1 Introduction
With the implementation of the 2-children policy, the proportion of older mothers is gradually increasing, leading to an increased number of pregnant women with high risk pregnancy.[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
Quality Control Circle (QCC) originated from the statistics and management courses by Professor Deming and Professor Juran in the 1950s. In the 1990s, it was used for quality management in the medical and health fields in Taiwan.[6] [7–9] [10–12] [13–15]
2 Methodology
2.1 Ethic statement
The present study obeyed the Helsinki Declaration and was based on the standards for quality improvement reporting excellence (SQUIRE, version 2.0).[16,17]
2.2 Formation of QCC
The “hand-in-hand test circle” composed of 8 medical technicians from the laboratory of the hospital was formed to solve the problems in hospital work in July 2017. First, 4 candidate topics were proposed by quality control commissioners in the group. Then the topics were scored from 4 perspectives including government policies, importance, urgency and ability of the circle. Finally, improving the specimen quality was determined as the most urgent problem because the unqualified specimens received by clinical laboratory would negatively impact clinical diagnosis and treatment, resulting in poor laboratory management and a decline in patients satisfaction.
2.3 Planning and implementation
The steps of carrying out the improvement were designed and evaluated. Then the person in charge of each step was selected. Next, the Gantt chart was drawn. Finally, the improvement procedure was conducted according to the plan. The director of the medical examination center was in charge of the whole procedure. The Medical Affairs Department of the hospital provided support and guidance. The whole procedure was recorded.
2.4 Investigation of the status quo and goal setting
The defective rate of specimens was investigated by a flow chart for improvement and a checklist for unqualified specimens (Fig. 1 ). Among the 30,105 blood samples examined from February to June 2017, 297 (0.98%) were unqualified (Table 1 ). The ability of circle was evaluated. Taking the full score as 40 (100%), the ability score of the circle was 24 points (60%). According to the principle of 80/20, the major causes of unqualified specimens, including insufficient sample quantity, the blood agglutination, barcode failure and specimen pollution, were selected.
Figure 1: Fishbone diagram to analyze the causes of unqualified specimens. QCC members analyzed the causes of unqualified specimens from the perspectives of operators, methods, materials and environment,drew the fishbone diagram. The following factors were determined as the key causes of unqualified specimens: “nonstandard pasting of bar code”, “poor the compliance of the patient during blood collection”, “lack of basic knowledge”, “no sample handover requirements”, “nonstandard storage of specimens”.
Table 1: Comparison of unqualified rate of blood samples before and after QCC activity.
2.5 Essential factor analysis
Brainstorming was conducted among the QCC members. They analyzed the causes of unqualified specimens from the perspectives of operators, methods, materials and environment, pinpointed the major causes and drew the fishbone diagram. At the same time, a survey was carried out among the hospital staff (the doctors, nurses and staff of the delivery center) who were asked to fill in a questionnaire. Finally, the following factors were determined as the key causes of unqualified specimens: “nonstandard pasting of bar code”, “poor the compliance of the patient during blood collection”, “lack of basic knowledge”, “no sample handover requirements”, “nonstandard storage of specimens”.
2.6 Strategies and implementations
Strategy I: The standard operation procedure (SOP) guidelines for specimen collection were formulated, pasted in each ward and displayed on the electronic screen at the nursing station. Tips were printed and given to the patients prior to blood collection.
Strategy II: The SOP guideline training was carried out among the hospital staff involved in specimen collection from June 2017. A nurse in charge was chosen in each ward as the specimen quality controller. Unified, lidded transporting boxes were used to ensure the safe transport of specimens.
Strategy III: Slides of specimen collection requirements were made and posted on Lis working intranet for all the staff to learn.
Strategy IV: Each clinical department was required to designate a staff member who had received specimen transport training to deliver specimens and record the whole transfer procedure.
2.7 Confirmation of effectiveness
The duration of this quality control circle activity was set as 5 months (from July to December 2017). The basic steps of QCC activity generally followed the Deming cycle (PDCA cycle). The 4 stages (plan, do, check, and act) were realized through 10 basic steps (Fig. 2 ). The effect, including tangible and intangible results, was evaluated after the implementation of the strategies. The tangible results included achievement rate and improvement rate. The intangible results were presented by multiple indicators in a radar map.
Figure 2: Protocol of the quality control circle. The basic steps of QCC activity generally followed the Deming cycle (PDCA cycle). The 4 stages (plan, do, check, and act) were realized through 10 basic steps.
2.8 Standardization
After the evaluation and confirmation of the effect, the standardized documents:
sample collection specification;
common specimen collection operation instruction, were formulated and implemented.
2.9 Statistical processing
The indices to evaluate achievements were calculated using the following formula: target index= present value - (present value × key improvement × ability of circle), the target index set as 0.49; achievement rate = [(data value after improvement – data value before improvement)/(data value before improvement –target index)] × 100%; improvement rate = [(data value after improvement – data value before improvement)/data value before improvement] × 100%. SPSS 16.0 (IBM, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis, Chi-Squared value was calculated for the comparison between groups, and P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
3 Results
3.1 Tangible results
From July to December 2017, the defective rate of blood specimens dropped from 0.98% to 0.45% (P < .05). The achievement rate and improvement rate were 108.2% and 54.1%, respectively (Tables 1–3 and Fig. 3 ). In the QCC activity, SOP related to specimen collection was developed. All the nursing staff received the training of specimen collection, and the pass rate of examination raised from 72.33% to 98.5% after the training.
Table 2: Causes of unqualified specimens before QCC activity.
Table 3: Causes of unqualified specimens after QCC activity.
Figure 3: Analysis of causes of unqualified specimens before and after QCC activity. After the QCC activity, the number of unqualified samples was decreased. 1. Insufficient amount; 2. Blood clots; 3. Bar code failure; 4. Polluted specimen; 5. Non-compliant specimen; 6. Wrong container; 7. No specimen in the container; 8. Other causes.
3.2 Intangible results
In the QCC activity, obvious improvements were found in the circle members in terms of confidence, responsibility, communication skills, harmony, team cohesion and motivation, and skills of quality control (Fig. 4 ).
Figure 4: Intangible results. Obvious improvements were found in the circle members in terms of confidence, responsibility, communication skills, harmony, team cohesion and motivation, and skills of quality control.
4 Discussion
Quality control circle (QCC), first established in Japan in 1962, has been widely used in medical and health care fields in Germany, Austria and Thailand.[13–19] [12] [20–22] [23,24]
In the present study, the following preliminary strategies were developed to solve the existing problems:
1. The blood collector should be properly trained to tilt the tube to a 30- to 40-degree angle immediately, slowly blend the blood up and down several times to avoid coagulation, and then label the tube correctly.
2. Blood sample should be submitted immediately after collection, otherwise be kept in the refrigerator (2–8 degrees) for no more than 2 hours.[26] + ions will be released into blood from the damaged erythrocyte, causing pseudo serum potassium elevation. CO2 release will alter the results.
3. Operation standardization should be conducted. In clinical practice, to avoid re-puncture and reduce the patients pain, the blood collector often collects blood through the vessel undergoing infusion, or even directly from the infusion channel. In this way, the blood collected is diluted and may contain drugs (such as antibiotics and glucose), so the test results will be greatly different from the actual ones. In addition, the secretion of prolactin (PRL) can be affected by mood, exercise and food intake. The detection of PRL needs to be performed with an empty stomach and after more than a half hour of sitting to reduce the above influence. To test the basic sex hormone levels, sex hormone drugs should not be used for at least 1 month before testing. Additionally, few studies have been conducted regarding the influence of pre-analytic blood sample collection factors (such as fasting time, time of day of blood collection, or season of blood collection) on the levels of metabolites measured by metabolomics profiling platforms.[25–27] [28]
4. Routine blood samples should be collected and examined within 2 hours; prompt blood samples should be checked within 30 minutes; the barcode should be pasted in a standard way; damage be prevented during delivery; the transportation center should designate dedicated workers to deliver the specimens.
5. One barcode should correspond to 1 specimen. In some cases, repeated prescriptions for blood testing may occur due to misinformation during shift handover, which can lead to repeated collections using the same bar code. Therefore, standard operation is urgently needed to solve the above-mentioned problems. And we have achieved it through the QCC activity.
