Journal Logo

Research Article: Clinical Case Report

Percutaneous pinning after prolonged skeletal traction with the hip in a flexed position for unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis

A case series of 11 patients

Matsushita, Masaki MD, PhDa; Mishima, Kenichi MD, PhDa; Iwata, Kohji MDb; Hattori, Tadashi MD, PhDb; Ishiguro, Naoki MD, PhDa; Kitoh, Hiroshi MD, PhDa,*

Editor(s): Mayr., Johannes

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006662
  • Open

Abstract

1 Introduction

Unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) has a significant risk of avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head.[1] The exact etiology of AVN has not been determined, but potential mechanisms for the development of AVN may partially depend on the type of treatment.[2] Recently, favorable clinical outcome with a low incidence of AVN was demonstrated by the modified Dunn procedure.[3–5] On the contrary, closed reduction and screw fixation have shown a relatively higher rate of AVN, ranging from 20% to 50%.[6] Parsch et al[7] reported a low AVN rate (<10%) by controlled gentle reduction and K-wire fixation associated with capsulotomy for evacuation of intra-articular effusion or hematoma. Safe and reliable treatment for unstable SCFE, however, has not been established.

There are some reports showing that the duration from onset of the disease to surgical intervention correlated to the occurrence of AVN. The period from 24 hours to 7 days after onset is accepted to be “unsafe window,” which shows a higher risk of ANV.[8,9] Several investigators have recommended an urgent (before 24 hours) surgical reduction to relieve the pressure and allow reperfusion of the femoral head.[10] Others recommend that definitive stabilization should be delayed for at least 7 days to allow the inflammation and synovitis to settle.[11,12] Vegter[13] proposed that increased intra-articular pressure of the hip associated with excess joint fluid should be treated by traction in a flexed position until the effusion settles. To decrease intra-articular pressure and prevent the occurrence of AVN, we applied skeletal traction with the hip in a flexed position during the acute phase (more than 7 days) for unstable SCFE.

We retrospectively reviewed clinical outcome of unstable SCFE patients who were treated with the standardized protocol in our institution and an affiliated hospital between 2003 and 2013. Our protocol included 1 week or more of preoperative skeletal traction with an affected hip in a flexed position and subsequent percutaneous pinning after unintentional reduction. We found less femoral head deformity with a low rate of AVN in our case series. We propose our technique could be 1 of the therapeutic options for the treatment of unstable SCFE.

2 Patients and methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and radiographs of all SCFE patients who were surgically treated at our institution and an affiliated hospital between 2003 and 2013 with the institutional review board approval of Nagoya University Hospital. Unstable SCFE was determined according to the report of Loder et al.[1] Inclusion criteria were the unstable SCFE patients who had adequate clinical, radiological, and operative documentation, and were followed at least 1 year after surgery.

We investigated the age at onset, the body mass index (BMI), the presence of hormonal abnormalities, and the duration between onset and surgery. The head shaft angle (HSA) and the posterior tilting angle (PTA) were measured based on anteroposterior and Lauenstein radiographs of the hip, respectively. Preoperative PTA could not been obtained in some patients because it was too difficult to keep Lauenstein position due to their severe hip pain. Postoperative HSA was measured by the radiographs taken within 1 month after the surgery. The PTA was evaluated postoperatively (within 1 month after surgery) and at the latest follow-up. We investigated the range of motion (ROM) of the hip, and clinical outcome was evaluated based on the modified Harris hip score (mHHS) at the latest follow-up.

Our treatment regimen for unstable SCFE patients had been standardized as follows. Immediately after the diagnosis of unstable SCFE, a Kirscher wire was inserted in the distal femur just proximal to the growth plate under local anesthesia. Then, skeletal traction was commenced with an affected hip in a flexed position of approximately 45 degrees to obtain gradual reduction and reduce intra-articular pressure as much as possible. After more than 1 week of traction period, the patient was transferred to the operating room and fixed gently in a traction table without intensive traction under general anesthesia. Epiphysiodesis was, then, performed using 2 cannulated SCFE screws (DePuy Synthes, Tokyo, Japan) to obtain firm fixation against the unstable epiphysis. No postoperative immobilization was encouraged, but weight-bearing was prohibited for a minimal period of 3 months after surgery. After confirming that there was no presence of AVN by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and also radiographs at 3 months after surgery, partial weight-bearing was allowed. Full weight-bearing was commenced at 6 months after surgery. Nonweight-bearing period was extended when the AVN was found.

3 Results

Details of unstable SCFE patients in the current study were shown in Table 1. There were 8 boys and 3 girls with an average age at surgery of 11.7 years old (range 8.8–14.2 years old) and an average BMI of 24.5 kg/mm2 (range 13.8–35.5 kg/mm2). No patient had hormonal abnormalities in this study. The average duration between onset and surgery was 11.5 days (range 8–16 days). The average HSA was 126 degrees (range 104–146 degrees) preoperatively and 141 degrees (range 117–154 degrees) postoperatively. The average postoperative and the latest PTA were 30.7 degrees (range 19–43 degrees) and 21.5 degrees (range 9–35 degrees), respectively. Neither pain nor significant limited ROM of the hip joint was observed in patients at the time of final follow-up (Table 2). All patients had a perfect score of mHHS with 2.8 years of average follow-up period (Fig. 1).

T1-7
Table 1:
Details of unstable SCFE patients.
T2-7
Table 2:
Pain and range of motion at the latest follow-up.
F1-7
Figure 1:
Preoperative anteroposterior hip radiograph of case 6 (A) demonstrating severely displaced femoral epiphysis with the HSA of 104 degrees. Postoperative anteroposterior (B) and Lauenstein (C) hip radiographs revealing reduced femoral epiphysis with the HSA of 146 degrees and the PTA of 33 degrees. Anteroposterior (D) and Lauenstein (E) hip radiographs at the age of 14 years demonstrating spherical femoral head with no evidence of avascular necrosis. HSA = head shaft angle, PTA = posterior tilting angle.

We observed AVN in 1 patient. He showed an uneventful postoperative clinical course, but tiny linear low-intensity area at the subchondral region was observed on the T1 and T2-weighted MRI scan routinely taken at 3 months after surgery (Fig. 2), suggesting the possibility of localized AVN of the femoral head at the weight-bearing surface. We thus continued nonweight-bearing treatment until the confirmation of disappearance of the abnormal finding on MRI. Partial and full weight-bearing were allowed at 1.3 and 1.5 years after surgery, respectively, and he gained full activity without pain and limitation of ROM of the hip joint at the latest follow-up.

F2-7
Figure 2:
Anteroposterior (A) and Lauenstein (B) hip radiographs of case 10 demonstrating posteriorly displaced femoral epiphysis with the HSA of 141 degrees and the PTA of 35 degrees. Postoperative anteroposterior hip radiograph showing reduced femoral epiphysis of the affected side and prophylactic pinning on the contralateral side (C). Coronal T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hip taken at 3 months after surgery indicating linear low-intensity area at the subchondral bone region of the affected hip (D). Coronal T1-weighted MRI of the hip taken at 1 year after surgery demonstrating disappearance of the abnormal signal intensity observed in previous films (E). Anteroposterior hip radiograph (F) at the age of 10.8 years showing spherical femoral head with no evidence of collapse. HSA = head shaft angle, PTA = posterior tilting angle.

4 Discussion

We have shown a favorable outcome of the unstable SCFE patients treated with prolonged skeletal traction with an affected hip in a flexed position and subsequent percutaneous pinning after unintentional reduction position. This technique is easy and minimally invasive with a low incidence of AVN compared with open surgeries such as the Dunn procedure.

The posterior-superior retinacular vessels provide the major blood supply to the epiphysis of the femoral head.[14] Kinking or twisting of these blood vessels may compromise the blood flow to the femoral epiphysis in a traumatic circumstance, as in unstable SCFE. Gradual hip traction in a flexed position could facilitate a reduction of the posteriorly displaced femoral epiphysis atraumatically, and relieve the kinking or twisting of these vessels.

