Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Primary malignant mesothelioma of the diaphragm with liver invasion

A case report and review of literature

Huang, Wen-Jing, MD; Li, Zhi-Han, MD; Wang, Zhao, MD; Yang, Mai-Qing, MD; Xu, Hong-Tao, MD, PhD*

Section Editor(s): NA.,

doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015147
Research Article: Clinical Case Report
Open
SDC

Rationale: Malignant mesothelioma is a malignant tumor with poor prognosis, which usually originates in the pleura, peritoneum, and pericardial cavity. Mesotheliomas that originate from the diaphragm are very rare. Here, we report a case of primary malignant mesothelioma of the diaphragm with liver invasion.

Patient concerns: A 66-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital because of a “liver space-occupying lesion,” without any special clinical symptoms. Imaging examinations suggested a cystic-solid mixed lesion in the right lobe of the liver.

Diagnosis: The tumor was diagnosed as epithelioid mesothelioma of the diaphragm with liver invasion.

Intervention: The patient underwent abdominal surgery in our hospital to remove the diaphragmatic mass, liver mass, and part of the diaphragm.

Outcomes: The postoperative course was uneventful.

Lessons: Primary diaphragmatic malignant mesothelioma is very rare and may involve liver or lung tissue and be mistaken for liver or lung tumor. Accurate diagnosis depends on careful pathological examination. Immunohistochemical staining is very useful to distinguish this tumor from other liver or diaphragmatic tumors.

Department of Pathology, The First Hospital and College of Basic Medical Sciences, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.

Correspondence: Hong-Tao Xu, Department of Pathology, The First Hospital and College of Basic Medical Sciences, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China (e-mail: xuht@cmu.edu.cn).

Abbreviations: AFP = alpha-fetoprotein, CDX2 = caudal type homebox 2, CK = cytokeratin, CT = computed tomography, GPC-3 = glypican-3, HMB-45 = human melanoma black-45, PAX8 = paired box 8, RFA = radiofrequency ablation, TTF-1 = thyroid transcription factor 1, WT1 = Wilms tumor gene-1.

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81372497 to H.-T.X.) and Program for Liaoning Excellent Talents in University (Grant No. LR2015067 to H.-T.X.).

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Received November 12, 2018

Received in revised form February 22, 2019

Accepted March 14, 2019

Back to Top | Article Outline

1 Introduction

Malignant mesothelioma is a malignant tumor originating from the pleura, peritoneum, and pericardial cavity. Malignant mesothelioma is more common in males than in females. Most mesothelioma patients are more than 40 years old, and the clinical symptoms are not specific. The morphology of malignant mesothelioma is varied.[1–3] Diffuse malignant mesotheliomas are primarily classified as epithelioid mesothelioma, sarcomatoid mesothelioma (including desmoplastic mesothelioma), and biphasic mesothelioma. Epithelioid mesothelioma, the most common type, is mainly composed of epithelioid cells. The most frequently observed patterns of epithelioid mesothelioma are tubulopapillary, adenomatoid (microglandular or microcystic), and sheet-like. Sarcomatoid and biphasic mesotheliomas account for <10% and 10% to 15% of all mesotheliomas, respectively. Sarcomatoid mesothelioma often consists of spindle cells arranged in fascicles or a haphazard pattern. Biphasic/mixed mesothelioma is composed of both epithelioid and sarcomatoid types, with each component accounting for at least 10%.[4] The clinical prognosis for malignant mesothelioma is poor. Most patients die within the first 2 years after diagnosis.[5] However, malignant mesotheliomas that originate from the diaphragm or liver are extremely rare. Here, we report a special case where clinical and imaging examination suggested a liver space-occupying lesion, but surgery and pathological examination revealed that the tumor was a primary diaphragmatic mesothelioma with liver invasion.

Back to Top | Article Outline

2 Case presentation

2.1 Ethic approval

The study was approved by the China Medical University Institutional Review Board for human studies. The ethical board approval number is LS[2018]016. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for use of her clinical records in our study.

Back to Top | Article Outline

2.2 Clinical history

In December 2017, a 66-year-old woman came to our hospital for a “liver space-occupying lesion.” Computed tomography (CT) showed a round lesion in the right liver measuring about 8.2 cm × 8.2 cm × 7.3 cm with a relatively clear border. The lesion was elevated from the surface of the liver and closely adhered to the right diaphragm (Fig. 1). Enhanced CT showed nodular enhancement in the tumor mass. Ultrasonography showed a cystic solid echogenic lesion above the right lobe of the liver. The shape of the mass was irregular, and the internal echo was slightly reticulated. Positron emission tomography-CT showed an increase of fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the liver adjacent to the diaphragm. The patient was generally in good condition and had no remarkable clinical symptoms. She denied any history of asbestos exposure. Based on the imaging examination, the tumor was considered a liver tumor, and laparotomy was performed to remove the tumor. During the surgery, it was found that the tumor grew from the right side of the diaphragm and bulged downward into the liver. The tumor was grayish white, and about 8 cm × 8 cm × 7 cm in size. The right liver was partially invaded. The intact tumor, including 1 cm margins in the diaphragm, and part of the liver infiltrated by the tumor were surgically removed. The patient recovered well after surgery and was not treated with radiotherapy or chemotherapy. After 11 months of follow-up, the patient was in good condition and had no evidence of recurrence.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

