Journal Logo

Research Article: Diagnostic Accuracy Study

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT combining ADC value of MRI in the diagnosis of naive prostate cancer

Perspective of radiologist

Wang, Liwei MD, PhDa; Yu, Fei MDb; Yang, Lulu MDc; Zang, Shiming MDb; Xue, Hailin MDa; Yin, Xindao MD, PhDa; Guo, Hongqian MD, PhDd; Sun, Hongbin MD, PhDe,∗; Wang, Feng MD, PhDb,∗

Editor(s): Lucarelli., Giuseppe

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020755
  • Open


1 Introduction

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with a high pretest likelihood.[1,2] Multiparametric MRI can reveal histopathological characteristics. [3] MRI tends to detect high-risk lesions or clinically significant PCa, which leads to prompt treatment. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) generated by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a parameter for quantitative analysis of malignant lesions.[4,5] Though ADC is helpful for tumor characterization, false-positive and false-negative findings are common.[6] Therefore, ADC alone has not become the single parameter with which to decide on biopsy.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is an intrinsic transmembrane protein, which is highly expressed in 95% of PCa; its expression corresponds positively with the degree of malignancy.[7,8] The improved efficacy of [68Ga]-labeled PSMA with a ligand, such as PSMA-11 (also known as HBED-CC) and PSMA-617, has been well documented in the diagnosis of PCa.[9,10] Our previous studies further demonstrated that it had higher sensitivity in the diagnosis of treatment-naive PCa and primary staging, especially for lymphadenopathy.[11–14] This technique allows prediction of biochemical recurrence and of lymphadenopathy, which has great impact on the clinical management.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of 68Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission computed tomography (PET/CT) and MRI in treatment-naive PCa and investigate the feasibility of combining ADC from MRI and SUVmax from PET/CT in differentiation of PCa from benign disease.

2 Methods

2.1 Patients

Between December 2016 and September 2019, 428 patients with suspected PCa underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. A total of 95 patients underwent both 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and MRI. Inclusion criteria for case data were: No treatment prior to examinations. PET/CT and MRI were performed within 2 weeks. Patients underwent radical prostatectomy or biopsy after imaging, with the final diagnosis confirmed by histopathology. Exclusion criteria: patients diagnosed with PCa previously; > 14 days between the 2 examinations; previous surgery or biopsy; disease not confirmed by pathology. A total of 63 cases met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 69.56 ± 11.56 years. A detailed flowchart is shown in Fig. 1. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels ranged from 4.15 to 1298 ng/mL. This retrospective study was approved by the review board of our hospital. All patients signed written consents.

Figure 1
Figure 1:
The flow chart of eligible case data inclusion.

2.2 MRI acquisition protocol

MRI was performed with a high-field system (Intera Achieva 3.0T TX, Philips, The Netherlands). The sequences were as follows: transverse T1-weighted imaging (T1WI, repetition time [TR] = 400 ms, echo time [TE] = 10 ms, field-of-view [FOV] = 35 × 30 cm, matrix = 192 × 200); T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) (TR = 3500 ms, TE = 90 ms, FOV = 20 × 20 cm, matrix = 240 × 230); fat-suppression spectral presaturation attenuated inversion recovery-T2WI (TR = 2800 ms, TE = 100 ms, FOV = 25 × 40 cm, matrix = 270 × 200); DWI (TR = 6200 ms, TE = 2000 ms, FOV = 20 × 30 cm, matrix = 80 × 142, b = 1500 s/mm2). The section thickness of each sequence was 3 mm; the section interval was 0.3 mm. Transverse DWI was obtained by single-shot echo planar imaging.

2.3 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT

PSMA-11(HBED-CC) was purchased from ABX (Germany). 68Ga-PSMA-11 was radiolabeled using the automated labeling module produced by ITM (Germany). The radiochemical purity was > 99%. The synthesis procedure was reported previously.[11] Whole-body PET/CT (uMI780, United Imaging, China) was performed from the vertex to the proximal legs 1 hour postinjection of 68Ga-PSMA-11 (111–185 MBq). Attenuation-corrected images were assessed clinically by certified nuclear medicine physicians.

