1 Introduction
Central nervous system (CNS) disorders are frequent complications after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) occurring in 9% to 14% of patients.[1] CNS involvements are mainly due to infectious complications, stroke, drug toxicity, Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-related posttransplantation lympho-proliferations, and metabolic disorders.[1] Graft versus host disease (GvHD) is one of the most severe complications after allo-HSCT and occurs when donor T cells recognize and target allo-antigens on healthy recipient tissues. Acute GvHD mainly targets skin, gut, and liver, whereas chronic GvHD can affect most of the organs. However, CNS lesions during GvHD are rarely described and remains controversial.[2–4] Indeed, some cases were initially misclassified as CNS GvHD and were later diagnosed as EBV-induced lympho-proliferation through progress in immunochemistry analytical techniques and the use of EBER probes.[2,3] Moreover, Santa Chiara[4] described JC virus-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) as a differential diagnosis of CNS GvHD. Indeed, white-matter lesions described by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in several CNS GvHD cases could also be described in PML.[5]
In 2010, neurological manifestations of chronic GvHD were described as a distinct entity in the Consensus Conference on Clinical Practice in chronic GvHD.[6] The authors proposed the following mandatory criteria for CNS manifestations of chronic GvHD: occurrence of neurological symptoms with chronic GvHD affecting other organs and CNS involvement without other explanations (ie, without any infectious, vascular, drug toxicity, or metabolic etiologies). Other criteria were facultative: paraclinic investigations showing MRI or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) abnormalities, pathological brain biopsy or postmortem examination revealing GvHD lesions, and response to immunosuppressive therapy. The diagnosis of chronic CNS GvHD can be made when both mandatory and 2 facultative criteria are met.[6] The Consensus Conference delineated 3 types of chronic CNS GvHD: cerebrovascular disease, CNS demyelinating disease, and immune-mediated encephalitis.[6] Cerebrovascular disease can affect medium and large vessels causing stroke-like episodes or involve CNS small vessels to induce vasculitis. CNS demyelination disease is described as a relapsing-remitting course resembling multiple sclerosis. Diagnosis is based on association of white-matter lesions with gadolinium enhancement in MRI and CSF abnormalities. Immune-mediated encephalitis is more difficult to diagnose and it is characterized by infiltration of immune cells or humoral factor on brain biopsy.[6] Between 1990 and 2015, only 32 cases of CNS chronic GvHD were reported in literature, among which only 15 were histologically proven. Furthermore, there is no formal definition of acute CNS GvHD in the literature.
Herein, we report 7 cases of CNS GvHD, of which 2 had a biopsy or a postmortem examination. We further describe 32 reported cases of CNS GvHD following a systematic PubMed database literature review.
2 Methods
2.1 Patients
Between 1998 and 2016, 7 patients had been diagnosed with CNS GvHD at Saint-Louis Hospital (France). All patients had received an allo-HSCT and developed CNS symptoms associated with biological or imaging abnormalities, in the absence of other possible etiological causes for CNS abnormalities, such as infection, autoimmune disease, relapse, and lympho-proliferation. Histology was available in 2 cases.
We searched via PubMed in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database for relevant articles using the keywords “allo-HSCT” together with “central nervous system GvHD”. References of all selected articles were reviewed for research of additional case reports. We selected 32 patients, including 15[5,7–14] with histological analysis (brain biopsy, spine biopsy, or autopsy), from 20 articles published between 1990 and December 2016.[5,7–23] Patients were selected if they had received an allo-HSCT for hematological pathology and had CNS abnormalities without another diagnosis (infectious diseases, autoimmune disease, hematologic malignancies relapse, or posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders). All patients signed a consent for registration and use of clinical and biological data (CNIL number 1238249).
2.2 Histology and FISH assay
Paraffin-embedded sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin or periodic acid-Schiff stain, for histopathological analysis. FISH analyses were performed on 2 to 3 μm paraffin of sections biopsies. The paraffin-embedded tissue section slides were processed using the Histology FISH Accessory Kit (Dako, Denmark) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The slide was hybridized overnight with specific probes CEP X(FITC) and Y(SPO) (Vysis Abbott), according to manufacturer's recommendations. Samples were analyzed with an AxioImager; M1 epifluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Hamburg, Germany). Images were captured with a ×63, ×40, or ×16 oil immersion objective and were analyzed by using the Isis software (METAsystems, Altlussheim, Germany) or with Fiji software (ImageJ 1.49m).
