Journal Logo

Research Article: Quality Improvement Study

Modulation of macrophage polarization by level-1 Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test in young football players

Chiu, Chen-Jan MEda; Chi, Chih-Wen PhDb; Hsieh, Hui-Ru BSb; Huang, Yu-Chuen PhDc,d; Wu, Huey-June PhDa; Chen, Yu-Jen MD, PhDe,f,∗

Editor(s): Perveen., Shagufta

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012739
  • Open


1 Introduction

Football is a high-intensity intermittent exercise consisted of continuous movement incorporating frequent bursts of high-intensity activity.[1] It is characterized by the high aerobic load and the extensive anaerobic energy turnover.[2]

To evaluate the ability to perform high-intensity intermittent exercise, the level-1 Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test (YYIRT) was designed as a specific tool.[3,4] For exercise such as adolescent handball players, YYIRT score could provide a useful composite index of the response to training or rehabilitation.[5] YYIRT has been widely utilized in monitoring cardiopulmonary fitness of football players because it correlates with match performance.[6] The metabolic responses to the YYIRT had been reported, including the changes in levels of lactate, glucose, triglycerides, and uric acid.[7] Its correlation to the elevation of biochemical markers of muscular damage such as creatine kinase (CK), and lactate deshydrogenase (LDH) had also been investigated.[8–10] However, the effect of YYIRT1 on immune status related to exercise and athlete health remains unclear. The importance of other immune lineage cells, including T cells, NK cells, and dendritic cells, involved in immunomodulation by football exercise had been demonstrated.[11–13] Given that macrophages consist of the most abundant and first-line innate immune cells with antigen presentation ability, we focused on the modulation of macrophage polarization by YYIRT1 in football players.

Macrophages, cells of innate immunity, are belonging to one of the subsets of human antigen-presenting cells.[14] Plasticity and heterogeneity is a hallmark of macrophages which is characterized by classification of macrophages into 2 different polarized states, one is the classically activated macrophages phenotype (M1) and another one is the alternatively activated macrophages phenotype (M2). The M1 induced by lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and Th1 cytokine interferon-γ (IFN-γ) possess high antigen-presenting ability and are more effective at antigen clearance and switching T-cell responses toward T helper-1 immune response.[15] In contrast, the M2 responding to Th2 cytokine interleukin-4, interleukin-10 (IL-10), and interleukin-13 activation are anti-inflammatory with immunosuppressive capacities.[16,17] The M1 subtype expresses major histocompatibility complex class II, CD80, CD86, and can secrete IL-12.[18] M2 populations are alternatively activated with expression of associated markers including CD163, CD206, CD209, and can secrete IL-10. Exercise, especially high-intensity sports, may cause inflammatory reactions and alteration in activation state of immunity.[19] However, the effect of exercise on macrophage polarization remains undetermined.

In the present study, we evaluated the changes in macrophage subsets responded to YYIRT1.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Subject

Fourteen elite young football players from Chinese Culture University (Taipei, Taiwan), were recruited. All the enrolled subjects were male. Each cyclist had been engaged in football training for 2–4 years before the study. In the subjects, the amount of alcohol intake and smoking had been restricted by the in-charge coach. No subjects participated in competitions in 3 months prior to the study. No clinical illnesses were noted, and no medical or surgical treatment was given during the 6 months prior to blood sampling. The pre-test blood was sampled after subjects had rested quietly for 30 minutes before the test. This study was approved my institutional review board (MMH-17MMHIS170) with informed consents.

2.2 The level-1 Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test (YYIRT1)

The YYIRT1 was performed according to the procedures suggested by Krustrup et al[3] with modification. The reliability of YYIRT1 was established in a previous study.[20] The test consisted of 20-meter shuttle runs with increasing speeds and 10 seconds of active recovery in 5-m distance between runs till exhaustion. The end of the test was defined as twice of failure to reach the front line in time. The total time (seconds) covered during the YYIRT1 was recorded. All participants had a warm-up consisting of the first four running bouts before the test. The total duration of the test was set in 6 to 20 minutes.

2.3 Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale (RPE)

The RPE scale assessment was performed to record the subjective exertion rating for the physical task of the participants.[21]

2.4 Measurement of cardiopulmonary fitness

Maximal oxygen uptake () was measured using a graded maximal treadmill protocol applied in our previous study.[22] In brief, oxygen uptake and ventilation were measured using a cardiopulmonary exercise testing system (Q-plus IW/Corival 400, Seattle, WA) equipped on a treadmill (Quinton-645). The participants warmed up by walking at 3.0 mph on a 10% grade initially and ran at increasing speeds with an increment of 0.5 mph per minute. The maximal heart rate was recorded by using a polar pacer heart rate monitor.

