Secondary Logo

Share this article on:

Human papilloma virus identification in ocular surface squamous neoplasia by p16 immunohistochemistry and DNA chip test

A strobe-compliant article

Shrestha, Tina, MDa,d; Choi, Won, MD, PhDa; Kim, Ga Eon, MD, PhDb; Yang, Jee Myung, MDa,c; Yoon, Kyung Chul, MD, PhDa,*

Section Editor(s): Wu., Kaili

doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013944
Research Article: Observational Study

The aim of this study was to identify the association between human papilloma virus (HPV) infection and ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) using p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) chip test.

Thirty-eight patients who underwent surgical excision of OSSN were retrospectively studied using tissue samples. The IHC was performed to assess the expression of p16 and DNA chip test was used to detect 24 HPV serotypes.

Among the 38 OSSN samples, 32 cases (84.2%) were histopathologically categorized as pre-invasive type and 6 cases (15.8%) as invasive type. The IHC for p16 showed strong positivity in 12 cases (31.6%), whereas it was negative in 26 cases (68.4%). On the other hand, only one case (2.6%) of invasive OSSN was positive for the HPV16 serotype, as assessed by DNA chip test.

In OSSN, p16 expression was positive in approximately 1/3rd of the cases, whereas the majority of the 24 HPV serotypes were negative for p16. Our findings suggest that only a weak association exists between HPV infection and OSSN.

aDepartment of Ophthalmology and Research Institute of Medical Sciences

bDepartment of Pathology and Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, Gwangju

cGraduate School of Medical Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea.

dDepartment of ophthalmology, Dhulikhel hospital, Kathmandu university school of medical science, Nepal.

Correspondence: Kyung Chul Yoon, Department of Ophthalmology, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, 42 Jebong-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju 61469, South Korea (e-mail:

Abbreviations: DNA = deoxyribonucleic acid, FFPE = formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, HIV = human immunodeficiency virus, HPV = human papilloma virus, IHC = immunohistochemistry, OSSN = ocular surface squamous neoplasia, PCR = polymerase chain reaction, pRB = retinoblastoma tumor suppressor, SCC = squamous cell carcinoma.

The work was funded by the Foundation of Jiaxing department of Science and Technology (2016BY28010), the Basic Public Welfare Research Program of Zhejiang Province (LGF18H160033), the Medical and Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province (2019KY214), the No. 1 project of the first hospital of Jiaxing (2017-YA-52), and the innovation fund of Zhejiang colorectal cancer (2016).

Tina Shrestha and Won Choi These authors contributed equally to this work.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received October 14, 2018

Accepted December 6, 2018

Back to Top | Article Outline

1 Introduction

Ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) is defined as a range of diseases from mild dysplasia to carcinoma in situ and invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).[1] The OSSN may be located in the cornea, conjunctiva, and limbus but is mostly found at the interpalpebral nasal limbus. The pathogenesis of OSSN is poorly understood and the role of various factors such as advanced age, male sex, vitamin A deficiency, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and human papilloma virus (HPV) infection has not been definitely established yet.[2] Conjunctival SCC represents the most severe form of OSSN, may associate with significant morbidity and also lead to mortality if left untreated.[3] The global age-standardized incidence of OSSN is 0.18 annual cases per 100,000 males and 0.08 annual cases per 100,000 females.[1]

The HPVs mostly cause cervical, anal, and oropharyngeal cancers, as well as a relatively low number of cases of vaginal, vulvar, and penile cancers.[4] The HPV consists of a small, non-enveloped, epitheliotropic strand of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). It can infect multiple types of epithelia, including stratified squamous cells as well as mucosal layers. The HPV contributes to cancer pathogenesis by the formation of a protein complex between the host p53 and the HPVE6 protein, resulting in blockage of the p53 suppressor action.[5] The neutralization of the cellular retinoblastoma tumor suppressor (pRB) and the p53 tumor suppressor proteins by the HPV E6 and E7 oncogenes induces the expression of p16.[6,7] Hence, p16 expression is considered a marker of high-risk HPV serotype infection.