An inflammatory effusion and increased intra-articular pressure associated with an unstable SCFE might further compromise an already tenuous blood supply.[15] Therefore, it is important to reduce the intra-articular pressure to prevent the development of AVN in unstable SCFE. Vegter[13] investigated the intra-articular pressure in patients with transient synovitis and Perthes disease, and demonstrated that extension and internal rotation caused an increase in intra-articular pressure which may compromise the blood supply to the capital epiphysis of the femur. The human cadaver study indicated that intra-articular pressure of the hip joint depended mainly on the position of the joint, and it showed the lowest in 45 degrees of flexion.[16] We believe that gradual traction with the affected hip in a flexed position of 45 degrees contributed to prevention of occurrence of AVN by reducing intra-articular pressure in the current study.

Jones et al[17] suggested that in situ pinning may result in impingement of moderate and severe (more than 30 degrees of Southwick angle) acute SCFE. The average final PTA was 21.5 degrees in the current cases, whereas postoperative PTA was 30.7 degrees. Even after stabilization of the slipped epiphysis, femoral neck growth and remodeling were seen radiologically,[18] and also histologically.[19] Actually, there were no patients who showed femoroacetabular impingement in the current study. Even if the mild slip remained just after the surgery, femoroacetabular impingement could be avoidable through the remodeling of femoral head during the residual growth.[17,18]

Prolonged skeletal traction with the hip in a flexed position and subsequent screw fixation with an unintentional reduction is a novel and easy technique with a low incidence of complications for the treatment of unstable SCFE. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to determine if the current procedure can maintain the proximal femoral morphology without AVN and delay the onset and progression of osteoarthritis.

References

[1]. Loder RT, Richards BS, Shapiro PS, et al. Acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis: the importance of physical stability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75:1134–40.
[2]. Zaltz I, Baca G, Clohisy JC. Unstable SCFE: review of treatment modalities and prevalence of osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:2192–8.
[3]. Ziebarth K, Zilkens C, Spencer S, et al. Capital realignment for moderate and severe SCFE using a modified Dunn procedure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:704–16.
[4]. Slongo T, Kakaty D, Krause F, et al. Treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis with a modified Dunn procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:2898–908.
[5]. Huber H, Dora C, Ramseier LE, et al. Adolescent slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated by a modified Dunn osteotomy with surgical hip dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93:833–8.
[6]. Wenger DR, Bomar JD. Acute, unstable, slipped capital femoral epiphysis: is there a role for in situ fixation? J Pediatr Orthop 2014;34(suppl 1):S11–7.
[7]. Parsch K, Weller S, Parsch D. Open reduction and smooth Kirschner wire fixation for unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 2009;29:1–8.
[8]. Kalogrianitis S, Tan CK, Kemp GJ, et al. Does unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis require urgent stabilization? J Pediatr Orthop B 2007;16:6–9.
[9]. Kohno Y, Nakashima Y, Kitano T, et al. Is the timing of surgery associated with avascular necrosis after unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis? A multicenter study. J Orthop Sci 2017;22:112–5.
[10]. Gordon JE, Abrahams MS, Dobbs MB, et al. Early reduction, arthrotomy, and cannulated screw fixation in unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis treatment. J Pediatr Orthop 2002;22:352–8.
[11]. Uglow MG, Clarke NM. The management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:631–5.
[12]. Dietz FR. Traction reduction of acute and acute-on-chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Clin Orthop 1994;302:101–10.
[13]. Vegter J. The influence of joint posture on intra-articular pressure. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987;69:71–4.
[14]. Trueta J. The normal vascular anatomy of the femoral head in adult man. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;334:6–14.
[15]. Casey BH, Hamilton HW, Bobechko WP. Reduction of acutely slipped upper femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1972;54:607–14.
[16]. Schwarz N, Leixnering M, Hopf R, et al. Pressure-volume ratio in human cadaver hip joints. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1988;107:322–5.
[17]. Jones CE, Cooper AP, Doucette J, et al. Relationships between severity of deformity and impingement in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 2015;[Epub ahead of print].
[18]. Hansson G, Billing L, Högstedt B, et al. Long-term results after nailing in situ of slipped upper femoral epiphysis. A 30-year follow-up of 59 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998;80:70–7.
[19]. Guzzanti V, Falciglia F, Stanitski CL, et al. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: physical histologic features before and after fixation. J Pediatr Orthop 2003;23:571–7.
Keywords:

avascular necrosis; skeletal traction; slipped capital femoral epiphysis; unstable

Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.