Journal Logo

Research Article: Clinical Case Report

A rare case of inflammation after total hip arthroplasty due to a malpositioned prosthesis

A case report

Wang, Jun PhDa; Zhang, Miao MDa; Xu, Yun RNa; Li, XiaoJing MDb; Wang, CongCong MDa; Gao, XiaoPeng MDa; Xu, Meng RNa; Li, XiaoPeng MDa; Li, Wei PhDa; Wang, Jun MDa; Zhang, YiMin PhDa; Wang, GuoWei MDc; Cao, XueJun PhDa,∗

Editor(s): Saranathan., Maya

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020468
  • Open

Abstract

1 Introduction

Developmental dysplasia of the hip and femoral head necrosis often eventually requires total hip arthroplasty (THA), although its associated complications bring serious problems to patients’ quality of life. Prosthetic loosening and periarticular infection are the most common and most serious complications of artificial joint replacement.[1–3] Loosening and infection around the prosthesis – characterized by local swelling, inconvenient movement, pain, low fever, and the presence of pus – is easily diagnosed. In contrast, an occult infection and inflammation might cause only local pain in the hip joint with unremarkable laboratory examinations, including joint puncture bacterial cultures, making it more difficult to diagnose. Hence, it is difficult to diagnose the origin of aseptic prosthetic loosening.[4]

We report a case of hip inflammation caused by a poorly positioned prosthesis during THA. For the patient's safety, we first removed the prosthesis and adopted a conservative treatment plan that included administration of intravenous vancomycin for 6 weeks and oral antibiotics for 6 weeks. Then, after a 6-month waiting period, the patient underwent THA revision surgery. As far as we could determine, this is the first reported case in which an occult infection elsewhere in the body was ruled out, and the diagnosis was a hip inflammation due to aseptic inflammation caused by a poorly positioned prosthesis. We believe that by reporting the clinical characteristics, detailed diagnosis, and treatment of the patient, combined with a review of the literature, we can help provide more early correct diagnoses and further exploration of reasonable treatment.

2 Case report

A 64-year-old woman came to our hospital complaining of pain in her left hip that had been particularly aggravated for the past 4 years since she had undergone THA. In addition, she experienced swelling of the hip for past 2 months. The THA had been performed for a left femoral neck fracture. Following the THA, the patient had left hip pain with increased activity, but it was relieved after rest. She therefore did not receive any treatment. Two months before the present admission, the left hip pain worsened along with the appearance of local skin redness and swelling. She came to our hospital and was diagnosed as having a possibly infected, loosening prosthesis following previous left THA.

At admission, the patient was in good condition and had no fever. There was no past history of cancer, kidney disease, human immunodeficiency virus infection, tuberculosis, rheumatoid disease, or hepatitis. The patient denied any history of smoking, drinking, steroid use, or illegal drug abuse. Her family and psychosocial histories were insignificant.

Physical examination showed that the left hip joint was swollen, with fluctuant touch and obvious local tenderness (Fig. 1). Plain radiography showed that changes had occurred after the THA (Fig. 2). Color Doppler ultrasonography showed a mixed echo mass and the left hip arthroplasty. No bacteria or fungi were found in 3 puncture-fluid cultures. Laboratory studies revealed the following: white blood cell count 9.29 × 109 (reference normal 4–10 × 109), absolute neutrophil value 4.46 × 109 (2–7 × 109), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) 97 mm/h (0–15 mm/h), C-reactive protein (CRP) 18.4 mg/L (0–8.0 mg/L).

Figure 1
Figure 1:
The skin of the hip is red and swollen.
Figure 2
Figure 2:
X-ray showed that changes had occurred after the total hip arthroplasty.

