Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Attitudes About Consumer Strategies Among Americans in High-deductible Health Plans

Cliff, Betsy Q., MS*; Krenz, Christopher, BA; West, Brady T., PhD‡,§; Levy, Helen, PhD‡,§; Fendrick, A. Mark, MD§,∥; Winkelman, Tyler N.A., MD; So, Jonathan, BA#; Fagerlin, Angela, PhD**; Kullgren, Jeffrey T., MD∥,§,††

doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001056
Original Articles
Buy
SDC

Background: More than 70 million Americans are enrolled in a high-deductible health plan (HDHP), with high upfront cost-sharing to encourage strategies such as price shopping to mitigate out-of-pocket spending. Recent research suggests HDHP enrollees are reluctant to engage in these consumer strategies, but there is little information on why.

Objectives: To describe associations between HDHP enrollees’ attitudes about and intent to engage in consumer strategies.

Research Design: We conducted a nationally representative web survey of 1637 HDHP enrollees that included 2 hypothetical scenarios amenable to consumer strategies. For each scenario, we asked participants whether they would compare price or quality information, discuss cost with a provider, or try to negotiate a service price. We measured participants’ ratings of the difficulty of each strategy, its effectiveness at reducing cost or increasing the likelihood of getting care, and how likely participants would be to actually engage in each strategy.

Results: Fewer than half of HDHP enrollees intended to engage in any of the surveyed strategies. Enrollees who viewed a consumer strategy as helpful were more likely to engage in that strategy; no associations were found with perceived difficulty of a strategy and intent to engage in it.

Conclusions: HDHP enrollees may not pursue consumer strategies because they believe they are not helpful for getting care or lowering costs. Providers and payers should ensure these strategies are actually helpful to HDHP enrollees and that enrollees understand how they could use these strategies to reduce their out-of-pocket costs.

*Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan

Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School

Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan

§Institute for Healthcare Policy & Innovation, University of Michigan

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI

Medicine & Pediatrics, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN

#Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, Southfield, MI

**Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

††Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

This work was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation grant number 73054.

Results from portions of this study were presented during the Academy Health Annual Research Meeting, June 26, 2016, New Orleans, LA.

A.M.F. has consulted for AbbVie, FMS Inc., Geisinger Health Plan, Janssn, Lilly, MedZed, Merck, Risalto, Sanofi, Sempre Health, Takeda, TriZetto, Wellth and Zansors. He is a partner in V-BID Health, LLC. J.S. discloses that his employer, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, is a health plan and provides commercial and government-sponsored coverage.

Reprints: Betsy Q. Cliff, MS, Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. E-mail: bqcliff@umich.edu.

Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.