The DNA chip test is a diagnostic tool. It is polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based microarray technique that has an ability to simultaneously detect up to 24 HPV subtypes, including high-risk types. The sensitivity of HPV detection by DNA chip test in cervical specimens was 91.1%.[8] Moreover, the sensitivity and specificity of the HPV DNA chip test in detecting HPV 16 and 18 have been proved to be as high as those of the Hybrid Capture 2 test.[9] To the best of our knowledge, no other previous studies have evaluated 24 HPV serotypes in OSSN.

Previous studies focusing on the prevalence of HPV in OSSN showed conflicting results and a high degree of variability, with prevalence ranging from 0 to 100%.[10] Moreover, only a limited number of HPV serotypes have been studied till date. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to evaluate the association of OSSN with HPV using immunohistochemistry (IHC) for p16 and the DNA chip test for the evaluation of 24 HPV serotypes.

Back to Top | Article Outline

2 Methods

Thirty-eight cases histologically diagnosed as OSSN from 2006 to 2016 were studied. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks and glass slides were obtained from the Department of Pathology, Chonnam National University Hospital. A search of the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary/Massachusetts General Hospital pathology information system was performed. Histomorphologic characteristics were evaluated on hematoxylin and eosin–stained slides to verify the pathologic diagnosis. The FFPE tissues were cut into 5 μm-thick sections and processed for IHC and DNA chip test. This observational, retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Chonnam National University Hospital. No other treatment was done before surgical excision of OSSN.

Back to Top | Article Outline

2.1 Immunohistochemical evaluation of p16

The IHC staining for p16 was conducted in all 38 FFPE sections as per Manufacturer's instructions. Ventana detection kits (CINtec Histology, mtm Laboratories AG, Germany) were used with a Ventana Benchmark ULTRA auto-stainer (Roche Ventana Medical Systems Inc) to detect a mouse monoclonal antibody against p16 (E6H4 clone, CINtec Histology; Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ). A cervical SCC sample was used as a positive control for p16 expression. The p16 expression was considered positive in the presence of a continuous, diffuse cell staining in the basal and parabasal cell layers of the squamous epithelium and was considered negative in case of focal or no staining. A 70% staining within nucleus and cytoplasm was used as a threshold for p16 positivity. This percentage was selected because it best correlated with the HPV status in non-ophthalmic head and neck squamous tumors.[11]

Back to Top | Article Outline

2.2 HPV genotyping by DNA chip test

As per manufacturer's manual instructions HPV genotyping was performed, using a PCR-based DNA microarray system, by the DNA chip test (MyGene Company), comprising probes for 15 high-risk serotypes (HPV-16,18, 31,33, 35,39,45,51,52,53,56,58,59,66, and 68) and 9 low-risk serotypes (HPV-6,11,34,40,42, 43,44,54, and 70). Briefly, the procedure was carried out by isolating DNA from samples using a DNA isolation kit (MyGene Company), and amplified by PCR. The PCR products of 150 base pairs were labeled with a single dye, indocardocyanine-dUTP (MEN Life Science Products, Inc, Boston, MA), using consensus GPd5+/GP6d+ primers, and subjected to electrophoresis in a 2.5% agarose gel. The HPV–amplified material (10 μl) was denatured at 95°C for 5 min, mixed with hybridization solution (MyGene Company), and then applied to the DNA chip. Hybridization was performed for 90 min at 43°C followed by 5 min washing with 3X saline-sodium phosphate-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and drying at normal room temperature. The DNA chip scanner (ScanArray Lite; GSI Lumonics, Ottawa, ON) was used to visualize hybridized DNA signals. The HPV amplicons were hybridized with the corresponding type-specific oligonucleotide probes and visualized on HPV DNA chip slides as double positive spots when the HPV DNA was present in the PCR product. Negative controls (without DNA) showed no HPV positivity and did not produce any spot.

