Journal Logo

Research Article: Clinical Case Report

Sotos syndrome

A case report of 1st genetically proven case from Saudi Arabia with a novel mutation in NSD1 gene

Kamal, Naglaa M. MDa,b,∗; Althobiti, Jwaher M. MBBChb; Alsaedi, Abdulaziz MDb; Bakkar, Ayman MDb; Alkaabi, Tahani MBBChc

Editor(s): Dora., Zelena

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012867
  • Open

Abstract

1 Introduction

Sotos syndrome or cerebral gigantism (OMIM 117550),[1] 1st described by Sotos in 1964,[2] is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder. It is characterized by overgrowth in childhood, distinctive facial appearance and mental and movement disabilities.[3]

The affected infants and children tend to grow quickly with large hands/feet.[4,5] They are all taller than their peers.[4,5] Patients have characteristic facial features including broad and prominent forehead, sparse fronto-temporal hair, down slanting palpebral fissures, malar flushing, long and narrow face, small pointed chin with unusual macrocephaly.[4,5] Their milestones are usually delayed with associated intellectual impairment and mostly behavioral problems. Some patients may have scoliosis, seizure disorders, congenital heart defects, kidney abnormalities, hearing loss, and visual problems.[1,3,6]

Most cases of Sotos syndrome are sporadic and may represent new dominant mutation in NSD1 gene (nuclear receptor-binding SET domain protein 1) located on chromosome 5q35.2-35.3.[1] Some authors suggest that its incidence is around 1 in 10,000 to 14,000 newborns[1] while others suggested a higher incidence of 1: 5000.[3] This is due to the fact that many of its features can be attributed to other conditions and hence it is under diagnosed.[3]

The NSD1 is a unique bi-functional cofactor with 2 distinct nuclear receptor (NR)-interaction domains called NID−L and NID+L.[5]NSD1 belongs to a family of NRs. These receptors bind to DNA response elements upon binding of congate ligands such as steroid and thyroid hormones, or retinoids.[5]NSD1 also contains several conserved functional domains, such as, SET, SAC, proline–tryptophan–tryptophan–proline (PWWP), and plant homeodomain protein (PHD). NSD1 contains a Cys-rich region, which is composed of different arrangements of 3 conserved motifs, corresponding to a protein domain that has been called SAC for SET-associated Cys-rich domain.[5] The SAC domain may have a function in chromosome binding. In addition to the SET and SAC domains, NSD1 contains 6 other domains including 2 PWWP domains and 5 PHD domains.[5]

The SET domain (su(var)3–9, enhancer-of-zeste, trithorax) was 1st identified as a motif present in the Drosophila proteins SU(var)3–9, E(z), and TRx. The SET domain was also found in a number of eukaryotic proteins.[5] The SET domain was shown to play a role in cell growth and differentiation, and it is associated with chromatin. It also functions as a transcriptional repressor and/or a transcriptional activator.[5]

It has been suggested that the PHD finger domains involve chromatin-mediated transcriptional regulation. The PWWP domain is thought to be involved in protein–protein interactions. Adjacent to the C-terminus of the PHD-V domain is another region rich in cysteines and histidines, possibly corresponding to a zinc-finger-like motif.[5]

The function of NSD1 remains largely unknown; however, its role includes activating as well as silencing domains and binding liganded as well as unliganded NRs. This suggests that NSD1 could be a versatile NR intermediary factor controlling transcription either negatively or positively. It has been observed that the haplo-insufficiency of NSD1 induces overgrowth which prompted Kurotaki et al to suggest that NSD1 acts as a co-repressor of genes that promote growth.[7]

Three reports were released from Saudi Arabia (SA), 14 cases were reported by al Rashed and 2 single cases, were reported by Alhumaidi and Al-Mulla et al.[8–10] All of them were diagnosed based on their clinical findings and radiologic abnormalities. Although all the reported cases were similar to our patient clinically, none of them had undergone molecular genetic studies to confirm their diagnosis.

The 5-year-old patient described below is 1st Sotos syndrome proven case by molecular genetic analysis from SA.

2 Case presentation

A 5-year-old Saudi male patient born at term with a weight of 3.25 kg“50th centile,” length of 57 cm “>97th centile,” occipitofrontal head circumference 38 cm “99th centile,” small muscular ventricular septal defect (VSD) and minimal bilateral hydronephrosis.

Follow-up visits were planned, but the patient did not show until he was 1 year when he was hospitalized with bronchopneumonia. His body system review revealed delay in both motor and mental developmental milestones. For instance, he was unable to sit, stand or produce single words. He had stuttered speech and was wearing glasses. His height (Ht) and head circumference (Hc) were more than 97th centile; 89 and 50 cm, respectively. He had high forehead, long narrow face, down slanted palpebral fissure, large ears, right eye strabismus, and left eye estropia. Fortunately, he had no hearing deficits.