2.5 Assessment of macrophage polarization

After lysis of red blood cells, the mononuclear cells (MNCs) from blood samples were separated by centrifugation on a density gradient (Ficoll-Hypaque, 1.077 gm/mL, Pharmacia Fine Chemicals). Immunolabeling was performed using fluorescei-conjugated antibodies including isotype control, CD14 (for monocyte/macrophage) (Clone M5E2, BD Biosciences, NJ), HLA-ABC (for M1) (Clone G46–2.6, BD Biosciences), and CD206 (for M2) (Clone 19.2, BD Biosciences). Before surface marker analysis, the cell debris was excluded by forward and side scattering on flow cytometer.

2.6 Fluorocytometric analysis of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS)

Intracellular ROS level was assessed by staining with 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) (Molecular Probes). Briefly, phosphate buffered saline-washed cells were incubated with 1 μM DCFH-DA for 15 minutes at 37 °C before the fluorocytometric analysis. The DCF level was measured with the FL-1 channel (green fluorescence).

2.7 Measurement of serum biochemical profiles

The serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine phosphokinase (CPK), blood urine nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT) and C-reactive protein were measured by using chemical reactions as previously described.[23]

2.8 Measurement of serum cytokines

Serum levels of cytokines were quantified by a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α were measured using Quantikine ELISA kits (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

2.9 Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The changes in the parameters before and after YYIRT1 were evaluated by paired t-test using SPSS 12.0 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Statistical significance was defined as a P value of less than .05.

3 Results

3.1 Total duration of YYIRT1 and cardiopulmonary fitness parameters

The time to exhaustion for YYIRT1 was 714.1 ± 114.4 seconds. RPE scale was 19.1 ± 1.1. The resting and maximal heart rates of the cyclists were 64.9 ± 8.8 and 181.9 ± 9.3 beats/min, respectively. The mean was 48.7 ± 5.6 mL/kg/min. These parameters indicated the participants did possess a high level of cardiopulmonary fitness.

3.2 The effect of YYIRT1 on macrophage polarization

The expression of macrophage-specific CD14 and M1 marker HLA-ABC, but not M2 marker CD206, was down-regulated after YYIRT1 (Fig. 1).

Figure 1:
Flow cytometric analysis for expression of surface antigens in macrophages. A, representative dot-plot figures and histograms before YYIRT1; (B) representative dot-plot figures and histograms after YYIRT1; and (C) bar charts for comparison of data. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. ∗ P < .05 for comparison of data between before and after YYIRT1.

3.3 The effect of YYIRT1 on biochemical profiles

In biochemical profile, the serum levels of LDH, a marker of muscle damage, increased after YYIRT1, indicating a possible muscle damage by YYIRT1 (Fig. 2A). No significant alteration was noted in CPK, blood urine nitrogen, creatinine, aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, and C-reactive protein (Fig. 2A,B).

Figure 2:
Serum biochemical parameters in young football players received YYIRT1. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. ∗ P < .05 for comparison of data between before and after YYIRT1.

3.4 The effect of YYIRT1 on intracellular superoxide levels

The intracellular ROS levels in macrophages had no significant change (Fig. 3).

Figure 3:
Serum levels of reactive oxygen species young football players received YYIRT1. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

3.5 The effect of YYIRT1 on serum cytokine levels

The serum levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α had no significant change (Fig. 4).

Figure 4:
Serum levels of cytokines in young football players received YYIRT1. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

4 Discussion

Our findings indicate that YYIRT1 caused elevation of serum LDH levels and down-regulated the M1 polarization of macrophages in young football players.

The main reason for the small test sample number is that only elite and young football players were recruited. We enrolled these elite football players from the national representative team to ensure high and relatively homogenous cardiopulmonry fitness levels of subjects. However, the small sample size remains a limitation of this study.

At initial or acute phase of tissue injury, the recruited macrophages that infiltrate the ischemic muscle are polarized to a pro-inflammatory M1-like phenotype. These M1-polarized macrophages may increased significantly suppress the arteriogenic response to decrease the perfusion recovery.[24] By contrast, the M2 polarized macrophages play an important role in the resolution of tissue and muscle damage through removal of necrotic cells to promote repair.[18] Strategy of therapies that are aimed at decreasing pro-inflammatory and increasing the anti-inflammatory macrophage populations in ischemic muscle are regarded beneficial to repair of tissue and muscle damage. Data from young football players in the present study show that YYIRT1 caused elevation of serum LDH levels, indicative of resultant muscle damage. Intriguingly, YYIRT1 suppressed the M1 polarization of macrophages in young football players. Taken together, it implicates that YYIRT1 may cause muscle damage with a stress reaction to suppress inflammation related to M1 polarization of macrophages.

The reversible nature of macrophage polarization between M1 and M2 phenotypes is characteristic to their plasticity.[15] Pharmacological targets, such as CREB-C/EBP beta cascade, sustaining M2 macrophage polarization to promote vascular remodeling and perfusion recovery in ischemic muscle have been developed.[25]

YYIRT1 had no significant effect on polarization of macrophages towards M2 phenotype. The mechanism for differential effect of YYIRT1 on M1, but not M2, polarization remains unclear and warrants further investigation.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Huey-June Wu, Yu-Jen Chen.