2.3 Immunohistochemical staining

The resected specimens were fixed with 10% neutral-buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin blocks. Tissue blocks were cut into 4-μm slides. Histological evaluation was performed on hematoxylin and eosin stained sections. The tumor tissue sections were processed for immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin (CK)-pan, CK5/6, CK7, CK18, CK19, CD31, CD34, caudal type homebox 2 (CDX2), human melanoma black-45 (HMB-45), hepatocyte, paired box 8 (PAX8), glypican-3 (GPC-3), vimentin, D2-40, thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1), Wilms tumor 1 (WT1), calretinin, and Ki-67. All of these antibodies were purchased from Maixin, Fuzhou, China. After incubation with primary antibody, antibody detection was accomplished using the streptavidin–peroxidase method.

Back to Top | Article Outline

2.4 Morphological and immunohistochemical findings

Grossly, the tumor was located in the right side of the diaphragm and bulged downward into the liver. The size of the tumor mass was about 8 cm × 8 cm × 7 cm. The cut section was cystic and contained clear liquid. The texture was soft, and the color was gray-white. No obvious bleeding or necrosis was found in the tumor.

Microscopically, the tumor tissue was mainly composed of epithelioid cells, which formed microcysts, cords, or small nests (Fig. 2). The tumor cells were large and round or oval shape with abundant, clear cytoplasm. The nuclei were blunt, ovoid, and eccentric without nucleoli. The eccentric nuclei and clear cytoplasm made the tumor cells appear similar to the signet ring cells, but the mitotic figures were few. Tumor cells were interspersed with a large amount of fibrous stroma with hyaline change.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Immunostaining showed almost all the tumor cells were strongly positive for CK-pan, CK5/6, CK7, CK18, CK19, WT1, calretinin, D2-40, and vimentin. PAX8, TTF-1, GPC-3, HMB-45, hepatocyte, CDX2, CD34, and CD31 tested negative in the tumor cells. The percentage of cells that stained positively for Ki-67 was about 5% to 10% (Fig. 3).

Figure 3

Figure 3

Back to Top | Article Outline

3 Discussion

According to the patient's clinical information, histological features, and immunohistochemical staining, the tumor was diagnosed as epithelioid mesothelioma (microcystic type) of the diaphragm with liver involvement. Primary diaphragmatic malignant mesothelioma is extremely rare. To date, only 7 cases have been reported in the literature. A summary of these cases is listed in Table 1.[6–11] The cases consisted of 4 females and 3 males (4:3). The patients’ ages ranged from 48 to 66 years and the average age was 57 years. Only 1 patient had a history of asbestos exposure. It has been pointed out that the history of asbestos exposure is closely related to the occurrence of pleural mesotheliomas, but mesotheliomas in peritoneum, liver, diaphragm, and other organs have no obvious relationship with asbestos exposure history.[12–14] All 7 patients presented with liver or diaphragm tumors during the initial examination, and underwent surgical resection. The median size of the tumors was 12 cm (range 4–20 cm). The cut surface was grayish white, tough, and nodular. Five cases were epithelioid type (71.4%), 1 was biphasic (14.3%), and 1 was sarcomatoid type (14.3%). Only 2 patients experienced tumor recurrence. One patient was found tumor recurrence 23 months after surgery, and cured by radiofrequency ablation and reoperation.[11] Another patient gave up treatment for economic reasons, and died of liver and pericardial tumor recurrence after half a year.[7]

Table 1

Table 1

It was reported that primary hepatic malignant mesothelioma occurs in the Glisson's capsule, hepatic falciform ligament, or fibrous connective tissue, and extends to the liver parenchyma. Moreover, the tumor may further metastasize or directly invade adjacent tissues, such as the diaphragm, peritoneum, and pancreas, after the liver has developed lesions.[9–14] The tumor often displays as a space-occupying lesion of the abdomen or thoracic cavity, tightly adhering to diaphragm, and often involving liver or lung. Due to the similarities observed during imaging examinations, these tumors are often mistaken for liver or lung tumors. An accurate diagnosis depends on gross and microscopic pathological examination.

Immunohistochemical staining is very useful for the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma. The WHO has recommended CK5/6, calretinin, and WT1 as the most useful mesothelial markers. Simultaneously, the International Mesothelioma Interest Group suggests that any combination of markers should contain at least 2 mesothelioma markers and 2 other cancer-related markers. Calretinin, CK5/6, WT1, and D2–40 are considered to be the best indicators for differentiating mesothelioma.[3,15] In this case, the tumor cells were epithelioid, and positive for calretinin, WT1, CK5/6, and D2–40 staining, which confirmed the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma.