On further follow-up, the patient started pronouncing mummy and daddy at the age of 18 months, and started walking at the age of 24 months. After that the patient did not attend follow-up visits until he was 5 years when his parents presented suffering from his aggressive behavior toward his siblings, obsession to close doors, nail biting, defective attention and hyperactivity, and an evident abnormal rapid growth compared to his siblings as he was much taller than his elder 7 years brother. His Ht and Hc were more than 99th centile. He had mild mental disability with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder and obsessions. VSD was closed and the hydronephrosis status was static. His brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed prominent ventricles and sulci as shown in Figure 1.

F1
Figure 1:
Patient's family pedigree.

There was no similar presentation of this syndrome in his family and his parents were nonconsanguineous. Patient's family pedigree is shown in Figure 2.

F2
Figure 2:
Brain magnetic resonance imaging of the patient, sagittal view, demonstrating prominent sulci and ventricles.

Molecular genetic analysis for NSD1 gene was done for the patient and proved the diagnosis of Sotos syndrome with a novel NSD1 gene mutation. Genetic counseling was carried for the family with extended genetic testing for the parents and his siblings with normal results, which shed light to the fact that the mutation found in the proband is denovo. Multidisplinary team management has been provided for the patient, in conjunction with regular follow-ups with the neurologist, cardiologist, general pediatrician, speech therapist, psychiatrist, and ophthalmologist.

2.1 Molecular genetic analysis of the NSD1 gene

Deletion/duplication analysis of NSD1 gene on chromosome 5q35 (OMIM 606681)[1] was performed. This was done by applying multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) using the SALSA P026-D1 kit (Fig. 3).

F3
Figure 3:
Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification genetic testing of the patient's with deletion of the complete NSD1 gene (exons 1–23).

The MLPA analysis revealed a heterozygous deletion of the complete NSD1 gene (exons 1–23). The result was confirmed by an independent MLPA analysis. Heterozygous deletions of the NSD1 gene have been reported to be causative for Sotos syndrome.

3 Discussion

Sotos syndrome, described in 1964, is a genetic disorder due to haplo insufficiency of the NSD1 gene on chromosome 5q35.2-35.3 in 90% of the patients: Sotos syndrome 1. Recently, heterozygous mutations in the NFIX gene (nuclear factor I, X type) on chromosome 19p13.3 were identified in a few children with the Sotos syndrome phenotype: Sotos syndrome 2.[11]

Clinically, it has cardinal, major and associated features occurring in ≥90%, 15% to 89%, and ≥2 and <15 of the affected patients, respectively.[12] Its cardinal features are the characteristic facial appearance, learning disability, and overgrowth while the behavioral problems, advanced bone age, cardiac anomalies, cranial MRI/computed tomography abnormalities, joint hyperlaxity/pes planus, maternal preeclampsia, neonatal complications, renal anomalies, scoliosis, and seizures are among the major features.[6] The other associated features include: astigmatism, cataract, cholesteatoma, conductive hearing loss, constipation, contractures, craniosynostosis, cryptorchidism, gastroesophageal reflux, hemangioma, hemihypertrophy, hydrocele, hypercalcemia, hypermetropia, hypodontia, hypoplastic nails, hypospadias, hypothyroidism, inguinal hernia, myopia, neonatal hypoglycemia, nystagmus, pectus excavatum, phimosis, skin hyper/hypo-pigmentation, strabismus, talipes equinovarus, umbilical hernia, vertebral anomalies, and 2 to 3 toe syndactyly.[6]

Sotos syndrome has worldwide distribution. Reviewing literature regarding genetically proven cases of Sotos syndrome revealed; deletion encompassing NSD1 gene in a Japanese patient. In addition, point mutations have been identified in the majority of European Sotos syndrome patients.[5] The NSD1 gene in 42 Japanese patients with sporadic Sotos syndrome was analyzed. This revealed that 19 of them had a 2.2 mb microdeletion of 5q35 encompassing NSD1, and 4 of them had intragenic NSD1 mutation predicted to inactivate the protein.[7]

Another study evaluated 75 patients with childhood overgrowth for intragenic mutations and large deletion of NSD1 gene. This study revealed that there were 3 deletions and 32 mutations (13 frame shift, 8 nonsense, 2 splice site, and 9 missense).[13] On the contrary, upon analysis of 266 patients with NSD1 aberrations, 233 had 180 different intragenic NSD1 mutations and the remaining 33 individual had 5q35 microdeletions encompassing NSD1 gene.[12]

Previously reported data suggest that 93% of patients, who have been clinically diagnosed with Sotos syndrome, have identifiable NSD1 abnormalities, of which 83% were intragenic mutations and 10% were 5q35 microdeletions.[12]

Tatton-Brown et al[12] evaluated 234 Sotos syndrome patients with an NSD1 abnormality, and found that those with a 5q35 microdeletion have less overgrowth and more severe learning disability than individuals with an intragenic pathogenic variant while no genotype–phenotype correlations were detected for cardiac abnormalities, renal anomalies, seizures, and scoliosis. In addition, they found no correlations between type of intragenic pathogenic variant (missense vs truncating) and phenotype or between position of pathogenic variant (5′ vs 3′) and phenotype.