2.3 Statistical analysis
Data are described as median for quantitative variables, and frequency and percentage for qualitative variables. Percentages were compared using Fisher exact test. All statistical tests were 2-tailed with a significance level of 0.05. Analyses were performed with R v3.2.4. Data collection and analyzes were conducted in accordance with French national guidelines.
3 Results
3.1 Case 1
The 1st patient was a 33-years-old male who received an allo-HSCT from an HLA-matched unrelated donor for advanced Fanconi anemia associated with myelodysplastic syndrome. He received a reduced intensity conditioning with a total body irradiation of 2 gray, cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. He received cyclosporine A (CsA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as GvHD prophylaxis. Acute skin GvHD (grade I from Glucksberg classification) was diagnosed at day 12 after transplantation. Five months after transplantation, he developed chronic GvHD with lichen planus-like changes of mouth mucosa. Eleven months after transplantation, the patient described 4-limb paresthesia associated with inferior limb motor deficit and abnormal deglutition. CSF analysis revealed a lymphocytic meningitis associated with motor and sensitive neuropathy confirmed with an electromyogram. The patient was treated with 3 courses of intravenous immunoglobulin infusion, corticosteroid therapy (1 mg/kg), and CsA (6 mg/kg), with a good response. CSF analysis showed remaining lymphocytic meningitis 4 and 10 months later. Between 2 and 4 years after transplantation, the patient developed 3 neurological outbreaks, partially remitting, with pyramidal syndrome, posterior cordonal track syndrome, and eventually memory disorders and cranial nerves deficits. Multiple CSF analysis revealed lymphocytic meningitis with CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, absence of bacterial, viral and fungal infection in direct examination, culture and PCR, and absence of autoantibodies in CSF and blood samples. Three years after transplantation, MRI showed a lepto-meningitis and a cervical centro-medullar pan-myelitis (Fig. 1A–F). One year later, MRI uncovered an atypical leucopathy affecting the fornix, the corpus callosum, and centrum semiovale (Fig. 1G–I). Electroneuromyogram showed motor and sensitive neuronopathy. Ten courses of plasmapheresis failed to improve the patient's medical condition. High-dose methylprednisolone (5 bolus followed by oral corticosteroid 1 mg/kg) stabilized symptoms. Finally, a pathological brain biopsy was performed and showed lympho-histiocytic vasculitis without necrosis, perivascular infiltration with CD3+ CD8+ T cells surrounding small and medium vessels, confirming the hypothesis of chronic GvHD of the CNS (Fig. 2). Fluorescent in situ hybridization with centromeric probes X and Y confirmed that perivascular infiltration was composed by donor cells of female origin (Fig. 3). The patient received a 5 bolus of high-dose methylprednisolone followed by oral corticosteroid (1 mg/kg) in combination with mycophenolic acid (30 mg/kg). Immunosuppressive drugs stopped disease progression and improved the patient's quality of life (Table 1).
Figure 1: Head and medullary MRI show central nervous system lesions (case 1,
Table 1). Head MRI showed a lepto-meningitis in sagittal cube-FLAIR sequences (A) and T1 FAT SAT sequences (B), with no vascular lesions in 3D TOF sequence (C). Medullary MRI revealed a centro-medullar pan-myelitis in sagittal T2 sequence (D), T1 FSE (E), and T1 FSE with gadolinium injection (F). After 1 year, a new head MRI uncovered an atypical leucopathy affecting the fornix, the corpus callosum, and centrum semiovale in axial T2 FLAIR sequence (G) and persistence of a pan-myelitis in sagittal T1 FSE (H) and T2 sequence (I). MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; FAT SAT = fat saturation; FLAIR = fluid attenuated inversion recovery; FSE = fast spin echo; TOF = time of flight.
Figure 2: Brain biopsy reveals a cytotoxic T cells perivascular infiltration (case 1,
Table 1). (A) Hematoxylin eosine staining reveals a lympho-histiocytic vasculitis with a perivascular infiltration around small and medium vessels in case 1 (black arrows, magnification ×400). (B) Periodic acid coloration shows that vasculitis is not associated with necrosis (black arrows, magnification ×400). Immunohistochemistry for CD3 (C) and granzyme B (D) confirmed that cellular infiltration is mainly composed of cytotoxic T cells.
