Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

New-onset ventricular arrhythmias post radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Wu, Lingmin MD, PhDa; Lu, Yanlai PhDb; Yao, Yan MD, PhD, FHRSa,*; Zheng, Lihui MD, PhDa; Chen, Gang MDa; Ding, Ligang MD, PhDa; Hou, Bingbo MD, PhDa; Qiao, Yu MDa; Sun, Wei MDa; Zhang, Shu MD, PhDa

Section Editor(s): Sardu., Celestino

doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004648
Research Article: Observational Study
Open

As a new complication, new-onset ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) post atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation have not been well defined. This prospective study aimed to describe the details of new-onset VAs post AF ablation in a large study cohort.

One thousand fifty-three consecutive patients who underwent the first radiofrequency catheter ablation for AF were enrolled. All patients had no evidence of pre-ablation VAs. New-onset VAs were defined as new-onset ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular contractions (PVC) ≥1000/24 h within 1 month post ablation.

There were 46 patients (4.4%) who had 62 different new-onset VAs, among whom 42 were PVC alone, and 4 were PVC coexisting with nonsustained VT. Multivariate analysis showed that increased serum leukocyte counts ≥50% post ablation were independently associated with new-onset VAs (OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.0–3.5; P = 0.043). The median number of PVC was 3161 (1001–27,407) times/24 h. Outflow tract VAs were recorded in 35 (76.1%) patients. No significant differences were found in origin of VAs (P = 0.187). VAs disappeared without any treatment in 6 patients (13.0%). No VAs-related adverse cardiac event occurred.

The study revealed a noticeable prevalence but relatively benign prognosis of new-onset VAs post AF ablation. Increased serum leukocyte counts ≥50% post ablation appeared to be associated with new-onset VAs, implying that inflammatory response caused by ablation might be the mechanism.

aState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing

bDepartment of Immunology, Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.

Correspondence: Yan Yao, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, People's Republic of China (e-mail: ianyao@263.net.cn).

Abbreviations: AF = atrial fibrillation, CPVI = circumferential pulmonary vein isolation, HR = heart rate, LA = left atrium, LV = left ventricle, LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction, LVOT = left ventricular outflow tract, NT-proBNP = N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, OT = outflow tract, PVC = premature ventricular contractions, RFCA = radiofrequency catheter ablation, RVOT = right ventricular outflow tract, VAs = ventricular arrhythmias, VT = ventricular tachycardia.

LW and YL contributed equally to this work.

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Received May 1, 2016

Received in revised form July 15, 2016

Accepted July 31, 2016

Back to Top | Article Outline

1 Introduction

Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly used.[1] Extensive ablation strategies including circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI), multilinear ablation, and complex fractionated atrial electrograms elimination are usually performed to improve the outcome.[2–5] However, extensive ablation may lead to more complications. Patel et al[6] first reported the new-onset outflow tract (OT) ventricular premature depolarization post RFCA in 53 AF patients. However, the small size of the study cohort limited their conclusion. In this prospective study, we aimed to describe the details of new-onset ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) post AF ablation in a large cohort, and to examine clinical variables associated with new-onset VAs.

Back to Top | Article Outline

2 Methods

2.1 Study population

The study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent the first RFCA for AF at our institution between January 2010 and July 2014. All patients failed to respond to antiarrhythmic drugs for rhythm control. The exclusion criteria included: patients had clinical history of VAs or structural heart diseases; patients had previous AF ablation history; patients had diseases which could affect the inflammatory state including pericarditis, myocarditis, connective tissue diseases, chronic inflammatory disease, infectious diseases, hepatic and renal dysfunction; patients had procedure-related cardiac tamponade or myocardial infarction. Paroxysmal AF was defined as AF that terminated spontaneously or with intervention within 7 days of onset, persistent AF was defined as continuous AF sustained beyond 7 days.[1] The study was approved by the local ethical research committee. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Back to Top | Article Outline

2.2 Electrophysiological study and ablation procedure

All patients underwent 24-h 12-lead Holter and 48-h telemetry monitoring within 1 month before ablation. The procedure was performed under conscious sedation with an intravenous injection of midazolam and flurbiprofen. Three-dimensional geometry of the left atrium (LA) and pulmonary veins were constructed under the guidance of the Ensite NavX (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN) or electroanatomical mapping system (CARTO, Biosense Webster Inc., Diamond Bar, CA).