Back to Top | Article Outline

3 Results

A total of 38 FFPE samples diagnosed as OSSN were analyzed (Table 1). The mean age of the patients was 69.1 ± 12.0 years (range, 12–88 years), with 27 males (71.0%) and 11 females (29.0%). All cases presented with lesions of the conjunctiva. None of them were diagnosed as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive. The mean follow-up period was 2.63 ± 1.21 years. Histopathological examination classified 32 cases (84.2%) as pre-invasive lesions and 6 cases (15.8%) as invasive OSSN/squamous cell carcinomas. Pre-invasive lesions were further classified as mild (less than a 3rd thickness occupied by atypical cells) squamous dysplasia in 8 cases (21.1%), moderate (3 quarters occupied by atypical cells) squamous dysplasia in one case (2.6%), severe (nearly full thickness occupied by atypical cells) squamous dysplasia in 9 cases (23.7%), and squamous cell carcinoma in situ (loss of normal cells layer by atypical cells) in 14 cases (36.8%) f.[12] Invasive OSSN/squamous cell carcinoma showed nests of neoplastic cells penetrating the epithelial basement membrane and spreading into the underlying stroma. Dysplasia of the conjunctival epithelium is determined by cellular pleomorphism, loss of cellular polarity, and acanthosis. With regard to the extent of the epithelial dysplasia, it can be devided to mild, moderate, or severe. Full thickness epithelial dysplasia without rupture of epithelial basement membrane is known for carcinoma in situ (Fig. 1).

Table 1

Table 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

The 38 FFPE samples were assessed for HPV status based on immunohistochemical detection of p16 and DNA chip tests (Tables 2 and 3). The IHC for p16 was definitively positive in 12 cases (31.6%) and negative in 26 cases (68.4%). The latter samples comprised 20 cases (52.6%) of bona fide negative staining and 6 cases (15.8%) of weakly positive samples (Fig. 2). Representative photographs of hematoxylin and eosin and p16 IHC in the invasive and pre-invasive groups are shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. The HPV DNA chip test was performed twice on each of the 38 specimens, and we detected only 1 positive case (2.6%), represented by an HPV 16 serotype (Table 3).

Table 2

Table 2

Table 3

Table 3

Figure 2

Figure 2

Back to Top | Article Outline

4 Discussion

In this study, we retrospectively investigated the association between HPV and OSSN. The HPV prevalence in OSSN was found to be 31.6% and 2.6%, as assessed by p16 staining and DNA chip test, respectively. Only 1 case (2.6%) of invasive OSSN was HPV positive for the high-risk serotype 16. Of the 12 cases with strong p16 expression, 11 did not contain any HPV serotype, as determined by DNA chip test. Consistently, studies conducted in India and Germany showed no presence of high-risk HPV in OSSN.[13,14] The HPV prevalence in OSSN is still controversial. According to previous studies, the average prevalence of HPV in OSSN is 33.8%, with values ranging from 0 to 100%.[10] Most studies were based on small numbers of patients and employed a limited number of viral detection, e.g., PCR and in situ hybridization. Additionally, geographical differences, insufficient consensus on appropriate detection algorithms, and diverse genetic susceptibility may account for these discrepancies.

Cervical and nasopharyngeal cancer studies have established IHC detection of p16 as a suitable method for the assessment of HPV-positive neoplasia.[15] However, many histopathologists, highly experienced in HPV diagnosis, warn against the pitfalls of p16 IHC in clinical practice.[16,17] Concerning OSSN, the sensitivity of p16 expression as a method for HPV detection is questionable. A study conducted in Africa found strong p16 immunoreactivity in 67% of the examined conjunctival squamous cell carcinomas, whereas an Australian study on corneal and conjunctival squamous lesions only reported a 6.5% positivity.[18,19] Analogously, Kobalka et al[20] were not able to detect the HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18 in any of the p16-positive cases evaluated. Our data showed that p16 expression is not a reliable indicator of the presence of HPV in OSSN, unlike cervical and nasopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, and suggested that HPV has a minor role in OSSN tumorigenesis.

