Journal Logo

Research Article: Clinical Trial/Experimental Study

A prospective, randomized clinical study comparing accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking with 5% NaCl hypertonic saline for bullous keratopathy in Asian eyes

Kasai, Kozue MD, PhDa,b; Kato, Naoko MD, PhDb,∗; Den, Seika MD, PhDa,b; Konomi, Kenji MD, PhDb; Shinzawa, Megumi MDb; Shimazaki, Jun MD, PhDb

Editor(s): Wu., Kaili

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018256

Abstract

1 Introduction

Bullous keratopathy (BK) is a condition that results from dysfunction and loss of corneal endothelial cells, leading to corneal edema, corneal opacification, and epithelial bullae formation. Patients usually initially present with decreased vision but, later, there is intense discomfort, pain, watering, irritation, photophobia due to rupture of bullae and exposure of corneal nerves.[1] Many therapeutic methods have been used to treat BK clinically. Although the most interventional treatment for BK is corneal transplantation or instillation of steroids and hypertonic saline (NaCl) eye drops,[2] applying a therapeutic bandage contact lens has also been considered to be effective.[3]

Corneal collagen cross linking (CXL) with riboflavin and ultraviolet (UV) -A radiation is a photochemical process that catalyzes the increase of cross-links between collagen fibers and extracellular matrices within the corneal stroma. The original procedure, introduced by Wollensak et al, named the “Dresden Protocol”, involves epithelial removal, riboflavin instillation, and UV-A with 3.0 mW/cm2 of intensity for 30 minutes. This reaction results in increasing stiffness of the corneal stroma, keeping the configuration, preventing bulging of the cornea and, eventually, halting the progression of keratoconus.[3]

Another aspect of CXL is that it has been shown to decrease the water content of the corneal stromal layer.[4] It is known that CXL decreases the corneal thickness several months to years after the procedure.[5,6] Furthermore, some recent clinical studies with human subjects reported that CXL performed on BK patients reduced corneal edema and alleviated ocular pain.[1,7–11] In these reports, CXL was performed using the original procedure involving UV-A irradiation with 3.0 mW/cm2 of intensity for 30 minutes.

Instead of the original procedure for CXL, some modified methods have been developed. Accelerated CXL, with a higher intensity of UV light, has facilitated a shorter UV irradiation time.[12–13] Because patients with BK are often elderly, time-consuming procedures are sometimes difficult to perform, and accelerated CXL may be more appropriate. The purpose of the present investigation was to assess the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of accelerated CXL for the treatment of symptomatic BK, as well as comparing it with 5% NaCl hypertonic saline (HS) instillation.

2 Methods

2.1 General information

The investigation was planned as a randomized controlled trial and is registered in the Clinical Trial Registration System of the University Hospital Medical Information Network Center (UMIN000029302). The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. The study was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2 Inclusion criteria

Japanese patients with symptomatic BK, who visited the Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Dental College, Ichikawa General Hospital, were enrolled. The inclusion criterion included age older than 20 years-old, and diagnosed with symptomatic BK. The etiology of BK included pseudophakic BK, previous keratoplasty, previous endotheliitis, previous glaucoma surgery, trauma, herpes infection, as well as unknown causes. The profiles of the patients are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1
Table 1:
Patient profiles (before the investigation).

2.3 Sample size

There is limited evidence quantifying the effectiveness of CXL for BK. The evidence available suggested CXL decreased the CCT approximately 112.75 ± 52.3 μm (approximately 15% of the preoperative value). We used Sample Size Estimation (http://www2.ccrb.cuhk.edu.hk/stat/Means.htm) to calculate sample size with an independent dichotomous endpoint (2-sided test) using a Type I error probability set at 0.05 and a Type II error probability set at 0.2 (power 80%). The calculated sample size to see a difference in efficacy between the both groups was 13 for each group. And 23 patients with BK agreed to participate the trial during the research periods.

