) with the Belgian strain (KT749850) and did not form a cluster with the HBV strains obtained from patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus or acute hepatitis patients who acquired HBV infection via sexual contact (Fig. 1). Abdominal computed tomography scan and ultrasound sonography revealed chronic changes in the liver without liver atrophy or ascites (Fig. 2). The patient received entecavir for suspected acute hepatitis caused by HBV reactivation to prevent progression to severe liver failure. In this case, a liver biopsy was performed at 43 weeks after the cessation of the treatment with SOF/RBV, and histological examination of liver biopsy specimens revealed no findings suggestive of self-limited acute hepatitis or positive Victoria blue staining in hepatocytes (Fig. 3). Liver function improved upon initiation of entecavir treatment. Moreover, serum HBV-DNA levels showed a gradual decrease to 3.6 LogIU/mL after 6 months of entecavir treatment (Fig. 4). Adverse events of nucleotide analog therapy were not observed. Thus, entecavir treatment successfully controlled HBV replication.

Table 1
Table 1:
Laboratory data at 39 weeks after the cessation of treatment with sofosbuvir + ribavirin.
Figure 1
Figure 1:
Phylogenetic tree based on the complete genomic sequences of genotype A hepatitis B virus (HBV) strains. A phylogenetic tree was constructed according to the neighbor-joining method based on the entire genomic sequences of the HBV strain (HB16-1360) obtained from the present case and representative genotype A HBV strains of subgenotypes A1 to A4. The HB16-1360 strain is highlighted in bold type with a closed box for visual clarity and the reported HBV strains are indicated with accession number and the name of the country where the strain was isolated. Asterisks indicate the HBV strains recovered from patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus or those who contracted acute HBV infection via sexual contact. Bootstrap values of > 70% are indicated for the nodes as a percentage obtained from 1000 resampling analyses of the data. The scale bar is in units of nucleotide substitutions per site.
Figure 2
Figure 2:
Imaging study of the abdominal computed tomography at hepatitis B virus reactivation.
Figure 3
Figure 3:
Histological findings of liver biopsy specimens. Liver biopsy showed (A) slight lymphocyte infiltration in the portal tract without obvious necrosis in the parenchyma (hematoxylin and eosin staining) and (B) no positive Victoria blue staining in hepatocytes (Victoria blue staining).
Figure 4
Figure 4:
Clinical course. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody against HBsAg were negative, antibody against hepatitis B virus (HBV) core was positive before direct-acting antiviral treatment. Treatment with sofosbuvir (SOF) + ribavirin (RBV) promptly decreased serum hepatitis C virus RNA levels, thereafter hepatitis C virus RNA remained undetectable. Serum alanine transaminase suddenly increased after treatment with SOF + RBV. Simultaneously, HBsAg became positive, while anti-HBs remained negative, and serum HBV DNA level increased, reaching 8.9 LogIU/mL at 39 weeks post cessation of direct-acting antiviral treatment with SOF + RBV. Entecavir was then administered. Liver function improved upon initiation of entecavir treatment. Moreover, serum HBV-DNA level gradually decreased.

Written informed written consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. Ethics approval was not required by our institution for completion and publication of this case report.

3 Discussion

HBV reactivation has been observed in inactive carriers (HBsAg-positive) or patients with resolved infection (HBsAg-negative and anti-HBc- and/or anti-HBs-positive) who have undergone immunosuppressive therapy and/or chemotherapy. DAAs for chronic HCV infection have been reported to induce HBV reactivation. We summarize previous case reports on HBV reactivation and/or HBV DNA reappearance during DAAs treatment in Table 2. According to those case reports,[4–10] patient HBV infection status was varied including inactive HBV carriers, occult hepatitis B, and resolved infection. The time between initiation of DAAs and HBV reactivation also differed between cases.

Table 2
Table 2:
Case reports on hepatitis B virus reactivation among hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus C co-infected patients treated with direct-acting antivirals.