Figure 3: Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) on brain biopsy confirms infiltration by donor T cells showing perivascular infiltration by female cells from donor origin (case 1,
Table 1). (A) FISH with centromeric probes for X (green) and Y (red), and DAPI (blue) was performed on paraffin-embedded brain biopsy in case 1. Mosaic of 2 adjacent acquisitions shows cellular infiltration surrounding vessels (DAPI signal in blue, magnification ×160). (B, C) Cellular infiltration is mainly composed of female cells from donor origin, revealed by a double green signal at magnifications ×400 and (D) ×630.
Table 1: Characteristics, CNS manifestation presentation, management, and follow-up of our series of patients.
3.2 Case 2
The 2nd patient was a 62-years-old male who received an allo-HSCT from an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (HLA-A mismatch) for a myelofibrosis after an essential thrombocythemia. He was treated with ruxolitinib, which was discontinued before allo-HSCT (JAK ALLO study, clinical trial registration number NCT01795677). He received a myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen with fludarabine, melphalan, and antithymocyte globulins. He was then treated with cyclosporine A (CsA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as prophylaxis of GvHD. He developed skin, gut, and liver acute GvHD (grade III) at day 101 posttransplantation. He was treated with intravenous methylprednisolone at 2 mg/kg and reached complete remission at day 3 of treatment. At day 13, after a reduction in corticosteroid therapy, a new gut acute GvHD outbreak was successfully treated with tacrolimus and sirolimus. Five months after transplantation, the patient exhibited confusion with a rapid progression to coma. Electroencephalogram revealed an encephalopathy. CSF analysis showed elevated protein (1.6 g/L) and lymphocytosis. CNS screening by both MRI and scanner were normal. No evidence for infection, metabolic, or autoimmune diseases were found. The patient's neurological state did not improve after large spectrum antibiotic, antiviral, and antiepileptic treatment. Finally, due to difficulty with swallowing, he was transferred to an intensive care unit for tracheal intubation. He developed a Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia and died of acute respiratory distress syndrome and septic shock. Brain postmortem examination uncovered a perivascular T cell infiltrate with diffuse gliosis and was considered as a GvHD of CNS (Table 1).
3.3 Case 3
The 3rd patient was a 65-years-old woman who received an allo-HCST from an unrelated HLA-matched donor for a myeloproliferative neoplasm with JAK2 V617F and SRSF2 mutations. She received ruxolitinib, which was discontinued before allo-HSCT. She had a MAC regimen with fludarabine and melphalan. She was treated with CsA and MMF as GvHD prophylaxis. She developed skin, gut, and liver acute GvHD (grade III according Glucksberg classification) at day 7 posttransplantation. At day 9, she presented an encephalitis confirmed with an electroencephalogram. MRI showed a hyper-T2 focal lesion of the left hemisphere, and CSF analysis revealed lymphocytosis with 100% of cells from donor origin confirmed with molecular chimerism. CSF and blood analysis showed absence of bacterial, viral and fungal infection by direct examination, and culture and PCR. She was treated with methylprednisolone (2 mg/kg) without response. Despite the treatment, the patient's neurological symptoms worsened, resulting in coma. Eventually, she developed pneumonia and multivisceral failures and deceased at day 14 (Table 1). The chronology of CNS alteration, the donor lymphocytosis in CSF, and the absence of toxic or infectious diagnosis suggested that the patient developed acute GVHD-related encephalitis.
3.4 Others cases
Four other patients with GVHD-related CNS involvement were identified during this period. Patients’ characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Clinical presentation was polymorph but always characterized by neurological symptoms associated with CNS lesions. Most patients had MRI or CSF abnormalities, with a constant cerebellum involvement. Case 4 and 5 had multiple sclerosis-like presentations with a remission-remittent course. Case 6 developed progressive encephalitis. Case 7 had a stroke-like presentation. Cases 4, 6, and 7 were treated with corticosteroids, whereas case 5 was treated with ciclosporin A. Case 4 received additional courses of plasmapheresis and intraveinous immunoglobulin. Only 2 patients are still alive at the end of follow-up and only 1 patient reached complete response with immunosuppressive drugs.