2.4 Randomization and grouping situations

All patients were randomly divided into 2 groups using a mathematical technique. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Randomization of protocols was performed using a simple randomization technique. Serial numbers assigned HS or CXL for each were randomized by randomization function of Microsoft Excel. Then, the number list was placed in a secure box in the office of ophthalmology. On admission into the study, eligible patients selected by doctors were assigned each of the treatments following the serial number list. Due to differences in administration, the doctors implementing the protocols could not be blinded. However, after completion of patient recruitment and data collection, all patient identifiers were removed.

3 Interventions

3.1 CXL procedure

CXL was performed under topical anesthesia using 0.4% oxybuprocaine hydrochloride eye drops before the procedure. A lid speculum was inserted, followed by removal of the central corneal epithelium (7.0–8.0 mm in diameter) using a blunt spatula. Then, 0.1% isotonic riboflavin in 20% dextran solution drops were instilled every 2 minutes for 20 minutes. After confirming stromal saturation of riboflavin by slit-lamp microscopy, the thinnest corneal stromal thickness was measured using an AL-3000 pachymeter (Tomey, Aichi, Japan). Then, UV-A was used to irradiate at an intensity of 18.0 mW/cm2 for 5 minutes (accelerated CXL; KXL system; Avedro, Waltham, MA). Isotonic riboflavin was instilled continuously every 1 to 2 minutes during the UV-A irradiation. At the end of the procedure, a soft bandage contact lens was applied, and a drop of levofloxacin was instilled.

Postoperative medications included levofloxacin and 0.1% betamethasone eye drops, four times daily. The bandage contact lens was removed when we confirmed that re-epithelialization of the operated cornea was complete. After the epithelial defect had healed, levofloxacin eye drops were discontinued, and betamethasone was continued for 1 month.

3.2 Hypertonic saline (HS) instillation

In the HS group, 5% NaCl hypertonic saline (HS) drops were prescribed and patients were instructed to use them four times daily during the study period.

However, as the NaCl instillation was done as a control for the CXL and not expected to have significant efficacy, we settled the CXL as an ethical bailout. When the patients could not tolerate the subjective symptoms caused by HS instillation, the patients were allowed to undergo CXL from 3 months after starting HS instillation.

3.3 Outcome measures

Examinations were performed before and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. In addition to a usual ophthalmic examination, the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central corneal thickness (CCT) were examined. CCT was measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (CASIA SS-3000; Tomey, Aichi, Japan). Subjective symptoms were also recorded using a visual analog scale (0–10 for each items) at each visit. The VAS was based on a 100-mm scale; the extreme left side indicated none of symptoms and the extreme right, maximal. The patients were asked to put a check on the scale.

3.4 Times of treatments

The follow-up examination was completed in all 11 eyes of the patients in the CXL group. No patient requested to have additional treatment, such as a corneal endothelial transplantation, during the study. However, one patient underwent CXL at 3 months after starting HS instillation, and 5 patients underwent CXL after 6 months.

3.5 Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with JMP version 12.1.0. A Dunnett test was used for analyses of changes in the BCVA, CCT, and subjective symptoms, and Wilcoxon test was used for comparison between CXL and HS groups. The Wilcoxon test was also used to evaluate the difference for patients’ age between CXL and HS groups. The Fischer exact test was used to evaluate the difference of gender between CXL and HS groups. A Dunnett test was performed for analyses of changes in the BCVA, CCT among cases who were initially treated with HS instillation, but requested and underwent subsequent CXL. A value of P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

4 Results

In total, 23 eyes of 23 patients were enrolled for the investigation: 11 eyes (6 females and 5 males; average age: 73.2 ± 14.4 years) received accelerated CXL, whereas 12 eyes of 12 patients (seven females and five males; average age: 67.8 ± 19.0 years) received a prescription of hypertonic NaCl eye drops. The follow-up examination was completed in all 11 eyes of the patients in the CXL group. No patient requested to have additional treatment, such as a corneal endothelial transplantation, during the study. However, one patient underwent CXL at 3 months after starting HS instillation, and five patients underwent CXL after 6 months (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1:
CONSORT flow diagram of patient selection and allocation.

