Journal Logo

Research Article: Observational Study

Neovascular glaucoma after vitrectomy in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy

Kwon, Jin-woo MD; Jee, Donghyun MD, PhD, MPH*; La, Tae Yoon MD, PhD*

Editor(s): Şahin., Alparslan

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006263
  • Open


1 Introduction

Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a serious ocular disease characterized by neovascularization of the iris and anterior chamber angle. The fibrovascular membrane eventually obstructs the trabecular meshwork and contracts, resulting in progressive angle closure and an increase in intraocular pressure (IOP).[1] Neovascularization of the iris and angle occurs in response to retinal ischemia, uveitis, trauma, and radiation.[2] Of these conditions, retinal ischemia due to diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most common cause of NVG.[2,3] The mechanism underlying NVG in proliferative DR (PDR) is mainly mediated by various cytokines and enzymes induced by retinal ischemia and inflammation.[4,5] The most suspected and studied cytokine is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and anti-VEGF agents have been used to treat various diseases involving retinal ischemic conditions such as PDR.[6] Treatments for PDR patients, including panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), vitrectomy, and anti-VEGF agents, are targeted to reduce cytokine levels in the vitreous.[7–9] In cases of vitreous hemorrhage associated with PDR, vitrectomy and intravitreal anti-VEGF agents have been used as first-line treatments.[10,11] Anti-VEGFs including intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) can be used as a single modality or can be combined with a vitrectomy.[11–13] Combinational IVB pretreatment before vitrectomy was recently reported,[14–16] with some studies reporting the efficacy of IVB pretreatment.[16,17] However, although these treatment modalities reported promising results, many patients presented with NVG after surgical treatments. Few studies have described NVG after PDR treatments; therefore, we evaluated the prevalence of NVG after vitrectomy, as well as the risk factors of NVG in patients with PDR treated with vitrectomy and intravitreal IVB.

2 Methods

This study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Catholic University of Korea (Seoul). Informed consent was not required because the study used chart reviews and patient records, and the information was anonymized before the analyses.

This retrospective study was conducted from 2010 to 2012 at St. Vincent Hospital (Suwon, South Korea) and included 127 consecutive eyes of 127 patients who underwent phacovitrectomy or vitrectomy because of PDR vitreous hemorrhage. Eyes with a history of glaucoma, preoperative IOP > 22 mm Hg, rubeosis iridis, ocular trauma, uveitis, intraocular injection or vitrectomy, or evidence of other vitreoretinal disease were excluded. By reviewing the medical records, we determined the prevalence and duration until the development of NVG, which was defined as the presence of neovascularization in the anterior chamber angle or iris with an IOP > 21 mm Hg after vitrectomy. We also evaluated possible risk factors including sex, age, lens status before vitrectomy, time from PRP to vitreous hemorrhage, previous PRP, surgery type (combined phacovitrectomy or conventional vitrectomy), duration from the onset of vitreous hemorrhage to vitrectomy, and IVB treatment.

IVB treatment was recommended to all of the patients as an optional treatment. These patients had definite PDR and persistent vitreous hemorrhage >2 weeks, and PRP was not performed because of an invisible fundus.[18] If there was a possibility of retinal detachment using an ultrasonogram (Echograph Axis II; Quantel Medical, Marcoussis, France), a history of myocardial infarction and cerebral vascular accidents, or evidence of ocular infection, IVB treatment was excluded.[19,20] We did not consider lens status in the IVB treatment.

We waited for resolution up to a maximum of 10 weeks.[21–23] During this observation period, there was close follow-up every 2 weeks that included an ultrasonogram for detection of any possible retinal detachment. If the patient requested early surgery, if sustained vitreous hemorrhage occurred for more than 10 weeks, or if there were any findings of suspicious retinal detachment, a vitrectomy was performed without waiting for resolution of the vitreous hemorrhage. Phacovitrectomy was performed in cases with significant cataract, which sometimes prevented visualization of the retina during surgery; otherwise, conventional vitrectomy was performed. PRP was performed in patients when PDR was identified; however, it could not be used to treat patients with vitreous hemorrhage to preclude the retina at the first visit. During the follow-up after vitrectomy, an additional PRP was performed in cases of new developments of retinal neovascularization, instead of additional treatment with IVB.

