Journal Logo

Research Article: Observational Study

Hereditary Pancreatitis Associated With the N29T Mutation of the PRSS1 Gene in a Brazilian Family

A Case-Control Study

Dytz, Marcio Garrison MD; Mendes de Melo, Julia; de Castro Santos, Olga MD, MS; da Silva Santos, Isabel Durso; Rodacki, Melanie MD, PhD; Conceição, Flavia Lucia MD, PhD; Ortiga-Carvalho, Tania Maria PhD

Section Editor(s): Kantarceken., Bulent

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001508
  • Open

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hereditary pancreatitis (HP) is an autosomal-dominant disease with variable expression and an estimated penetrance of 80%. HP presents clinically as recurrent acute pancreatitis with an unusually early onset, progression to fibrosis, and chronic pancreatitis, and it carries a high risk of pancreatic adenocarcinoma beginning in the fifth decade of life.1 The primary manifestations of HP include abdominal pain, maldigestion due to pancreatic exocrine dysfunction, and diabetes mellitus due to islet cell damage.2

Comfort and Steinberg published the first description of HP in 1952.3 However, the first associated genetic mutation, R122H, was identified in 1996 by Whitcomb et al, in the cationic trypsinogen (PRSS1) gene.4 Mutations in the PRSS1 gene (including R122H, N29I, and A16V) are responsible for greater than 70% of mutations in HP kindreds, according to various national series.5–7

The primary mechanism by which mutations in the PRSS1 gene cause HP is an increase in the autocatalytic conversion of trypsinogen to active trypsin, leading to autodigestion and damage to the acinar cells, which result in ductal and interstitial injury.8 Increased autoactivation is associated with the R122H and N29I mutations. Additionally, R122H results in the increased stability of trypsin through the elimination of an essential autolytic cleavage site in trypsin, thereby rendering the protease resistant to inactivation through autolysis.9

Additional genetic defects are involved in the pathogenic mechanism of pancreatitis and present a more heterogeneous genetic pattern. The serine protease inhibitor Kazal type 1 (SPINK1) acts as a pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor, and a mutation in the SPINK1 gene is associated with chronic pancreatitis with a recessive inheritance pattern.10 Chymotrypsin C (CTRC) degrades all human trypsin and trypsinogen isoforms, and CTRC mutants are poorly secreted in pancreatic acinar cells, accompanied by the loss of the second line of defence against the premature activation of trypsinogen isoforms.11 Additionally, loss of function of carboxypeptidase A1 (CPA1) variants is strongly associated with chronic pancreatitis due to endoplasmic reticulum stress.12 Carboxypeptidases are metalloproteases that hydrolyse C-terminal peptide bonds in dietary polypeptide chains.13CPA1 is the second most abundant protein in pancreatic juices after trypsinogen, contributing to approximately 16% of the total protein content.14

Genetic mutations that result in HP have been frequently reported (www.pancreasgenetics.org) in Europe, North America, and Asia.5–7,15,16 In contrast, reports from Latin America are scarce. Although 1 Mexican study described the SPINK1 N34S mutation and 2 new mutations in the PRSS1 gene, these results require further functional studies to define their relevant pathogenic features.17 In addition, a Venezuelan kindred report studied the PRSS1 R122H mutation,18 and a Brazilian study reported the PRSS1 E79K mutation in 1 patient with alcohol-related chronic pancreatitis and 1 healthy control.19 However, there is no available information regarding the role and characteristics of HP-related genetic mutations in Brazil. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to identify whether HP in Brazilian patients can be caused by mutations in either the PRSS1 or SPINK1 genes.

METHODS

Patients

Patients with suspected HP were recruited at the Hospital of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) for 24 months starting in January of 2012. The diagnosis of HP in a family was based on disease occurrence in 2 first-degree relatives or 3 or more second-degree relatives, in 2 or more generations with recurrent acute pancreatitis and/or chronic pancreatitis, for which no predisposing factors were identified according to the European Registry of Hereditary Pancreatitis and Familial Pancreatic Cancer (EUROPAC) trial.5 A detailed questionnaire was administered to HP patients to assess their dates of birth; dates when the event began; diagnoses of exocrine pancreatic failure and/or diabetes mellitus and requirements for pancreatic enzyme supplements and oral hypoglycaemic drugs and/or insulin, respectively; if they had undergone pancreatic resection and the type of surgery, either a resection for pain or a nonresectional procedure for the complications of chronic pancreatitis; presence of pancreatic cancer; and information regarding the consumption of alcohol and/or tobacco. For the control group, unrelated individuals were selected from among medical students and hospital staff. None of the controls showed any symptoms of pancreatitis.

The study was conducted at the Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital (HUCFF) of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The local ethics committee approved the study protocol (169 11-CEP), in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Patient and control assent, informed parental consent for underage subjects (<18 years old), and approval of the hospital ethics committee were obtained before initiating the studies.

Mutation Screening

Ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) blood samples were collected, and genomic DNA was extracted from blood leucocytes using Wizard Genomic DNA Purification (Promega, Madison, WI). All blood specimens were processed at the Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho. Exons 2 and 3 of the PRSS1 gene and exon 3 of the SPINK1 gene were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).4,20,21 Cycling conditions consisted of an initial 4 min denaturation step at 95°C; 36 cycles of 30 s denaturation at 95°C, 30 s of annealing at 58°C for exon 2 of the PRSS1 gene, at 54°C for exon 3 of the PRSS1 gene and at 60°C for exon 3 of the SPINK1 gene, and 1 min of primer extension at 72°C; and a final extension for 7 min after the final cycle. The PCR products were purified using a GFX PCR DNA and Gel Band Purification Kit (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) and then assessed for quality by ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel electrophoresis and for quantity using a nanophotometer (Implen, München, Germany). DNA sequences were analyzed by sequencing both strands of the products using an ABI 3100 automated DNA sequencer, with the same sense and antisense primers used for PCR.

RESULTS

A family with 16 members who fit the diagnostic criteria of HP and 24 healthy controls were enrolled (Figure 1). Ten out of 16 (62.5%) individuals in the family were affected by a mutation in exon 2 of the PRSS1 gene. This mutation was a heterozygous A to C substitution at nucleotide position c.86, which resulted in an aspargine-to-threonine substitution at codon 29 (Figure 2). All 8 symptomatic patients and 2 clinically unaffected relatives exhibited a heterozygous N29T mutation. Six relatives and the control group had no identified mutations. The clinical characteristics of the affected individuals with mutations are presented in Table 1. Moreover, 3 subjects among the 8 symptomatic patients consumed alcohol, and 1 subject was a former smoker.

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1:
Pedigree of the reported family demonstrating the autosomal-dominant inheritance pattern of HP.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2:
A, Agarose gel electrophoresis of DNA against a 100 bp DNA ladder (Promega) following PCR amplification. Lanes 1 and 2, exon 2 of PRSS1 with a length of 310 bp; Lanes 3 and 4, exon 3 of PRSS1 with a length of 638 bp; Lanes 5 and 6, exon 3 of SPINK1 with a length of 691 bp. DNA sequences in affected and unaffected individuals. B, DNA sequence electropherogram of exon 2 of PRSS1 showing the wild-type sequence and the heterozygous A > C substitution (arrow) at nucleotide position c.86 that replaces asparagine with threonine at codon 29 (box) in the affected individual. C, DNA sequence electropherogram of intron 2 of SPINK1 showing the wild-type sequence at position c.88-352 (box) and the homozygous A > G polymorphism (arrow).
TABLE 1
TABLE 1:
Clinical Characteristics of the Affected Patients With the N29T Mutation

One neutral polymorphism in intron 2 of the SPINK1 gene (c.88–352A > G) was observed in all members of the HP-affected family (13 homozygous and 3 heterozygous), as well as in the majority of the controls (7 homozygous and 11 heterozygotes); 6 controls displayed no alterations. No alterations were found in exon 3 of the PRSS1 gene in the individuals studied.

DISCUSSION

This report describes the first HP-affected Brazilian family with a mutation in the PRSS1 gene. Asparagine substitution at position 29 of PRSS1 is frequently observed in HP, although the asparagine is substituted with isoleucine in most cases (the N29I mutation), which is the second most frequent mutation associated with HP.6 The N29T missense mutation is rare, with only 5 cases reported.5,22–25 Nevertheless, this mutation plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of HP, as functional studies show that the N29T mutation results in a gain-of-function that leads to an increased rate of autoactivation and increased trypsin stability, while the N29I mutation increases only the propensity for autoactivation (Figure 3).26

FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3:
Schematic mechanism underlying mutations associated with pancreatitis. The PRSS1 mutation (blue arrow) leads to a gain-of-function with an increased conversion of trypsinogen to trypsin and increased trypsin stability. The SPINK1 and CTRC mutations (red line) lead to an imbalance of proteases and antiproteases with the respective losses of first and second-line defences against the activation of trypsinogen and the enzymatic cascade that leads to autodigestion and pancreatitis. Mutations in CPA1 generate misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), leading to ER stress and the development of pancreatitis.

The pedigree reported here showed an autosomal-dominant inheritance pattern of HP, in which 8 out of 10 individuals carrying the N29T mutation developed pancreatitis. Thus, the penetrance of the N29T mutation in this family was 80%, which is the same penetrance rate as the most frequently described R122H and N29I mutations.1,2,27

It remains unclear why some family members with HP-related mutations do not develop pancreatitis. In particular, 2 members of the present family represent the first reports of clinically unaffected carriers of the N29T mutation in the PRSS1 gene.

The incomplete penetrance between the members is determinated by genetic, epigenetic, and/or environmental factors, but the mechanism is unknown. One plausible explanation for the incomplete penetrance of the PRSS1 gene mutation is the presence of mutations that protect against the development of proteolytic pancreatic injury. One such mutation has been described in codon 191 (G191R) of the anionic trypsinogen (PRRS2) gene, which was overrepresented in control subjects compared with HP patients.28

In accordance with published cohorts, there does not seem to be a gender predilection in the development of HP secondary to the N29T mutation in this family.5–7 However, the age of symptomatic onset of pancreatitis was lower than those previously described, with a median age of 6 years and 2 subjects showing disease onset at 2 years. In the EUROPAC trial, in which data were collected from 418 HP patients from 14 European countries, the median age of onset was 12 years.5

In this study, the most frequent clinical symptom was pancreatic pain, which was experienced by the older members of the family, likely due to a lack of access to appropriate management. Indeed, at the time of diagnosis, these members already showed signs of chronic pancreatitis. In the younger family members, the disease manifested with acute pancreatitis without morphologic or functional alterations suggestive of chronic pancreatitis.

Exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency occurred in 6 out of 8 (75%) and 5 out of 8 (62.5%) of the affected members of the studied family, respectively. All patients with diabetes mellitus required insulin therapy, following a lack of response to oral hypoglycaemic drugs administered over a short treatment period, and these patients also had high rates of hypoglycaemia due to a deficiency in glucagon secretion compatible with type 3c diabetes mellitus.29 In contrast, in published cohorts, the rates of malabsorption and diabetes mellitus were 38% and 32%, respectively.5,6

Surgical procedures were performed on 3 out of 8 (37.5%) affected family members, of whom 2 underwent pancreatic resection for refractory pain and abdominal complications and 1 received a pancreatic drainage procedure. These findings are similar to those from a French cohort of 200 HP patients in which 40% underwent an interventional procedure.6 No cases of pancreatic cancer were reported in our study, likely because the majority of patients studied had disease duration of less than 30 years (with only 1 member with a disease duration of >50 years), as disease duration is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer in HP.5,30

Finally, the presence of the c.88-352 A> G polymorphism in intron 2 of the SPINK1 gene was prevalent in this study, affecting 85% of the subjects (all patients and 75% of the controls), which suggests its role as a nonpathogenic component.31

In summary, this study contributes to the characterization of the genetic features of HP with the first description of a PRSS1 gene mutation in a Brazilian family. Furthermore, our study defines the clinical characteristics of affected patients, thereby supporting the clinical management of patients with precise diagnoses and subsequent genetic counselling. National surveys will be required to establish the prevalence of HP in Brazil and Latin America.

Acknowledgment

We thank the staff at the Laboratory of Translational Endocrinology and Molecular Endocrinology (UFRJ). We are in debt to the American Journal Experts (AJE) for English edition and to Sapiens for image creation (Figure 3).

REFERENCES

1. Rebours V, Lévy P, Ruszniewski P. An overview of hereditary pancreatitis. Dig Liver Dis 2012; 44:8–15.
2. Rosendahl J, Bödeker H, Mössner J, et al. Hereditary chronic pancreatitis. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2007; 2:1.
3. Comfort MW, Steinberg AG. Pedigree of a family with hereditary chronic relapsing pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 1952; 21:54–63.
4. Whitcomb DC, Gorry MC, Preston RA, et al. Hereditary pancreatitis is caused by a mutation in the cationic trypsinogen gene. Nat Genet 1996; 14:141–145.
5. Howes N, Lerch MM, Greenhalf W, et al. Clinical and genetic characteristics of hereditary pancreatitis in Europe. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2:252–261.
6. Rebours V, Boutron-Ruault MC, Schnee M, et al. The natural history of hereditary pancreatitis: a national series. Gut 2009; 58:97–103.
7. Applebaum-Shapiro SE, Finch R, Pfützer RH, et al. Hereditary pancreatitis in North America: the Pittsburgh-Midwest Multi-Center Pancreatic Study Group Study. Pancreatology 2001; 1:439–443.
8. Sahin-Tóth M, Tóth M. Gain-of-function mutations associated with hereditary pancreatitis enhance autoactivation of human cationic trypsinogen. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000; 278:286–289.
9. Sahin-Tóth M. Biochemical models of hereditary pancreatitis. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2006; 35:303–312.ix.
10. Aoun E, Chang CC, Greer JB, et al. Pathways to injury in chronic pancreatitis: decoding the role of the high-risk SPINK1 N34S haplotype using meta-analysis. PLoS One 2008; 3:e2003.
11. Rosendahl J, Witt H, Szmola R, et al. Chymotrypsin C (CTRC) variants that diminish activity or secretion are associated with chronic pancreatitis. Nat Genet 2008; 40:78–82.
12. Witt H, Beer S, Rosendahl J, et al. Variants in CPA1 are strongly associated with early onset chronic pancreatitis. Nat Genet 2013; 45:1216–1220.
13. Vendrell J, Querol E, Avilés FX. Metallocarboxypeptidases and their protein inhibitors. Structure, function and biomedical properties. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000; 1477:284–298.
14. Scheele G, Bartelt D, Bieger W. Characterization of human exocrine pancreatic proteins by two-dimensional isoelectric focusing/sodium dodecyl sulfate gel electrophoresis. Gastroenterology 1981; 80:461–473.
15. Otsuki M, Nishimori I, Hayakawa T, et al. Hereditary pancreatitis: clinical characteristics and diagnostic criteria in Japan. Pancreas 2004; 28:200–206.
16. Chandak GR, Idris MM, Reddy DN, et al. Absence of PRSS1 mutations and association of SPINK1 trypsin inhibitor mutations in hereditary and non-hereditary chronic pancreatitis. Gut 2004; 53:723–728.
17. Pelaez-Luna M, Robles-Diaz G, Canizales-Quinteros S, et al. PRSS1 and SPINK1 mutations in idiopathic chronic and recurrent acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:11788–11792.
18. Solomon S, Gelrud A, Whitcomb DC. Low penetrance pancreatitis phenotype in a Venezuelan kindred with a PRSS1 R122H mutation. JOP 2013; 14:187–189.
19. Bernardino AL, Guarita DR, Mott CB, et al. CFTR, PRSS1 and SPINK1 mutations in the development of pancreatitis in Brazilian patients. JOP 2003; 4:169–177.
20. Amann ST, Gates LK, Aston CE, et al. Expression and penetrance of the hereditary pancreatitis phenotype in monozygotic twins. Gut 2001; 48:542–547.
21. Teich N, Bauer N, Mössner J, et al. Mutational screening of patients with nonalcoholic chronic pancreatitis: identification of further trypsinogen variants. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97:341–346.
22. Pfützer R, Myers E, Applebaum-Shapiro S, et al. Novel cationic trypsinogen (PRSS1) N29T and R122C mutations cause autosomal dominant hereditary pancreatitis. Gut 2002; 50:271–272.
23. Ochi F, Fujii M, Sakai T, et al. A case of acute pancreatitis associated with cationic trypsinogen N29T mutation. Pancreas 2003; 27:199–201.
24. Lee YJ, Kim KM, Choi JH, et al. High incidence of PRSS1 and SPINK1 mutations in Korean children with acute recurrent and chronic pancreatitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2011; 52:478–481.
25. Rosendahl J, Landt O, Bernadova J, et al. CFTR, SPINK1, CTRC and PRSS1 variants in chronic pancreatitis: is the role of mutated CFTR overestimated? Gut 2013; 62:582–592.
26. Sahin-Tóth M. Human cationic trypsinogen. Role of Asn-21 in zymogen activation and implications in hereditary pancreatitis. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:22750–22755.
27. Keim V, Bauer N, Teich N, et al. Clinical characterization of patients with hereditary pancreatitis and mutations in the cationic trypsinogen gene. Am J Med 2001; 111:622–626.
28. Witt H, Sahin-Tóth M, Landt O, et al. A degradation-sensitive anionic trypsinogen (PRSS2) variant protects against chronic pancreatitis. Nat Genet 2006; 38:668–673.
29. Cui Y, Andersen DK. Pancreatogenic diabetes: special considerations for management. Pancreatology 2011; 11:279–294.
30. Weiss FU. Pancreatic cancer risk in hereditary pancreatitis. Front Physiol 2014; 5:70.
31. Witt H, Luck W, Hennies HC, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding the serine protease inhibitor, Kazal type 1 are associated with chronic pancreatitis. Nat Genet 2000; 25:213–216.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Health, Inc. All rights reserved.