Although there were no definitive diagnostic indicators of infection, we still decided to remove the entire prosthesis (Fig. 3). Dark blood-reddish fluid was seen after incising the subcutaneous tissue during the operation (Fig. 4). The prosthesis was loose, and no pus was observed. Tissue culture and pathology evaluation revealed the presence of fibrous connective tissue, granulation tissue proliferation, striated muscle, chronic inflammation, bone, and granuloma formation (Fig. 5). No growth was seen in the bacterial or fungal cultures (i.e., they were aseptic). We treated the patient conservatively with antibiotics. Then, after 6 weeks of intravenous vancomycin and oral antibiotics, her ESR and CRP returned to the normal range, and a waiting period of 6 months, revision THA was performed (Fig. 6). The patient's recovery was uneventful, with good results and without infection.

Figure 3
Figure 3:
X-ray showed changes after removal of hip prosthesis.
Figure 4
Figure 4:
During the operation showed dark blood-reddish fluid.
Figure 5
Figure 5:
A. Intraoperative rapid freezing pathology suggested chronic inflammation, necrosis, granuloma formation, and small abscess. B. Postoperative pathological results suggested fibrous connective tissue, granulation tissue proliferation, striated muscle, granuloma formation, and suppurative inflammation.
Figure 6
Figure 6:
X-ray shows revision after arthroplasty.

Ethical review and written informed consent: the Institutional Review Board was waived for this retrospective study. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and all accompanying images.

3 Discussion

There are many reasons for loosening of artificial hip prostheses, among which the top 3 are the following[5,6]:

  • (1) A biological reaction occurs at the interface of the tissues and the prosthesis due to the wear debris.
  • (2) Inflammatory prosthesis loosening may be caused by infection after the operation.
  • (3) The prosthesis was improperly installed, leading to instability, or improper specification and use of the prosthesis, causing it to loosen. In the case described herein, it was considered that the prosthesis was installed in a high, medial position. The patient's daily activities aggravated and wore on the joint, eventually leading to prosthesis loosening caused by aseptic inflammation.

Infection after hip replacement is a serious complication, so it was extremely important to adopt a clear, effective diagnostic method.[7,8] Some occult infections cause symptoms similar to those of aseptic prosthesis loosening (e.g., pain, limited joint movement).[9] There are no obvious radiographic signs of loosening in these patients. At present, a plain radiographic examination and laboratory assessments, such as ESR, CRP, prothrombin consumption time, white blood cell count of synovial fluid, percentage of polymorphonuclear cells, blood and tissue cultures, are the diagnostic methods for recognizing an infection after hip replacement.[10] The combined application of these methods is the basic technique for confirming/excluding the diagnosis of a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after THA.[11,12] When these indicators are negative, however, the diagnostic information provided is of relatively limited use.

We initially considered the patient to have a latent infection, but delayed infection after hip arthroplasty usually occurs within 1 to 6 months after surgery, and symptoms such as swelling and pain or sinus formation mainly around the hip joint are rarely reported for more than 6 months postoperatively. According to the accepted diagnostic criteria, PJI (subsequent to index revision) may be diagnosed if at least 1 of the following criteria is present[4]:

  • (1) positive intraoperative cultures on solid medium;
  • (2) neutrophil count >1760 cells/L and polymorphonuclear cell count >65% in the joint aspirate[13];
  • (3) presence of a sinus or an abscess.

In our patient, no bacteria or fungi were found in either the preoperative or intraoperative synovial fluid puncture cultures; the routine blood tests and other routine examinations were normal; and the bacterial and fungal cultures (the latter performed 3 times) were within the normal range, so the possibilities that there was a latent infection or an infection somewhere else in the body were completely excluded.

Previous studies had reported that blood laboratory markers, such as ESR and CRP levels, were highly effective in excluding PJI and could be used as first-line screening tests.[14] High ESR and CRP levels may be indications of a latent infection. Their predictive sensitivity is high but poor their specificity.[15] Like other scholars, we deemed that the aseptic inflammation also could lead to the elevated ESR and CRP levels.[16–18] Poor positioning of a prosthesis can cause aseptic inflammation, which, in turn, could lead to increased ESR and CRP levels. Furthermore, aseptic inflammation causes increased effusion, which could induce a low-virulence infection and localized symptoms (i.e., swelling, fever, pain).