From Arab world, a total of 17 cases with typical clinical features of Sotos syndrome have been reported, among them 10 were Saudi. None of the those patients was proved by molecular genetic studies.[8–10,14] Al Rashed et al[8] diagnosed his 14 cases based on clinical features, 8 Saudis, 3 Egyptians, 2 Sudanese, and 1 Syrian. Alhumaidi[9] described a patient with typical clinical features of Sotos syndrome with normal chromosomal studies.[11] A similar patient, described by Al-Mulla et al,[10] was clinically diagnosed as Sotos syndrome and treated for acute myelocytic leukemia. Our patient is the 1st genetically proven case from Saudi Arabia with a novel heterozygous deletion of the complete NSD1 gene (exons 1–23). We recommend genetic testing of other cases from SA for better characterization of the Saudi cohort.

Author contributions

NMK: diagnosed the patient, did investigations, followed up him.

NMK, AA, AB, JMA: reviewed literature, drafted the manuscript, and reviewed the manuscript final.

JMA, TA: collected data of the patient and helped to draft the manuscript.

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conceptualization: Naglaa M Kamal.

Data curation: Naglaa M Kamal, Jwaher Althobiti, Ayman Bakkar, Abdulaziz Alsaedi, Tahani Alkaabi.

Formal analysis: Ayman Bakkar, Abdulaziz Alsaedi, Tahani Alkaabi.

Investigation: Naglaa M Kamal.

Methodology: Naglaa M Kamal.

Project administration: Naglaa M Kamal.

Supervision: Naglaa M Kamal.

Writing – original draft: Naglaa M Kamal.

Writing – review & editing: Naglaa M Kamal, Jwaher Althobiti, Ayman Bakkar, Abdulaziz Alsaedi.

Naglaa M Kamal orcid: 0000-0002-8535-3838.

References

[1]. Sotos syndrome 1. Available at: www.omim.org/entry/117550. Accessed January 15, 2018.
[2]. Tatton-Brown K, Rahman N. Sotos syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet 2007;15:264–71.
[3]. Sotos syndrome. Available at: ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition/sotos-syndrome. Genetics home reference. Accessed January 31, 2018.
[4]. Sotos syndrome. Genetic and rare disease information center. Available at: https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/diseases/10091/sotos-syndrome. Accessed January 17, 2018.
[5]. Türkmen S, Gillessen-Kaesbach G, Meinecke P, et al. Mutations in NSD1 are responsible for Sotos syndrome, but are not a frequent finding in other overgrowth phenotypes. Eur J Hum Genet 2003;11:858–65.
[6]. Tatton-Brown K, Cole TRP, Rahman N. Sotos Syndrome. GeneReviews. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle. Initial posting: December 17, 2004; Last update November 19, 2015.
[7]. Kurotaki N, Imaizumi K, Harada N, et al. Haploinsufficiency of NSD1 causes Sotos syndrome. Nature Genet 2002;30:365–6.
[8]. Al Rashed AA, Al-Jarallah AA, Salih MA, et al. Sotos syndrome (cerebral gigantism): a clinical and radiological study of 14 cases from Saudi Arabia. Ann Trop Paediatr 1999;19:197–203.
[9]. Alhumaidi M. Sotos syndrome: a case report. Ann Saudi med 1994;14:514–6.
[10]. Al-Mulla N, Belgaumi AF, Teebi A. Cancer in Sotos syndrome: report of a patient with acute myelocytic leukemia and review of the literature. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2004;26:204–8.
[11]. Sotos JF. Sotos syndrome 1 and 2. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 2014;12:2–16.
[12]. Tatton-Brown K, Douglas J, Coleman K, et al. Childhood Overgrowth CollaborationGenotype-phenotype associations in Sotos syndrome: an analysis of 266 individuals with NSD1 aberrations. Am J Hum Genet 2005;77:193–204.
[13]. Douglas J, Hanks S, Temple IK, et al. NSD1 mutations are the major cause of Sotos syndrome and occur in some cases of Weaver syndrome but are rare in other overgrowth phenotypes. Am J Hum Genet 2003;72:132–43.
[14]. al Talabani J, Shubbar AI, Mustafa KE. Major congenital malformations in United Arab Emirates (UAE): need for genetic counselling. Ann Hum Genet 1998;62(Pt 5):411–8.
Keywords:

cerebral gigantism; novel mutation; NSD1; Saudi; Sotos syndrome

Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.