Primary diaphragmatic mesothelioma invading into the liver needs to be differentiated from other tumors of the liver or diaphragm. First, primary liver tumors involving the diaphragm should be excluded (i.e., hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, angioleiomyolipoma, angiosarcoma), as well as other cancers that metastasize to the liver. Hepatocellular carcinomas or gastrointestinal cancers often show elevated blood tumor markers, such as alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) for hepatocellular carcinomas, and carcinoembryonic antigen or carbohydrate antigen 19–9 for gastrointestinal cancers. Immunohistochemically, hepatocellular carcinoma is positive for AFP, GPC-3, and hepatocyte; angioleiomyolipoma is positive for HMB-45 and melan A; and angiosarcoma is positive for CD31 and CD34. These liver tumors are often negative for WT1, calretinin, and D2–40 staining, which distinguishes them from mesothelioma. Second, other primary diaphragmatic tumors also need to be considered. Most of the primary diaphragmatic lesions are benign, in which a cyst (such as mesenchymal cyst and bronchial cyst) is the most common lesion, followed by lipoma, neurofibroma, and other benign tumors derived from mesenchymal tissue. The most common primary malignant diaphragmatic lesion is rhabdomyosarcoma.[16,17] This lesion is also negative for WT1, calretinin, and D2–40 staining, and can be easily excluded.

In summary, we report a rare malignant mesothelioma that originated from the diaphragm. Primary diaphragmatic malignant mesothelioma may involve the liver or lung tissue, and may be mistaken for a liver or lung tumor. An accurate diagnosis depends on careful pathological examination. Immunohistochemical staining is very useful to distinguish this tumor from other liver or diaphragmic tumors.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Author contributions

Funding acquisition: Hong-Tao Xu.

Methodology: Jing-Wen Huang, Zhi-Han Li, Zhao Wang, Mai-Qing Yang.

Writing – original draft: Jing-Wen Huang.

Writing – review & editing: Hong-Tao Xu.

Hong-Tao Xu orcid: 0000-0001-5062-3108.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

[1]. McCroskey Z, Staerkel G, Roy-Chowdhuri S. Utility of BRCA1-associated protein 1 immunoperoxidase stain to differentiate benign versus malignant mesothelial proliferations in cytologic specimens. Diagn Cytopathol 2017;45:312–9.
[2]. Wu D, Hiroshima K, Yusa T, et al. Usefulness of p16/CDKN2A fluorescence in situ hybridization and BAP1 immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of biphasic mesothelioma. Ann Diagn Pathol 2017;26:31–7.
[3]. An YX, Wei LX. Malignant mesothelioma clinicopathological analyses of 100 cases. Zhen Duan Bing Li Xue Za Zhi 2015;22:156–8. (Chinese).
[4]. Zhang Y, Gu YH. One case of diffuse high differentiated papillary mesothelioma of the peritoneum. Zhen Duan Bing Li Xue Za Zhi 2018;06:457–9. (Chinese).
[5]. Schunselaar LM, Zwart W, Baas P. Targeting BAP1: a new paradigm for mesothelioma. Lung Cancer 2017;109:145–6.
[6]. Zhang SY. One cases of large localized pleural mesothelioma of the diaphragm. Shi Yong Ai Zheng Za Zhi 2003;05:353(Chinese).
[7]. Zhao ZH, Ding RL, Ren CB. Malignant mesothelioma of diaphragm misdiagnosed as primary hepatocellular carcinoma with liver metastasis: a case report and literature review. Jie Fang Jun Yi Yao Za Zhi 2012;11:10–1. (Chinese).
[8]. Ismael H, Steven C. Primary intrahepatic mesotheliomas: a case presentation and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep 2018;47:1–6.
[9]. Sasaki M, Araki I, Yasui T, et al. Primary localized malignant biphasic mesothelioma of the liver in a patient with asbestosis. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15:615–21.
[10]. Serter A, Buyukpinarbasili N, Karatepe O, et al. An unusual liver mass: primary malignant mesothelioma of the liver, CT and MRI findings and literature review. Jpn J Radiol 2015;33:102–6.
[11]. Kim DS, Lee SG, Jun SY, et al. Primary malignant mesothelioma developed in liver. Hepatoqastroenterology 2008;55:1081–4.
[12]. Nagata S, Tomoeda M, Kubo C, et al. Malignant mesothelioma of the peritoneum invading the liver and mimicking metastatic carcinoma: a case report. Pathol Res Pract 2011;207:395–8.
[13]. Haji Ali R, Khalife M, El Nounou G, et al. Giant primary malignant mesothelioma of the liver: a case report. Int J Surg Rep 2017;30:58–61.
[14]. Leonardou P, Semelka RC, Kanematsu M, et al. Primary malignant mesothelioma of the liver: MR imaging findings. Magn Reson Imaging 2003;21:1091–3.
[15]. Zhou D, Quan Z, Wang J. Current status of malignant mesothelioma with liver involvement in China: a brief report and review of the literature. Intractable Rare Dis Res 2018;7:112–9.
[16]. Zhang JK, Chen DL, Xu KX. Diaphragmatic hamartoma (fibroangiolipoma). Han Shao Ji Bing Za Zhi 2014;21:40–3. (Chinese).
[17]. Kim MP, Hofstetter WL. Tumors of the diaphragm. Thorac Surg Clin 2009;19:521–9.
Keywords:

diaphragm; liver; mesothelioma

Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.