The high-risk HPV serotypes 16 and 18 are currently considered as the most strongly associated with OSSN but other HPV serotypes (6, 11, 31, 33, 35, 45, 51, 52, and 66) have also been detected within these tumors.[21] Previous studies have investigated a limited number of HPV serotypes, i.e., HPV 16 and HPV 18, with low-sensitivity methods. Therefore, the presence of HPV serotypes other than 16 and 18 may have been overlooked, resulting in false negatives. In order to more thoroughly address the involvement of HPV in OSSN pathogenesis, we employed the DNA chip test as it could detect 24 HPV serotypes and multiple infections at once by PCR-microarray-based method. The accuracy of HPV serotyping by this method has been certified by sequencing data in a previous study conducted on cervical lesions.[8]

The low prevalence of HPV infection in OSSN (2.6%), despite p16 positivity in 1/3rd of the cases, suggests that HPV infection may not be the cause but rather a risk contributor for OSSN. Other pathways, downstream cell cycle regulation might induce p16 expression independently of HPV infection. For instance, aberrant growth signals and dysregulated cell divisions can also induce the expression of p16. Beside HPV infection, excessive ultraviolet radiation exposure and coinfections with oncogenic viruses, including Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, HIV, and Herpes simplex virus are considered as possible triggering factors for OSSN development.[22–25] For example, HIV-related immunosuppression is considered as a risk factor of OSSN, as HPV infection is associated with an increased incidence of HIV acquisition.[26]

The present study has several limitations. First, it is a retrospective study with a low number of samples obtained from a single institute. Secondly, little information was retrieved about the clinical presentation and the follow-up of cases. Although the DNA chip test is one of the most comprehensive and convenient methods for HPV detection available to date, definitive tests based on the use of subtype-specific primers could help minimizing the risk of false-negative results.

In conclusion, although 1/3rd of the examined OSSN cases were positive for p16 expression, the great majority of the 24 HPV serotypes were not detected in any of the tumors, suggesting a weak association between HPV and OSSN. However, although HPV may not be necessary or sufficient to cause OSSN, it may still contribute to tumorigenesis. Further validation of these results is warranted in prospective studies to elucidate the role of p16 expression and the possible involvement of additional HPV serotypes in OSSN.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The authors thank Dr. Punyaram Kharbuja, Department of Surgical Oncology, Bhaktapur Cancer Hospital, Nepal for his help in preparing the manuscript.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Ga Eon Kim.

Data curation: Tina Shrestha, Ga Eon Kim.

Funding acquisition: Kyung Chul Yoon.

Investigation: Tina Shrestha, Ga Eon Kim, Jee Myung Yang.

Methodology: Won Choi, Jee Myung Yang.

Writing – original draft: Tina Shrestha, Won Choi.

Writing – review & editing: Kyung Chul Yoon.