Surgical procedures involved the following. Vitrectomy was performed by a single retinal specialist, who used a standard 3-port, 23-ga pars plana vitrectomy procedure. After total vitrectomy with vitreous hemorrhage removal, endolaser retinal photocoagulation was performed. Air or perfluorocarbon gas was used to fill the vitreous cavity at the end of surgery to reduce recurrent vitreous hemorrhage.[24,25] In cases of phacovitrectomy, additional phacoemulsification and implantation of an artificial intraocular lens using an in-the-bag procedure was performed before the vitrectomy.

Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were used to evaluate the rate of NVG following vitrectomy. Factors associated with survival were determined using the Cox regression proportional hazards model. Two approaches were used to assess the validity of the proportional hazard assumptions. First, the assumption was assessed using a log-minus-log survival function and was valid. Second, to confirm the assumption of proportionality, a time-dependent covariate was used. The time-dependent covariate was not statistically significant, suggesting that the proportional hazard assumption was valid. Estimates for odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidential interval (CI) were calculated from these regression models. All of the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software for Windows, version 20.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL).

3 Results

The mean duration of the follow-up period was 35.9 ± 12.5 months (range: 6.7–54.3 months). The average age of the patients was 52.0 ± 11.5 years, and 66 patients (52.0%) were male. Preoperative PRP was conducted in 85 eyes (66.9%). IVB was used to treat 14 eyes (11.0%) for vitreous hemorrhage. Phacovitrectomy was performed in 102 eyes (80.3%), and vitrectomy was performed in 25 eyes (19.7%). Of the 102 eyes with phacovitrectomy, there was no patient with posterior capsule rupture. The characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1
Table 1:
Patient demographic characteristics according to subjects with or without NVG.

NVG occurred in 15 of 127 eyes (11.8%). The percentages of NVG development after vitrectomy at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were 8.7%, 11.1%, 11.1%, and 11.8%, respectively (Fig. 1). Of the 15 eyes with NVG, 11 cases (73.3%) postoperatively developed within 6 months (Table 2). The mean duration from surgery to the development of NVG was 5.8 ± 6.9 months (median, 3.0 months; range, 0.9–29.9 months). All of the eyes with NVG were administered the maximal tolerable dose of IOP-lowering drugs and were promptly treated using PRP. Of the 15 eyes with NVG, 7 (46.6%) ultimately required an Ahmed valve implantation. Using Cox proportional hazard multiple regression analyses, the IVB injection strategy for resolution of vitreous hemorrhage was independently associated with the development of NVG after adjusting for serum glucose levels, hemoglobin A1c levels, blood pressure, preoperative PRP, lens status, and the time from PRP to vitreous hemorrhage, which were all possible confounding factors affecting retinal ischemia (OR, 4.43; CI, 1.28–15.27; P = 0.019; Table 3).

Figure 1
Figure 1:
Cumulative probability of neovascular glaucoma after vitrectomy in patients with vitreous hemorrhage associated with proliferative diabetic retinopathy using Kaplan–Meier survival analyses. (A) Total patients. (B) Patients with or without intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) treatment. The solid line designates patients without IVB treatment, and the dotted line designates patients with IVB treatment. IVB = intravitreal injection of bevacizumab, NVG = neovascular glaucoma.
Table 2
Table 2:
Survival tables for 15 cases of neovascular glaucoma after vitrectomy in diabetic retinopathy using a Kaplan–Meier analysis.
Table 3
Table 3:
Associated factors with neovascular glaucoma after vitrectomy in diabetic retinopathy using multiple Cox proportional hazard regression model.

4 Discussion

The prevalence of NVG in our study was 11.8%, which is comparable to previous studies that reported percentages of 2% to 17%.[26–29] However, most of these studies were performed in the 1980s and early 1990s, and did not include recent developments in treatment modalities such as phacovitrectomy, high cutter speed, and IVB. Recently, a study of 512 patients with PDR reported an NVG percentage of 7.1% at 12 months after vitrectomy,[30] which was lower than the results of our study.

The development of NVG after vitrectomy in this study was associated with IVB treatment for the resolution of vitreous hemorrhages. This is an unexpected result because IVB is reportedly effective for the treatment of NVG as an adjunctive or primary therapy.[31–33] One possible mechanism for this unexpected finding is that IVB increased fibrosis leading to peripheral anterior synechia formation, which is an important mechanism involved in NVG development. These results are consistent with a recent study, which reported that intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment increased fibrosis in PDR patients.[34] In this study, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) increased, while VEGF levels decreased after IVB treatment. The CTGF/VEGF, which was a good predictor of fibrosis, was shifted toward increased levels of CTGF that led to accelerated fibrosis.[34,35] Clinically, the progression and development of tractional retinal detachment have been reported shortly after IVB treatment.[20] Moreover, a histopathological study reported a fibrotic switch toward diabetic fibrovascular membrane formation after IVB treatment.[36] Our hypothesis was further supported by another study that reported a sudden decrease in VEGF levels after IVB treatment, resulting in compensatory increases in other inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6, which is associated with fibrosis.[37] However, the CTGF/VEGF ratio was not evaluated in this study. Therefore, additional studies are needed to examine CTGF and VEGF levels.

Another possible explanation was that IVB might have aggravated retinal ischemia, because the diabetic retina could have been susceptible to ischemic damage by nonspecific VEGF suppression. Although the systemic use of bevacizumab is associated with an increased risk of ischemia in cancer patients,[38,39] there has been controversy regarding whether IVB exacerbates ischemia in DR.[40,41] Enlargement of the foveal avascular zone after IVB treatment was reported in 1 patient with DR.[40] In contrast, another study using fluorescence in angiography, before and 1 month after IVB treatment in 19 patients with PDR, reported no evidence of increasing retinal ischemia after IVB treatment.[41] However, an adequate explanation involving aggravation of ischemia remains unknown due to a lack of supporting evidence.

A recent study showed that in vitro VEGF-A concentrations increased in the retinal pigment epithelium after exposure to ranibizumab or aflibercept due to a compensatory response from the cells and suggested the possibility of differing responses according to the VEGF subtype. We propose that a similar mechanism may affect the prevalence of NVG.[42]

The duration from onset of a vitreous hemorrhage after vitrectomy was evaluated as a risk factor for the development of NVG. The time delay caused by waiting for resolution of the vitreous hemorrhage after IVB treatment may have had adverse effects on its development. However, the time delay associated with vitrectomy was not associated with NVG, implying that the pharmacological action of bevacizumab itself, and not the time delay effect, may be a risk factor. In addition, we also examined several factors such as diabetic control and hypertension, which may have affected retinal ischemia in the patient. Even after adjusting for these possible confounding factors, IVB treatment was an independent risk factor for the development of postoperative NVG.

The results of this study should be cautiously applied to clinical practice, because IVB treatment has been shown to be an efficient and safe treatment for NVG in multiple studies.[31–33] In this study, patients receiving IVB treatment waited up to 10 weeks for resolution of vitreous hemorrhage, followed by PRP. The IVB treatment strategy for vitreous hemorrhage in PDR patients was designed to reduce the need for vitrectomy. A recent study reported that IVB, instead of early vitrectomy, reduced the need for vitrectomy by 35% in patients with vitreous hemorrhage associated with PDR.[18] In this study, the percentages of cases requiring vitrectomy were 10% in the IVB treatment group and 45% in the control group. Another study reported that IVB treatment resulted in the rapid resolution of vitreous hemorrhage with no short-term safety concerns.[43] Therefore, this strategy using IVB treatment for the resolution of vitreous hemorrhage differs from preoperative IVB treatment to reduce intraoperative hemorrhage during vitrectomy or IVB treatment to treat developed NVG.

An association between NVG and phacovitrectomy was not found in this study. There has been controversy concerning whether phacovitrectomy is a risk factor for NVG in patients with PDR. Phacovitrectomy may increase the risk of NVG by destroying the barrier between the anterior and posterior segments of the eye, leading to anterior diffusion of vasoproliferative substances such as VEGF and inflammatory cytokines.[44] In addition, anterior chamber oxygen diffuse posteriorly into the vitreous cavity.[45] A retrospective study comparing combined and sequential surgeries reported that NVG only occurred in the combined phacovitrectomy group (15.4%) and not in the vitrectomy-alone group (0%).[46] In contrast, more extensive PRP to the peripheral retina using phacovitrectomy reduced the probability of NVG.[47] Tseng et al[48] reported that the incidence of NVG was significantly lower in the phacovitrectomy group (0%) than in the vitrectomy-alone group (15.1%). Regarding the extent of PRP, our study showed that there was also the possibility of insufficient PRP intraoperatively, because there was a difference in the operation field between phacovitrectomy and vitrectomy. Additional studies such as randomized clinical trials are needed to resolve this controversy.

To date, no study has reported the direct association between metabolic control and the prevalence of NVG. However, many studies have reported an association between metabolic control and the progression stage of DR.[49–51] Although it has been reported that NVG occurs because of retinal ischemia,[52] we could ignore this association. The basic mechanism of retinal ischemia is affected by the progression of DR, and NVG is included in PDR, so we considered the possible association of NVG and metabolic control. However, in this study, there was a difference in glycated hemoglobin levels between patients with and without NVG. Thus, future studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm the possible association of metabolic control and NVG.

PRP, which induced increased diffusion of oxygen from the choroid to the retina or retinal pigmented epithelial cells and downregulated angiogenic factors, has been an important treatment for NVG.[53–56] However, many patients need glaucoma surgery, and the prognosis of NVG is very poor.[2,54,57] In addition, after using anti-VEGF agents as an adjuvant therapy with glaucoma surgery, the results have been better than previous treatments.[58–60] There have even been studies reporting NVG regression after treatment with anti-VEGF agents, with or without PRP.[61–63]

A major limitation of the present study was the relatively small number of cases, which limited the statistical power to identify risk factors. Further studies involving a larger number of patients are therefore needed to verify our results. Another limitation of this study was that the Cox proportional hazard ratio model used in this study is heavy, which suggested that more variables than appropriate were included in the model. However, a recent study reported that the rule of thumb suggesting that the Cox model use a minimum of 10 outcome events per predictor variable was too conservative and could be relaxed.[64] Finally, the retrospective nature of this study limited an accurate comparison between subjects with or without IVB treatment under controlled conditions.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the prevalence and risk factors for NVG after vitrectomy that included the new treatment modality of IVB. In our study, the prevalence of NVG was 11.8%, and most NVG (73.3%) developed postoperatively within 6 months. Patients undergoing vitrectomy after IVB treatment for the resolution of vitreous hemorrhage were associated with postoperative NVG. These findings indicate that IVB treatment may have adverse effects on the development of NVG, although IVB treatment can reduce the vitrectomy burden. Instead of waiting up to 10 weeks, early vitrectomy would be another option in patients who show no resolution of vitreous hemorrhage. However, further studies are needed to verify this possibility.


[1]. Havens SJ, Gulati V. Neovascular glaucoma. Dev Ophthalmol 2016;55:196–204.
[2]. Liao N, Li C, Jiang H, et al. Neovascular glaucoma: a retrospective review from a tertiary center in China. BMC Ophthalmol 2016;16:14.
[3]. Sivak-Callcott JA, O’Day DM, Gass JDM, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1767–76.
[4]. Hou XR, Miao H, Tao Y, et al. Expression of cytokines on the iris of patients with neovascular glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 2015;93:e100–4.
[5]. Ohira S, Inoue T, Shobayashi K, et al. Simultaneous increase in multiple proinflammatory cytokines in the aqueous humor in neovascular glaucoma with and without intravitreal bevacizumab injection. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015;56:3541–8.
[6]. Kim M, Lee C, Payne R, et al. Angiogenesis in glaucoma filtration surgery and neovascular glaucoma: a review. Surv Ophthalmol 2015;60:524–35.
[7]. Salam A, Mathew R, Sivaprasad S. Treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy with anti-VEGF agents. Acta Ophthalmol 2011;89:405–11.
[8]. Sanchez MC, Luna JD, Barcelona PF, et al. Effect of retinal laser photocoagulation on the activity of metalloproteinases and the alpha(2)-macroglobulin proteolytic state in the vitreous of eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Exp Eye Res 2007;85:644–50.
[9]. Li S, Fu XA, Zhou XF, et al. Angiogenesis-related cytokines in serum of proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients before and after vitrectomy. Int J Ophthalmol 2012;5:726–30.
[10]. Sinawat S, Rattanapakorn T, Sanguansak T, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab for proliferative diabetic retinopathy with new dense vitreous hemorrhage after full panretinal photocoagulation. Eye 2013;27:1391–6.
[11]. Ahmadieh H, Shoeibi N. Bevacizumab, vitrectomy, and vitreous hemorrhage. Ophthalmology 2013;120:219–20.
[12]. Yeh PT, Yang CH, Yang CM. Intravitreal bevacizumab injection for recurrent vitreous haemorrhage after diabetic vitrectomy. Acta Ophthalmol 2011;89:634–40.
[13]. Goncu T, Ozdek S, Unlu M. The role of intraoperative bevacizumab for prevention of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage in diabetic vitreous hemorrhage. Eur J Ophthalmol 2014;24:88–93.
[14]. Berk Ergun S, Toklu Y, Cakmak HB, et al. The effect of intravitreal bevacizumab as a pretreatment of vitrectomy for diabetic vitreous hemorrhage on recurrent hemorrhage. Semin Ophthalmol 2015;30:177–80.
[15]. Smith JM, Steel DH. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for prevention of postoperative vitreous cavity haemorrhage after vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;Cd008214.
[16]. Ferenchak K, Duval R, Cohen JA, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab for postoperative recurrent vitreous hemorrhage after vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Retina 2014;34:1177–81.
[17]. Manabe A, Shimada H, Hattori T, et al. Randomized controlled study of intravitreal bevacizumab 0.16 mg injected one day before surgery for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Retina 2015;35:1800–7.
[18]. Huang YH, Yeh PT, Chen MS, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab and panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy associated with vitreous hemorrhage. Retina 2009;29:1134–40.
[19]. Kemp A, Preen DB, Morlet N, et al. Myocardial infarction after intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors: a whole population study. Retina 2013;33:920–7.
[20]. Arevalo JF, Maia M, Flynn HW Jr, et al. Tractional retinal detachment following intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) in patients with severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:213–6.
[21]. Ho T, Smiddy WE, Flynn HW Jr. Vitrectomy in the management of diabetic eye disease. Surv Ophthalmol 1992;37:190–202.
[22]. [No authors listed]. Early vitrectomy for severe vitreous hemorrhage in diabetic retinopathy. Two-year results of a randomized trial. Diabetic retinopathy vitrectomy study report 2. The Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:1644–52.
[23]. Ramsay RC, Knobloch WH, Cantrill HL. Timing of vitrectomy for active proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 1986;93:283–9.
[24]. Yang CM, Yeh PT, Yang CH. Intravitreal long-acting gas in the prevention of early postoperative vitreous hemorrhage in diabetic vitrectomy. Ophthalmology 2007;114:710–5.
[25]. Branisteanu D, Danielescu C, Irimia A, et al. Efficiency of air tamponade in prevention of early recurrence of vitreal hemorrhage in diabetic patients with vitrectomy. Oftalmologia 2006;50:62–7.
[26]. Blankenship GW, Machemer R. Long-term diabetic vitrectomy results. Report of 10 year follow-up. Ophthalmology 1985;92:503–6.
[27]. Summanen P. Neovascular glaucoma following vitrectomy for diabetic eye disease. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1988;66:110–6.
[28]. Oldendoerp J, Spitznas M. Factors influencing the results of vitreous surgery in diabetic retinopathy. I. Iris rubeosis and/or active neovascularization at the fundus. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1989;227:1–8.
[29]. Sima P, Zoran T. Long-term results of vitreous surgery for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Doc Ophthalmol 1994;87:223–32.
[30]. Goto A, Inatani M, Inoue T, et al. Frequency and risk factors for neovascular glaucoma after vitrectomy in eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. J Glaucoma 2013;22:572–6.
[31]. Iliev ME, Domig D, Wolf-Schnurrbursch U, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin®) in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:1054–6.
[32]. Silva Paula J, Jorge R, Alves Costa R, et al. Short-term results of intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) on anterior segment neovascularization in neovascular glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2006;84:556–7.
[33]. Wakabayashi T, Oshima Y, Sakaguchi H, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab to treat iris neovascularization and neovascular glaucoma secondary to ischemic retinal diseases in 41 consecutive cases. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1571.
