Evaluation of a National Care Coordination Program to Reduce Utilization Among High-cost, High-need Medicaid Beneficiaries With Diabetes : Medical Care

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Natural Experiments

Evaluation of a National Care Coordination Program to Reduce Utilization Among High-cost, High-need Medicaid Beneficiaries With Diabetes

Duru, O. Kenrik MD, MSHS*; Harwood, Jessica MS*; Moin, Tannaz MD, MBA, MS*,†; Jackson, Nicholas J. PhD*; Ettner, Susan L. PhD*,‡; Vasilyev, Arseniy BS*; Mosley, David G. PhD§; O’Shea, Donna L. MD, MBA§; Ho, Sam MD§; Mangione, Carol M. MD, MSPH*,‡

Author Information
Medical Care 58():p S14-S21, June 2020. | DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001315

Abstract

Background: 

Medical, behavioral, and social determinants of health are each associated with high levels of emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations.

Objective: 

The objective of this study was to evaluate a care coordination program designed to provide combined “whole-person care,” integrating medical, behavioral, and social support for high-cost, high-need Medicaid beneficiaries by targeting access barriers and social determinants.

Research Design: 

Individual-level interrupted time series with a comparator group, using person-month as the unit of analysis.

Subjects: 

A total of 42,214 UnitedHealthcare Medicaid beneficiaries (194,834 person-months) age 21 years or above with diabetes, with Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Medicaid expansion, Supplemental Security Income without Medicare, or dual Medicaid/Medicare.

Measures: 

Our outcome measures were any hospitalizations and any ED visits in a given month. Covariates of interest included an indicator for intervention versus comparator group and indicator and spline variables measuring changes in an outcome’s time trend after program enrollment.

Results: 

Overall, 6 of the 8 examined comparisons were not statistically significant. Among Supplemental Security Income beneficiaries, we observed a larger projected decrease in ED visit risk among the intervention sample versus the comparator sample at 12 months postenrollment (difference-in-difference: −6.6%; 95% confidence interval: −11.2%, −2.1%). Among expansion beneficiaries, we observed a greater decrease in hospitalization risk among the intervention sample versus the comparator sample at 12 months postenrollment (difference-in-difference: −5.8%; 95% confidence interval: −11.4%, −0.2%).

Conclusion: 

A care coordination program designed to reduce utilization among high-cost, high-need Medicaid beneficiaries was associated with fewer ED visits and hospitalizations for patients with diabetes in selected Medicaid programs but not others.

Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid