Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Management and outcomes of spinal epidural hematoma during vertebroplasty

Case series

Fang, Miao MMa; Zhou, Jiaojiao MDb; Yang, Dongjun MMa; He, Yu MMa; Xu, Yong MMa; Liu, Xin MMa; Zeng, Yong BMa,*

Section Editor(s): NA.,

doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010732
Research Article: Clinical Case Report
Open

Rationale: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the common complications of spinal surgery. There is no definite treatment and time of decompression for spinal cord induced by epidural hematoma during vertebroplasty.

Patient concerns: A total of 6 patients with SCI during vertebroplasty were included in our research. All of them occurred sensory disturbance and motor dysfunction due to a lower or same level operative vertebral body lesion in vertebroplasty.

Diagnoses: Neurological manifestations during vertebroplasty, postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography.

Interventions: Once SCI occurred in vertebroplasty, four patients were underwent spinal cord decompression immediately, and two patients were done after 14 and 22 hours, respectively.

Outcomes: Before decompression operation, one patient was Frankel A, three were Frankel B, and two were Frankel C. One day after evacuation of the SEH, three patients recovered to normal neurological function (Frankel E), one to Frankel C, and one to Frankel D, but the other one did not recover. At the last follow-up, five patients had recovered to Frankel E and one patient to Frankel D.

Lessons: According to our experience, when SCI occurs during vertebroplasty, neurological deficits are always secondary to acute SEH. Timely decompression, particularly transfer surgery, can shorten recovery time.

aDepartment of Orthopedics, Second People's Hospital of Chengdu

bDivision of Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Correspondence: Yong Zeng, Department of Orthopedics, Second People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu 610017, China (e-mail: zysh2929@163.com).

Abbreviations: CT = computed tomography, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, SCI = spinal cord injury, SHE = spinal epidural hematoma.

MF and JZ contributed equally to this work.

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

Received March 21, 2018

Accepted April 23, 2018

Back to Top | Article Outline

1 Introduction

The vertebroplasty technique was first applied to the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures by Galibert et al,[1] and has quickly gained impetus worldwide. It requires the placement of a large-bore spinal needle under fluoroscopic guidance into each affected vertebral body via a posterior, transpedicular approach.[2] Some complications, such as pedicular fracture, nerve root injury, and spinal cord lesion, may occur during this puncture process. A spinal epidural hematoma (SEH) is an emergent complication. Without appropriate management, it may result in a poor prognosis and permanent harm.

Back to Top | Article Outline

2 Materials and methods

From March 2012 to September 2016, 6 patients with a SEH were treated for spinal cord decompression. All fractured vertebral bodies were thoracic vertebra. Neurological outcomes were assessed via the Frankel system.[3] Four of them (No. 1–4) were transferred for decompression operation when they incurred neurological deficit symptoms (Frankel B to C) due to a lower or same level operative vertebral body lesion during vertebroplasty. One patient (No. 5) incurred the symptoms of SCI during vertebroplasty. Physical examination after SCI resulted in SCI of Frankel D after the vertebroplasty. These deteriorating symptoms were the result of spinal cord compression by a SEH, seen upon computed tomography (CT). Decompression surgery was then performed 14 hours after vertebroplasty. Patient No. 6 evidenced neurological deficits during the vertebroplasty; therefore, the operation was stopped. The neurological deficit was rated as Frankel B, but not managed. The patient was transferred to our hospital immediately, and an SEH was confirmed via emergency magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Surgery was then performed 22 hours after the initial vertebroplasty and the SCI was rated as Frankel A at that time (Table 1).

Table 1

Table 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

2.1 Statement of ethics

This study was approved by the ethical committees of Second People's Hospital of Chengdu. All aspects of our research were in compliance with applicable ethical standards, and informed consent was also obtained from all patients enrolled in the study. We obtained written informed consent from all participants.

Back to Top | Article Outline

3 Results

Spinal cord decompression was performed on the 6 SCI patients with local anesthesia. An SEH, from vertebral plate or pedicular fracture, was verified intraoperatively in all cases. SEH extension ranged from 2 to 4 spinal levels across the patients. The theca vertebrali of 2 patients were ruptured by needle insertion.

In patient No. 1 to 4, who had been transferred for operations, 2 were Frankel B and 2 were Frankel C. One day after decompression, 3 cases (No. 1–3) recovered to Frankel E, and the other one (No. 4) to Frankel D. Patient No. 4 later recovered to Frankel E in the second postoperative week. Patient No. 5 was improved to Frankel D and then Frankel E with detection of a normal SCI in the sixth week. One patient (No. 6) did not recover 24 hours after evacuation of the SEH. Fortunately, this patient was eventually improved to Frankel D 32 weeks later, although had trouble walking that did not improve by follow-up (Table 1).

Back to Top | Article Outline

4 Discussion

Vertebroplasty has become a mainstay in the management of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture and malignant vertebral fractures. Complications from punctures in vertebroplasty are often considered moderately severe. Needle traversal of the lamina instead of the pedicle can occur, especially in the thoracic vertebra, where pedicles are smaller, and can lead to catastrophic complications.[4] In one report, the incidence of SCI in vertebroplasty was 2.21%; meanwhile, the incidence of injury caused by cement leakage was 1.02% and puncture and puncture-related injuries 0.51%. Puncture and puncture-related injuries accounted for 23.08% of all neurological injuries.[5] Puncture injuries often result in fracture or nerve root damage, and a resulting secondary hematoma can cause further neurological deficits. According to our clinical experience, lower extremity pain, numbness, and weakness are among the most common symptoms of SCI caused by an SEH during vertebroplasty.

The anatomy of the thoracic vertebral canal is specialized, meaning that the diameter of the canal is small with very limited buffer space. When an acute epidural hematoma forms in the thoracic spinal canal, the effective area of the thoracic spinal canal decreases further, and the spinal cord and other structures are easily subjected to direct compression. Compression of the spinal cord causes necrosis in the central region of the spinal cord, and edema around the axon and myelin sheaths.[6,7] Pressure to the spinal canal affects local blood vessels and causes dysfunction in feeding and draining. This dysfunction can lead to the accumulation of harmful substances and a secondary cascade of deleterious biochemical and cellular processes.[8,9] Previous work in animal models demonstrated that recovery of neurological function is related to the degree of spinal cord compression, duration of hemorrhage, and the rate of development of neurological deficits.[9] Functional recovery of the spinal cord further depends on the size of the spinal cord and the duration of the compression event. Survival time of spinal cord tissues under high pressure was 1 minute, although this was extended to 2 hours under relatively small amounts of pressure. When spinal cord compression exceeds these limits, complete recovery becomes nearly impossible. However, when spinal cord compression occurs progressively rather than acutely, the degree of nerve recovery can be increased.[10–12]

The parameters determining the severity of SCI are multifactorial and include rate, depth, and duration of compression.[13] An SEH causes clinical symptoms, such as lower limb paralysis and cauda equina symptoms. An SEH is a neurosurgical emergency, and often leads to devastating sequelae unless it is managed effectively.[14] Controversy exists between those who advocate emergency surgery and those who operate on an urgent rather than emergent basis. Some scholars argue that the recovery of spinal cord function is not dependent on the timing of surgical intervention but that a patient's preoperative neurological status is the most important factor in predicting their outcome.[15] Some report that outcomes are better in patients with an incomplete neurological deficit and timely surgical decompression.[15–18] Dolan et al[19] argue that the time of spinal cord compression and the magnitude of pressure are negatively correlated with the recovery of neurological function. McQuarrie [17] confirmed the possibility that delayed surgery reduces nerve recovery. Collectively, these studies indicate that both the extent of neurological deficits at the time of surgery and a minimal interval from symptom onset to surgical decompression are key factors in predicting a patient's functional outcomes.[20–23]

In the cases presented here, the 4 patients who were transferred to open surgery recovered better and more quickly than the 2 who were not. Neurological function deteriorated after the SCI that occurred in patient No. 5 and 6. Definite diagnoses were made on the basis of CT/MRI. Patient No. 5 exhibited poor neurological function (Frankel C) at the time of decompression. While SCI recovered to normal, the recovery time was significantly prolonged (6 weeks) when compared with the other 4 cases (No. 1–4). The SCI of patient No. 6 was Frankel C during vertebroplasty, Frankel A before decompression, and Frankel D at follow-up (40 weeks). On the basis of these cases, we speculate that aggravation of neurological deficits is related to acute SEH. The time from SCI to decompression operation was critical to the patient's degree and speed of recovery.

Our study has numerous limitations. First, it contained a small number of cases. Second, patients who were transferred for their operations incurred SCI during vertebroplasty, which was diagnosed on the basis of symptoms and physical examination rather than objective evidence (e.g., via CT or MRI).

Back to Top | Article Outline

5 Conclusion

Neurological deficits always occur secondary to acute SEH if SCI occurs during vertebroplasty. Neurological recovery is multifactorial, and the timing of surgery is a key factor in determining postsurgical success. Timely decompression and transfer surgery can shorten the time of recovery. Therefore, exploratory surgery is worth performing in patients who incur SCI during vertebroplasty.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgment

Thanks to Yang Zhou's contribution to the collection of this research. At the same time, we would like to thank the medical record room of the Second People's Hospital of Chengdu in the collection of medical records for the convenience of the study.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Miao Fang, Yong Zeng.

Data curation: Miao Fang, Yu He, Yong Zeng, Jiaojiao Zhou.

Funding acquisition: Miao Fang.

Supervision: Miao Fang, Yong Zeng.

Investigation: Dongjun Yang.

Resources: Dongjun Yang, Yu He.

Project administration: Yong Xu.

Methodology: Xin Liu.

Formal analysis: Yu He.

Writing – original draft: Jiaojiao Zhou.

Writing – review & editing: Jiaojiao Zhou.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

[1]. Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, et al. Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty. Neurochirurgie 1987;33:166–8.
[2]. Harrington KD. Major neurological complications following percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:1070–3.
[3]. Frankel HL. Ascending cord lesion in the early stages following spinal injury. Paraplegia 1969;7:111–8.
[4]. Al-Nakshabandi NA. Percutaneous vertebroplasty complications. Ann Saudi Med 2011;31:294–7.
[5]. Xu Z, Hao D, Liu T, et al. Cause analysis of open surgery used after percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Med Sci Monit 2016;22:2595–601.
[6]. Jarmundowicz W, Lawicki B, Orkisz S. The effect of prolonged spinal cord compression on the extent of morphological changes in experimental spinal cord injury in rabbits. Neurol Neurochir Pol 1997;31:1177–88.
[7]. Jarmundowicz W, Tosik D, Chlebinski J, et al. The effect of early decompression on the extent of changes in spinal cord microcirculation in experimental traumatic injury to the cord in rabbits. Neurol Neurochir Pol 1997;31:1167–75.
[8]. Evans AJ, Jensen ME, Kip KE, et al. Vertebral compression fractures: pain reduction and improvement in functional mobility after percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty retrospective report of 245 cases. Radiology 2003;226:366–72.
[9]. Carlson GD, Gorden CD, Oliff HS, et al. Sustained spinal cord compression: part I: time-dependent effect on long-term pathophysiology. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85-A:86–94.
[10]. Tarlov IM. Spinal cord compression studies III. Time limits for recovery after gradual compression in dogs. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1954;71:588–97.
[11]. Tarlov IM, Herz E. Spinal cord compression studies IV. Outlook with complete paralysis in man. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1954;72:43–59.
[12]. Tarlov IM, Klinger H. Spinal cord compression studies II. Time limits for recovery after acute compression in dogs. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1954;71:271–90.
[13]. Kearney PA, Ridella SA, ViaNo DC, et al. Interaction of contact velocity and cord compression in determining the severity of spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 1988;5:187–208.
[14]. Dziedzic T, Kunert P, Krych P, Marchel A. Management and neurological outcome of spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma. J Clin Neurosci 2015;22:726–9.
[15]. Foo D, Rossier AB. Preoperative neurological status in predicting surgical outcome of spinal epidural hematomas. Surg Neurol 1981;15:389–401.
[16]. Rajz G, Cohen JE, Harnof S, et al. Spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma: the importance of preoperative neurological status and rapid intervention. J Clin Neurosci 2015;22:123–8.
[17]. McQuarrie IG. Recovery from paraplegia caused by spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma. Neurology 1978;28:224–8.
[18]. Grollmus J, Hoff J. Spontaneous spinal epidural haemorrhage:good results after early treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1975;38:89–90.
[19]. Dolan EJ, Tator CH, Endrenyi L. The value of decompression for acute experimental spinal cord compression injury. J Neurosurg 1980;53:749–55.
[20]. Zhong W, Chen H, You C, et al. Spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma. J Clin Neurosci 2011;18:1490–4.
[21]. Fukui MB, Swarnk, Groen RJ, et al. High blood pressure and the spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma: the misconception about their correlation. Eur J Emerg Med 2008;15:119–20.
[22]. Shin JJ, Kuh SU, Cho YE. Surgical management of spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma. Eur Spine J 2006;15:998–1004.
[23]. Lawton MT, Porter RW, Heiserman JE, et al. Surgical management of spinal epidural hematoma:relationship between surgical timing and neurological outcome. J Neurosurg 1995;83:1–7.
Keywords:

outcome; spinal cord injury; spinal epidural hematoma; vertebroplasty

Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.