Journal Logo

Research Article: Observational Study

Gout and the risk of epilepsy

A population-based cohort study

Chen, Hung-Lin PhDa,b; Hsu, Yi-Chao PhDc; Chen, Chang-Hsu MDd; Wang, Pei-Jen BSa; Lin, Cheng-Li MSce; Cheng, Sheng-Han MDf,∗; Chang, Kuang-Hsi PhDa,g,h,∗

Editor(s): Palazón-Bru., Antonio

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020823
  • Open

Abstract

1 Introduction

Gout is a chronic inflammatory disease related to uric acid metabolism.[1] Sustained hyperuricemia leads to intra- and/or peri-articular monosodium urate (MSU) crystal accumulation.[2] While free MSU crystals are phagocytosed by immune cells including resident macrophages and other mononuclear cells, it triggers inflammation via the NALP-3 inflammasome, which stimulates secretion of the cytokine IL-1β into the blood.[3–5]

Gout constitutes an increasing burden of disease worldwide. The prevalence of gout in the United States and the United Kingdom is 3.9% and 2.49%, respectively. In Taiwan, the prevalence of gout is 6.25%, which is a significantly higher prevalence compared with that in many other countries.[6] Although there are several options for treating gout, treatment outcomes are not as good as could be expected.

Recent studies have revealed that gout may be associated with neurologic disorders, such as autoimmune and neurodegenerative dementia and Alzheimer's disease.[7–9] These neurologic diseases are associated with inflammation, which is a condition that can be induced in patients with gout. In addition, there is accumulating evidence to suggest that inflammation also plays a critical role in the pathology of epilepsy.[10,11] Epilepsy is one of the most common brain disorders and can evoke severe physical and psychological complications in patients who suffer with it. Currently, epilepsy affects more than 50 million people worldwide. Dysregulation of inflammation is related to the development of epilepsy. Although the role played by inflammation in the pathology of epilepsy is not clear, it is possible that impaired inflammatory processes cause abnormal neural connectivity and hyper-excitability of neuronal networks, leading to epilepsy.

The risk of stroke, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, and hypertension has been shown to increase with both gout and epilepsy.[12–15] However, there is currently no direct evidence to support any association between gout and epilepsy. Therefore, we conducted this cohort study to determine the risk of epilepsy in patients with gout.

2 Methods

2.1 Data sources

Data were acquired from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), which holds data relating to inpatient care, ambulatory care, medication, and expenses from 1996 to 2011. Since the compulsory single-payer National Health Insurance (NHI) program of Taiwan began in 1995, more than 99% of the 23.75 million residents of Taiwan have enrolled in this program. To ensure the NHI reimbursement data are legal for public research, all personal identification data are removed to maintain privacy and confirm all data are de-identified prior to being released. Following privacy protocols, for all files that needed to be linked this linking was achieved via encrypted identification numbers. This retrospective cohort study utilized a subset of the NHIRD, including files from the Registry of Catastrophic Illnesses Patient Database (RCIPD) and the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2000 (LHID2000). Diseases in the NHIRD data were defined using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. This cohort study was approved by the Ethical Review Board of China Medical University (CMUREC-101–012).

2.2 Sampled patients

The gout cohort from the RCIPD included patients who were aged more than 20 years and newly diagnosed with gout (ICD-9-CM Code 274) and 3 outpatient visits or history of gout-specific hospitalization between 2000 and 2011. The RCIPD aims to track patients who have major or catastrophic illnesses, including cancer, end-stage renal disease, mental illness, congenital illness, and several autoimmune diseases, including gout. When patients are registered on the RCIPD, the Bureau of NHI routinely reviews the original medical charts to validate the diagnosis of a catastrophic illness. The index date represented the date of a diagnosis of gout. Patients were excluded if they had been diagnosed of epilepsy (ICD-9-CM Code 345) before the index date or had an incomplete medical history or follow-up within 6 months. The control cohort included patients without a history of gout who were randomly selected from the LHID2000. We first selected the controls whose age, sex, and comorbidities matched the corresponding gout patient. Among the controls from the first step, we randomly selected 2 controls who were still enrolled in the NHI program in the same year as the corresponding year of gout diagnosis of the gout patient. Then, we assigned that year as the index year of the controls. Furthermore, the index year plus a randomly assigned month and date will be the index date of the controls. The frequency of matching between the control and gout cohorts was a 2:1 ratio, based on age (in 5-year bands), sex, comorbidities, and the year of gout diagnosis, using the same exclusion criteria (see Fig. 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1:
Flow diagram for study participants.

2.3 Outcomes

All patients were tracked from the index date until a diagnosis of epilepsy (ICD-9-CM 345) or censoring due to death or the end date of the database (December 31, 2011).

2.4 Comorbidities

Baseline comorbidities included in the analysis were as follows: diabetes (ICD-9-CM Code 250), hypertension (ICD-9-CM Codes 401–405), head injury (ICD-9-CM Codes 850–854, 959.01), coronary artery disease (CAD) (ICD-9-CM Codes 410–414), stroke (ICD-9-CM Codes 430–438), and autoimmune disease (ICD-9-CM Codes 710.0, 710.1, 710.2, 710.3, 710.4, and 696.0). The follow-up times for the case and control groups were 7.42 (SD = 3.21) years and 7.24 (SD = 3.26) years, respectively.

2.5 Statistical analysis

The distribution of categorical characteristics between the gout and the control cohorts were described and compared using Pearson's chi-squared test for categorical variables and a two-sample t test for continuous variables. The cumulative incidence of epilepsy between the gout and control cohorts was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the differences between the groups were assessed using a log-rank test. The incidence densities (per 1000 person-years) of epilepsy were estimated according to various risk factors. Univariate and multivariate Cox-proportional hazard regression models were adopted to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of developing epilepsy. In addition, the Cox model was used to assess the risk of epilepsy development in the gout cohort compared with the control cohort. All data analyses were performed using SAS for Windows (Version 9.4; SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC). A two-tailed P value of .05 was considered statistically significant.

3 Results

3.1 Demographic characteristics and comorbidities in the gout and control cohorts

The demographic characteristics and comorbidities of the gout and control cohorts are shown in Table 1. The gout cohort contained 51,893 patients and the control cohort contained 103,057 patients. There were no statistical differences in the distributions of age and sex between the gout and control cohorts (the mean age was ∼52 years). In the gout cohort, 53.9% of patients were older than 50 years old, and 72.4% were men. No significantly different prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, stroke, CAD, head injury, or autoimmune disease was observed between the gout and control cohorts.

Table 1
Table 1:
Demographic characteristics and comorbidities in cohorts with and without gout.

3.2 Cox model analysis of risk factors related to epilepsy development

The overall incidence of epilepsy was 1.27-fold higher in the gout cohort compared with the control cohort (2.39 vs 1.87 per 1000 person-years, 95% CI = 1.17–1.38) (Table 2). Even after being adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidities, patients with gout were still associated with an increased risk of epilepsy compared with those without gout (adjusted HR [aHR] = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.15–1.36). Multivariable analysis also showed that the incidence of epilepsy increased with age. After adjustment for potential risk factors, the risk of epilepsy incidence was 1.28-fold higher in patients aged 35 to 49 years (95% CI = 1.07–1.53), 1.54-fold higher in those aged 50 to 64 years (95% CI = 1.29–1.85), and 2.57-fold higher in those aged 65 years or more (95% CI = 2.14–3.09), compared with patients aged 34 years or less. Sex also affected the risk of developing epilepsy (aHR of male to female = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.17–1.41). All comorbidities investigated increased the incidence of epilepsy in patients with the exception of autoimmune disease. A higher risk of epilepsy was apparent for patients with the comorbidities of diabetes (aHR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.05–1.33), hypertension (aHR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.45–1.79), stroke (aHR = 2.86, 95% CI = 2.51–3.26), CAD (aHR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.09–1.32), and head injury (aHR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.83–2.43).