4 Discussion and literature review
Between 1990 and December 2016, 7 cases of CNS GvHD (Table 1) were diagnosed in Saint-Louis Hospital, France, and 32 cases were reported in literature (Table 2).
Table 2: Characteristics, CNS manifestation presentation, management, and outcome of 33 patients with CNS GvHD described in literature.
Table 2: (Continued) Characteristics, CNS manifestation presentation, management, and outcome of 33 patients with CNS GvHD described in literature.
4.1 Patients’ characteristics
In our cohort and in literature, sex ratio was 1.3 and median age at HSCT was 35 years old (0.67–68). Allogeneic stem cell transplantations were performed for acute myelogenous leukemia (n = 9),[7,10,12,13,18,19] myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 1),[17] acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 4),[5,8,12,24] myeloproliferative neoplasm (n = 3), chronic myelogenous leukemia (n = 6),[11–13] chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (n = 1),[19] lymphoma (n = 9),[5,9,14–16,20–22,25] chronic lymphoid leukemia (n = 1),[13] constitutional bone marrow failure (n = 3),[13] and aplastic anemia (n = 2).[8,23] Fourteen patients received MAC,[5,9,10,13,17,18,21] 7 reduced intensity conditioning,[5,14,16,19,22] 1 patient did not have any conditioning,[13] and 1 had sequential conditioning.[19] Donors were matched-related donor (n = 14),[5,7,9,15,17–19,21,23] matched-unrelated donor (n = 8),[8,13,16,19,22] mismatch-unrelated donor (n = 3),[10] cord blood (n = 2),[5] and haplo-identical T depleted cells (n = 1).[13] Acute GvHD history was reported for 26 cases, among them, 21 patients had at least 1 episode of acute GvHD.[5,10,12,16,18,20–22,26] Moreover, chronic GvHD episodes were reported before or during neurological symptoms in 25 patients[5,8,9,11–15,17,18,23,25] whereas 11 patients had no other cGvHD symptoms than those attributed to CNS GvHD[10,16,19–22,24] (Table 3).
Table 3: Clinical feature of 39 patients with possible CNS GvHD.
4.2 Clinical features and histological results
Among the 39 patients with CNS GvHD, median symptoms onset was 385 days after HCST (7–7320). In our cohort and in literature, only immunosuppression modulations were found as triggering factor. Fourteen patients developed their neurological symptoms after decreased (cases 2, 5, and 6, and 3 patients from the literature)[9,11,18] or discontinuation (8 patients from the literature)[5,12–14,17,22] of immunosuppressive therapy after a median delay of 124.5 days (14–549). Interestingly, 1 patient received donor lymphocyte infusion for malignancy relapse and developed neurological symptoms 3 days later.[7] Thirteen patients (cases 1, 3, 4, and 7, and 9 patients from the literature)[10,12,15,16,19–21,23] were already treated with immunosuppressive drugs at neurological symptoms onset.
Clinical features were heterogeneous: 7 patients developed stroke-like episodes (case 7 and 6 patients from the literature),[12,15,24,26] 3 patients developed lacunar syndrome,[12,13] 7 patients had multiple sclerosis-like presentation (cases 1, 4, and 5, and 4 patients from the literature),[17,19,25] 4 patients had acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis-like presentation,[7,16] 14 patients had an encephalitis (cases 2, 3, and 6, and 11 literature patients),[5,8,10,11,13,20–23] 1 patient had a mass syndrome,[9] and 3 had nonspecific clinical presentations.[13,14,18]
Histological data were available for 17 patients. According to the Conference Consensus definition of CNS GvHD histological classification,[6] neurological vasculitis was founded in 7 biopsies (case 1 and 6 patients from the literature),[10,12,13] demyelinating lesions in 5 biopsies[7,12,13] (3 patients presented both vasculitis and demyelinating lesions),[12,13] immune-mediated encephalitis in 5 biopsies (case 2 and 6 patients from the literature),[5,8,11,14] and 1 patient had noncaseating granuloma.[9]
4.3 CNS GvHD diagnosis
In the Consensus Conference, occurrence of chronic GvHD affecting other organs is one of mandatory criteria to diagnose chronic CNS GvHD.[6] No diagnosis criteria for acute GvHD were defined in literature. In our cohort and in previously published cases, 11 patients (28%), of whom 2 had a brain biopsy, did not have extra-CNS chronic GvHD. Interestingly, these patients had a different clinical presentation compared to patients with extra-CNS chronic GvHD history. First, CNS GvHD appeared earlier in this population: median neurological symptoms onset delay was 81.5 days (range 7–1095) versus 549 days (range 119–7300) for patients with extra-CNS chronic GvHD, P = .001. In the group of patients without chronic GvHD history, 8 patients out of 11 (73%) had an acute GvHD history and 3 patients had active acute GvHD at neurological symptoms onset (case 3 and 2 patients from the literature).[20,21] Moreover, clinical presentations seem to be different. Encephalitis was more frequent in the group of patients without chronic GvHD: 7/11 patients (64%, cases 2, 3, and 6, and 4 patients from the literature)[10,20–22] versus 7/25 patients (28%), P = .07. Conversely, stroke-like episodes and lacunar syndromes were less frequent: 1/11 (9%)[24] versus 9/25 patients (36%), P = .13. This suggests that early encephalitis after allo-HSCT may be a clinical presentation of CNS involvement during acute GvHD (Table 4). However, due to the rarity of this complication, we were not able to identify in our series or in literature, patients at risk to develop CNS GvHD.
