Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Travel Distance and Health Outcomes for Scheduled Surgery

Chou, ShinYi PhD*,†; Deily, Mary E. PhD*; Li, Suhui PhD

doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000082
Original Articles

Background: Changes in the location and availability of surgical services change the distances that patients must travel for surgery. Identifying health effects related to travel distance is therefore crucial to evaluating policies that affect the geographic distribution of these services. We examine the health outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients in Pennsylvania for evidence that traveling further to a hospital for a one-time, scheduled surgical procedure causes harm.

Methods: We perform instrumental-variable regressions to test for the effect of distance to the admitting hospital on the in-hospital mortality and readmission rates of 102,858 CABG patients in Pennsylvania during 1995–2005, where the instrumental variables are constructed based on the quality of and distance to nearby CABG hospitals.

Results: We found that patients living near a CABG hospital with acceptable quality traveled significantly less and if they were high-risk, had lower in-hospital mortality rates. Readmission rates in general are not affected by patients’ travel distance.

Discussion: The positive correlation between travel distance and health outcomes observed by previous studies may reflect the confounding effects of behavioral factors and patient health risks. We found instead that living further from the admitting hospital increases in-hospital mortality for high-risk CABG patients. More research on the possible causes of these effects is necessary to identify optimal policy responses.

*Department of Economic, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA

National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA

Department of Health Policy, School of Public Health and Health Services, The George Washington University, Washington, DC

Supported by the Lehigh University College of Business & Economics, the Lehigh University Martindale Center for Private Enterprise, and the Pennsylvania Department of Health (CURE Grant SAP Number 4100054856). This analysis was carried out by S.-Y. C., M.E.D., and S. L. PHC4, its agents and staff, bear no responsibility or liability for the results of the analysis, which are solely the opinion of the authors.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Reprints: Suhui Li, PhD, Department of Health Policy, School of Public Health and Health Services, The George Washington University, 2021 K St., Suite 800, Washington, DC 20006 (e-mail:

© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.