Table 2
Table 2:
The incidence and risk factors for epilepsy.

3.3 Incidence and HRs of epilepsy stratified by age, sex, and comorbidity: comparison between gout and control cohorts

When samples were stratified by age, the relative risk of epilepsy was significantly higher in the gout cohort compared with the control cohort in all stratified ages (≤34 years: aHR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.22–2.18; 35–49 years: aHR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.02–1.47; 50–64 years: aHR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.09–1.48; ≥65 years: aHR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.04–1.34). After stratification by sex, the gout cohort still displayed a significantly higher relative risk of developing epilepsy compared with the control cohort, regardless of sex (female: aHR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.15–1.56; male: aHR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.10–1.34). The final sample stratification was by comorbidity. The risk of epilepsy was increased in the gout cohort compared with the control cohort with or without a comorbidity (no comorbidity: aHR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.09–1.52; comorbidity: aHR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.13–1.36) (Table 3).

Table 3
Table 3:
Incidence of epilepsy by age, sex, and comorbidity and Cox model measured hazards ratio for patients with gout compared those without gout.

3.4 Cumulative incidence of epilepsy in the gout and control cohorts

The mean follow-up periods of the gout and control cohorts were 7.42 years and 7.24 years, respectively. The cumulative incidence curves of epilepsy were estimated using a Kaplan–Meier analysis, and the results showed a significantly higher rate in the gout cohort compared with that in the control cohort (log-rank test P < .001; Fig. 2)..

Figure 2
Figure 2:
A comparison of cumulative incidence of epilepsy for patients with (solid line) or without (dashed line) gout.

4 Discussion

Our analysis clearly indicated that a high level of coincidence between epilepsy and gout exists. There was a statistically significant increased risk of epilepsy in patients with gout compared with patients without gout. The epileptogenesis is still vague.[16,17] There is some evidence to indicate that stroke, brain tumors, and traumatic brain injury may lead to the development of epilepsy.[18–20] Chronic inflammation is considered to play a critical role in epileptogenesis and increase the risk of epilepsy. Gout is a common arthritic disease that causes chronic inflammation by inducing cytokines. Cytokines may cross the blood–brain barrier to activate innate immunity and the transition to adaptive immunity in the central nervous system (CNS).[21] Evidence exists which suggests an association between inflammation of the CNS and epilepsy.[22,23]

One of the major symptoms of gout is pain, which could be another important connection between epilepsy and gout. The perception of pain involves activity in the cerebral cortex and extensive cortical networks. Several studies have indicated that abnormal circuitry between the thalamus and the cerebral cortex could make some contribution to the mechanism that results in seizures. Unusual electrical activity in the cortical area which comes from the perception of pain may induce seizures in patients with gout.

However, although inflammation and pain could be reasons for the increased risk of epilepsy in patients with gout, a limitation of this study is that the NHIRD cannot provide sufficiently convincing data to reach a firm conclusion. It will be necessary to conduct more clinical and experimental studies, such as molecular biological studies or the use of animal models.

The connection between gout and epilepsy has rarely been studied. This was the first nationwide study to evaluate a possible relationship between having gout and being at increased risk of developing epilepsy. Significantly, this study analyzed a national database which included all patients with gout in Taiwan and included data related to inpatient care, ambulatory care, dental care, prescription drugs, and costs. Since there is only one compulsory social insurance program in Taiwan, the NHI program covers almost 100% of Taiwan's residents. This study enrolled 51,893 patients with gout, which was similar to the number in another national study in which the total number of gout patients in Taiwan was 56,595, between 1995 and 2010.[6] The long follow-up period (1996–2011) in this study provided an accurate assessment of possible epilepsy occurrence.

However, there are several potential limitations to this study. For example, it lacked original clinical data, such as blood tests and electroencephalograms of patients to confirm gout and epilepsy diagnoses, since the NHIRD does not store these clinical data. To overcome this limitation, the gout and epilepsy diagnoses in this study were determined by ICD-9-CM Codes, which are determined by highly trained clinicians; ICD-9-CM Codes for disease diagnoses in the NHIRD have been frequently and consistently used in other studies.[6,24] Another major limitation of the NHIRD is the lack of lifestyle information, such as smoking frequency and level of alcohol consumption. Nevertheless, the confounding effects of smoking and alcohol can be ignored since gout is a sex-specific disease.