Table 4: Analysis of patients with or without history of extra-CNS chronic GvHD.
Consensus conference distinguishes 3 presentations of GvHD: cerebrovascular disease, demyelinating disease, and immune-mediated encephalitis.[6] This study highlights the link between clinical presentation and histological lesions. Large and medium vessels vasculitis can be revealed by stroke-like episode or lacunar syndrome. Demyelinating disease can arise as acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis or as multiple sclerosis-like episodes. Both of these histological forms can be diagnosed by the association of specific clinical, biological, and imaging evidences (Table 2). However, histological sampling and analysis remains the only way to formally distinguish small vessel vasculitis and immune-mediated encephalitis, as both lesions might induce encephalitis symptoms (Table 2). Moreover, the biopsy may also help to exclude differential diagnoses such as EBV-related lymphoproliferative disorders. Interestingly, we were able to confirm in 2 cases that immune infiltration was of donor origin. In case of sex-mismatch, centromeric XY FISH assay is an easy way to determine the origin of infiltrating immune cells. Molecular chimerism can also be used when FISH cannot be performed and can also be applied to lymphocytes detected in CSF.
4.4 Treatment and outcome
Of 35 patients with available data, 34[5,7,9,10,12–17,19–23,25] received immunosuppressive therapy: 31 patients had been treated with corticosteroids[5,7,9,10,12–14,16,17,19–25] in combination with at least another immunosuppressive drug in 19 patients.[7,9,12–14,17,19,20,23,25] Other immunosuppressive treatments included intravenous immunoglobulin (IV Ig) (n = 6), plasmapheresis (n = 3),[25] cyclophosphamide (n = 9),[12,13,19,25] anticalcineurin inhibitors (n = 4),[9,15,17] mycophenolate mofetil (n = 3),[14] and methotrexate (n = 1), and 1 patient was also treated with etoposide because of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis[20] (Table 5).
Table 5: Treatment and outcome of 39 patients with CNS GvHD.
With immunosuppressive therapy, 10 patients reached complete response,[5,12,13,16,18,19,22,24] 15 had a partial response,[7,9,10,13,15,17,19,21,23] and 2 had a transient response[5,25] (TR). Disease remains stable for 2 patients[12] and 7 patients had progressive disease.[12,14,20] Data were not available for 3 patients (Table 5).
At last follow-up, 7 patients (18%) were alive[5,7,16–18] and 18 patients (46%) were deceased.[5,7,8,11–14,20,21] Data were not available for 14 patients (Table 5).