To avoid pediatric hemolysis, inadequate amount of blood and blood clots, corresponding strategies regarding blood collection were made and implemented.
The key to the quality of venous blood collection was to make sure that the needle punctures the skin and enters the vessel in a correct way.
1. The order of patients for blood collection was properly arranged. The pediatric patients with no difficulty in blood collection were dealt with firstly and then those who with difficulty to collect blood were handled. To ensure successful blood sampling, the nurses should evaluate the orientation, depth, mobility of the vein before puncturing.
2. The operation procedure was standardized. Using direct puncture to the vein could effectively avoid the accompanying nerves and the pain caused by puncturing.
3. During clinical operation, each junior nurse was assigned a tutor who gave advice and corrected mistakes promptly.
4. Theoretical learning was highlighted. Nurses were provided with PPT slides to know more about blood sampling in the newborns, like the anatomical location of vessels, the skin surrounding the puncture point, the thickness of subcutaneous fat, angle of puncturing, time, and location of using the tourniquet.
QCC has been successfully carried out in business circles for several decades and gradually extended to hospital management in recent years. The participants can learn about scientific quality management, raise their own awareness of amending problems, and improve their work efficiency. QCC also helps to establish a harmonious work team, which can improve the quality of medical service and lower the operating costs of the hospital.[29]
In the present QCC activity, after brainstorming, literature review, and evaluation of quality control methods, strategies were formulated from the perspective of doctors, nurses and patients, and then carried out. For example, to standardize specimen collection, requirements were informed in multiple channels like specimen collection manuals for the patients and LIS network for nurses and doctors. Through our efforts, favorable results have been achieved. Improvement was also made in specimen transport. The designated staff members delivered the specimens using the special boxes, which ensured the safe and successful transport of the specimens.[30]
This study also presents some limitation and suggestions. First, after being submitted in the ward, the sample information sometimes could not be retrieved via the LIS network in the laboratory, leading to bar code failure. Therefore, we suggest that the information system and software should be updated regularly. Second, the QCC activity is a continuous activity that needs frequent optimization. The improvement achieved does not mean the end of the activity. The QCC team should resume the work, pinpointing the new problems and setting new targets. Hopefully, after another round of QCC activity, the quality of the specimens could be furthered improved.
In conclusion, in the QCC activity, we analyzed the problems in blood specimen collection, and implemented the corresponding strategies, which reduced the incidence of adverse events and increased the rate of qualified specimens. Promoting QCC activity can stimulate work morale, improve the skills of the staff, encourage positive work attitudes, and reduce institutional costs.[31]
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Chen Yajun from the Department of Clinical Laboratory, who devoted great efforts to polishing the paper.
Author contributions
K.S.L and X.D.M designed the study, K.S.L. and Z.R.X. performed the study and wrote the manuscript, K.S.L,Y.J.C and X.D.M collected the data and analyzed the data, K.S.L and X.D.W prepared the figures and tables, and all the authors reviewed the manuscript.
References
[1]. Sun L, Yue H, Sun B, et al. Estimation of high risk pregnancy contributing to perinatal morbidity and mortality from a birth population-based regional survey in 2010 in China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014;14:338–52.
[2]. Rakhshani A, Nagarathna R, Mhaskar R, et al. The effects of yoga in prevention of pregnancy complications in high-risk pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial. Preventive Med 2012;55:333–40.
[3]. Shen ZY. Hospital Management - Clinical Laboratory Management Branch. 2003;Beijing: People's Health Press, 58-67.
[4]. Sun HZ, Hou YX. Evaluation on effect of clinical lab management after carrying out management measures about the clinical lab in medical establishment. Chin J Gen Pract 2010;8:507–9.
[5]. Cong YL. Clinical laboratory quality management and the policy before analysis. Chin J Lab Med 2004;27:483.
[6]. Lin CY, Huang AL, Minas H, et al. Mental hospital reform in Asia: the case of Yuli Veterans hospital, Taiwan. Int J Ment Health Syst 2009;3:1–3.
[7]. Chen W, Deng H, Shen L, et al. A comprehensive intervention program on the long-term placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheters. J Cancer Res Ther 2014;10:359–62.