2.4 Image interpretation

All MR images were interpreted by 1 certified radiologist (with 5 years of experience in prostate MRI) while blinded to PET images. Both interpreters reviewed all imaging data in a single session blinded to all clinical and pathologic data, Regions of interest were placed around lesions with diameters > 5 mm. The mean ADC and maximum SUVmax were measured. For ADC values, an ROI was drawn around the lesion on DWI according to hypointense signal on T2WI. The SUVmax/ADC ratio was manually calculated to express both PSMA expression and ADC.

2.5 Statistical analysis

Continuous variables with abnormal distribution are expressed as median (interquartile range). The correlation between SUVmax and ADC and correlation between GS and SUVmax, ADC, and SUVmax/ADC were evaluated by Spearman correlation analysis. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the difference in SUVmax, ADC, and SUVmax/ADC among different groups. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and cutoff value of each parameter. AUCs of the 3 parameters were compared by the z test. R (version 3.6.1) and MedCalc (version 15.0) statistical software programs were employed for all analysis. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

3 Results

Out of 63 cases enrolled in this retrospective study (40 with PCa, 23 with benign prostatic disease), 32 cases were confirmed by postoperation pathology, and 31 cases were confirmed by needle biopsy. A total of 107 primary prostate lesions were found among the 63 cases. There were 2 to 4 lesions in 27 cases, and 36 solitary lesions. Eighteen cases with PCa had lymph node metastasis (28.57%) and 6 cases had bone metastasis (9.52%). All pelvic lymph node metastases were detected by PET/CT and MRI while all extraprostatic bone metastases were only detected by PET/CT.

PCa presented as hypointense signal in the peripheral zone or the central gland on T2WI, hypointense signal on ADC maps, and hyperintense signal on DWI. These findings corresponded to focal increased uptake in 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET images (Fig. 2). Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) presented as increased volumes in the transition zone and central zone with compression and thinning of the peripheral zone (Fig. 3). Mixed hypointense and hyperintense signals were observed on T2WI, and no obvious hypointense or hyperintense signals appeared on DWI and ADC maps. No significantly increased uptake was observed on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Characteristics of prostatitis were hypointense signals in the central and peripheral zone on T2WI, isointense or hyperintense signal on DWI, and isointense or hypointense signal on ADC maps. 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT showed no or mildly diffuse uptake (Fig. 4).

Figure 2
Figure 2:
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and MRI in a case with progressive dysuria (male, age 83, PSA: 87.18 ng/mL). Hypointense signals were shown on T2WI (A, white and red arrows), and hyperintense signals on DWI (B, white and red arrows) in both lobes of prostate. ADC map showed hypointense signal in all lesions (C, white and red arrows). A PSMA-avid lesion occupies the right peripheral zone (SUVmax = 33.19, SUVmax/ADC = 68.37; D and E, white, black and red arrows). All of left and right lesions were confirmed pathologically as prostate cancer (HE staining, 100 × magnification; GS 4 + 5 = 9; F). ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient, DWI = diffusion-weighted imaging, GS = Gleason score, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, PET = positron emission computed tomography, PSMA = prostate-specific membrane antigen, SUV = standard uptake value, T2WI = T2-weighted imaging, PSA = prostate-specific antigen, CT = computed tomography.
Figure 3
Figure 3:
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and MRI in a case of benign prostatic hyperplasia (male, age 77, PSA: 66.07 ng/mL). T2WI showed prostatic hyperplasia in the central gland zone, with compression of the peripheral zone (A). No abnormal signals were identified on DWI or ADC map (B, C). 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT images showed concentrated radioactivity in the right peripheral zone (SUVmax = 13.86, SUVmax/ADC = 10.67; D and E, white arrow). Benign prostatic hyperplasia with prostatitis was confirmed by pathology (HE staining, 100 × magnification; F). ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient, DWI = diffusion-weighted imaging, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, PET = positron emission computed tomography, PSMA = prostate-specific membrane antigen, SUV = standard uptake value, T2WI = T2-weighted imaging, PSA = prostate-specific antigen, CT = computed tomography.
Figure 4
Figure 4:
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and MR in a patient with prostatitis (male, age 65, PSA: 10.93 ng/mL). An irregular lesion with blurred borders in the left peripheral and transitional zones shown on T2WI (A, white arrow), slightly higher signal on DWI (B, white arrow), and low signal on ADC (C, white arrow). No obvious uptake in prostate gland (SUVmax = 4.66, SUVmax/ADC = 5.18; D and E). Benign prostatic hyperplasia with prostatitis was confirmed by pathology (HE staining, 100 × magnification; F). ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient, DWI = diffusion-weighted imaging, PET = positron emission computed tomography, PSMA = prostate-specific membrane antigen, SUV = standard uptake value, T2WI = T2-weighted imaging, PSA = prostate-specific antigen, CT = computed tomography.

Five malignant prostatic lesions were missed on MRI but detected on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, which showed PSMA-avidity but no significant changes on DWI or ADC maps (Fig. 5).

Figure 5
Figure 5:
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detected a primary prostatic lesion, missed by MRI, in a case of suspected PCa (male, age 63, PSA: 17.57 ng/mL). Slightly hypointense signal in the right peripheral zone and transition zone are shown on T2WI (A, white arrow), isointense signal on DWI (B, white arrow), and slightly hypointense signal on ADC (C, white arrow). In 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, obvious focal uptake in the right transition zone is shown (SUVmax = 15.03, SUVmax/ADC = 17.68; D and E, white arrow). Prostate cancer confirmed by pathology (HE staining, 100 × magnification; GS 3 + 4 = 7; F). ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient, DWI = diffusion-weighted imaging, PET = positron emission computed tomography, PSMA = prostate-specific membrane antigen, SUV = standard uptake value, T2WI = T2-weighted imaging, PSA = prostate-specific antigen, CT = computed tomography, PCa = prostate cancer, GS = Gleason score.

The present study showed that ADC value negatively correlated with SUVmax (P = 1.52 × 10−9 in all lesions, P = 4.54 × 10−2 in benign lesions, and P = 7.94 × 10−3 in PCa) (Fig. 6). The median (interquartile range) ADC values of benign and malignant lesions were 1.04 (0.75–1.29) and 0.69 (0.55–0.85), respectively. The median (interquartile range) SUVmax of benign lesions was 4.02 (3.00–7.86), and that of malignant lesions was 14.86 (9.34–19.80). The median (interquartile range) SUVmax/ADC of benign lesions was 3.51 (2.67–6.15), whereas that of malignant lesions was 19.64 (13.12–33.16). The ADCs of PCa were significantly lower than those of benign disease (P = 3.27 × 10−8), and SUVmax and SUVmax/ADC of PCa were significantly higher than those of benign disease (P = 1.49 × 10−12 and P = 6.33 × 10−14, respectively), as shown in Table 1. For the 64 malignant lesions, the correlations between ADC, SUVmax, SUVmax/ADC and Gleason score (GS) were analyzed. ADC negatively correlated with GS (P = 7.63 × 10−4), while SUVmax and SUVmax/ADC positively correlated with GS (P = 5.49 × 10−9 and 1.71 × 10−10, respectively) (Fig. 6). Stratified analysis found that ADC decreased in lesions with GS > 6 (P = 1.12 × 10−2), and SUVmax and SUVmax/ADC increased with GS > 6 (P = 7.14 × 10−5) (Table 2).

Figure 6
Figure 6:
Scatter plots of the different parameters and GS. Correlation among SUVmax and ADC (A), benign lesions (B), and PCa lesions (C). Correlation among ADC and GS in PCa lesions (D), correlation between SUVmax and GS in PCa lesions (E), and correlation between SUVmax/ADC and GS in PCa lesions (F). ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient, SUV = standard uptake value, PCa = prostate cancer, GS = Gleason score.
Table 1
Table 1:
The difference of the 3 diagnostic parameters.
Table 2
Table 2:
The difference of the 3 diagnostic parameters between PCa with high (≥7) and low (≤6) GS.