4 Conclusion

Positioning the prosthesis properly during THA is extremely important. If the prosthesis is not well positioned postoperatively, it increases the “wear and tear” on the hip. The wear particles produced can lead to:

  • (1) long-term local aseptic inflammation;
  • (2) local inflammation, swelling, fever; and
  • (3) low-virulence infection.

In the long term, poor prosthetic positioning can eventually lead to revision. If the prosthesis is not properly installed, early revision should be considered. The “inflammation” in our patient was caused by the poor positioning of the prosthesis. Considering the terrible consequences of infection after arthroplasty, to be safe we treated the patient by removing the damaged prosthesis and administering anti-infective therapy (antibiotics). We later successfully implanted a new prosthesis.

Acknowledgments

We thank all of the nurses and personnel of Weifang People's Hospital for their cooperation in all the stages of the study.

Author contributions

Formal analysis: XiaoPeng Li.

Funding acquisition: YiMin Zhang.

References

[1]. Parvizi J, Fassihi SC, Enayatollahi MA. Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection following hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2016;47:505–15.
[2]. Sanz-Reig J, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Miralles-Muã±Oz F. Risk factors for total hip arthroplasty dislocation and its functional outcomes. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 2015;59:19–25.
[3]. Navab SAI, Hajzargarbashi SR, Mostafa S, et al. Infection after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 2001;77:64–70.
[4]. Javad P, Dong-Hun S, Mehdi S, et al. Aseptic loosening of total hip arthroplasty: infection always should be ruled out. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:1401–5.
[5]. Parvizi J, Suh DH, Jafari SM, et al. Aseptic loosening of total hip arthroplasty: infection always should be ruled out. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:1401–5.
[6]. Sochart D. Relationship of acetabular wear to osteolysis and loosening in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;363:135–50.
[7]. Squire MW, Della Valle CJ, Parvizi J. Preoperative diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: role of aspiration. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:875–9.
[8]. Cahir JG, Toms AP, Marshall TJ, et al. CT and MRI of hip arthroplasty. Clin Radiol 2007;62:1163–71.
[9]. Nelson CL, McLaren SG, Smeltzer MS. Is aseptic loosening truly aseptic? Clinorthoprelatres 2005;437:25–30.
[10]. Yuan K, Li WD, Qiang Y, et al. Comparison of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection before revision total hip arthroplasty. Surg Infect 2015;16:146–50.
[11]. Andrej T, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, et al. Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N Engl J Med 2007;357:654–63.
[12]. Nicole B, Christof VE, Franziska S, et al. Physiology and antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus small colony variants. Microb Drug Resist 2002;8:253–60.
[13]. Parvizi J, Ghanem E, Menashe S, et al. Periprosthetic infection: what are the diagnostic challenges? J Bone Joint Surg 2006;88:138–47.
[14]. Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, et al. Use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level to diagnose infection before revision total knee arthroplasty. A prospective evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:1409–16.
[15]. Johnson AJ, Zywiel MG, Stroh A, et al. Serological markers can lead to false negative diagnoses of periprosthetic infections following total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2011;35:1621–6.
[16]. Huang J, Zhang Y, Wang Z, et al. The serum level of D-dimer is not suitable for distinguishing between prosthetic joint infection and aseptic loosening. J Orthop Surg Res 2019;14:407–505.
[17]. Mimoz O, Benoist JF, Edouard AR, et al. Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein during the early posttraumatic systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Intensive Care Med 1998;24:185–8.
[18]. Sproston NR, Ashworth JJ. Role of C-reactive protein at Sites of inflammation and infection. Front Immunol 2018;9:754–811.
Keywords:

infection; inflammation; malposition; total hip arthroplasty

Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.