4.5 Pathophysiology of CNS GvHD
CNS involvement of GvHD is controversial, especially since clinical manifestations of CNS GvHD are heterogeneous: cerebrovascular manifestations,[12,15,24,26] encephalitis,[5,8,9,11,14,20–22] or myelitis.[7,16–19] Interestingly, some human cases were histologically proven and revealed frequent T cell infiltration, supporting the hypothesis of an immune-mediated CNS disease after allo-HSCT. Furthermore, several animal models, including primate models, bring some evidence of CNS targeting by donor T cells during GvHD. In rat disease models, it has been demonstrated that GvHD was associated with diminished cerebellar RNA synthesis and transcription, and with ectopic protein and change in protein expression profile compared to syngeneic controls.[27] In addition, immunosuppressive treatment of GvHD was able to restore cerebellar RNA synthesis and protein expression.[28] In rat models of allo-HSCT, expression of c-Fos, a neural activation marker, increased in piriform, occipital, visual, and prefrontal neurons 3 days after GvHD onset.[29] In murine models, allogeneic HSCT was also associated with a donor T cells-mediated alloimmune response in brain. Compared to syngeneic control, brain necropsies of transplanted mice revealed T cell infiltration, microglia activation, and angiitis-like abnormalities.[30] In rats, T cell infiltration of CNS was associated with increased expression of class I and class II major histocompatibility antigens.[31] In mouse models, cerebral endothelial adhesion molecule expression was modified: ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 expression were upregulated and could contribute to T cell infiltration in neural tissues.[26] Recently, it has been demonstrated in murine[32] and primate[33] models with acute GvHD, that neurological symptoms and behavior modifications were caused by alloreactive activated donor CD8+ T cells.[32,33] T cell infiltration was prevented by immune prophylaxis.[33] Few data are available about human CNS GvHD pathophysiology. Infiltration of T cells was described in 8 biopsies (case 1 and 2, and 6 patients from literature).[5,8,9,14] Consistently with data obtained in animal models, this infiltration was mainly composed of CD3+CD8+ cytotoxic T cells in 3 brain biopsies (case 1 and 2 biopsies from literature)[5,14] whereas only 1 showed CD3+/CD4+ cells infiltration.[5] A recent paper demonstrated that this infiltration let to inflammatory cytokine production. IL-6 production together with indoleamine 2,3 deoxygenase upregulation played a central role in CNS GvHD by its action on host microglial cells.[34] In this model, IL-6 blockade could partially reversed neuroinflammation.
To conclude, despite the paucity of human CNS GvHD described in the literature, analysis of CNS clinical biopsies and necropsies suggests that the CNS may be a target of GvHD. CNS GvHD is a rare and severe complication after allo-HSCT that can be difficult to diagnose. MRI and CSF analysis should be performed to eliminate all other etiology of CNS disorders, especially infections, drug toxicity, or relapses of underlying malignancies. Although brain biopsy may be difficult to achieve, histological analysis is useful to eliminate other diagnoses. CNS GvHD treatment is not consensual and mainly based on immunosuppressive drugs, especially high-dose corticosteroids. However, despite a frequent response to treatment, CNS GvHD remains associated with a dismal prognosis.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr Pervinder Sagoo for her careful reading of the manuscript.
References
[1]. Syed FI, Couriel DR, Frame D, et al. Central nervous system complications of hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2016;30:887–98.
[2]. Armstrong D, Hawkins E, Rouah E, et al. Graft-vs-host disease in the central nervous system. Am J Clin Pathol 1997;107:379.
[3]. Rouah E, Gruber R, Shearer W, et al. Graft-versus-host disease in the central nervous system: a real entity? Am J Clin Pathol 1988;89:543–6.
[4]. Santa Chiara U. Central nervous system graft-versus-host disease: consider progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy among the differential diagnoses. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007;40:1095–6.
[5]. Kamble RT, Chang CC, Sanchez S, et al. Central nervous system graft-versus-host disease: report of two cases and literature review. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007;39:49–52.
[6]. Grauer O, Wolff D, Bertz H, et al. Neurological manifestations of chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: report from the Consensus Conference on Clinical Practice in chronic graftversus-host disease. Brain 2010;133:2852–65.
[7]. Delios AM, Rosenblum M, Jakubowski AA, et al. Central and peripheral nervous system immune mediated demyelinating disease after allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematologic disease. J Neurooncol 2012;110:251–6.
[8]. Iwasaki Y, Sako K, Ohara Y, et al. Subacute panencephalitis associated with chronic graft-versus-host disease. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1993;85:566–72.
[9]. Kew AK, Macaulay R, Burrell S, et al. Central nervous system graft-versus-host disease presenting with granulomatous encephalitis. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007;40:183–4.