[8]. Chang YN, Lin LH, Chen WH, et al. Quality control work group focusing on practical guidelines for improving safety of critically ill patient transportation in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs 2010;36:140–5.
[9]. Pan SC, Tien KL, Hung IC, et al. Compliance of health care workers with hand hygiene practices: independent advantages of overt and covert observers. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e53746.
[10]. Chang YN, Lin LH, Chen WH. Quality control work group focusing on practical guidelines for improving safety of critically ill patient transportation in the emergency departme. J Emerg Nurs 2010;36:140–5.
[11]. Clebone A, Burian BK, Watkins SC, et al. The development and implementation of cognitive aids for critical events in pediatric anesthesia: the society for pediatric anesthesia critical events checklists. Anesth Analg 2017;124:900–7.
[12]. Lei Lin, Pingjun Chang, Jialu Xie, et al. Sustained accuracy improvement in intraocular lens power calculation with the application of quality control circle. Sci Rep 2017;7:14852.
[13]. Wensing M, Broge B, Riens B, et al. Quality circles to improve prescribing of primary care physicians. Three comparative studies. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2009;18:763–9.
[14]. Lowe G, Stike R, Pollack M, et al. Nursing blood specimen collection techniques and hemolysis rates in an emergency department: analysis of venipuncture versus intravenous catheter collection techniques. J Emerg Nurs 2008;34:26–32.
[15]. Hosseinabadi R, Karampourian A, Beiranvand S, et al. The effect of quality circles on job satisfaction and quality of work-life of staff in emergency medical services. Int Emerg Nurs 21:264-70.
[16]. Goodman D, Ogrinc G, Davies L, et al. Explanation and elaboration of the SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) Guidelines, V.2.0: examples of SQUIRE elements in the healthcare improvement literature. BMJ Qual Saf 2016;25:e7.
[17]. Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, et al. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf 2016;25:986–92.
[18]. Pethyoung W, Picheansathian W, Boonchuang P, et al. Effectiveness of education and quality control work group focusing on nursing practices for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia. J Med Assoc Thai 2005;(Suppl 10): S110–4.
[19]. Spiegel W, Mlczoch-Czerny MT, Jens R, et al. Quality circles for pharmacotherapy to modify general practitioners’ prescribing behaviour for generic drugs. J Eval Clin Pract 2012;18:828–34.
[20]. Yang X. Keys quality control of medcial laboratory. Hosp Admin J Chin PLA 2013;20:368–9.
[21]. Tian J, Dai Y, Dong LI, et al. Integration of quality requirements into information systems to improve the quality control ability of preanalytic process. Laboratory Med 2012;27:844–8.
[22]. Paolo C. Mario. Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later. Clin Chem 2007;3:1338–42.
[23]. Alisna MJ, Alrarezv, Barba N, et al. Pre-analytical quality control program-an overview of results (2001-2005 summary). Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:849–54.
[24]. Qin Y. An influence of blood sample collection on test results and its countermeasures. Lab med chin 2009;6:425–6.
[25]. Sampson JN, Boca SM, Shu XO, et al. Metabolomics in epidemiology: sources of variability in metabolite measurements and implications. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013;22:631–40.
[26]. Yin P, Lehmann R, Xu G. Effects of pre-analytical processes on blood samples used in metabolomics studies. Anal Bioanal Chem 2015;407:4879–92.
[27]. Kamlage B, Maldonado SG, Bethan B, et al. Quality markers addressing preanalytical variations of blood and plasma processing identified by broad and targeted metabolite profiling. Clin Chem 2014;60:399–412.
[28]. White E. Measurement error in biomarkers: sources, assessment, and impact on studes. Int Age Res Cancer; Lyon 2011;163:143–61.
[29]. Wang LR, Wang Y, Lou Y, et al. G The role of quality control circles in sustained improvement of medical quality. Springer Plus 2013;2:141–6.
[30]. Feng H, Li G, Xu C, et al. A quality control circle process to improve implementation effect of prevention measures for high-risk patients. Int Wound J 2017;14:1094–9.
[31]. CLSI, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Laboratory quality control based on risk management; approved guideline [S]EP23-A. 2011.
