Journal Logo

Research Article: Study Protocol Systematic Review

Prevalence of dry eye disease in the elderly

A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis

Zhang, Xinyue MDa; Wang, Lizhen MDa,b; Zheng, Yanlin MDb,∗; Deng, Lu MDa,b; Huang, Xiaoying MMeda,b

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022234
  • Open

Abstract

1 Introduction

Dry eye disease (DED) as one of the most prevalent ocular diseases in the world draws a growing public health concern, which remains widely underestimated. It is defined as “a multifactorial disease of the tears and ocular surface that results in symptoms of discomfort, visual disturbance, and tear film instability, with potential damage to the ocular surface. It is accompanied by increased osmolarity of the tear film and inflammation of the ocular surface.”[1] DED was highly correlated with decreased vision related quality of life and disturbance of daily activities. However, due to the diversity of clinical manifestations and diagnostic criteria, and the poor correlation between clinical signs and symptoms,[2] it is difficult to determine its prevalence.

Large epidemiological studies have shown that after the age of 50, the prevalence of DED in women and men increases every 5 years, and the prevalence rate of women is higher than that of men.[3–9] With the aging of the population and the increase of life expectancy, DED will continue to be one of the main reasons for ophthalmic treatment.[10] Therefore, a better understanding of age-related DED and treatment for this particular population is essential. Previous epidemiological evidence has shown that the overall prevalence of DED is between 5% and 87.5% in the general population worldwide.[9,11–17] In mainland China, the prevalence rate of elderly people over 60 is obviously higher, about 34.4%, while the comprehensive prevalence rate is 17%.[12] It is reported that the proportion of regional elderly population in Australia, Taiwan, South Korea and Japan is 57.5%, 33.7%, 33.2%, and 21.6%, respectively.[9,14,18,19] We hypothesized that this wide heterogeneity can be explained by inconsistent diagnostic criteria and multiple risk factors including age, sex, and latitude.

Therefore, our aim is to conduct a systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis to more accurately determine the prevalence of DED in population over 60 years of age, taking into account the diagnostic methods used.

2 Methods

2.1 Study registration

The protocol of the SR has been registered.

Registration: Open Science Fra network (OSF) registration number: August 12, 2020. osf.io/3jyb4. (https://osf.io/3jyb4). This SR protocol will be conducted and reported strictly according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [20] statement guidelines, and the important protocol amendments will be documented in the full review.

2.2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria for study selection

2.2.1 Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria are all epidemiological cohort investigations of DED involving over 60 years of age population. All included studies should have a clear assessment and diagnostic method of DED. The language of the trials to be included only Chinese or English.

2.2.2 Exclusion criteria

Following studies will be excluded: Studies that were conducted in subpopulations, such as people with specific diseases (eg, diabetes, hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, Sjögren's syndrome, thyroid associated diseases) were excluded.

2.3 Outcome measures

The number of participants and DED cases.

2.4 Search methods

2.4.1 Search resources

We will search the following electronic databases from their inception to August 2020: Electronic database includes PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Database, VIP medicine information, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) (Fig. 1 The research flowchart).

Figure 1
Figure 1:
The research flowchart. This figure shows the identification, screening, eligibility, and included when we searching articles.

2.4.2 Search strategies

The search terms included “prevalence” or “incidence” or “epidemiology” or “morbidity,” combined with “dry eye,” in the forms of free words or controlled vocabulary (ie, medical subject headings). No language restrictions were applied. Second, snowball searching was performed to further identify potentially relevant studies from the reference lists of articles in the first step (Table 1 The research strategy).

Table 1
Table 1:
Search strategy sample of PubMed.

2.5 Data collection and analysis

2.5.1 Studies selection

There will be 2 researchers (XZ and LW) carry out the selection of research literature independently using Note-Express software. We will first make the preliminary selection by screening titles and abstracts. Secondly, we will download full text of the relevant studies for further selection according to the inclusion criteria. If there is any different opinion, 2 researchers will discuss and reach an agreement. If a consensus could not be reached, there will be a third researcher (YZ) who make the final decision. The details of selection process will be displayed in the PRISMA flow chart.

2.5.2 Data extraction

Two researchers (XZ and LW) will read all the included text in full, and independently extract the following information: The following information will be extracted from each study:

  • (1) Study characteristics: title, author, study year, study site, diagnostic method.
  • (2) population characteristics: age, gender.
  • (3) the outcome measures: the number of participants and DED cases.

We unified the elderly age as over 60. The geographic information (latitude and longitude) of the investigation sites in all included studies was obtained by using the Google Maps GPS coordinates (http://www.gps-coordinates.net/). If the information is not enough, we will contact experts and authors in this field to get relevant information.

2.5.3 Quality of assessment

The STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) criteria were used for checking the quality of reporting. The 21 items identified in the STROBE criteria could achieve a maximum score of 34.

2.5.4 Measures of prevalence

The dichotomous outcomes will be expressed by the odds ratio, while the continuous data will use the standardized mean difference. All these outcomes report 95% confidence intervals.

2.5.5 Assessment of a reporting bias

The bias of publication will be explored through funnel plot analysis. If the funnel plot show asymmetry, it will be evaluated via the Egger and Beg tests, and P value <.05 means the publication bias is significant.

2.5.6 Assessment of heterogeneity

The heterogeneity between studies was tested by Cochran Q statistic (Q-test) and quantified by I2 index. A P < .05 in the Q-test indicates significant heterogeneity, and I2 index represents the percentage of between-study variance due to heterogeneity rather than chance, where values of 25% or less correspond to low heterogeneity, near 50% indicate moderate heterogeneity and near 75% or larger reflect high heterogeneity. In the case of significant heterogeneity (P < .05 or I2 > 50%), a random-effects meta-analysis (DerSimonian and Laird method) was adopted to generate the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals, otherwise, a Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model was adopted. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the robustness of the pooled results.

2.5.7 Data synthesis

The results of the study will be analyzed by RevMan 5.0 software provided by Cochrane collaborate on network. The binary data will be expressed by the odds ratio, while the continuous data will use the mean difference.

2.5.8 Subgroup analysis

When the heterogeneity test results are heterogeneous, we need to clarify the source of the heterogeneity by subgroup analysis. First, we did univariable meta-regression to test the individual association of prevalence estimates and relevant factors, which included age, sex (male vs female), setting, study year, and geographic indicators (latitude and longitude). Factors that were significantly associated with the prevalence of DED in the univariable meta-regression were subsequently included in the multivariable meta-regression analysis. To visually inspect the goodness of the final multivariable regression, diagnostic plots were generated, including predicted vs standardized residuals, Quantile-Quantile (QQ) plot and histogram of residuals.

2.5.9 Sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity analysis can not only assess the stability and reliability of the conclusions of the meta analysis, but also assess whether the changes in the results are related to the impact of a single study. If the stability of the conclusion is poor, we can achieve the purpose of increasing stability by changing the analysis model, inclusion and exclusion criteria, or excluding a certain type of literature.

2.6 Ethics and dissemination

We will publish the system review results in peer-reviewed journals, disseminated in meetings or in peer-reviewed publications. Aggregated published data will be used to exclude data of individuals, so there is no need for obtaining the ethical approval or patients’ informed consent.

3 Discussion

Age and female sex have been found to be the greatest risk factors for DED. This is supported by the results of clinical studies of reduced tear secretion in women in the sixth decade.[21,22] With biological aging, the decrease of tear secretion and the increase of evaporation may be the core explanation of DED.[23,24] The function and structure of lacrimal gland (LG) were impaired apparently with aging. The histopathologic changes such as acinar atrophy, periacinar fibrosis, periductal fibrosis can be observed in the human main LG.[25,26,27,28] Diffuse fibrosis and diffuse atrophy in orbital lobes were more frequently observed in women than in men.[28,29] Decrease of tear volume and increase of tear break-up time in age-related eyelid alterations like lid laxity, meibomian gland atrophy, and orifice metaplasia may related to dry eye.[30–34] It has been reported that Marx line, the meibomian gland orifices located anterior to the mucocutaneous junction in young healthy eyelid, migrate anteriorly with aging.[35] Meibomian adenosis can occur alone or associated with tear deficiency (aqueous-tear deficiency).

As life expectancy increases, the immune system also ages and there is increasing evidence that DED is associated with inflammation. Compared with the control group, the levels of inflammatory mediators and T cell related mediators (such as IL-1 β, IL-6, TNF - α, IL-17, IFN - γ) in conjunctiva and tears of patients with DED increased.[36–38] Although previous studies have shown that DED is an age-related disease, there are still controversies about whether aging leads to DED, or whether DED is an aging disease with completely different mechanisms from aging.[39] In a conclusion, it is more and more obvious that, similar to autoimmune DED, age-related DED has significant inflammatory response and complex immune response, and overtime will lead to deep LG and ocular surface changes.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Xinyue Zhang, Lizhen Wang, Xiaoying Huang, Yanlin Zheng

Data curation: Xiaoying Huang, Lu Deng

Formal analysis: Xinyue Zhang, Lizhen Wang

Methodology: Xinyue Zhang, Lizhen Wang

Project administration: Yanlin Zheng

Resources: Xinyue Zhang, Lizhen Wang, Xiaoying Huang, Lu Deng

Software: Xinyue Zhang, Lizhen Wang

Supervision: Yanlin Zheng

Writing – original draft: Xinyue Zhang, Lizhen Wang

Writing – review & editing: Yanlin Zheng

References

[1]. [No authors listed] The epidemiology of dry eye disease: report of the epidemiology subcommittee of the international dry eye workshop. Ocul Surf. 2007;5:93–107.
[2]. Sullivan BD, Crews LA, Messmer EM, et al. Correlations between commonly used objective signs and symptoms for the diagnosis of dry eye disease: clinical implications. Acta Ophthalmol 2014;92:1616.
[3]. Schein OD, Munoz B, Tielsch JM, et al. Prevalence of dry eye among the elderly. Am J Ophthalmol 1997;124:7238.
[4]. Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. Incidence of dry eye in an older population. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:36973.
[5]. Schaumberg DA, Sullivan DA, Buring JE, et al. Prevalence of dry eye syndrome among US women. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:31826.
[6]. Schaumberg DA, Dana R, Buring JE, et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease among US men: estimates from the Physicians’ Health Studies. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:7638.
[7]. Schein OD, Hochberg MC, Munoz B, et al. Dry eye and dry mouth in the elderly: a population-based assessment. Arch Intern Med 1999;159:135963.
[8]. Paulsen AJ, Cruickshanks KJ, Fischer ME, et al. Dry eye in the beaver dam offspring study: prevalence, risk factors, and health-related quality of life. Am J Ophthalmol 2014;157:799806.
[9]. Chia EM, Mitchell P, Rochtchina E, et al. Prevalence and associations of dry eye syndrome in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003;31:22932.
[10]. Pflugfelder SC. Prevalence, burden, and pharmacoeconomics of dry eye disease. Am J Manag Care 2008;14:S1026.
[11]. Romain C, Bruno P, Geraldine N, et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease in visual display terminal workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2016;6:e009675.
[12]. Liu NN, Liu L, Li J, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for dry eye symptom in mainland China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ophthalmol 2014;2014:748654.
[13]. Lekhanont K, Rojanaporn D, Chuck RS, et al. Prevalence of dry eye in Bangkok, Thailand. Cornea 2006;25:11627.
[14]. Uchino M, Nishiwaki Y, Michikawa T, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of dry eye disease in Japan: Koumi Study. Ophthalmology 2011;118:23617.
[15]. Viso E, Rodriguez-Ares MT, Gude F. Prevalence of and associated factors for dry eye in a Spanish adult population (the Salnes Eye Study). Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2009;16:1521.
[16]. Stapleton F, Alves M, Bunya VY, et al. TFOS DEWS II epidemiology report. Ocul Surf 2017;15:33465.
[17]. Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. Prevalence of and risk factors for dry eye syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:12648.
[18]. Lin P-Y, Tsai S-Y, Cheng C-Y, et al. Prevalence of dry eye among an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1096101.
[19]. Han SB, Hyon JY, Woo SJ, et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease in an elderly Korean population. Arch Ophthalmol 2011;129:6338.
[20]. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 2015;349:g764717647.
[21]. McCarty CA, Bansal AK, Livingston PM, et al. The epidemiology of dry eye in Melbourne, Australia. Ophthalmology 1998;105:11149.
[22]. Lamberts DW, Foster CS, Perry HD. Schirmer test after topical anesthesis and the tear menius height in normal eyes. ArchOphthalmol 1979;97:10825.
[23]. Gayton JL. Etiology, prevalence, and treatment of dry eye disease. Clin Ophthalmol 2009;3:40512.
[24]. Gilbard JP. Human tear film electrolyte concentrations in health and dry-eye disease. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1994;34:2736.
[25]. Bukhari AA, Basheer NA, Joharjy HI. Age, gender, and interracial variability of normal lacrimal gland volume using MRI. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;30:38891.
[26]. El-Fadaly AB, El-Shaarawy EA, Rizk AA, et al. Age-related alterations in the lacrimal gland of adult albino rat: a light and electron microscopic study. Ann Anat = Anatomischer Anzeiger 2014;196:33651.
[27]. Nasu M, Matsubara O, Yamamoto H. Post-mortem prevalence of lymphocytic infiltration of the lacrymal gland: a comparative study in autoimmune and non-autoimmune diseases. J Pathol 1984;143:115.
[28]. Obata H, Yamamoto S, Horiuchi H, et al. Histopathologic study of human lacrimal gland. Statistical analysis with special reference to aging. Ophthalmology 1995;102:67886.
[29]. Obata H. Anatomy and histopathology of the human lacrimal gland. Cornea 2006;25:S829.
[30]. Obata H. Anatomy and histopathology of human meibomian gland. Cornea 2002;21:S704.
[31]. Chhadva P, McClellan AL, Alabiad CR, et al. Impact of eyelid laxity on symptoms and signs of dry eye disease. Cornea 2016;35:5315.
[32]. Alghamdi YA, Mercado C, McClellan AL, et al. Epidemiology of meibomian gland dysfunction in an elderly population. Cornea 2016;35:7315.
[33]. Hykin PG, Bron AJ. Age-related morphological changes in lid margin and meibomian gland anatomy. Cornea 1992;11:33442.
[34]. Sullivan DA, Sullivan BD, Evans JE, et al. Androgen deficiency, Meibomian gland dysfunction, and evaporative dry eye. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002;966:21122.
[35]. Yamaguchi M, Kutsuna M, Uno T, et al. Marx line: fluorescein staining line on the inner lid as indicator of meibomian gland function. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141:66975.
[36]. Solomon A, Dursun D, Liu Z, et al. Pro- and anti-inflammatory forms of interleukin-1 in the tear fluid and conjunctiva of patients with dry-eye disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:228392.
[37]. Yoon K, Jeong IY, Park YG, et al. Interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels in tears of patients with dry eye syndrome. Cornea 2007;26:4317.
[38]. Massingale ML, Li X, Vallabhajosyula M, et al. Analysis of inflammatory cytokines in the tears of dry eye patients. Cornea 2009;28:10237.
[39]. Stern ME. Dry eye–is this a disease or a natural consequence of aging. Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia 2005;80:12531.
Keywords:

dry eye disease; elderly; meta analysis and systematic review; prevalence; protocol

Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.