4.1 BCVA

CXL was uneventfully performed in all cases. Slit-lamp examinations showed no complications during the follow-ups for both groups. The mean BCVA was 1.24 ± 0.62 (0.00–2.00) in the CXL group and 1.70 ± 0.59 (–0.08 to –2.00) in the HS group before treatment (P = .031). The mean BCVA did not significantly change from baseline within the follow-up period for both groups (Table 2).

Table 2
Table 2:
Clinical outcomes of BCVA and CCT.

4.2 CCT

The initial CCT was 715.6 ± 137.7 μm in the CXL group and 844.3 ± 214.6 μm in the HS group (P = .157). The CCTs of both CXL and HS groups were not significantly decreased from the preoperative values in the follow-up periods; however, the CCT was significantly thinner in the CXL group compared to the HS group at 1 and 6 months (P = .015 and .044, respectively; Fig. 2; Table 2).

Figure 2
Figure 2:
Change in the CCT. The initial CCT was not significantly different between the CXL group and the HS group. The CCTs of both CXL and HS groups were not significantly decreased from the initial values in the follow-up period; however, the CCT was significantly thinner in the CXL group compared to the HS group at 1 and 6 months. Pre, before treatment; 1 M; 1 month; 3 M, 3 months; 6 M, 6 months; n, number of eyes. CCT = central corneal thickness, CXL = corneal crosslinking, HS = hypertonic saline.

4.3 Subjective symptoms

The total symptom score was 13.5 ± 8.5 before the treatment and 9.3 ± 6.1 at 1 month in the CXL group (P = .662), whereas it was 11.7 ± 9.6 and 12.5 ± 10.3 in the HS group, respectively (P = 0.459). The total symptom score did not significantly change from the initial values in both groups, and did not differ between the CXL and HS groups within the follow-up period.

When we analyzed each score, the irritation score was significantly less in the CXL group than in the HS group at 1 month (1.1 ± 4.7 vs. 1.6 ± 3.2, respectively; P = .012); however, it returned to the preoperative value at 3 months after the procedure (Fig. 3). Other symptom scores such as pain, blurred vision, and photophobia did not significantly change during follow-ups for both groups.

Figure 3
Figure 3:
Change in the subjective scores. The pain (top left), blurred vision (top right), and photopsia (bottom left) scores was not significantly changed both in the CXL and HS groups. The irritation (bottom right) score was significantly less in the CXL group than in the HS group at 1 month, but not significantly different between both groups at 3 and 6 months. The number of cases who answered the questionnaire for subjective scores was 10 before the treatment, 8 at 1 month, 7 at 3 months, and 6 at 6 months after the treatment in the CXL group, and 10, 11, 10 and 7 in the HS group, respectively. Pre, before treatment; 1 M; 1 month; 3 M, 3 months; 6 M, 6 months. CXL = corneal crosslinking, HS = hypertonic saline.

4.4 Outcomes for subsequent CXL

Six eyes of 6 patients (71.0 ± 20.7-years-old; 1 male and 5 females) who were initially treated with HS instillation, requested and underwent subsequent CXL. Five patients completed the 6-month follow-up period. One patient began to use not designed eye drops at 3 months, therefore we excluded her data from analysis. The BCVA was 1.24 ± 0.64 and the CCT was 687.4 ± 224.7 μm (Suppl. Fig. 1, http://links.lww.com/MD/D423) before the CXL, respectively, and neither changed significantly up to 6 months after the CXL. Subjective symptoms were not evaluated in all six patients, so they were not analyzed.

5 Discussion

In the present study, we compared the effects of accelerated CXL (UV-A irradiation with an intensity of 18.0 mW/cm2 for 5 minutes) and HS instillation for the treatment of patients with BK. The results showed that the BCVA, CCT, and symptom scores were not significantly improved in either the CXL or HS groups; however, the CCT was significantly thinner at 1 and 6 months, and the irrigation score was significantly smaller at 1 month in the CXL group compared to the HS group. This difference disappeared thereafter. However, one of the patients in the HS group dropped out due to pain, and 5 patients underwent CXL for 6 months after the completion of the HS instillation, and all participants in the CXL group completed the study.

For the treatment of keratoconus, whether accelerated CXL provides the identical crosslinking effect in the corneal stroma as conventional CXL has been a controversial issue. Several investigators[14–18] reported the outcomes of accelerated CXL using the same conditions of UVA irradiation as the present study, and compared it with conventional CXL for the treatment of keratoconus. Hashemi et al[17] and Chow et al[18] reported that accelerated CXL was less effective in the flattening effect on topography; however, they did not find any difference between the 2 procedures when monitoring other factors. However, we previously reported the outcomes of two different CXLs, the Dresden protocol and accelerated CXL (18.0 mW/cm2 for 5 minutes), for Japanese patients with progressing keratoconus, and showed that the outcomes were similar.[19] We also showed that the depths of the demarcation lines occurring 1 month after the CXL were similar for both procedures, indicating similar crosslinked stromal areas between conventional CXL and accelerated CXL.[20]

The outcomes of the present study indicated that, for both treatments, the accelerated CXL and HS were not significantly effective treatments for the clinical symptoms of BK. However, the observations that the one patient in the HS group dropped out and requested CXL and the other 5 patients also requested CXL after the completion of the follow-up period, with these patients completing 6 months of follow-up for subsequent CXL, may indicate that the CXL was more effective in treatment for the improvement of subjective symptoms.

We speculate that the reason CXL was less effective in the present study compared to previous studies was probably due to the etiology of the BK of patients enrolled in our study. The etiology of the BK was limited to Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy or pseudophakic BK in previous investigations. In contrast, the etiology of the BK of patients enrolled in the present study varied, including previous corneal transplants, glaucoma surgery, trauma, and/or endotheliitis. In these conditions, the elevation of intraocular cytokines may exacerbate corneal endothelial cell functions,[21,22] and the effect of the CXL could be overwhelmed by persistent intraocular inflammation.

However, it was noteworthy that the accelerated CXL treatment significantly decreased the CCT and subjective symptoms, even though the effect was only transient. For patients who cannot undergo corneal transplant surgery, for example, due to poor general conditions or having been diagnosed with dementia, accelerated CXL could be more effective than conservative treatment with eye drops, and it has also become a good alternative for conventional CXL or endothelial keratoplasty.

The limitation of the present study was that the number of enrolled eyes was small and also that the study design was not a randomized trial. The small sample size may obscure the difference of BCVA or CCT between before and after the treatment. On the other hand, the fact that we did not perform the sham treatment for both CXL and HS may have leaded some confounding factors that affect the outcomes, in particular, in analyses for subjective symptoms.

6 Conclusion

In conclusion, accelerated CXL may improve the corneal edema and subjective symptoms of BK. If we select only patients with Fuchs corneal endothelial keratopathy or pseudophakic BK, the effect could be more significant. Further investigations with a larger number of patients and limited etiology of BK and comparison with the effect of Dresden protocol are therefore warranted are therefore warranted.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Kozue Kasai, Naoko Kato, Kenji Konomi, Megumi Shinzawa, Jun Shimazaki.

Data curation: Kozue Kasai, Naoko Kato, Megumi Shinzawa.

Formal analysis: Kozue Kasai, Naoko Kato, Seika Den.

Funding acquisition: Naoko Kato.

Investigation: Kozue Kasai, Seika Den.

Methodology: Kozue Kasai, Naoko Kato, Kenji Konomi, Megumi Shinzawa, Jun Shimazaki.

Project administration: Kozue Kasai, Naoko Kato, Jun Shimazaki.

Resources: Naoko Kato, Jun Shimazaki.

Supervision: Seika Den, Kenji Konomi, Jun Shimazaki.

Validation: Seika Den.

Writing – original draft: Kozue Kasai, Naoko Kato.

Writing – review & editing: Naoko Kato, Seika Den, Kenji Konomi, Megumi Shinzawa, Jun Shimazaki.

References

[1]. Khan MS, Basit I, Ishaq M, et al. Corneal collagen cross linking (CXL) in treatment of pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. Pak J Med Sci 2016;32:965–8.
[2]. Knezovic I, Dekaris I, Gabric N, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of 5% NaCl hypertonic solution in patients with bullous keratopathy. Coll Antropol 2006;30:405–8.
[3]. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:620–7.
[4]. Wollensak G, Aurich H, Pham DT, et al. Hydration behavior of porcine cornea crosslinked with riboflavin and ultraviolet A. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:516–21.
[5]. Hassan Z, Modis L Jr, Szalai E, et al. Intraoperative and postoperative corneal thickness change after collagen crosslinking therapy. Eur J Ophthalmol 2014;24:179–85.
[6]. Steinberg J, Ahmadiyar M, Rost A, et al. Anterior and posterior corneal changes after crosslinking for keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci 2014;91:178–86.
[7]. Ghanem RC, Santhiago MR, Berti TB, et al. Collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A in eyes with pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010;36:273–6.
[8]. Cordeiro Barbosa MM, Barbosa JB Jr, Hirai FE, et al. Effect of cross-linking on corneal thickness in patients with corneal edema. Cornea 2010;29:613–7.
[9]. Sharma N, Roy S, Maharana PK, et al. Outcomes of corneal collagen crosslinking in pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. Cornea 2014;33:243–6.
[10]. Arora R, Manudhane A, Saran RK, et al. Role of corneal collagen cross-linking in pseudophakic bullous keratopathy: a clinicopathological study. Ophthalmology 2013;120:2413–8.
[11]. Ucakhan OO, Saglik A. Outcome of two corneal collagen crosslinking methods in bullous keratopathy due to Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy. Case Rep Med 2014;2014:463905.
[12]. Schumacher S, Oeftiger L, Mrochen M. Equivalence of biomechanical changes induced by rapid and standard corneal cross-linking, using riboflavin and ultraviolet radiation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:9048–52.
[13]. Mrochen M. Current status of accelerated corneal cross-linking. Indian J Ophthalmol 2013;61:428–9.
[14]. Kymionis GD, Kontadakis GA, Hashemi KK. Accelerated versus conventional corneal crosslinking for refractive instability: An update. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2017;28:343–7.
[15]. Males JJ, Viswanathan D. Comparative study of long-term outcomes of accelerated and conventional collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus. Eye (Lond) 2018;32:32–8.
[16]. Vounotrypidis E, Athanasiou A, Kortüm K, et al. Long-term database analysis of conventional and accelerated crosslinked keratoconic mid-European eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018;256:1165–72.
[17]. Hashemi H, Miraftab M, Seyedian MA, et al. Long-term results of an accelerated corneal cross-linking protocol (18 mW/cm) for the treatment of progressive keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2015;160:1164–70.
[18]. Chow VW, Chan TC, Yu M, et al. One-year outcomes of conventional and accelerated collagen crosslinking in progressive keratoconus. Sci Rep 2015;5:14425.
[19]. Kato N, Konomi K, Shinzawa M, et al. Corneal crosslinking for keratoconus in Japanese populations: one year outcomes and a comparison between conventional and accelerated procedures. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2018;62:560–7.
[20]. Kato N, Negishi K, Sakai C, et al. Five-year outcomes of corneal crosslinking for keratoconus: comparison between conventional and accelerated procedures. Cornea 2019.
[21]. Yagi-Yaguchi Y, Yamaguchi Y, Higa K, et al. Association between corneal endothelial cell densities and elevated cytokine levels in the aqueous humor. Sci Rep 2017;7:13603.
[22]. Ishii N, Yamaguchi T, Yazu H, et al. Factors associated with graft survival and endothelial cell density after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Sci Rep 2016;6:25276.
Keywords:

bullous keratopathy; corneal cross-linking (CXL); corneal thickness; subjective symptoms

Supplemental Digital Content

Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.