Back to Top | Article Outline


[1]. Carroll JN, Willis ZI, de St Maurice A, et al. Human papilloma virus vaccination and incidence of ocular surface squamous neoplasia. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2017;57:57–74.
[2]. Gichuhi S, Ohnuma S, Sagoo MS, et al. Pathophysiology of ocular surface squamous neoplasia. Exp Eye Res 2014;129:172–82.
[3]. Ogun GO, Ogun OA, Bekibele CO, et al. Intraepithelial and invasive squamous neoplasms of the conjunctiva in Ibadan, Nigeria: a clinicopathological study of 46 cases. Int Ophthalmol 2009;29:401–9.
[4]. Burd EM, Dean CL. Human papilloma virus laboratory testing the changing paradigm. Clin Microbiol Rev 2016;29:291–319.
[5]. Scott IU, Karp CL, Nuovo GJ. Human papillomavirus 16 and 18 expression in conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia. Ophthalmology 2002;109:542–7.
[6]. Dyson N, Howley PM, Münger K, et al. The human papilloma virus-16 E7 oncoprotein is able to bind to the retinoblastoma gene product. Science 1989;243:934–7.
[7]. Scheffner M, Huibregtse JM, Vierstra RD, et al. The HPV-16 E6 and E6-AP complex functions as a ubiquitin-protein ligase in the ubiquitination of p53. Cell 1993;75:495–505.
[8]. Choi YD, Jung WW, Nam JH, et al. Detection of HPV genotypes in cervical lesions by the HPV DNA Chip and sequencing. Gynecol Oncol 2005;98:369–75.
[9]. Yeo MK, Lee A, Hur SY, et al. Clinical significance of an HPV DNA chip test with emphasis on HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 detection in Korean gynecological patients. J Pathol Transl Med 2016;50:294–9.
[10]. Di Girolamo N. Association of human papilloma virus with pterygia and ocular-surface squamous neoplasia. Eye (Lond) 2012;26:202–11.
[11]. Singhi AD, Westra WH. Comparison of human papillomavirus in situ hybridization and p16 immunohistochemistry in the detection of human papillomavirus associated head and neck cancer based on a prospective clinical experience. Cancer 2010;116:2166–73.
[12]. Lee GA, Hirst LW. Ocular Surface Squamous neoplasia. Surv Ophthalmol 1995;39:429–50.
[13]. Manderwad GP, Kannabiran C, Honavar SG, et al. Lack of association of high-risk human papillomavirus in ocular surface squamous neoplasia in India. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009;133:1246–50.
[14]. Guthoff R, Marx A, Stroebel P. No evidence for a pathogenic role of human papillomavirus infection in ocular surface squamous neoplasia in Germany. Curr Eye Res 2009;34:666–71.
[15]. Bishop JA, Lewis JS Jr, Rocco JW, et al. HPV-related squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: an update on testing in routine pathology practice. Semin Diagn Pathol 2015;32:344–51.
[16]. Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, et al. Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;363:24–35.
[17]. El-Naggar AK. Westra WH. p16 expression as a surrogate marker for HPV-related oropharyngeal carcinoma: a guide for interpretative relevance and consistency. Head Neck 2012;34:459–61.
[18]. Mwololo A, Nyagol J, Rogena E, et al. Correlation of EGFR, pEGFR and p16INK4 expressions and high risk HPV infection in HIV/AIDS-related squamous cell carcinoma of conjunctiva. Infect Agent Cancer 2014;9:7.
[19]. Woods M, Chow S, Heng B, et al. Detecting human papillomavirus in ocular surface diseases. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;54:8069–78.
[20]. Kobalka PJ, Abboud JP, Liao X, et al. p16INK4A expression is frequently increased in periorbital and ocular squamous lesions. Diagn Pathol 2015;10:175.
[21]. Afrogheh AH, Jakobiec FA, Hammon R, et al. Evaluation for high-risk HPV in squamous cell carcinomas and precursor lesions arising in the conjunctiva and lacrimal sac. Am J Surg Pathol 2016;40:519–28.
[22]. Coroneo MT. Ultraviolet radiation and the anterior eye. Eye Contact Lens 2011;37:214–24.
[23]. Di Girolamo N, Coroneo MT, Wakefield D. UVB-elicited induction of MMP-1 expression in human ocular surface epithelial cells is mediated through the ERK1/2 MAPK-dependent pathway. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:4705–14.
[24]. Simbiri KO, Murakami M, Feldman M, et al. Multiple oncogenic viruses identified in ocular surface squamous neoplasia in HIV-1 patients. Infect Agent Cancer 2010;5:6.
[25]. Tuppurainen K, Raninen A, Kosunen O, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the conjunctiva. Failure to demonstrate HPV DNA by in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1992;70:248–54.
[26]. Rositch AF, Gravitt PE, Smith JS. Growing evidence that HPV infection is associated with an increase in HIV acquisition: exploring the issue of HPV vaccination. Sex Transm Infect 2013;89:357.

DNA chip test; human papillomavirus; immunohistochemistry; ocular surface squamous neoplasia

Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.