[34]. Van Geest RJ, Lesnik-Oberstein SY, Tan HS, et al. A shift in the balance of vascular endothelial growth factor and connective tissue growth factor by bevacizumab causes the angiofibrotic switch in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:587–90.
[35]. Kuiper EJ, Van Nieuwenhoven FA, de Smet MD, et al. The angio-fibrotic switch of VEGF and CTGF in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. PLoS One 2008;3:e2675.
[36]. El-Sabagh HA, Abdelghaffar W, Labib AM, et al. Preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab use as an adjuvant to diabetic vitrectomy: histopathologic findings and clinical implications. Ophthalmology 2011;118:636–41.
[37]. Jeon S, Lee WK. Intravitreal bevacizumab increases intraocular interleukin-6 levels at 1 day after injection in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Cytokine 2012;60:535–9.
[38]. Schutz F, Je Y, Azzi G, et al. Bevacizumab increases the risk of arterial ischemia: a large study in cancer patients with a focus on different subgroup outcomes. Ann Oncol 2011;22:1404–12.
[39]. Ranpura V, Hapani S, Chuang J, et al. Risk of cardiac ischemia and arterial thromboembolic events with the angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab in cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Oncol 2010;49:287–97.
[40]. Jun Lee S, Jun Koh H. Enlargement of the foveal avascular zone in diabetic retinopathy after adjunctive intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) with pars plana vitrectomy. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2009;25:173–4.
[41]. Neubauer AS, Kook D, Haritoglou C, et al. Bevacizumab and retinal ischemia. Ophthalmology 2007;114:2096.
[42]. Puddu A, Sanguineti R, Traverso CE, et al. Response to anti-VEGF-A treatment of retinal pigment epithelial cells in vitro. Eur J Ophthalmol 2016;26:425–30.
[43]. Spaide RF, Fisher YL. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy complicated by vitreous hemorrhage. Retina 2006;26:275–8.
[44]. Senn P, Schipper I, Perren B. Combined pars plana vitrectomy, phacoemulsification, and intraocular lens implantation in the capsular bag: a comparison to vitrectomy and subsequent cataract surgery as a two-step procedure. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1995;26:420–8.
[45]. Stefansson E, Landers MB 3rd, Wolbarsht ML. Increased retinal oxygen supply following pan-retinal photocoagulation and vitrectomy and lensectomy. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1981;79:307–34.
[46]. Chung TY, Chung H, Lee JH. Combined surgery and sequential surgery comprising phacoemulsification, pars plana vitrectomy, and intraocular lens implantation: comparison of clinical outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:2001–5.
[47]. Lahey JM, Francis RR, Kearney JJ. Combining phacoemulsification with pars plana vitrectomy in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a series of 223 cases. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1335–9.
[48]. Tseng H-Y, Wu W-C, Hsu S-Y. Comparison of vitrectomy alone and combined vitrectomy, phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2007;23:339–43.
[49]. Pan J, Li Q, Zhang L, et al. Serum glycated albumin predicts the progression of diabetic retinopathy—a five year retrospective longitudinal study. J Diabetes Complications 2014;28:772–8.
[50]. Aiello LP. Diabetic retinopathy and other ocular findings in the diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study. Diabetes Care 2014;37:17–23.
[51]. Shurter A, Genter P, Ouyang D, et al. Euglycemic progression: worsening of diabetic retinopathy in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes in minorities. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2013;100:362–7.
[52]. Chalam KV, Brar VS, Murthy RK. Human ciliary epithelium as a source of synthesis and secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor in neovascular glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol 2014;132:1350–4.
[53]. Ogata N, Ando A, Uyama M, et al. Expression of cytokines and transcription factors in photocoagulated human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2001;239:87–95.
[54]. Olmos LC, Sayed MS, Moraczewski AL, et al. Long-term outcomes of neovascular glaucoma treated with and without intravitreal bevacizumab. Eye 2016;30:463–72.
[55]. Magargal LE, Brown GC, Augsburger JJ, et al. Efficacy of panretinal photocoagulation in preventing neovascular glaucoma following ischemic central retinal vein obstruction. Ophthalmology 1982;89:780–4.
[56]. Kriechbaum K, Bolz M, Deak GG, et al. High-resolution imaging of the human retina in vivo after scatter photocoagulation treatment using a semiautomated laser system. Ophthalmology 2010;117:545–51.
[57]. Netland PA, Ishida K, Boyle JW. The Ahmed glaucoma valve in patients with and without neovascular glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2010;19:581–6.
[58]. Shen X, Chen Y, Wang Y, et al. Intravitreal ranibizumab injection as an adjuvant in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma accompanied by vitreous hemorrhage after diabetic vitrectomy. J Ophthalmol 2016;2016:4108490.
[59]. Sevim MS, Buttanri IB, Kugu S, et al. Effect of intravitreal bevacizumab injection before Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmologica 2013;229:94–100.
[60]. Zhou M, Xu X, Zhang X, et al. Clinical outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation with or without intravitreal bevacizumab pretreatment for neovascular glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glaucoma 2016;25:551–7.
[61]. Ehlers JP, Spirn MJ, Lam A, et al. Combination intravitreal bevacizumab/panretinal photocoagulation versus panretinal photocoagulation alone in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma. Retina 2008;28:696–702.
[62]. Ryoo NK, Lee EJ, Kim TW. Regression of iris neovascularization after subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab. Korean J Ophthalmol 2013;27:299–303.
[63]. Sugimoto Y, Mochizuki H, Okumichi H, et al. Effect of intravitreal bevacizumab on iris vessels in neovascular glaucoma patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010;248:1601–9.
[64]. Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol 2007;165:710–8.

bevacizumab; neovascular glaucoma; phacovitrectomy; proliferative diabetic retinopathy; retinal ischemia

Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.