[10]. Ma M, Barnes G, Pulliam J, et al. CNS angiitis in graft vs host disease. Neurology 2002;59:1994–7.
[11]. Marosi C, Budka H, Grimm G, et al. Fatal encephalitis in a patient with chronic graft-versus-host disease. Bone Marrow Transplant 1990;6:53–7.
[12]. Padovan CS, Bise K, Hahn J, et al. Angiitis of the central nervous system after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation? Stroke J Cereb Circ 1999;30:1651–6.
[13]. Sostak P, Padovan CS, Eigenbrod S, et al. Cerebral angiitis in four patients with chronic GVHD. Bone Marrow Transplant 2010;45:1181–8.
[14]. Saad AG, Alyea EP, Wen PY, et al. Graft-versus-host disease of the CNS after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:e147–9.
[15]. Campbell JN, Morris PP. Cerebral vasculitis in graft-versus-host disease: a case report. Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:654–6.
[16]. Harvey CM, Gottipati R, Schwarz S, et al. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis following allo-SCT: central nervous system manifestation of GVHD. Bone Marrow Transplant 2014;49:854–6.
[17]. Matsuo Y, Kamezaki K, Takeishi S, et al. Encephalomyelitis mimicking multiple sclerosis associated with chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Intern Med 2009;48:1453–6.
[18]. Tomonari A, Tojo A, Adachi D, et al. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia. Ann Hematol 2003;82:37–40.
[19]. Voss M, Bischof F. Recurrent myelitis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Report of two cases. BMC Neurol 2010;10:1.
[20]. Yamamoto H, Uchida N, Ishiwata K, et al. Possible graft-versus-host disease involving the central nervous system soon after cord blood transplantation. Am J Hematol 2009;84:764–6.
[21]. Provenzale JM, Graham ML. Reversible leukoencephalopathy associated with graft-versus-host disease: MR findings. Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:1290–4.
[22]. Shortt J, Hutton E, Faragher M, et al. Central nervous system graft-versus-host disease post allogeneic stem cell transplant. Br J Haematol 2006;132:245–7.
[23]. Rathore GS, Leung KS, Muscal E. Autoimmune encephalitis following bone marrow transplantation. Pediatr Neurol 2015;53:253–6.
[24]. Takatsuka H, Okamoto T, Yamada S, et al. New imaging findings in a patient with central nervous system dysfunction after bone marrow transplantation. Acta Haematol 2000;103:203–5.
[25]. Solaro C, Murialdo A, Giunti D, et al. Central and peripheral nervous system complications following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Eur J Neurol 2001;8:77–80.
[26]. Sostak P. Cerebral endothelial expression of adhesion molecules in mice with chronic graft-versus-host disease. Stroke 2004;35:1158–63.
[27]. Griffin WST, Head JR, Pardue S, et al. Changes in RNA synthesis and messenger RNA content in the cerebellum of rats with graft versus host disease. J Neurochem 1980;35:880–8.
[28]. Griffin WST, Snider BJ, Morrison MR. Normalization of cerebellar RNA synthesis and mRNA levels after treatment of graft versus host disease. J Neurochem 1982;39:1412–7.
[29]. Furukawa H, Yamashita A, del Rey A, et al. c-Fos expression in the rat cerebral cortex during systemic GvH reaction. Neuroimmunomodulation 2004;11:425–33.
[30]. Padovan CS, Gerbitz A, Sostak P, et al. Cerebral involvement in graft-versus-host disease after murine bone marrow transplantation. Neurology 2001;56:1106–8.
[31]. Hickey WF, Kimura H. Graft-vs.-host disease elicits expression of class I and class II histocompatibility antigens and the presence of scattered T lymphocytes in rat central nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1987;84:2082–6.
[32]. Hartrampf S, Dudakov JA, Johnson LK, et al. The central nervous system is a target of acute graft versus host disease in mice. Blood 2013;121:1906–10.
[33]. Kaliyaperumal S, Watkins B, Sharma P, et al. CD8-predominant T-cell CNS infiltration accompanies GVHD in primates and is improved with immunoprophylaxis. Blood 2014;123:1967–9.
[34]. Belle L, Zhou V, Stuhr KL, et al. Host interleukin 6 production regulates inflammation but not tryptophan metabolism in the brain during murine GVHD. JCI Insight 2017;2: