Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis : Lung India

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Article

Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Daniel, Roy Arokiam1; Aggarwal, Praveen2; Kalaivani, Mani3; Gupta, Sanjeev Kumar1,

Author Information
Lung India 38(6):p 506-513, Nov–Dec 2021. | DOI: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_159_21
  • Open



Globally, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality.[1] COPD was estimated to be the sixth leading cause of death in 2019.[2] According to the 2017 GBD study, of all the chronic respiratory diseases, COPD contributed 50% of all cases and 69% of years lived with disability.[3] More than 90% of COPD-related deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).[4] Apart from causing a huge economic burden, COPD causes disability and impairs the quality of life, loss of productivity, increased hospital admissions, and premature mortality.[5] The global prevalence of COPD, as per the estimates by Adeloye et al. is 11.37% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.76–11.96).[6] A review by Rehman et al. in 2019, to estimate the economic burden of COPD in Europe reported that the annual per-patient cost of work productivity loss was highest in Germany (€5735) and lowest in Greece (€998).[7]

The diagnosis of COPD requires a broader approach which includes assessment based on symptoms, risk factors, and spirometry.[8] The prevalence of COPD is underestimated as most symptoms such as cough and dyspnea are ignored by the patients until they worsen, and are not confirmed by objective lung function tests.[91011] Spirometry is necessary to diagnose COPD, and is increasingly used in epidemiological studies to objectively assess airway obstruction.[121314] Even with increasing consensus on the use of spirometry, cut-off points for detecting airway limitation vary.[15] There is a lack of national-level estimates on the burden of COPD in India. Previous studies have attempted to review the status of COPD in India qualitatively.[16] Moreover, many of the estimates are based on varying definitions and diagnostic criteria of COPD. Hence, in order to address the above-mentioned methodological issues, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of COPD among adults diagnosed by spirometry in India.


A comprehensive literature search was conducted for studies published since their inception to December 31, 2020, in the following databases: Medline through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar, without any language restriction, using MeSH terms and keywords. We used the Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis statement for reporting systematic review and meta-analysis as a guide for this study.[17]


The eligible studies were identified by performing an initial screening of identified titles and abstracts, followed by a full-text review. We included only those studies which adhered to the following criteria: (1) it was a population/community-based cross-sectional study, (2) reporting prevalence of COPD among the Indian population, (3) diagnosis of COPD based on spirometry, and (4) sufficient data were available in the article to extract both the numerator and denominator for the prevalence of COPD. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies assessing the burden of COPD among patients with other chronic conditions such as kidney disease and heart failure because they might show higher than expected prevalence and (2) letters, abstracts, conference papers, review articles, modeling studies, and studies not conducted on humans.


Two independent reviewers (RAD and SKG) screened all the titles and abstracts of retrieved records. All duplicates were removed after verifying the recent version. Reference lists of the retrieved studies were also searched for additional sources. The full-text studies were retrieved for the selected abstracts, and the final inclusion in the review was based on full-text reading. There was a complete agreement between the two reviewers. A data extraction form was developed in Microsoft Excel, which was used to extract information on author name, year of publication, place, location, sample size, the proportion of females, criteria used and the reported prevalence of COPD. Risk of bias assessment was done based on the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist.[18]


We provided summary estimates of the prevalence of COPD and used 95% CI to gauge the precision of the summary estimate. The standard error was calculated using the prevalence and sample size from each included studies. The meta-analysis was performed by package metan[19] in STATA[20] version 14.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA), using random-effects model, weighted by the inverse of the variance. I2 statistic was calculated to estimate the amount of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed by the visual inspection of funnel plot and the small-study effect was assessed by Egger’s test. Subgroup analysis was done based on study setting, geographical region, and gender. Sensitivity analysis was done by excluding studies that used other than GOLD criteria and by excluding the study undertaken exclusively on women participants.


Overall, 770 studies were initially retrieved from the databases and through cross-references. After removing the duplicates (101 studies), 669 studies (titles and abstracts) were screened for inclusion criteria, of which, a total of 32 eligible abstracts were selected, and their full-texts were screened. Finally, eight studies satisfied the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis [Figure 1].

Figure 1:
Flow of selection of studies for meta-analysis


This review includes 8,569 individuals, of which 50.8% are females. The majority of the studies used GOLD criteria to diagnose COPD except the study done by Gupta et al.[21] where forced expiratory volume during the 1st s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC)<lower limit of normal (LLN) criteria was used to classify COPD [Table 1]. The studies conducted by Koul et al.[22] and Christopher et al.[23] reported estimates of the prevalence of COPD by both cut-offs; for the calculation of the summary estimate, we considered the FEV1/FVC<LLN criteria. Out of eight studies, three studies[212224] were conducted in the urban region, and three were from south. The study by Mukherjee et al.[25] was conducted exclusively on women participants in Burdwan, Birbhum, Hooghly, Nadia, and South 24-Pargans districts of West Bengal. All the studies included in this meta-analysis diagnosed COPD based on either or both of the two above-mentioned cut-offs. As per GOLD criteria, patients with FEV1/FVC (forced expiratory volume in the first second/forced vital capacity) ratio of <0.7 are considered to have airway obstruction, and based on the obtained values, the patient is classified into any one of the 4 categories, i.e. GOLD stage 1 (mild): ≥80%; stage 2 (moderate): 50%–79%; stage 3 (severe): 30-49; and stage 4 (very severe) <30%.[26] Postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC < LLN, defined as a z-score for FEV1/FVC below the 5th percentile derived from population-based normative data adjusted for age, sex, and ethnicity.[27]

Table 1:
Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis


The prevalence of COPD from the eight studies ranged from 2.4% in a cross-sectional study done by Johnson et al.[28] in Southern India, to 16.1% by Koul et al.[22] conducted in Northern India [Table 2]. The random-effects pooled estimate for the prevalence of COPD among the Indian population was 7.4% (95% CI: 5.0%–9.8%) [Figure 2]. There was significant heterogeneity between the studies. Heterogeneity test showed I2 value of 95.5% and P < 0.001.

Table 2:
Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults
Figure 2:
Forest plot of the meta-analysis for the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease


Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-based on gender

Out of the eight studies, gender-wise prevalence was reported in five studies. The prevalence of COPD among males and females were 11.4% (95% CI: 6.0%–16.9%) and 7.4% (95% CI: 5.2%–9.6%), respectively. We did not observe any decrease in heterogeneity among this sub-group. There was a significant difference in the heterogeneity between the studies as shown in Figure 3 (P < 0.001).

Figure 3:
Forest plot of the meta-analysis for the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on gender

Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-based on study setting

Out of the eight studies, three studies were conducted in an urban area. The prevalence of COPD in the rural and urban areas was 5.6% (95% CI: 3.3%–6.8%) and 11.4% (95%CI: 7.6%–15.2%), respectively. We did not observe any decrease in heterogeneity. There was significant difference in the heterogeneity between the studies of rural and urban setting as shown in Figure 4 (P < 0.001).

Figure 4:
Forest plot of the meta-analysis for the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on study setting

Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-based on geographical distribution

Out of the eight studies, four studies are conducted in the northern part of India, three studies in the southern part of India, and one study in the east. The prevalence of COPD in these regions was 10.4%, 3.7%, and 6.8%, respectively. We observed a mild decrease in heterogeneity in the southern part of India. There was a significant difference in the heterogeneity between the studies based on geographical region as shown in Figure 5 (P < 0.001).

Figure 5:
Forest plot of the meta-analysis for the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on geographical location


Across the nine quality domains evaluated, majority of the studies met five or more of the quality criteria [Table 3]. Three studies met all the quality criteria assessed.[232428] Five studies did not mention CIs in their main results. The sample size of three studies was not based on pre-study considerations of statistical power. Three studies did not clearly explain the methods of selection of the participants. All the eight studies had measurements that were likely to be valid and reliable and achieved a satisfactory response rate.

Table 3:
Risk of bias assessment of the studies included in the meta-analysis


The funnel plot demonstrated a mild asymmetry [Figure 6]. Moreover, the P value for Egger’s test was observed to be 0.01, implying publication bias.

Figure 6:
Funnel plot for assessing publication bias


Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing three studies[212223] that had classified COPD based on LLN criteria; it showed a decrease in the prevalence of COPD from 7.4% (95% CI: 5.0-9.8%) to 6.2% (95% CI: 3.6–8.8). The pooled estimate after removing one study conducted exclusively on women participants by Mukherjee et al.[25] showed no substantial change.(7.5% [95%CI: 4.8–10.2]).


We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from eight studies involving 8,569 participants and found a pooled prevalence of COPD of 7.4% (95% CI: 5.0–9.8) among adults in India. The studies included in this review had high heterogeneity among them. We conducted subgroup analysis based on gender, geographical region, and study setting, but we could not find the reason for heterogeneity.

A systematic review conducted to determine the prevalence of COPD in India by McKay et al. in 2012 reported that the prevalence ranges from 6.5%–7.7% from 16 eligible studies.[16] This estimate is similar to our pooled estimate. The projections based on the COPD prevalence estimation model among 12 Asia-Pacific regions by regional COPD working group in 2003,[29] reported that the prevalence of COPD is 6.3% which is closer to our study’s estimate. Another global systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by Halbert et al. in 2006 on COPD prevalence reported a pooled estimate of 8.9% (95% CI: 2.1–26.4) based on 26 studies, which is similar to our study’s estimate.[30] In the 2005, Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study conducted in 12 sites across the world by Buist et al. reported that the prevalence of COPD was 10.1%, which is a little higher than our estimate.[31]

Another systematic review and meta-analysis done by Adeloye et al. reported the prevalence of COPD of 11.4% (95% CI: 10.8–12.0) from 123 eligible studies among adults globally.[43] This prevalence is higher than the estimate from our study. The possible reason for the disparity in the prevalence is that the former had included estimates of COPD prevalence from all the six WHO regions. Studies included in their review diagnosed COPD using varied cut-offs like FEV1/FVC <75%, FEV1/FVC <65%, FEV1/FVC <70%, and FEV1/FVC<LLN, which might be the reason for the high prevalence of COPD whereas, the studies included in this systematic review and meta-analysis had included only the latter two cut-offs. The difference in estimates could also be due to the race of the population included in this study which consists of the population which belongs to Mongoloid and Indo-Aryan race. This is supported by the evidence from various studies, which says that the prevalence of COPD may vary by race and ethnicity.[32333435]

A systematic review and meta-analysis on COPD prevalence on adults by Ntritsos et al. reported a pooled prevalence of 9.23% (95% CI: 8.16–10.36) from 194 eligible studies, and this estimate is a little higher than our estimate.[36] The reason might be that the former study has included studies that have diagnosed COPD based on patient-reported, spirometry diagnosed, and physician-diagnosed cases. Furthermore, the study population included belongs to LMIC, upper-middle, and high-income countries.

Epidemiological studies undertaken to estimate the prevalence of COPD varies with the criteria used to diagnose COPD. The majority of the studies conducted are based on FEV1/FVC<70%. Some subject experts claim that the fixed cut-off has no statistical basis and is arbitrary.[37] It may overestimate COPD in the elderly because the elasticity of the lung decrease as the age increases, thereby reducing the FEV1 more than the FVC value.[38] Hence, using this criterion will lead to underestimation in young adults and overestimation in elderly people. To resolve such issues in the classification of COPD, the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society advocates using LLN criteria, which is defined as the value below the lower 5th percentile of a reference population is considered abnormal.[3940] However, the usage of this definition in the studies selected in this review is very less (3/8). However, some studies suggest that LLN may miss some people with COPD.[41] This variation in COPD diagnosis is more prominent in LMICs, where cases such as bronchiectasis, tuberculosis, or some other obstructive airway disease are more prevalent and may be misdiagnosed as COPD.[42] Apart from this, the population structure, age-range, and increased rates of smoking might be the reason for the high heterogeneity observed in this meta-analysis. We explored the reason for heterogeneity by performing subgroup analysis based on gender, geographical region, and study setting, and there was no decrease in the heterogeneity.

Even though spirometry is recognized as a standard tool to diagnose COPD, still it is being under-utilized among the primary care level leading to misdiagnosis. Strong political will and funding are crucial for any successful program. Hence, adequate training and resources should be provided to the primary care physicians to correctly diagnose COPD and start on appropriate treatment to prevent their complications and the quality of life.

In total, we identified eight studies, which allowed us to pool results from 8,569 participants. The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis should be interpreted with the follow limitations. Even though we followed a comprehensive search strategy, we did not include the grey literature which might affect the pooled estimate. The pooled prevalence estimate from this study has to be interpreted cautiously as there is high heterogeneity among the studies.


Our findings suggest a high prevalence of COPD in India among adults. This suggests the need to have a nationwide community-based survey to estimate the true burden of COPD using robust and uniform methodology. This would be useful for planning and implementation of community-based control measures and also for their monitoring and evaluation.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


1. The Lancet GBD 2017:A fragile world Lancet 2018 392 1683
2. Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi M, Abbasifard M, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019:A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 Lancet 2020 396 1204 22
3. James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017:A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 Lancet 2018 392 1789 858
4. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Available from: Last accessed on 2021 Jan 28
5. Patel JG, Nagar SP, Dalal AA Indirect costs in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease:A review of the economic burden on employers and individuals in the United States Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2014 9 289 300
6. Adeloye D, Chua S, Lee C, Basquill C, Papana A, Theodoratou E, et al. Global and regional estimates of COPD prevalence:Systematic review and meta-analysis J Glob Health 2015 5 020415
7. Rehman AU, Hassali MA, Muhammad SA, Harun SN, Shah S, Abbas S The economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Europe:Results from a systematic review of the literature Eur J Health Econ 2020 21 181 94
8. Andreeva E, Pokhaznikova M, Lebedev A, Moiseeva I, Kutznetsova O, Degryse JM The prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by the global lung initiative equations in North-Western Russia Respiration 2016 91 43 55
9. Bird Y, Moraros J, Mahmood R, Esmaeelzadeh S, Kyaw Soe NM Prevalence and associated factors of COPD among Aboriginal peoples in Canada:A cross-sectional study Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2017 12 1915 22
10. Evans J, Chen Y, Camp PG, Bowie DM, McRae L Estimating the prevalence of COPD in Canada:Reported diagnosis versus measured airflow obstruction Health Rep 2014 25 3 11
11. Magitta NF, Walker RW, Apte KK, Shimwela MD, Mwaiselage JD, Sanga AA, et al. Prevalence, risk factors and clinical correlates of COPD in a rural setting in Tanzania Eur Respir J 2018 51 1700182
12. GOLD Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2018 2019
13. Rajkumar P, Pattabi K, Vadivoo S, Bhome A, Brashier B, Bhattacharya P, et al. Across-sectional study on prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in India:Rationale and methods BMJ Open 2017 7 e015211
14. Joana M, Paulo B, Ana A Clinical epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Arq Med 2011 25 146 52
15. Celli BR, Halbert RJ, Isonaka S, Schau B Population impact of different definitions of airway obstruction Eur Respir J 2003 22 268 73
16. McKay AJ, Mahesh PA, Fordham JZ, Majeed A Prevalence of COPD in India:A systematic review Prim Care Respir J 2012 21 313 21
17. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses:The PRISMA statement PLoS Med 2009 6 e1000097
18. CASP Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Oxford UK Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Available from: Last accessed on 2021 Jan 30
19. Harris RJ, Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ, Harbord RM, Sterne JA Metan:Fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis Stata J Promot Commun Stat Stata 2008 8 3 28
20. Stata 14 |Stata Available from: Last accessed on 2020 Dec 31
21. Gupta S, Arora V, Sharma OP, Satyanarayana L, Gupta AK Prevalence and pattern of respiratory diseases including tuberculosis in elderly in Ghaziabad-Delhi-NCR Indian J Tuberc 2016 63 236 41
22. Koul PA, Hakim NA, Malik SA, Khan UH, Patel J, Gnatiuc L, et al. Prevalence, of chronic airflow limitation in Kashmir, North India:Results from the BOLD study Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2016 20 1399 404