All patients underwent CPVI, CPVI in combination with linear ablation, or pure linear ablation. The strategy of linear ablation has been previously reported.[3,4] A 4-mm or 3.5-mm irrigated-tip ablation catheter (IBI, St. Jude Medical, Irvine, CA or Thermo Cool Navi-Star, Biosense Webster Inc., Diamond Bar, CA), or an 8-mm-tip ablation catheter (Bard Electrophysiology, Lowell or St. Jude Medical, Irvine) was used. For irrigated-tip catheters, radiofrequency lesions were made at a target temperature of 43°C and maximum output of 40 W. For the 8-mm-tip catheters, settings of temperature ≤58°C and power ≤60 W were used.

Back to Top | Article Outline

2.3 Data collection and follow-up

All patients were monitored for 48 h in hospital after ablation. Previously ineffective antiarrhythmic drugs were continued for 3 months. Routine blood examinations made including level of serum N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and C-reactive protein before ablation. Post-ablation routine blood tests were repeated within 24 h. Follow-up including echocardiography, electrocardiogram, and 24-h 12-lead Holter were obtained at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation. In addition, electrocardiograms were recorded at the times of symptoms, and 12-lead Holters were also repeated in patients without recorded VAs.

New-onset VAs were defined as new-onset ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular contraction (PVC) ≥1000/24 h within 1 month post ablation. Nonsustained VT was defined as runs of beats arising from the ventricles with duration between 3 beats and 30 s and with cycle length of <600 ms.[7] OT VAs were defined as VT/PVC with a QRS complex >120 ms, positive deflection in inferior wall leads. VAs originating from right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) were defined as an inferior axis in the frontal plane and left bundle branch block configuration with precordial R/S transition after lead V3 or R/S transition later than sinus rhythm, or R/S transition <0.6 in lead V2. Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) VAs were defined as either a right bundle branch block/inferior axis or a left bundle branch block/inferior axis with a precordial R/S-wave transition before lead V3 or R/S transition >0.6 in lead V2.[8–11]

Back to Top | Article Outline

2.4 Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Comparisons of continuous variables were performed with the Student t-test or Wilcoxon test and categorical variables with χ2 analysis. For the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the continuous variables were appropriately transformed where required to render them normally distributed. The baseline variables including age, sex, AF classification, AF history, occurrence of comorbidities, echocardiography parameters, serum NT-proBNP level, serum leukocyte counts, serum C-reactive level, and whether heart rate (HR) increased 1 month post ablation were analyzed to evaluate their association with the presence of new-onset VAs. All tests were two-tailed and a statistical significance was established at a P < 0.05.

Back to Top | Article Outline

3 Results

3.1 Patient characteristics

From January 2010 to July 2014, 1574 patients underwent RFCA for AF at our institution and 1053 patients (797 men and 256 women) who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Table 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

3.2 Prevalence and predictor of new-onset VAs

There were 46 patients (4.4%) who showed new-onset VAs post ablation, among whom 42 showed frequent PVC alone, and 4 showed frequent PVC coexisting with nonsustained monomorphic VT. A total of 62 different VAs were recorded, the mean number of VA morphologies in each patient was 1.3. The number of VA morphology was 1 in 33 (71.8%) patients, 2 in 10 (21.7%), and 3 in 3 (6.5%).

Comparison of characteristics between patients with and without new-onset VAs is shown in Table 2. Univariate analysis showed significant statistical difference in post-ablation serum leukocyte counts (P = 0.026). Multivariate analysis showed that an increase of ≥50% in post-ablation serum leukocyte counts was independently associated with new-onset VAs (OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.0–3.5; P = 0.043).

Table 2

Table 2

Back to Top | Article Outline

3.3 Characterization and prognosis of new-onset VAs

There were 31 patients who were asymptomatic (67.4%), the remaining 15 patients had palpitations associated with fullness in the chest. No patients had presyncope or syncope. The median number of PVC was 3161 (1001–27,407)/24 h at 1 month post ablation. PVC ≥10,000/24 h was found in 6 and PVC ≥5000/24 h in 14 patients. VAs originated from OT were recorded in 35 (76.1%) patients. Significant circadian rhythm of new-onset VAs was found (Fig. 1). More PVCs occurred in the daytime than in night, and each peak was found during the morning and afternoon. Comparison of the origin of VAs is shown in Figure 2, no significant statistical difference was found (P = 0.187).