From ROC analysis (Fig. 7), the cutoff value of ADC was determined to be 1.02 × 10−3mm2/s for a sensitivity and specificity in PCa of 90.6% and 58.1%, respectively. The Youden index was 0.49, and the AUC was 0.816. When the cutoff value for SUVmax was set at 11.72, the sensitivity and specificity of SUVmax in PCa was 67.2% and 97.7%, respectively, with a Youden index = 0.65 and AUC = 0.905. In 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT combined with MRI, a cutoff value for SUVmax/ADC at 12.35 resulted in sensitivity and specificity of 81.2% and 88.4%, respectively. The Youden index = 0.70, and the AUC = 0.929. The AUCs of the 3 diagnostic parameters were compared by z test, and higher AUCs in SUVmax and SUVmax/ADC than ADC alone were observed (Table 3).

Figure 7
Figure 7:
ROC curves of the 3 diagnostic parameters. ROC = receiver operating characteristic.
Table 3
Table 3:
Comparison of the AUCs of the 3 diagnostic parameters.

4 Discussion

Transrectal ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy is a routine method in the diagnosis of PCa. However, the false-negative rate of biopsy is as high as 15% to 35%.[15] MRI has improved the detection rate of clinically significant PCa, which avoids unnecessary biopsy. The ADC from DWI reflects the degree of diffusion of water molecules in the tissue. Current studies have shown that ADC maps illustrate the histopathological features of the lesion.[16,17] ADC values were significantly lower in the PCa group than that in prostatitis, and ADC value alone showed high sensitivity in detecting PCa.[18] However, the specificity of MRI for PCa is limited, and MRI likely missed some prostatic and extraprostatic lesions.

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET has been validated to be more sensitive than MRI in the detection of PCa.[19–24] SUVmax represents PSMA expression, which correlates with tumor differentiation and prognosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of 68Ga-PSMA-11 in treatment-naive prostate cancer compared with that of MRI, and the feasibility of using the SUVmax/ADC was further explored. To our knowledge, this is the first head-to-head comparison study between MRI and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET in the detection of primary prostatic lesions in China.

In this study, the ADC value negatively correlated with SUVmax, which was consistent with previous studies.[25,26] The SUVmax/ADC ratio has been utilized to evaluate the combined advantages of MRI and PET/CT and showed great sensitivity and specificity for the detection of lymphadenopathy in PCa.[25] This study demonstrated PCa was associated with lower ADC, and higher SUVmax and SUVmax/ADC. The GS negatively correlated with ADC values, and positively correlated with SUVmax and the SUVmax/ADC. These findings were consistent with other studies.[27–30] SUVmax/ADC may be used as a predictive parameter for PCa, to help distinguish benign from malignant prostatic lesions.

ROC curve analysis showed that ADC had high sensitivity but lower specificity in the detection of PCa. The sensitivity of SUVmax in this study (67.2%) was less than that reported in other studies,[24,31,32] which may be attributed to differences among the populations and the different cutoff values. The ratio of SUVmax/ADC integrates the degree of water molecule diffusion and PSMS expression. In this study, the diagnostic efficacy of the SUVmax/ADC ratio was better than that of SUVmax or ADC alone. SUVmax/ADC might be an alternative parameter in the detection of treatment-naive prostatic lesions.

MRI has been well documented in the detection of treatment naive prostate cancer, recent studies validated that MRI might improve the detection rate of clinical significantly PCa. However, MRI missed the lesion located in the transitional and ventral zone, especially patients combining with prostate hyperplasia. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT had higher sensitivity in the detection of biochemical recurrence, several studies further validated that it improved the detection rate of primary prostatic lesion, especially in the peripheral and translational zone even with low PSA level. However, PSMA PET/CT missed some primary lesions in patients with higher Gleason Score or poor differentiated PCa and special rare PCa. Some false-positive or false-negative results existed in the clinical when SUVmax and ADC valued are used separately. Therefore, as a radiologist, we supposed that SUVmax combining with ADC value might improve the detection rate of primary prostatic lesion. Combination of the SUVmax and ADC will decrease the deviation and improve the diagnostic accuracy.

In cases of high-GS primary PCa, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT not only improved the detection rate of prostatic primary lesions but also of extra-prostatic spread, which had great impacts on staging and clinical management. To our great interest, 27 cases with multiple primary lesions were discovered in this study. MRI with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT detected all lesions. From a radiology perspective, MRI is valuable in the detection of primary prostatic lesions in the peripheral and translational zone, and identification of seminal vesicle involvement. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT has the advantage in the detection of multiple lesions and lesions in the central zone. ADC integration with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT provides some insights into the evaluation of tumor behavior and aggressiveness, with GS correlating positively with SUVmax/ADC. This study will pave the way for future investigations into the molecular phenotyping of prostate cancer.

The limitation of this study is that this was a small-scale retrospective study. Large-scale prospective studies between MRI and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in the detection of prostatic primary lesions are warranted in China. Second, this study was not performed with hybrid PET/MRI but with the modalities separated. A well-designed study with hybrid PET/MRI is underway. Third, we did not evaluate the role of SUVmax/ADC in predicting metastatic behavior on follow-up. In the future study, further study will be performed with simultaneous PET/MRI, which has been used in my department, SUVmax/ADC parameter will be further evaluated not only in prostatic primary lesion but also in metastatic lesion. We will validate if SUVmax/ADC can be served as a useful parameter for the evaluation of tumor biology and prognosis, which may have great impact of treatment strategy selection.

5 Conclusion

MRI combined with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT has higher sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of treatment-naive PCa, which has great merits in the detection of multiple primary prostatic lesions and confirmation of seminal vesicle involvement. The SUVmax/ADC ratio may serve as a valuable parameter for the diagnosis of PCa and evaluation of biological behavior.


The authors thank all participants and staff from the Nanjing First Hospital for their contribution to the study.

Author contributions

Study design: Feng Wang, Liwei Wang.

Paper writing: Liwei Wang, Fei Yu.

Statistics and graphing: Fei Yu, Liwei Wang.

Histopathology: Lulu Yang.

PET/CT acquisition and interpretation: Shiming Zang, Feng Wang.

MRI acquisition and interpretation: Hailin Xue, Liwei Wang, Xindao Yin.

Patient biopsy and surgery: Hongbin Sun, Hongqian Guo.