23. Christopher DJ, Oommen AM, George K, Shankar D, Agrawal A, Thangakunam B Prevalence of airflow obstruction as measured by spirometry, in rural Southern Indian Adults COPD 2020 17 128 35
24. Sinha B, Vibha, Singla R, Chowdhury R An epidemiological profile of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease:A community-based study in Delhi J Postgrad Med 2017 63 29 35
25. Mukherjee S, Roychoudhury S, Siddique S, Banerjee M, Bhattacharya P, Lahiri T, et al. Respiratory symptoms, lung function decrement and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in pre-menopausal Indian women exposed to biomass smoke Inhal Toxicol 2014 26 866 72
26. Rabe KF, Hurd S, Anzueto A, Barnes PJ, Buist SA, Calverley P, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease:GOLD executive summary Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007 176 532 55
27. Celli BR, Decramer M, Wedzicha JA, Wilson KC, Agustí AA, Criner GJ, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement:Research questions in COPD Eur Respir Rev 2015 24 159 72
28. Johnson P, Balakrishnan K, Ramaswamy P, Ghosh S, Sadhasivam M, Abirami O, et al. Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in rural women of Tamilnadu:Implications for refining disease burden assessments attributable to household biomass combustion Glob Health Action 2011 4 7226
29. Regional COPD Working Group COPD prevalence in 12 Asia-Pacific countries and regions:Projections based on the COPD prevalence estimation model Respirology 2003 8 192 8
30. Halbert RJ, Natoli JL, Gano A, Badamgarav E, Buist AS, Mannino DM Global burden of COPD:Systematic review and meta-analysis Eur Respir J 2006 28 523 32
31. Buist AS, McBurnie MA, Vollmer WM, Gillespie S, Burney P, Mannino DM, et al. International variation in the prevalence of COPD (the BOLD Study):A population-based prevalence study Lancet 2007 370 741 50
32. Lee H, Shin SH, Gu S, Zhao D, Kang D, Joi YR, et al. Racial differences in comorbidity profile among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease BMC Med 2018 16 178
33. Mamary AJ, Stewart JI, Kinney GL, Hokanson JE, Shenoy K, Dransfield MT, et al. Race and gender disparities are evident in COPD underdiagnoses across all severities of measured airflow obstruction Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis 2018 5 177 84
34. Martin A, Badrick E, Mathur R, Hull S Effect of ethnicity on the prevalence, severity, and management of COPD in general practice Br J Gen Pract 2012 62 e76 81
35. Gilkes A, Ashworth M, Schofield P, Harries TH, Durbaba S, Weston C, et al. Does COPD risk vary by ethnicity? A retrospective cross-sectional study Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2016 11 739 46
36. Ntritsos G, Franek J, Belbasis L, Christou MA, Markozannes G, Altman P, et al. Gender-specific estimates of COPD prevalence:A systematic review and meta-analysis Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2018 13 1507 14
37. Pellegrino R, Brusasco V, Viegi G, Crapo RO, Burgos F, Casaburi R, et al. Definition of COPD:Based on evidence or opinion? Eur Respir J 2008 31 681 2
38. Di Marco F, Tantucci C, Pellegrino G, Centanni S Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis:The simpler the better? Not always Eur J Intern Med 2013 24 199 202
39. Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, Crapo RO, Burgos F, Casaburi R, et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests Eur Respir J 2005 26 948 68
40. Mohamed Hoesein FA, Zanen P, Lammers JW Lower limit of normal or FEV1/FVC<0.70 in diagnosing COPD:An evidence-based review Respir Med 2011 105 907 15
41. Izquierdo Alonso JL, De Lucas Ramos P, Rodríguez Glez-Moro JM; Grupo de Estudio CONSISTE The use of the lower limit of normal as a criterion for COPD excludes patients with increased morbidity and high consumption of health-care resources Arch Bronconeumol 2012 48 223 8
42. Salvi SS, Manap R, Beasley R Understanding the true burden of COPD:The epidemiological challenges Prim Care Respir J 2012 21 249 51
43. Chaturvedi R, Muzammil K, Singh N, Davey S, Singh JV Prevalence of COPD in rural population, Muzaffarnagar Indian J Community Health 2015 27 467 71
44. Parasuramalu BG, Huliraj N, Prashanth Kumar SP, Gangaboraiah, Ramesh Masthi NR, Srinivasa Babu CR Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its association with tobacco smoking and environmental tobacco smoke exposure among rural population Indian J Public Health 2014 58 45 9

Adults; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; community; cross-sectional; India; prevalence

Copyright: © 2021 Indian Chest Society