Compared with 2 nationwide studied in the United States, the prevalence of hypertension, CAD and diabetes in gout patients were significantly lower in present study.[25,26] The mean age of gout patients was 52 and 71 years in our study and Keenan's study, respectively. The male ratios were 72% and 99%, respectively.[25] The differences in age and sex distribution resulted in the lower prevalence of comorbidities in our study. The obesity prevalences were 16.7 (BMI ≥ 27) and 32.8 (BMI ≥ 30) in the Taiwan population and non-gout population in the United States, respectively.[26,27] The large differences in obesity prevalence between 2 populations led to the lower prevalence of comorbidities in our study. However, a previous Taiwan study reported that 45.57% of 7690 gout patients had hypertension from 2002 to 2011, which was consistent with our results.[28] Our study had exclusion criteria that were similar to those of the 2 nationwide studies in the United States; however, we additionally excluded patients who were diagnosed with epilepsy (ICD-9-CM Code 345) before the index date. This exclusion criterion might have decreased the prevalence of comorbidities in participants of our study. In spite of the potential over-diagnosis in the gout cohort, strict fines from the Taiwan Bureau of National Health Insurance may have minimized the impact of misclassification, and this bias result may have under-estimated the risk of epilepsy in gout patients. In addition, the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and CAD in gout patients varies among different regions and this may be due to ethnicity or lifestyle, such as food and exercise habits.

Furthermore, in Taiwan, a significantly lower proportion of women smokes and drinks alcohol compared with men. Other risk factors associated with epilepsy, such as diet, environment, and family history, were not available in the NHIRD either, so we cannot estimate the effects of these factors on the risk of developing epilepsy in patients with gout.

The role of gout in brain diseases has recently been debated.[29] One study indicated that people who have gout have a 24% lower risk of Alzheimer's after stratification by age, sex, lifestyle, and weight.[8] However, another study found that people with gout may have a 17% to 20% higher risk of dementia.[9] Our study revealed that people who had gout showed a 25% increased risk of epilepsy. Thus, we have provided further clear evidence to show the adverse effects of gout in relation to brain diseases. Gout causes inflammation leading to the release of cytokines, which may be a possible risk factor for epilepsy. Our previous study showed that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may reduce the risk of epilepsy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.[24] NSAIDs are also used as gout medications. Thus, when gout patients seek treatment for pain relief during the early stages of the disease, this may also help lower their risk of epilepsy. Due to the limitations of the NHI database, further clinical studies are required to delineate the biological mechanisms by which gout results in an increased risk of epilepsy.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: KH Chang

Formal analysis: KH Chang, CL Lin

Investigation: all authors

Methodology: KH Chang, CL Lin

Project administration: HL Chen, KH Chang.

Supervision: KH Chang

Visualization: all authors

Writing – original draft preparation: KH Chang, HL Chen

Writing – review & editing: KH Chang, HL Chen

References

[1]. Smith E, Hoy D, Cross M, et al. The global burden of gout: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1470–6.
[2]. Loeb JN. The influence of temperature on the solubility of monosodium urate. Arthritis Rheum 1972;15:189–92.
[3]. Pascual E, Jovani V. A quantitative study of the phagocytosis of urate crystals in the synovial fluid of asymptomatic joints of patients with gout. Br J Rheumatol 1995;34:724–6.
[4]. Singh JA. Gout: will the “King of Diseases” be the first rheumatic disease to be cured? BMC Med 2016;14:180.
[5]. Xiao J, Zhang XL, Fu C, et al. Soluble uric acid increases NALP3 inflammasome and interleukin-1beta expression in human primary renal proximal tubule epithelial cells through the Toll-like receptor 4-mediated pathway. Int J Mol Med 2015;35:1347–54.
[6]. Kuo CF, Grainge MJ, See LC, et al. Epidemiology and management of gout in Taiwan: a nationwide population study. Arthritis Res Ther 2015;17:13.
[7]. Han L, Jia Z, Cao C, et al. Potential contribution of the neurodegenerative disorders risk loci to cognitive performance in an elderly male gout population. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e8195.
[8]. Lu N, Dubreuil M, Zhang Y, et al. Gout and the risk of Alzheimer's disease: a population-based, BMI-matched cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:547–51.
[9]. Singh JA, Cleveland JD. Gout and dementia in the elderly: a cohort study of Medicare claims. BMC Geriatr 2018;18:281.
[10]. Terrone G, Balosso S, Pauletti A, et al. Inflammation and reactive oxygen species as disease modifiers in epilepsy. Neuropharmacology 2020;167:107742.
[11]. Cerri C, Caleo M, Bozzi Y. Chemokines as new inflammatory players in the pathogenesis of epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 2017;136:77–83.
[12]. Cho J, Dalbeth N, Petrov MS. Bidirectional relationship between gout and diabetes mellitus in individuals after acute pancreatitis: a nationwide cohort study. J Rheumatol 2020;47:917–23.
[13]. Dafoulas GE, Toulis KA, Mccorry D, et al. Type 1 diabetes mellitus and risk of incident epilepsy: a population-based, open-cohort study. Diabetologia 2017;60:258–61.
[14]. Harnod T, Lin CL, Kao CH. Epilepsy is associated with higher subsequent mortality risk in patients after stroke: a population-based cohort study in Taiwan. Clin Epidemiol 2019;11:247–55.
[15]. Thottam GE, Krasnokutsky S, Pillinger MH. Gout and metabolic syndrome: a tangled web. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2017;19:60.
[16]. Klein P, Tyrlikova I. No prevention or cure of epilepsy as yet. Neuropharmacology 2019;107762.
[17]. Pitkanen A, Lukasiuk K, Dudek FE, et al. Epileptogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2015;5: a022822.
[18]. Goldstein ED, Feyissa AM. Brain tumor related-epilepsy. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2018;52:436–47.
[19]. Tanaka T, Ihara M. Post-stroke epilepsy. Neurochem Int 2017;107:219–28.
[20]. Webster KM, et al. Inflammation in epileptogenesis after traumatic brain injury. J Neuroinflammation 2017;14:10.
[21]. Sadowska GB, Chen X, Zhang J, et al. Interleukin-1beta transfer across the blood-brain barrier in the ovine fetus. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2015;35:1388–95.
[22]. Vezzani A, Fujinami RS, White HS, et al. Infections, inflammation and epilepsy. Acta Neuropathol 2016;131:211–34.
[23]. Wilcox KS, Vezzani A. Does brain inflammation mediate pathological outcomes in epilepsy? Adv Exp Med Biol 2014;813:169–83.
[24]. Chang KH, Hsu YC, Chang MY, et al. A large-scale study indicates increase in the risk of epilepsy in patients with different risk factors, including rheumatoid arthritis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e1485.
[25]. Keenan RT, O’Brien WR, Lee KH, et al. Prevalence of contraindications and prescription of pharmacologic therapies for gout. Am J Med 2011;124:155–63.
[26]. Zhu Y, Pandya BJ, Choi HK. Comorbidities of gout and hyperuricemia in the US general population: NHANES 2007–2008. Am J Med 2012;125:679–87. e1.
[27]. Hwang LC, Bai CH, Chen CJ. Prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 2006;105:626–35.
[28]. Huang KH, Tai CJ, Tsai YF, et al. Correlation between gout and coronary heart disease in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Acta Cardiol Sin 2019;35:634–40.
[29]. Singh JA, Cleveland JD. Gout and the risk of Parkinson's disease in older adults: a study of U.S. Medicare data. BMC Neurol 2019;19:4.
Keywords:

epilepsy; gout; inflammation; Registry of Catastrophic Illnesses Patient Database

Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.