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 2

There were 9 VAs which disappeared without any treatment in 6 patients within 6 months (13.0%), amongst which 6 originated from OT. The counts of new-onset PVC during different periods are compared in Figure 3. Three patients with symptomatic PVC ≥10,000/24 h underwent successful RFCA. No adverse cardiac event was recorded in patients with new-onset VAs including sustained VT, ventricular fibrillation, left ventricle (LV) enlargement, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decrease, and sudden cardiac death.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Back to Top | Article Outline

4 Discussion

This study is the first to describe the prevalence, characteristics and potential mechanism of new-onset VAs in a large cohort. The results enriched the knowledge of complications of AF ablation. Although extensive ablation strategies for AF may decrease the rate of AF recurrence, it may lead to more complications. Thus, extensive ablation strategies for AF may be used with caution. To our knowledge, only one study with a small sample size by Patel et al[6] reported new-onset PVC post AF ablation. They studied 53 consecutive patients undergoing wide-area CPVI ablation, and found that the incidence of new-onset PVC was 11%. The relative low incidence of new-onset VAs found in our study may be attributed to more stringent inclusion criteria or the larger sample size.

The mechanism of new-onset VAs post AF ablation remains to be understood. With present understanding, 2 hypotheses have been proposed to explain this. First, drug-related proarrhythmia is a possible mechanism.[12] However, previously ineffective antiarrhythmic drugs without demonstrated proarrhythmic effects were prescribed post ablation in our study, which is against this possibility. Second, Patel et al[6] hypothesized that the modulation of adjacent autonomic ganglia by AF ablation developed new-onset OT PVC. They considered that increased mean HR post ablation reflected modulation of adjacent autonomic ganglia, and were associated with new-onset VAs. The results from our study did not support this point. However, it remains difficult to evaluate accurately remodeling of the cardiac autonomic nervous system. More evidence is needed to establish the possible mechanisms of cross talk between atrium and ventricle, post AF ablation. In addition, 40% of new-onset VAs in our study were of non-OT origin, which do not readily correlate with atrial autonomic ganglia.

Our findings prompted us to propose a new hypothesis that post-ablation inflammation may be an underlying mechanism. Extensive lesions in the atria caused by RFCA could induce an important inflammatory response. Previous studies have shown that early recurrences of AF are related to inflammatory response, and that the use of anti-inflammatory drugs including corticosteroids or colchicine could decrease systemic inflammation and improve the outcome of the procedure.[13–15] Inflammatory response following myocardial infarction or myocarditis is related to the risk of new-onset VAs.[16–18] Furthermore, as a traditional biomarker, serum leukocyte counts can be used as a marker of systemic inflammation.[19–21] The results of this study showed that post-ablation increases in serum leukocyte counts ≥50% were associated with new-onset VAs. This result indicates that inflammatory response post RFCA may be one of the mechanisms responsible for new-onset VAs. Further studies are required to test our hypothesis.

It is worth mentioning that 9 VAs disappeared without any treatment in 6 patients within 6 months. Similar phenomenon can be observed in myocarditis. One possible explanation might be that inflammatory injury was transient.

MicroRNAs have been used as myocardial fibrotic and electrical alterations biomarkers in recent years. Sardu et al reported that microRNA expression might change after AF ablation, and the catheter ablation response may be upgraded by microRNA therapy to prevent cardiac electrical and fibrotic remodeling post ablation.[22] However, whether the changes of microRNA expression post ablation are associated with new-onset VAs remains unclear, which should be clarified in future studies. Metabolic and oxidative stresses are associated with the generation and development of VAs. The mechanism may be that the metabolic and oxidative stresses induce ion channel changes in cardiac myocytes.[23,24] Autonomic dysfunction is associated with AF and the ablation response.[25] However, the quantitative analysis of autonomic dysfunction is relatively difficult. HR, HR variability, and deceleration capacity are often used to evaluate the autonomic dysfunction. In this study, we used HR to assess the autonomic dysfunction and no significant difference was found between patient with and without new-onset VAs.

Back to Top | Article Outline

5 Limitations

There are several limitations in our study. First, given the potential temporal variability in VAs burden in individuals, it is possible that only a 24-h Holter and 48-h of monitoring before ablation might have underestimated the prevalence of VAs. Second, although all patients underwent clinical follow-up including electrocardiograms and 24-h Holter monitor at prescribed intervals, asymptomatic episodes of VAs might have been missed, more rigorous follow-up methods may show our results to have underestimated the numbers of VAs. In addition, other metrics of inflammatory response were not used, for example the C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 post ablation. If other metrics displayed similar trends, this would add support for our hypothesis.

Back to Top | Article Outline

6 Conclusions

This study revealed a noticeable prevalence but relatively benign prognosis of new-onset VAs post RFCA for AF. Increased serum leukocyte counts ≥50% post ablation appeared to be associated with new-onset VAs, implying that inflammatory response caused by the ablation may be the underlying mechanism.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully thank Prof Richard Sutton of the National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK, for help in preparation of this manuscript.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, et al Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:1812–1822.
2. January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, et al 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 2014; 130:e199–267.
3. Atienza F, Almendral J, Ormaetxe JM, et al Comparison of radiofrequency catheter ablation of drivers and circumferential pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation: a noninferiority randomized multicenter RADAR-AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64:2455–2467.
4. Wu L, Yao Y, Zheng L, et al Long-term follow-up of pure linear ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation without circumferential pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2014; 25:471–476.
5. Vogler J, Willems S, Sultan A, et al Pulmonary vein isolation versus defragmentation: The CHASE-AF Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66:2743–2752.
6. Patel PJ, Ahlemeyer L, Freas M, et al Outflow tract premature ventricular depolarizations after atrial fibrillation ablation may reflect autonomic influences. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2014; 41:187–192.
7. Pedersen CT, Kay GN, Kalman J, et al EHRA/HRS/APHRS expert consensus on ventricular arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm 2014; 11:e166–196.
8. Betensky BP, Park RE, Marchlinski FE, et al The V (2) transition ratio: a new electrocardiographic criterion for distinguishing left from right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia origin. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57:2255–2262.
9. Callans DJ, Menz V, Schwartzman D, et al Repetitive monomorphic tachycardia from the left ventricular outflow tract: electrocardiographic patterns consistent with a left ventricular site of origin. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29:1023–1027.
10. Hachiya H, Aonuma K, Yamauchi Y, et al Electrocardiographic characteristics of left ventricular outflow tract tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000; 23:1930–1934.
11. Lin D, Ilkhanoff L, Gerstenfeld E, et al Twelve-lead electrocardiographic characteristics of the aortic cusp region guided by intracardiac echocardiography and electroanatomic mapping. Heart Rhythm 2008; 5:663–669.
12. Lin CY, Lin YJ, Lo LW, et al Factors predisposing to ventricular proarrhythmia during antiarrhythmic drug therapy for atrial fibrillation in patients with structurally normal heart. Heart Rhythm 2015; 12:1490–1500.
13. Letsas KP, Weber R, Bürkle G, et al Pre-ablative predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation: the potential role of inflammation. Europace 2009; 11:158–163.
14. Koyama T, Tada H, Sekiguchi Y, et al Prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrence with corticosteroids after radiofrequency catheter ablation: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56:1463–1472.
15. Deftereos S, Giannopoulos G, Efremidis M, et al Colchicine for prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation: mid-term efficacy and effect on quality of life. Heart Rhythm 2014; 11:620–628.
16. Kaneko H, Anzai T, Naito K, et al Role of ischemic preconditioning and inflammatory response in the development of malignant ventricular arrhythmias after reperfused ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Card Fail 2009; 15:775–781.
17. Feldman AM, McNamara D. Myocarditis. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:1388–1398.
18. Grün S, Schumm J, Greulich S, et al Long-term follow-up of biopsy-proven viral myocarditis: predictors of mortality and incomplete recovery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59:1604–1615.
19. Compté N, Bailly B, De Breucker S, et al Study of the association of total and differential white blood cell counts with geriatric conditions, cardio-vascular diseases, seric IL-6 levels and telomere length. Exp Gerontol 2015; 61:105–112.
20. Misialek JR, Bekwelem W, Chen LY, et al Association of White Blood Cell Count and Differential with the Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0136219.
21. Palmerini T, Mehran R, Dangas G, et al Impact of leukocyte count on mortality and bleeding in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary interventions: analysis from the Harmonizing Outcome with Revascularization and Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction trial. Circulation 2011; 123:2829–2837.
22. Sardu C, Santamaria M, Paolisso G, et al microRNA expression changes after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Pharmacogenomics 2015; 16:1863–1877.
23. Sardu C, Carreras G, Katsanos S, et al Metabolic syndrome is associated with a poor outcome in patients affected by outflow tract premature ventricular contractions treated by catheter ablation. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2014; 14:176.
24. Santulli G, Pagano G, Sardu C, et al Calcium release channel RyR2 regulates insulin release and glucose homeostasis. J Clin Invest 2015; 125:1968–1978.
25. Rizzo MR, Sasso FC, Marfella R, et al Autonomic dysfunction is associated with brief episodes of atrial fibrillation in type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications 2015; 29:88–92.
Keywords:

atrial fibrillation; inflammation; radiofrequency catheter ablation; ventricular arrhythmia

Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.