[1]. Woo S, Suh CH, Kim SY, et al. Head-to-head comparison between high- and standard-b-value DWI for detecting prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;210:91100.
[2]. Barbieri S, Bronnimann M, Boxler S, et al. Differentiation of prostate cancer lesions with high and with low Gleason score by diffusion-weighted MRI. Eur Radiol 2017;27:154755.
[3]. Taneja SS. Re: diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. J Urol 2017;198:1012.
[4]. Kang Z, Min X, Weinreb J, et al. Abbreviated biparametric versus standard multiparametric MRI for diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019;212:35765.
[5]. Papadopoulos I, Phillips J, Evans R, et al. Evaluation of diffusion weighted imaging in the context of multi-parametric MRI of the prostate in the assessment of suspected low volume prostatic carcinoma. Magn Reson Imaging 2018;47:1316.
[6]. Rourke E, Sunnapwar A, Mais D, et al. Inflammation appears as high prostate imaging-reporting and data system scores on prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) leading to false positive MRI fusion biopsy. Investig Clin Urol 2019;60:38895.
[7]. Afshar-Oromieh A, Malcher A, Eder M, et al. PET imaging with a [68Ga]gallium-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: biodistribution in humans and first evaluation of tumour lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013;40:48695.
[8]. Koerber SA, Utzinger MT, Kratochwil C, et al. (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in newly diagnosed carcinoma of the prostate: correlation of intraprostatic PSMA uptake with several clinical parameters. J Nucl Med 2017;58:19438.
[9]. Al-Bayati M, Grueneisen J, Lutje S, et al. Integrated 68Gallium labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen-11 positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging enhances discriminatory power of multi-parametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging. Urol Int 2018;100:16471.
[10]. Freitag MT, Radtke JP, Afshar-Oromieh A, et al. Local recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy is at risk to be missed in (68)Ga-PSMA-11-PET of PET/CT and PET/MRI: comparison with mpMRI integrated in simultaneous PET/MRI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017;44:77687.
[11]. Zang S, Shao G, Cui C, et al. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for prostate cancer staging and risk stratification in Chinese patients. Oncotarget 2017;8:1224758.
[12]. Chen M, Zhang Q, Zhang C, et al. Combination of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT and multiparametric MRI improves the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a lesion-by-lesion analysis. J Nucl Med 2019;60:9449.
[13]. Gao J, Zhang C, Zhang Q, et al. Diagnostic performance of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT for identification of aggressive cribriform morphology in prostate cancer with whole-mount sections. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019;46:153141.
[14]. Zhang Q, Zang S, Zhang C, et al. Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT with mpMRI for preoperative lymph node staging in patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer. J Transl Med 2017;15:230.
[15]. Eskicorapci SY, Guliyev F, Islamoglu E, et al. The effect of prior biopsy scheme on prostate cancer detection for repeat biopsy population: results of the 14-core prostate biopsy technique. Int Urol Nephrol 2007;39:18995.
[16]. Kwak JT, Sankineni S, Xu S, et al. Prostate cancer: a correlative study of multiparametric MR imaging and digital histopathology. Radiology 2017;285:14756.
[17]. Syer TJ, Godley KC, Cameron D, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of high b-value diffusion- and T2-weighted imaging for the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018;43:178797.
[18]. Peker E, Sonmez DY, Akkaya HE, et al. Diagnostic performance of multiparametric MR imaging at 3.0 tesla in discriminating prostate cancer from prostatitis: a histopathologic correlation. Eurasian J Med 2019;51:317.
[19]. Calais J, Cao M, Nickols NG. The utility of PET/CT in the planning of external radiation therapy for prostate cancer. J Nucl Med 2018;59:55767.
[20]. Taneja S, Jena A, Taneja R, et al. Effect of combined (68)Ga-PSMAHBED-CC uptake pattern and multiparametric MRI derived with simultaneous PET/MRI in the diagnosis of primary prostate cancer: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;210:133845.
[21]. Herrmann K, Bluemel C, Weineisen M, et al. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry for a probe targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen for imaging and therapy. J Nucl Med 2015;56:85561.
[22]. Sachpekidis C, Kopka K, Eder M, et al. 68Ga-PSMA-11 dynamic PET/CT imaging in primary prostate cancer. Clin Nucl Med 2016;41:e4739.
[23]. Giesel FL, Sterzing F, Schlemmer HP, et al. Intra-individual comparison of (68)Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT and multi-parametric MR for imaging of primary prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016;43:14006.
[24]. Zhang J, Shao S, Wu P, et al. Diagnostic performance of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the detection of prostate cancer prior to initial biopsy: comparison with cancer-predicting nomograms. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019;46:90820.
[25]. Uslu-Besli L, Bakir B, Asa S, et al. Correlation of SUVmax and apparent diffusion coefficient values detected by Ga-68 PSMA PET/MRI in primary prostate lesions and their significance in lymph node metastasis: preliminary results of an on-going study. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther 2019;28:10411.
[26]. Wetter A, Lipponer C, Nensa F, et al. Quantitative evaluation of bone metastases from prostate cancer with simultaneous [18F] choline PET/MRI: combined SUV and ADC analysis. Ann Nucl Med 2014;28:40510.
[27]. Ma XZ, Lv K, Sheng JL, et al. Application evaluation of DCE-MRI combined with quantitative analysis of DWI for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Oncol Lett 2019;17:307784.
[28]. Park SY, Oh YT, Jung DC, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging predicts upgrading of Gleason score in biopsy-proven low grade prostate cancers. BJU Int 2017;119:5766.
[29]. Ergül N, Yilmaz Güneş B, Yücetaş U, et al. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in newly diagnosed prostate adenocarcinoma. Clin Nucl Med 2018;43:e4227.
[30]. Jena A, Taneja R, Taneja S, et al. Improving diagnosis of primary prostate cancer with combined (68)Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-HBED-CC simultaneous PET and multiparametric MRI and clinical parameters. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;211:124653.
[31]. Basha MAA, Hamed MAG, Hussein O, et al. 6868Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in newly diagnosed prostate cancer: diagnostic sensitivity and interobserver agreement. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019;44:254556.
[32]. Bettermann AS, Zamboglou C, Kiefer S, et al. [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for gross tumor volume delineation in a slice by slice analysis with whole mount histopathology as a reference standard—implications for focal radiotherapy planning in primary prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2019;141:2149.

magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); positron emission computed tomography (PET); prostate cancer; prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)

Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.