Regarding occurrence of HBV reactivation and/or HBV DNA reappearance during DAA treatment in Japan, there were several reports showing that clinical HBV reactivation and HBV DNA reappearance in HBsAg-positive patients treated with DAAs ranged from 25% to 50%.[11–13] However, HBV reactivation and/or HBV DNA reappearance in HBAg-negative, anti-HBc- and/or anti-HBs-positive patients treated with DAAs was rare (range, 0.1%–2.6%).[11–14] In this case, anti-HBc was positive, and HBsAg and anti-HBs were measured before and after DAA treatment, showing negativity before treatment but becoming positive at 39 weeks post treatment cessation in the case of HBsAg. Therefore, we speculated this case could be defined as HBV reactivation, with the following features suggestive of this scenario. Acute hepatitis mainly arises in young individuals because the route of transmission depends on sexual activity. This case involved an elderly woman who might be considered to be at low risk for this transmission route. She had no family history of HBV, and no opportunity for occurrence of infection was evidenced. Moreover, the HBV subgenotype was A2. There was a report from Japan that almost all strains from homosexual men belonged to subgenotype A2 following phylogenetic analysis of genotype.[15] However, the current strain was different to those recognized in Japan. Furthermore, a histological examination of liver biopsy specimens revealed that there were no findings suggesting acute hepatitis. HBV spontaneous reactivation in elderly patients [16] unrelated to DAA treatment cannot entirely be ruled out, however we consider that it is unlikely.

The mechanism of HBV reactivation and HBV DNA reappearance occurring during DAA treatment is not fully understood. The following mechanism, however, has been proposed:

  • (i) HBV replication may be suppressed by HCV infection[17–20];
  • (ii) HCV replication can be inhibited by an HBV superinfection[21];
  • (iii) phase dominance of 1 virus over the other may alternate[17,20];
  • (iv) the host immune response to both HCV and HBV may be attenuated by the eradication of HCV and thereby cause HBV reactivation.[22,23]

In the present case, absence of HBV reactivation during the previous chemotherapy indicates that HBV replication may be strongly suppressed by HCV infection. However, eradication of HCV by DAA treatment without inhibitory effects on HBV would be able to trigger reactivation of HBV infection. In addition, the host immune response may be attenuated by the eradication of HCV.

Japan Society of Hepatology guidelines state that the administration of nucelot(s)ide analogs is recommended if serum HBV DNA levels increase during DAA treatment for chronic hepatitis C (http://www.jsh.or.jp/medical/guidelines/jsh_guidlines/hepatitis_c). Thus, it is necessary for us to closely monitor the serum HBV DNA level during and after DAA treatment. In this case, the patient received nucleotide analog. Thereby, serum HBV-DNA level gradually decreased, and liver enzymes improved.

We herein reported a rare case of HBV reactivation from resolved infection status (HBsAg-, anti-HBs-negative, anti-HBc-positive) that developed after DAA treatment in a patient with chronic hepatitis C. This case highlights that reactivation of resolved HBV infection remains a risk following eradication of HCV, suggesting that HCV infection may play a role in suppressing HBV replication.

Acknowledgments

We thank Gillian Campbell, PhD, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Author contributions

Data curation: Akio Miyasaka, Yuichi Yoshida, Akiko Suzuki.

Formal analysis: Tomoyuki Masuda, Hiroaki Okamoto.

Supervision: Hiroaki Okamoto, Yasuhiro Takikawa.

Writing – original draft: Akio Miyasaka.

Writing – review & editing: Akio Miyasaka.

References

[1]. Kanda T, Lau GKK, Wei L, et al. APASL HCV guideline of virus-eradicated patients by DAA on how to monitor HCC occurrence and HBV reactivation. Hepatol Int 2019;13:649–61.
[2]. Gish RG. HBV/HCV Coinfection and possible reactivation of HBV following DAA use. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;13:292–5.
[3]. Mulyanto, Depamede SN, Surayah K, et al. Identification and characterization of novel hepatitis B virus subgenotype C10 in Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Arch Virol 2010;155:705–15.
[4]. Ende AR, Kim NH, Yeh MM, et al. Fulminant hepatitis B reactivation leading to liver transplantation in a patient with chronic hepatitis C treated with simeprevir and sofosbuvir: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2015;9:164doi: 10.1186/s13256-015-0630-8.
[5]. Collins JM, Raphael KL, Terry C, et al. virus reactivation during successful treatment of hepatitis C virus with sofosbuvir and simeprevir. Clin Infect Dis 2015;61:1304–6.
[6]. Takayama H, Sato T, Ikeda F, et al. Reactivation of hepatitis B virus during interferon-free therapy with daclatasvir and asunaprevir in patient with hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus co-infection. Hepatol Res 2016;46:489–91.
[7]. Hayashi K, Ishigami M, Ishizu Y, et al. A case of acute hepatitis B in a chronic hepatitis C patient after daclatasvir and asunaprevir combination therapy: hepatitis B virus reactivation or acute self-limited hepatitis? Clin J Gastroenterol 2016;9:252–6.
[8]. De Monte A, Courjon J, Anty R, et al. Direct-acting antiviral treatment in adults infected with hepatitis C virus: Reactivation of hepatitis B virus coinfection as a further challenge. J Clin Virol 2016;78:27–30.
[9]. Madonia S, Orlando E, Madonia G, et al. HCV/HBV coinfection: the dark side of DAAs treatment? Liver Int 2017;37:1086–7.
[10]. Sato K, Kobayashi T, Yamazaki Y, et al. Spontaneous remission of hepatitis B virus reactivation during direct-acting antiviral agent-based therapy for chronic hepatitis C. Hepatol Res 2017;47:1346–53.
[11]. Doi A, Sakamori R, Tahata Y, et al. Frequency of, and factors associated with, hepatitis B virus reactivation in hepatitis C patients treated with all-oral direct-acting antivirals: analysis of a Japanese prospective cohort. Hepatol Res 2017;47:1438–44.
[12]. Tamori A, Abiru S, Enomoto H, et al. Low incidence of hepatitis B virus reactivation and subsequent hepatitis in patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving direct-acting antiviral therapy. J Viral Hepat 2018;25:608–11.
[13]. Kawagishi N, Suda G, Onozawa M, et al. Comparing the risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation between direct-acting antiviral therapies and interferon-based therapies for hepatitis C. J Viral Hepat 2017;24:1098–106.
[14]. Ogawa E, Furusyo N, Murata M, et al. Potential risk of HBV reactivation in patients with resolved HBV infection undergoing direct-acting antiviral treatment for HCV. Liver Int 2018;38:76–83.
[15]. Takeda Y, Katano Y, Hayashi K, et al. Difference of HBV genotype distribution between acute hepatitis and chronic hepatitis in Japan. Infection 2006;34:201–7.
[16]. Kamitsukasa H, Iri M, Tanaka A, et al. Spontaneous reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients with resolved or occult HBV infection. J Med Virol 2015;87:589–600.
[17]. Konstantinou D, Deutsch M. The spectrum of HBV/HCV coinfection: epidemiology, clinical characteristics, viral interactions and management. Ann Gastroenterol 2015;28:221–8.
[18]. Dai CY, Yu ML, Chuang WL, et al. Influence of hepatitis C virus on the profiles of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001;16:636–40.
[19]. Fong TL, Di Bisceglie AM, Waggoner JG, et al. The significance of antibody to hepatitis C virus in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 1991;14:64–7.
[20]. Sagnelli E, Coppola N, Marrocco C, et al. Hepatitis C virus superinfection in hepatitis B virus chronic carriers: a reciprocal viral interaction and a variable clinical course. J Clin Virol 2006;35:317–20.
[21]. Coffin CS, Mulrooney-Cousins PM, Lee SS, et al. Profound suppression of chronic hepatitis C following superinfection with hepatitis B virus. Liver Int 2007;27:722–6.
[22]. Meissner EG, Kohli A, Virtaneva K, et al. Achieving sustained virologic response after interferon-free hepatitis C virus treatment correlates with hepatic interferon gene expression changes independent of cirrhosis. J Viral Hepat 2016;23:496–505.
[23]. Zhou Y, Li S, Tang Z, et al. Different antiviral effects of IFNα and IFNβ in an HBV mouse model. Immunobiology 2017;222:562–70.
Keywords:

hepatitis B reactivation; chronic hepatitis C; direct-acting antiviral agents

Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.