Data curation: Chen-Jan Chiu, Hui-Ru Hsieh.

Formal analysis: Yu-Chuen Huang.

Investigation: Chen-Jan Chiu, Hui-Ru Hsieh.

Supervision: Huey-June Wu, Yu-Jen Chen.

Validation: Huey-June Wu.

Writing – original draft: Chen-Jan Chiu.

Writing – review & editing: Chih-Wen Chi, Yu-Jen Chen.


[1]. Impellizzeri FM, Rampinini E, Marcora SM. Physiological assessment of aerobic training in soccer. J Sports Sci 2005;23:583–92.
[2]. Helgerud J, Engen LC, Wisloff U, et al. Aerobic endurance training improves soccer performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001;33:1925–31.
[3]. Krustrup P, Mohr M, Amstrup T, et al. The yo-yo intermittent recovery test: physiological response, reliability, and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35:697–705.
[4]. Bangsbo J, Iaia FM, Krustrup P. The Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test: a useful tool for evaluation of physical performance in intermittent sports. Sports Med 2008;38:37–51.
[5]. Hermassi S, Aouadi R, Khalifa R, et al. Relationships between the yo-yo intermittent recovery test and anaerobic performance tests in adolescent handball players. J Hum Kinet 2015;45:197–205.
[6]. Rampinini E, Sassi A, Azzalin A, et al. Physiological determinants of Yo-Yo intermittent recovery tests in male soccer players. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010;108:401–9.
[7]. Hammouda O, Chtourou H, Chaouachi A, et al. Biochemical responses to level-1 Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test in young Tunisian football players. Asian J Sports Med 2013;4:23–8.
[8]. 22080741Brancaccio P, Lippi G, Maffulli N. Biochemical markers of muscular damage. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:757–67.
[9]. Hammouda O, Chtourou H, Chahed H, et al. Diurnal variations of plasma homocysteine, total antioxidant status, and biological markers of muscle injury during repeated sprint: effect on performance and muscle fatigue-a pilot study. Chronobiol Int 2011;28:958–67.
[10]. Hammouda O, Chtourou H, Chahed H, et al. High intensity exercise affects diurnal variation of some biological markers in trained subjects. Int J Sports Med 2012;33:886–91.
[11]. Bury T, Marechal R, Mahieu P, et al. Immunological status of competitive football players during the training season. Int J Sports Med 1998;19:364–8.
[12]. Malm C, Ekblom O, Ekblom B. Immune system alteration in response to two consecutive soccer games. Acta Physiol Scand 2004;180:143–55.
[13]. Suchanek O, Podrazil M, Fischerova B, et al. Intensive physical activity increases peripheral blood dendritic cells. Cell Immunol 2010;266:40–5.
[14]. Zhou D, Huang C, Lin Z, et al. Macrophage polarization and function with emphasis on the evolving roles of coordinated regulation of cellular signaling pathways. Cell Signal 2014;26:192–7.
[15]. Varin A, Gordon S. Alternative activation of macrophages: immune function and cellular biology. Immunobiology 2009;214:630–41.
[16]. Biswas SK, Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and interaction with lymphocyte subsets: cancer as a paradigm. Nat Immunol 2010;11:889–96.
[17]. Mantovani A, Sozzani S, Locati M, et al. Macrophage polarization: tumor-associated macrophages as a paradigm for polarized M2 mononuclear phagocytes. Trends Immunol 2002;23:549–55.
[18]. Martinez FO, Helming L, Gordon S. Alternative activation of macrophages: an immunologic functional perspective. Annu Rev Immunol 2009;27:451–83.
[19]. Silveira LS, Antunes Bde M, Minari AL, et al. Macrophage polarization: implications on metabolic diseases and the role of exercise. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 2016;26:115–32.
[20]. Castagna C, Impellizzeri F, Cecchini E, et al. Effects of intermittent-endurance fitness on match performance in young male soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2009;23:1954–9.
[21]. Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982;14:377–81.
[22]. Chiang J, Huang YW, Chen ML, et al. Comparison of anti-leukemic immunity against U937 cells in endurance athletes versus sedentary controls. Int J Sports Med 2000;21:602–7.
[23]. Chiang J, Chen YY, Akiko T, et al. Tai Chi Chuan increases circulating myeloid dendritic cells. Immunol Invest 2010;39:863–73.
[24]. Ganta VC, Choi MH, Kutateladze A, et al. A MicroRNA93-interferon regulatory factor-9-immunoresponsive gene-1-itaconic acid pathway modulates m2-like macrophage polarization to revascularize ischemic muscle. Circulation 2017;135:2403–25.
[25]. Ruffell D, Mourkioti F, Gambardella A, et al. A CREB-C/EBPbeta cascade induces M2 macrophage-specific gene expression and promotes muscle injury repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:17475–80.

biochemical parameters; intermittent recovery test; macrophage polarization

Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.